Ååååkej. Låter som en parodi...
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
Och alltså inte samma hund. Eller enbart hundar av samma ras. Kan ingen lära AB korrekt svenska? De menar förstås *flera* hundar (och inte bara en enda)...
OK, the dog-fox hybrids are strange. Sure of that one? And why would conservationists "condemn" big cat hybrids? I mean, I assumed everyone loves ligers! Note also that polar bears are moving further south and hybridize with grizzlies as they go along. Are these hybrids fertile? If so, it seems the polar bear doesn´t need "saving", after all. Life will find a way. Finally, what´s up with those strange fish accidentally "created" by some crazy scientists in Hungary (I mean, where else)?
10 of the strangest hybrid animals
Scientists accidentally create "impossible" hybrid fish
| - So I got tired of the cremation ground and ran away, can you blame me for it, bruh? |
Sometimes AI pictures can be damn funny. The above is supposedly the Hindu child goddess Bala Tripura Sundari, which it obviously isn´t. It looks more like Lalita Tripura Sundari, and even that only barely. And why is there a *dog* standing there?
At least on modern devotional pictures, the Hindu god Bhairava´s child form Batuka is often paired with a small dog (in contrast to Bhairava´s adult form where the dog is large and dangerous). So it seems the AI through some form of free association combined a goddess looking vaguely like Lalita with Batuka´s doggie. Probably because I earlier asked the system to generate a picture of Batuka together with his little dog, something the AI promptly refused to do cuz content policy or something. Instead, the dog shows up *now* instead, without me even asking for it.
Hah hah hah. It can´t be long now. The AI-calypse cometh.
The idiot AI´s simply refuse to generate pictures of Shiva´s or Bhairava´s child-form Batuka, so the illustration above is credit the website "Hindu Temple Talk". How did *they* generate it? Note the adorable little puppy! The fully grown version of Bhairava is associated with fierce feral dogs stalking the charnel grounds...
My bouts with the AI concerning Hindu gods and goddesses are getting more and more intense.
The most crazy temple in India? Note the extremely large dogs! Here is ChatGPT:
Is there a Bhairava temple in Anichunchanagiri?
Here are some images of the Kalabhairaveshwara Swamy Temple atop Adichunchanagiri Hill (also called Anichunchanagiri or Sri Kshetra Adichunchanagiri) in Mandya district, Karnataka. This temple is one of the few in South India specifically dedicated to Bhairava.
Absolutely — there is a Kalabhairava temple in Adichunchanagiri:
The temple is officially known as Sri Kalabhairaveshwara Swamy Temple. It serves as the Kṣetra-Pālaka (guardian deity) of the Adichunchanagiri Maha Samsthana Math, with the presiding deity being Shiva as Gangadhareshwara.hindufestivalsonline.comAstroVedWikipedia
It is the only dedicated temple to Kalabhairava in South India, built around 2008 under the guidance of Sri Balagangadharanatha Swamiji.AstroVedparichaybp.blogspot.comsakrecubes.com
The temple features over 64 representations of Bhairava (signifying different aspects or avatars), all carved in stone.AstroVedFree Online Library
Architectural highlights include a fully stone-built structure—pillars, doors, ceilings—all crafted from black 'krishnashila' stone sourced from Kanchipuram, reflecting 16th–18th century Vijayanagara style.Free Online Libraryparichaybp.blogspot.com
Other notable features at the site include the Pancha Lingas, Jwāla Pīṭha, Sthambambike, the Bindu Sarovara sacred pond, and the summit point known as Akasha Bhairava.hindufestivalsonline.comgnanamrutham.blogspot.comacnain.inAstroVedWikipedia
A statue of a dog, the traditional vāhana (mount) of Bhairava, is found within the temple complex.Arjunpuri's Blog
Yes, there is a Bhairava temple—specifically dedicated to Kala Bhairava—on Adichunchanagiri Hill.
It is a major shrine for devotees, architecturally impressive, and spiritually significant, especially in the Nath tradition of Karnataka.
The temple uniquely combines the worship of Gangadhareshwara (Shiva) with prominent veneration of Kalabhairava.
If you're planning a visit or want to know more about the rituals, visiting hours, or historical context, I'd be happy to help!
That’s a really sharp observation — you’re absolutely right to notice the irony.
