Showing posts with label Gender Jihad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gender Jihad. Show all posts

Thursday, September 11, 2025

Turning Point USA

 


Is the assassination of Charlie Kirk the "turning point" or even "the point of no return"? Asking for a former friend named USA.

Friday, August 8, 2025

Provocera, provocera, provocera


Jag ser att Anders Lindberg är tillbaka från semestern. Alltid lika fascinerande när Woke-"vänstern" projicerar kulturkriget på högern. Om Anders vill snacka om ekonomi, kan han väl börja med att ta ett litet samtal med den amerikanska "vänstern". Varför tror han att den alltid "faller" för högerns provokationer? Juuuust det. Och varför är inte t.ex. kriminalitet och massinvandring frågor som "drabbar vanligt folk"? 

I USA har Woke-liberalerna ägnat snart ett år nu åt att klaga på att högern "fortfarande talar om trans". Ja, vad det tänkas bero på? Den andra länken nedan går förresten till en annan artikel på Aftonbladets ledarsida. Gissa vad...?

Provocera, provocera, provocera! 

Snart pratar väl Tidölaget också om dina gener

 "Inga politiker är trans"


Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Confession

 


A certain Nicholas Confessore offers some criticism of the trans cult in the liberal New York Times following a recent defeat for this "movement" in the US Supreme Court. 

Probably just damage control, but it *is* interesting that trans is the first "Woke" item the Dems criticize. Suggesting the senior hierarchs never really believed in it. Maybe one day they´ll explain why they wanted the rest of us to buy the crap...

NYT skewers former trans heroes after SCOTUS defeat 

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Low hanging fruit bat

 


The insufferable moonbat Professor Dave attacks the crazy wingnut Candace Owens (who I think is a friend of the master provocateur Kanye West). The internet race-to-the-bottom at its "best". 

Apparently, Candace´s latest revolution in science is the claim that space is "fake and gay" (just like the dinosaurs), although I´m not sure what that even means. Is she a flat earther? Personally, I see space floating above me every night and there are plenty of dinosaurs flying around me by day, so there´s that, but maybe the situation looks different from Ye´s bunker c/o The Event? But sure, the earth *does* look flat. At least in Kansas, LOL.

As for Davie, well, if you don´t want the wingnuts to talk about trans all the damn time, maybe you moonbats should stop promoting it all the damn time!

Just sayin´.     

Friday, May 9, 2025

We have a pope...or something

 

Credit: INFOWeather1

Pro-Trump/pro-Vance Breitbart News tries to cope with the new Woke Pope in the State of Vatican City. See links below! Whatever. 

Personally, I would like to know why Prevost took the papal name Leo XIV. Leo XIII (the Pope most people-in-the-know think about when they hear the name "Leo") is still seen as one of the greatest popes in modern Catholic history (reigned 1878-1903). So choosing *that* name strikes me as...daring. 

Also, what does it tell us about Prevost´s political orientation? Leo XIII could be seen as a cautious reformer. But he could also be seen as radical, since his predecessors on the papal throne were arch-conservative. Leo XIII, by contrast, is associated with "Rerum novarum", the first social encyclical. It inspired the Catholic trade union movement. I read "Rerum novarum" years ago and didn´t find it particularly radical, but in its 1891 Catholic context, maybe it was. So perhaps the name signals that Prevost wants to be explicitly political and even somewhat "radical"?

I suppose we´re about to find out, aren´t we?   

Newly elected Pope opposed gender theory

Cubs or White Sox?

Monday, April 14, 2025

Trans and dire

 

- Are you assuming my species, human ape?

So the "de-extincted Dire Wolves" are really Grey Wolves who identify as Dire Wolves? Got it.   

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

It´s their religion, stupid

 


This BS just continues...and continues...and continues. There are two possible explanations, one "rational" and the other not so. The rational explanation is that we´re dealing with an instrument of social control. Compare "1984". Indeed, it´s an excellent instrument not just to control conservatives, but also to uphold internal discipline within the liberal camp. 

But the Woke double down on their gender jihad even when it´s counter-productive. See: the Democratic Party in the United States after Trump´s election victory (which *the Democrats themselves* suspect happened in part due to their intransigent stance on trans issues). And that leaves the irrational explanation: Woke is their *religion*, their social cult. 

Of course, the one doesn´t contradict the other. In "1984", the cynical Party had a fanatical youth organization...   

Christian nurse who refused to refer to male pedophile as a woman suspended

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Life as we don´t know it

 


Why is this even an issue? Note the bizarre fact that the Pentagon has spent 52 million dollars to cure "gender dysphoria", including 15 million dollars for psychotherapy! Since when is this the mission of the *American military*?  

Biden-appointed judge blocks Pentagon from banning transgender troops

Förvåning

 


Vem kunde ha anat detta?

Svenska transbarn blev 37% färre på två år  

Thursday, March 13, 2025

Doubling down

 


I think it´s obvious that Woke hurt the Democrats in the recent presidential elections. Heck, the Dems themselves say so. Specifically trans-people, hyper-specifically trans-women in women´s sports. 

Yet, it´s precisely this issue that the Dems are now doubling down on?!

There are three possible explanations. One: the Democrats are Satanists. Or crazy. Or both. Two: the Democrat campaign organizations are dominated by a certain kind of Woke activists, who simply won´t back down. Three: the Democrats are funded by somebody who is friendly (or "friendly") to trans-people. Perhaps Big Pharma and Big Shrink? Somebody is making money off the drugs and medical procedures. 

My wild guess is number three. Which explains why the activists (number two) can´t be fired. Number one is *of course* completely impossible. Well, I think!

Thursday, March 6, 2025

Electable

 



It seems Gavin Newsom wants to become the Democratic nominee in 2028. He wants to win, too! Interesting, I suppose...  

Liberals torch "trash" Gavin Newsom, etc

Thursday, February 27, 2025

Tuesday, February 11, 2025

The liberal boutique




Kind-of-liberal gadfly Michael Tracey on the trans issue. From X.

>>>If there was ever an issue that cultural liberals would be well-served to strategically concede on, it's "Trans in Sports," which in addition to being a political albatross is hardly defensible on the merits. Even the NYT comment sections have been largely against this stuff for years now.

>>>But the nature of contemporary liberalism requires a perpetual search for boutique cultural issues to turn into hectoring administrative crusades -- that's what their political passions are most animated by, as opposed to a whole slate of other potential issues, like foreign policy or economics.

>>>So the "strategic concession" may not even be practically possible, when a certain activist core is just never going to budge.

Saturday, February 8, 2025

Så trevligt

 


Lustigt att feministernas gräns alltid går vid aborter... 

Sveriges Kvinnoorganisationer vill behålla kvinnan i abortlagen

The curse of Woke?

 


This was...awkward. The first trans-woman ever nominated for an Academy award in the category Best Actress, Karla Sofia Gascón, turns out to be an anti-Black/anti-Asian racist and Islamophobe. 

The acting actress is still a nominee, but Netflix has removed him from the promotion campaign for the film in question, "Emilia Perez". The problem? He is the, ahem, lead actor of the movie...   

Netflix nightmare: trans-actor removed from Oscar campaign

Director disavows trans-star

Cosmic Justice comes for Netflix