Rubrik i Aftonbladet. Det som hände var förstås att läkaren rättkönade patienten...
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
Apropå mitt tidigare blogginlägg "Framtiden är vår", där jag länkade till några inlägg på TH:s blogg. Vi kan väl hoppas att nedanstående är kraftigt överdrivet!
| Credit: Calle Eklund/V-wolf |
Previously posted on January 29, 2022
"Riskområde: Tjärna Ängar" is a Swedish documentary recently aired on SVT, the Swedish public service TV network. It´s only available in Swedish. Tjärna Ängar is a neighborhood in Borlänge (in the county of Dalarna or Dalecarlia). Most of the inhabitants are immigrants, and half of those are from Somalia. Swedes have nicknamed the neighborhood "Little Mogadishu". Tjärna Ängar is officially on the Swedish government´s list of areas with dangerous social problems (really a euphemism for No Go Zones). These are heavily immigrant neighborhoods with high rates of crime, unemployment and welfare dependency. For some reason, Tjärna Ängar is often mentioned in Swedish media, perhaps because it´s the northernmost of the problem areas (it´s actually in central Sweden). There doesn´t seem to be anything particularly unusual with this particular barrio compared to all the others.
Officially, the population of Tjärna Ängar is 3,500. The houses are built for 5,000 people. However, many suspect that the actual population is around 10,000. The documentary doesn´t explain who these additional people might be. Illegal aliens? Unregistered children, or what? The camera crew is threatened by stone-throwing masked criminals who (bizarrely) demand that the TV documentary must "concentrate on the positive things" in the neighborhood. A local Somali association refuse to participate in the documentary after realizing that it will be critical. At one point, the reporters interview a group of young drug dealers who spout politically correct rhetoric, as if they were left-wing activists! Meanwhile, 49% of all elementary school children fail to qualify for senior high school. Kids in the area tell stories of shootings and other disturbances.
The reporters interview Mursal Isa, a Somali immigrant who represents the Green Party on a regional government committee. Isa was threatened by criminal gangs from Tjärna Ängar for wanting to speak to SVT. He believes that the failure of integration in the neighborhood is to a large extent caused by the Somali community itself (hardly the official Green Party position). When new Somali immigrants arrive at Tjärna Ängar, the local ethnic networks tell them three things: it´s pointless to learn the Swedish language, it´s not worth the effort to seek employment, and everyone who reports local crime to the police risks being attacked by the criminals (hint hint nudge nudge). Isa believes that the immigrant associations in the neighborhood, which get enormous public grants, form a kind of elite group and do very little to actually solve the social problems. (One of the Somali associations teach Quran classes. I´m sure this aids the integration process.)
Foreign students who study at the Dalarna University have been placed at Tjärna Ängar. Their house has been burglarized several times. When the students complained about the high rate of criminality to the student union, and the union supported them, the union was (surprise) accused of "racism" by the Somali associations. But who are these foreign students? They turn out to be...Black Africans! The irony is palpable. Perhaps the real racists are the politically correct bureaucrats who decided to place Third World students in a "Third World" barrio?
The documentary is concluded by an interview with Borlänge´s long-time mayor Jan Bohman (Social Democrat). He mentions all the programs the local government has initiated to help Tjärna Ängar. They aren´t working and Bohman has no real answers, except that the politicians simply have to stay the course. For instance, he promises an upgrade of the old houses in the neighborhood. I admit that I feel sorry for him - he looks like a typical Swedish local politician who is trying to administer the crisis as best as he can. Bohman at one point says that welfare payments should be the responsibility of the national government. He does have a certain point. And while the alcalde can´t say it, the problems are *created* at the national level, including the Social Democratic Party (which is currently in government).
Here is a heretical thought: what if the overwhelming majority of Somalis *actually don´t want to be integrated into Swedish society*? Why *should they* want to be integrated? Isn´t this just a smug liberal myth, that everyone in the world wants to be like "us", meaning the modern-liberal Western middle class?
Another thought: why was this "racist" program aired on Swedish public service TV? Managed dissent?
With that, I leave you for now.
| Nås, not Jerusalem |
“Jerusalem”
is a Swedish drama series in four parts from 1997, directed by Bille August.
Among the many actors, Max von Sydow and Sven-Bertil Taube are perhaps most well-known.
Most of the dialogue is in Swedish. American actress Olympia Dukakis stars the
Christian cult leader “Mother”. In real life, Dukakis was apparently a Goddess-worshipping
pagan feminist! And yes, she only speaks English.
The TV
series is based on famous Swedish writer Selma Lagerlöf´s two-volume novel “Jerusalem”,
originally published in 1901-1902. The novel is in turn based on real events in
1896, when 37 people from the small village of Nås in Dalarna (Dalecarlia) left
Sweden and journeyed to Jerusalem, where they joined the so-called American
Colony, really an authoritarian religious commune. This somewhat peculiar
emigration has become part of the local folklore at Nås, where a theatre play
based on Lagerlöf´s novel is still staged once a year.
