John Campbell actually supports the current process in Florida to ban chemtrails. The reason? The connection to geoengineering, including "solar dimming". Interesting angle.
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
John Campbell actually supports the current process in Florida to ban chemtrails. The reason? The connection to geoengineering, including "solar dimming". Interesting angle.
"Daylight Robbery" (double entendre intended) is the longer version of Campbell´s recent viral video about "solar dimming" (which I linked to previously).
OK, now I´m worried. The above YouTube clip is born again "conspiracy theorist" John Campbell on recent proposals by the UK government to carry out "solar dimming" experiments. Think food control, elite cabals, that kind of stuff. And look what ChatGPT (which I assume is immune from evil evilly conspiracist thinking) says about it all...
Wtf.
Is it true that "solar dimming" can negatively affect agriculture and photosynthesis in plants?
Yes, it's true that solar dimming—also known as global dimming—can negatively affect agriculture and photosynthesis in plants.
Solar dimming refers to a reduction in the amount of sunlight reaching Earth's surface due to particles and pollutants (like sulfate aerosols) in the atmosphere that reflect or absorb solar radiation. It can also occur as a result of volcanic eruptions, industrial emissions, or intentional geoengineering efforts (e.g., solar radiation management).
Reduced Photosynthesis:
Plants rely on sunlight for photosynthesis, the process by which they produce energy.
Less light means less energy available, leading to slower growth, reduced yields, and sometimes lower nutritional value in crops.
Crop Yield Reduction:
Studies have shown that during periods of significant dimming (e.g., after volcanic eruptions), crop productivity drops.
For example, after the Mount Pinatubo eruption in 1991, global sunlight levels dropped slightly, and there were measurable agricultural impacts in some regions.
Disruption of Seasonal Growth Cycles:
Some crops are highly sensitive to light levels, and prolonged dimming can disrupt flowering or fruiting times, affecting harvest cycles.
In some cases, diffuse light (scattered light under hazy conditions) can penetrate deeper into plant canopies, slightly improving photosynthesis in lower leaves—but this effect rarely outweighs the overall negative impact of less total sunlight.
If dimming is caused by air pollution, the same pollutants can directly harm plant tissues or affect rainfall patterns, further damaging crops.
Would you like a real-world example or data from a specific region or time period?
Yes, there is credible scientific evidence indicating that solar radiation management (SRM)—a form of geoengineering aimed at cooling the planet by reflecting sunlight—can have negative effects on agriculture and plant photosynthesis.meetingorganizer.copernicus.org+2Carbon Brief+2sciencenews.org+2
SRM involves techniques like stratospheric aerosol injection, where reflective particles (such as sulfur dioxide) are released into the upper atmosphere to reduce incoming solar radiation. While this approach may lower global temperatures, it also reduces the amount of sunlight reaching Earth's surface, which is vital for plant growth and photosynthesis.Carbon Brief+1sciencenews.org+1
Blocking sunlight diminishes the energy available for photosynthesis, leading to lower crop productivity. A study published in Nature found that the reduction in sunlight from SRM could negate the benefits of cooler temperatures, resulting in decreased yields of crops like maize, soy, rice, and wheat. sciencenews.org+1meetingorganizer.copernicus.org+1
Historical events, such as the eruptions of El Chichón in 1982 and Mount Pinatubo in 1991, injected large amounts of aerosols into the stratosphere, leading to global dimming. Subsequent analyses showed that these events caused significant reductions in crop yields due to decreased sunlight. sciencenews.org
Model simulations indicate that SRM could lead to substantial regional yield reductions. For instance, groundnut yields in India might decrease by up to 20% under solar dimming geoengineering scenarios. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+3theenergymix.com+3meetingorganizer.copernicus.org+3pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Exposure to weak light conditions, akin to those under SRM, can impair chloroplast function, increase reactive oxygen species, and disrupt the photosynthetic electron transport chain in plants like maize. This physiological stress hampers plant growth and productivity. PubMed
While SRM may offer benefits like reduced heat stress on crops, the accompanying decrease in sunlight poses significant risks to agricultural productivity. The trade-offs between cooling the planet and ensuring food security need careful consideration.
John Campbell (the Scottish anti-vaxxer who supports RFK Jr) discusses the steep increase in cases of autism. While he never says so explicitly, I assume he agrees with MAHA that autism is caused by vaccines.
