"Life's Solution" is a book by Simon Conway Morris, a palaeontologist and expert on the Burgess Shale fossils from the so-called Cambrian Explosion. Conway Morris is also a Christian, and in this book argues in favour of theistic evolution.
The book is very uneven in my opinion, but could nevertheless be of some
interest, especially since Conway Morris wrote it as a counterpoint to Stephen
Jay Gould's "Wonderful Life". The materialist Gould believed that the
evolution of various animal body-plans in the Cambrian was highly contingent,
and that evolution became constrained only afterwards. The existence of bizarre
fossil creatures with no known relatives or descendants, such as
Hallucinogenia, was to Gould part of the evidence for contingency in evolution.
Ironically, Hallucinogenia was scientifically described by Conway Morris!
Conway Morris believes that evolution is teleological and directed to a
specific goal - the emergence of intelligence - by God. Teleology in evolution
is difficult to prove empirically, but Conway Morris believes that convergent
evolution is the key to the puzzle. In his opinion, examples of evolutionary
convergence are ubiquitous throughout nature. Completely unrelated animals
arrive at strikingly similar solutions (for instance, the camera-eye has
evolved independently at least seven times), which points to a deep structure
in biology. Evolution is using a limited amount of pathways, although myriads
of possibilities should logically exist. To the author, this reveals a kind of
pattern behind evolution. It's not contingent, but highly constrained and
virtually fated to arrive at man (or some similar, super-intelligent creature).
While Conway Morris regards humans as inevitable, he takes the position that we
might be lonely in the universe. Our solar system is supposedly unique, and
uniquely fine-tuned for the existence of life. This is a version of the
anthropic argument (as used by theologians). The author would presumably find
himself right at home in "Rare Earth" by Ward and Brownlee, or even
Michael Denton's "Nature's Destiny"!
While I'm sympathetic to the idea of teleology in evolution, I'm not sure if
Conway Morris' approach is helpful. Evolutionary convergence might just as well
be explained in a materialist-naturalist manner by physical constraints. There
might only be a few possible ways to detect light, hence camera-eyes would be
favoured by "blind" natural selection in vastly different animals.
Another problem: how do we objectively measure the number of counterfactual
pathways evolution hasn't taken? A "rare Earth" is compatible with
both God-directed cosmic "evolution" and pure chance. To me, the main
argument in favour of teleology is philosophical: how can consciousness arise
from matter, how can life arise from dead matter, how is meaning possible in an
otherwise"blind" universe, etc.
I'm not saying Conway Morris is necessarily wrong. Indeed, it seems that
Hallucinogenia wasn't so strange after all. The absurd creature could be
related to onychophorans. Both Conway Morris and his adversary Gould were
looking at the fossil upside down! At least on the symbolic level, this removes
one of the obstacles to Conway Morris' theories. In general, however, I think
the jury is still out on this one...

No comments:
Post a Comment