Is the assassination of Charlie Kirk the "turning point" or even "the point of no return"? Asking for a former friend named USA.
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
Is the assassination of Charlie Kirk the "turning point" or even "the point of no return"? Asking for a former friend named USA.
Jag ser att Anders Lindberg är tillbaka från semestern. Alltid lika fascinerande när Woke-"vänstern" projicerar kulturkriget på högern. Om Anders vill snacka om ekonomi, kan han väl börja med att ta ett litet samtal med den amerikanska "vänstern". Varför tror han att den alltid "faller" för högerns provokationer? Juuuust det. Och varför är inte t.ex. kriminalitet och massinvandring frågor som "drabbar vanligt folk"?
I USA har Woke-liberalerna ägnat snart ett år nu åt att klaga på att högern "fortfarande talar om trans". Ja, vad det tänkas bero på? Den andra länken nedan går förresten till en annan artikel på Aftonbladets ledarsida. Gissa vad...?
Provocera, provocera, provocera!
Snart pratar väl Tidölaget också om dina gener
A certain Nicholas Confessore offers some criticism of the trans cult in the liberal New York Times following a recent defeat for this "movement" in the US Supreme Court.
Probably just damage control, but it *is* interesting that trans is the first "Woke" item the Dems criticize. Suggesting the senior hierarchs never really believed in it. Maybe one day they´ll explain why they wanted the rest of us to buy the crap...
The insufferable moonbat Professor Dave attacks the crazy wingnut Candace Owens (who I think is a friend of the master provocateur Kanye West). The internet race-to-the-bottom at its "best".
Apparently, Candace´s latest revolution in science is the claim that space is "fake and gay" (just like the dinosaurs), although I´m not sure what that even means. Is she a flat earther? Personally, I see space floating above me every night and there are plenty of dinosaurs flying around me by day, so there´s that, but maybe the situation looks different from Ye´s bunker c/o The Event? But sure, the earth *does* look flat. At least in Kansas, LOL.
As for Davie, well, if you don´t want the wingnuts to talk about trans all the damn time, maybe you moonbats should stop promoting it all the damn time!
Just sayin´.
Credit: INFOWeather1 |
Pro-Trump/pro-Vance Breitbart News tries to cope with the new Woke Pope in the State of Vatican City. See links below! Whatever.
Personally, I would like to know why Prevost took the papal name Leo XIV. Leo XIII (the Pope most people-in-the-know think about when they hear the name "Leo") is still seen as one of the greatest popes in modern Catholic history (reigned 1878-1903). So choosing *that* name strikes me as...daring.
Also, what does it tell us about Prevost´s political orientation? Leo XIII could be seen as a cautious reformer. But he could also be seen as radical, since his predecessors on the papal throne were arch-conservative. Leo XIII, by contrast, is associated with "Rerum novarum", the first social encyclical. It inspired the Catholic trade union movement. I read "Rerum novarum" years ago and didn´t find it particularly radical, but in its 1891 Catholic context, maybe it was. So perhaps the name signals that Prevost wants to be explicitly political and even somewhat "radical"?
I suppose we´re about to find out, aren´t we?
One thing is certain: if the Democrats win the federal elections, it won´t be because of their politics...
Transgender activists slam gay nudist event for male-only policy
Investigation into "USA Fencing" for trans inclusion policy
Trans fencer leaves college team following controversy
Colorado push through radical transgender bill
Trump´s press secretary refuses to engage with pro-trans reporters
This BS just continues...and continues...and continues. There are two possible explanations, one "rational" and the other not so. The rational explanation is that we´re dealing with an instrument of social control. Compare "1984". Indeed, it´s an excellent instrument not just to control conservatives, but also to uphold internal discipline within the liberal camp.
But the Woke double down on their gender jihad even when it´s counter-productive. See: the Democratic Party in the United States after Trump´s election victory (which *the Democrats themselves* suspect happened in part due to their intransigent stance on trans issues). And that leaves the irrational explanation: Woke is their *religion*, their social cult.
Of course, the one doesn´t contradict the other. In "1984", the cynical Party had a fanatical youth organization...
Christian nurse who refused to refer to male pedophile as a woman suspended
This is beyond parody at this point...
Two "trans" players face off in pool championship after defeating female competition
Why is this even an issue? Note the bizarre fact that the Pentagon has spent 52 million dollars to cure "gender dysphoria", including 15 million dollars for psychotherapy! Since when is this the mission of the *American military*?
Biden-appointed judge blocks Pentagon from banning transgender troops
I think it´s obvious that Woke hurt the Democrats in the recent presidential elections. Heck, the Dems themselves say so. Specifically trans-people, hyper-specifically trans-women in women´s sports.
Yet, it´s precisely this issue that the Dems are now doubling down on?!
There are three possible explanations. One: the Democrats are Satanists. Or crazy. Or both. Two: the Democrat campaign organizations are dominated by a certain kind of Woke activists, who simply won´t back down. Three: the Democrats are funded by somebody who is friendly (or "friendly") to trans-people. Perhaps Big Pharma and Big Shrink? Somebody is making money off the drugs and medical procedures.
My wild guess is number three. Which explains why the activists (number two) can´t be fired. Number one is *of course* completely impossible. Well, I think!
Probably a chupacabra. Or something. |
Red state stupidity:
West Texas outbreak of measles grow
Blue state stupidity:
Kind-of-liberal gadfly Michael Tracey on the trans issue. From X.
>>>If there was ever an issue that cultural liberals would be well-served to strategically concede on, it's "Trans in Sports," which in addition to being a political albatross is hardly defensible on the merits. Even the NYT comment sections have been largely against this stuff for years now.
>>>But the nature of contemporary liberalism requires a perpetual search for boutique cultural issues to turn into hectoring administrative crusades -- that's what their political passions are most animated by, as opposed to a whole slate of other potential issues, like foreign policy or economics.
>>>So the "strategic concession" may not even be practically possible, when a certain activist core is just never going to budge.
Lustigt att feministernas gräns alltid går vid aborter...
Sveriges Kvinnoorganisationer vill behålla kvinnan i abortlagen
This was...awkward. The first trans-woman ever nominated for an Academy award in the category Best Actress, Karla Sofia Gascón, turns out to be an anti-Black/anti-Asian racist and Islamophobe.
The acting actress is still a nominee, but Netflix has removed him from the promotion campaign for the film in question, "Emilia Perez". The problem? He is the, ahem, lead actor of the movie...