But is that really so? The US figures he shows suggest that autism (including "low functioning" autism) is more common among Black children than White ditto. But surely Whites are more likely to vaccinate their children than Blacks? And if both are equally likely to do so, why the Black spike? It still suggests another cause, perhaps bad nutrition.
That being said, autism (presumably both high and low functioning) has increased internationally (including among Whites), so other factors obviously can´t be ruled out.
However, I must say that I´m *very* skeptical to the claim that a proper scientific investigation can tell us the full truth already in September. That´s not how science works. Unless, of course, "they" already know the truth but have decided to memory-hole it for some reason, September being the deadline for certain people to produce the damning documents...
Dr John Campbell´s latest video is somewhat eclectic, featuring both a discussion about autism, Trump´s comments on eliminating the "middleman" from the medical industry and...the same Trump commenting the drone invasion in New Jersey and elsewhere?!
The dramatic increase in autism among children seems to be real. Something similar has been observed in Sweden (since 2010). And no doubt in many other nations, too. Not mentioned by Campbell is the equally steep growth of kids and teens diagnosed with "gender dysphoria" (since about 2012). There could be a connection.
Is the increase real, or is it just Big Pharma and Big Shrink inventing new diagnoses as they go along for reasons of profit? Campbell and his new hero RFK Jr believe it´s a real thing. Campbell says its connected to "lifestyle changes", but doesn´t elaborate. Maybe he doesn´t know, maybe it´s the YouTube censorship. Hint: if the latter, he probably believes it´s the vaxx.
Trump, somewhat ironically, doesn´t take an anti-vaxx position in his televized comments, explicitly defending the polio vaccine. Note also that Trump says he, RFK and Oz had dinner with Pfizer´s CEO!
Either way, the truth will hurt if and when it will become known. Add to that the demographic crisis and you have a rough (pun intended) picture of the century ahead...
This week, John Campbell doesn´t talk about COVID or vaccines, but rather about Britain´s first "3 parent baby".
The implications are...intriguing. Or perhaps staggering!
Ultimately, it all boils down to the question "is reproduction a right or a privilege". Or a duty?
Apparently, both houses of the United States Congress recently voted unanimously (!) in favor of requesting the Biden Admin to release all intelligence on the Wuhan lab and the origins of the COVID pandemic.
Meanwhile, the medical establishment in the UK still considers the lab leak scenario a "conspiracy theory" against which everyone must "unite", or whatever.
From John Campbell´s YouTube channel.
Masks are essentially worthless. Not to put too fine spin on it. Even the efficacy of sophisticated masks (which few people had anyway) is questionable.
And yes, they do make your glasses steam up.
Nothing to see here, as usual...
Seriously, though, this really does need to be investigated. To put it very diplomatically!
Vitamin D actually protects you from, you know, disease or something. I mean, who the fuck knew? Obviously, I´m not calling on you to do anything with this information...
Fiery speech by Dr John Campbell on "conspiracy theory", Chinese lab leaks and by implication you-know-what. Peer review this, Fauci!
Dr John Campbell discusses the excess deaths in the wake of the COVID pandemic. These deaths are not attributable to COVID, but it´s not clear what could cause them. At least not in the censored media environment of YouTube...
The lack of hard data is annoying. Especially since some figures seem to indicate that cancer has become more prevalent post-pandemic. Campbell fears that the situation will become even worse in the near future.
At the moment, though, the most dangerous disease is the cancer of censorship!
The Republican minority of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions have issued an interim report on the origins of the COVID virus. They reach the conclusion that a lab origin is "likely".
I have no position on the issue, and the GOP obviously have a vested interest in pointing the finger at China, but it annoys me that the official "line" changes all the time, while everyone else is facing censorship...
So I link to this as a kind of political protest (I have previously linked to articles attacking exactly this position).
Geezus, here we go again.
Authorities in Scotland refuse to investigate whether excess neo-natal deaths are caused by the COVID vaccine, openly saying it´s because it might give the vaccine a bad name! Meanwhile, there are allegations in Britain at large that neo-natal deaths are registered as "stillborn", to avoid a coroner´s investigation.
Note that the presenter is being ironic when he says that he has confidence in the Scottish authorities - he doesn´t want to be censored by YouTube...
Somehow, they will blame this on Donald Trump...
Obviously, I take absolutely no responsibility for whatever this might mean.
But I do think the needle just moved a bit!
Unite behind the science, guys...
Still not enough to "move the needle", I´m afraid.