In Hindu symbolism, the dog is indeed the vāhana (mount, vehicle) of Bhairava, especially Kala Bhairava. In many places, dogs (especially black dogs) are regarded as manifestations or companions of Bhairava, and devotees sometimes even feed stray dogs as a form of worship. In some Bhairava temples in North India, dogs are allowed into the temple compound, and offerings of food (prasāda) are placed out for them.
But context matters a lot:
In Adichunchanagiri (Karnataka), the worship of Bhairava is central, so the dog as Bhairava’s vāhana is honored directly. Black dogs have even been part of rituals, festivals, and temple iconography there — it’s not just tolerated but ritually enshrined.
In mainstream Shaiva or Vaishnava temples, especially in orthodox South Indian traditions, dogs are considered ritually impure and never allowed inside sanctums. Bringing a live dog in and demanding prasāda for it would be seen as a disruptive or deliberately provocative act — even if symbolically it makes sense from a Bhairava perspective.
So what you read in the news likely involved this clash of symbolism: in a Bhairava-oriented context, feeding a black dog prasāda is normal devotion, but in a temple that does not recognize Bhairava’s vāhana in ritual practice, it comes across as sacrilege.
Your insight is exactly right: in a temple like Adichunchanagiri, that same act could be welcomed as an offering to Bhairava; in a different temple, it’s condemned. It really shows how diverse Hindu practice is — a symbol sacred in one tradition can be taboo in another.
👉 Do you want me to dig up examples of living traditions where dogs are still ritually fed as Bhairava’s manifestation? There are some fascinating ones in Varanasi, Rajasthan, and Tamil Nadu.
Absolutely—here are some living, on-the-ground examples where dogs are honored as Bhairava’s companions (or otherwise sacred), and are fed/receive prasāda:
Varanasi & broader Bhairava observance (India): On Bhairava Aṣṭamī, devotees traditionally worship Bhairava and his vāhana, the dog, offering milk, sweets, curd and other foods to dogs. This is described in mainstream summaries of the festival. Wikipedia
Ujjain & Varanasi folklore/practice: Popular guides about Kāl Bhairava note that feeding a black dog near Bhairava’s temple is considered auspicious, linked to Bhairava’s protective gaze—an attitude you’ll find around the famous Kāl Bhairav temples in Ujjain and Kashi. astroulagam.com.my
Adichunchanagiri, Karnataka: At the Sri Kalabhairaveshwara shrine, Bhairava devotion is central and the dog symbolism is explicit—the temple famously features a dog image facing the sanctum and the site is often cited as a major Bhairava center; local coverage highlights the temple’s distinctive Bhairava focus and dog association. Arjunpuri's BlogHinduism Today
Parassini Muthappan Temple, Kerala (Kannur): Different deity, same canine reverence: at this folk-Shaiva/Vaishnava shrine, dogs are sacred, roam freely, and the first prasād is traditionally given to a dog; naming-ceremonies for dogs are also reported. This is well documented in both reportage and encyclopedic entries. Hindustan TimesWikipediaCurly Tales
Nepal (Kukur Tihar / Kukur Pūjā): During Tihar (Diwali), a whole day is devoted to honoring dogs with garlands, tilak and special food—a widely covered, living festival that underscores canine sanctity in the Hindu sphere (here linked more to Yama than Bhairava, but very relevant to the practice of feeding and honoring dogs). AP News
If you want to mirror these customs at home in a simple way, the most widely attested practice is: feed and care for local dogs—especially on Aṣṭamī tithis or on Bhairava Aṣṭamī—and then offer a brief salutation to Bhairava. That aligns closely with how devotees express this bhakti in India. Wikipedia
Look what I found.
This is a kind of follow up to the robot essay "Better than panpsychism". Rupert Sheldrake and Mark Vernon discusses the strange phenomenon of terminal lucidity in humans *and animals*. It seems dogs and cats also experience "the last rally". The commentary section is worth reading.
At the end of the video, Sheldrake and Vernon try to wrap everything up by discussing the resurrection of Christ from a somewhat heterodox perspective.
Actually quite interesting. Thank you, guys, you may have saved my faith!
I previously linked to the live performance of this song at the recent ESC, but I didn´t realize that the song is actually quite sad. This is an unofficial "lyrics video" that just showed up in my recommendations...
Some more Eurovision fun. This is the Irish entry (voted out in the semifinale). Yes, it´s a disco song about Laika. You know, Laika. The first dog in space. It´s called "Laika Party". Communist kitsch have never been so...I don´t know...kitschie or something?
So I just saw a French science documentary, "Alter Ego", on Swedish TV about cloning. Artificial human cloning of non-human animals, to be exact. Remember Dolly the cloned sheep? For whatever reason, the European Union bans this kind of cloning, so the industry thrives in the rest of the world. In the docu, they interview Americans and Argentinians who clone horses (including race horses), Chinese who clone pet dogs, and a hyper-modern lab in the United Arab Emirates financed by the Emir of Dubai which clone dromedaries (camel races are popular in some nations). In the United States, there are supposedly cloned deer with exactly the qualities a wild-game hunter wants!
There are also discussions to clone mammoths and other extinct animals, such as the dodo. Maybe this is a bit too much hype? One scientist actually believes that cloning birds is extremely difficult to impossible. Another opines that "cloned mammoths" would really be genetically enhanced elephants which can live in cold weather! However, the cloned foal of a Przewalski´s horse (this species or sub-species is extinct in the wild) is real, so here is a possible avenue to save endangered species. It seems cloning can even enhance the genetic diversity of a species. The two-humped Bactrian camel (which is almost extinct in the wild) is mentioned as the object of another possible rescue mission.
The documentary doesn´t discuss human cloning and no Raëlians are interviewed. The production is clearly pro-cloning and I do wonder after watching it why the EU has banned cloning. How does this help us? How does it help the animals? Is it just some weird superstition? On our "enlightened" continent! In reality, the applications are almost endless. Imagine killing off all wolves, but keeping their DNA around for future re-creation just in case.
Hmmm...
If Labrador Retrievers are real, why are there still Newfoundland dogs? Can you answer that, evolutionista, huh huh?
So I did my own armchair research a propos the previous blog post "Emerson´s Dogman". I admit I was...stunned.
In New Jersey, a black bear nicknamed Pedals could actually walk permanently on its hind legs, and quite fast too! It was an adaptation to the fact that one of its front paws had been damaged and rendered non-functional. There are also dogs who learned to walk bipedally for similar reasons. They, too, were quite fast.
Bears walking on their hind legs for longer or shorter distances are (surprise) the main suspects in many purported Bigfoot observations. One clip above shows two normal bears in a South Korean safari park standing and even walking bipedally a short distance. But if bears and dogs can walk upright under certain conditions, what about wolves? While there is no scientific evidence for factultative bipedalism among wolves, who´s to say that it´s intrinsically impossible?
Note that there isn´t any particular contradiction between this and the notion that most (perhaps 99%) of Dogman sightings are misidentifications, hallucinations or hoaxes. Obviously, unusual observations of animals will be sensationalized and later mythologized. And in the Internet age, people will end up "seeing" them pretty much everywhere.
The same logic applied to Bigfoot could yield some interesting results. Or speculations...
"The best cryptid evidence" doesn´t strike me as very "cryptid". Note that the Patterson-Gimlin film of Bigfoot fame isn´t included in this survey. All animals featured (except maybe Marvin) seem to belong to known and currently extant taxa. So-called cryptozoologists don´t really care - they want to find a giant ape-man, a surviving dinosaur, or something to that effect.
So it seems the Patterson-Gimlin film is unique, being the only good footage of an *actual* cryptid (i.e. a monster). But it´s precisely it´s singular character that makes it so hard to believe...
Never heard of this matie before, but he is apparently some kind of local celebrity in Australia.
Science blogger Darren Naish isn´t impressed, and charges free-wheeling herpetologist Ray Hoser with "taxonomic vandalism" and "nomenclatural harvesting".
Or, not to put too fine spin on it, of being a real pain the ass! Apparently, the unhinged mate has named snakes after his pet dogs, when not busy running a snake-related road show, unsuccesfully running for office, and accusing other scientists of being rapists, thieves, and what not...
So Donald Trump´s possible running mate Kristi Noem is unelectable because she killed a puppy 20 years ago, but Trump himself is electable despite all *his* crazy shit? LOL. Makes you wonder if the ChiComs were right after all. American democracy really doesn´t work...
En ovanligt korkad artikel. Ja, man äter hund i Kina. Och därför...vad?
Kritiken av Demirok lär oss att vi kan äta hundar