In the
novel and the TV series, the preacher who turns the heads of the Nås peasants
is named Hellgum. At least in the TV series, Hellgum is depicted as a fiery
charismatic who skillfully manipulates the villagers into joining his cult. (I
don´t remember how he is depicted in the novel, since I only read it once,
about 30 years ago!) In Jerusalem, the Hellgumites join forces with another
cult, simply called the Colony, led by Miss Gordon (Mother). Both Hellgum and Gordon
are based on real people. Hellgum´s real name was Olof Henrik Larsson, a
returning Swedish expat from the United States. The Larssonites are sometimes
dubbed “Sweden´s smallest revivalist movement”. Gordon´s real name was Anna Spafford,
a Norwegian-American with a background in Christian pyramidology. An intriguing
detail is that Spafford actually purged Larsson once the latter had joined her
in the Holy Land with his Swedish faithful. Larsson was demoted to an insignificant
position within the Colony, and died under wretched circumstances. In the TV series,
Hellgum gets second thoughts about the move to Jerusalem and wants to travel
back to Sweden with his flock, and then “purges” himself by simply absconding
when his brain-washed followers prefer to stay in Mother´s authoritarian sect!
“Jerusalem”
isn´t just a story about a revival gone dangerously wrong, but also contains a
number of other plot elements. How much of these are true, I don´t know. The
main characters aren´t really Hellgum and Miss Gordon, but the farmer and
saw-mill owner Ingmar and his on-off love interest Gertrud. Ingmar´s sister
Karin is also important. Both Gertrud and Karin joins the cult. As a
counterpoint to the crazy revival and its contretemps in Jerusalem stands Ingmarsgården
(the Ingmar Farm) back at Nås, presumably a symbol of stability and tradition,
since the farm is said to have been in the possession of the Ingmar family since
time immemorial, every male head of the family being named “Ingmar”. The
Ingmars are depicted as the local strongmen in the community. For various reasons,
the current Ingmar loses control of the family farm, and his attempts to regain
possession forms a kind of intertwined parallel plot to Hellgum´s rabble-rousing.
Perhaps the revival represents the “new” or “modern”, while Ingmar stands for
the old way? In the novel, the various storylines are even more complex than in
the TV series.
What
strikes me most in the TV series is its negative depiction of religion, except –
somewhat ironically – the Lutheranism of the Swedish establishment. Ingmar is
depicted as a near-atheist skeptic and rationalist. The local priest and the schoolmaster represent common sense and civic virtue. All other religious types are dangerous
firebrands (Hellgum), authoritarian cultists (Mother), gullible and emotional
(Gertrud), fanatics (Karin) or easily led (Karin´s husband). Jerusalem turns
out to be filled with eponymous madness. The increasingly delusional Gertrud
mistakes a bizarre Dervish sect for Jesus and his disciples, and is attacked by
fanaticized Russian pilgrims when she by mistake aborts one of their penances.
Order is restored when Ingmar unexpectedly shows up in Jerusalem, deprograms
Gertrud and forces Mother to let her return to Sweden. At the very end, the Lutheran
priest baptizes skeptic Ingmar´s newly born son (of course also named Ingmar),
while Karin remains behind at the Colony in Jerusalem, fervently thanking God
for deliverance while surrounded by the graves of dead Swedish emigrants at a
cemetery, including her husband and little daughter…
I would
like to say that we are wiser today, 127 years later, but alas, we are not. We
simply live out different delusions to those of the Nås Jerusalem-farers.
Jerusalem Madness has been replaced by Clown World.
YouTube ads are usually not funny. They are mostly annoying, actually. So it´s something of a surprise that the most funny YouTube ad is Swedish. I mean, Sweden isn´t known for funny ads. Or funny anything, really. Yet, here we are!
In the ad (linked above), the teacher asks some kids who the man on the portrait is (it´s 16th century Swedish king Gustav Vasa). The little girl answers "That´s a hipster, obviously". When the teacher tries to explain that Vasa fled from Mora to Sälen on skis, an event which inspired the modern cross-country ski race Vasaloppet, the girl answers "Yeah, but that´s what hipsters do (i.e. they go skiing). And then they bake bread".
I admit I have no idea what the heck this is supposed to mean, LOL. Nor do I understand the connection between hipsters, skiing, king Gustav, and the "KPA". The KPA? Yes, that´s who made the ad. But what *is* the KPA? As far as I can make out, it´s a national pension plan for Swedish local government employees?!
Not sure why on earth they even *need* an ad (does anyone voluntarily say no to their pension plans?). Which just makes the whole thing even more crazy, somehow...
| Dalarna University Campus Credit: Edaen |
"Riskområde: Tjärna Ängar" is a Swedish documentary recently aired on SVT, the Swedish public service TV network. It´s only available in Swedish. Tjärna Ängar is a neighborhood in Borlänge (in the county of Dalarna or Dalecarlia). Most of the inhabitants are immigrants, and half of those are from Somalia. Swedes have nicknamed the neighborhood "Little Mogadishu". Tjärna Ängar is officially on the Swedish government´s list of areas with dangerous social problems (really a euphemism for No Go Zones). These are heavily immigrant neighborhoods with high rates of crime, unemployment and welfare dependency. For some reason, Tjärna Ängar is often mentioned in Swedish media, perhaps because it´s the northernmost of the problem areas (it´s actually in central Sweden). There doesn´t seem to be anything particularly unusual with this particular barrio compared to all the others.
Officially, the population of Tjärna Ängar is 3,500. The houses are built for 5,000 people. However, many suspect that the actual population is around 10,000. The documentary doesn´t explain who these additional people might be. Illegal aliens? Unregistered children, or what? The camera crew is threatened by stone-throwing masked criminals who (bizarrely) demand that the TV documentary must "concentrate on the positive things" in the neighborhood. A local Somali association refuse to participate in the documentary after realizing that it will be critical. At one point, the reporters interview a group of young drug dealers who spout politically correct rhetoric, as if they were left-wing activists! Meanwhile, 49% of all elementary school children fail to qualify for senior high school. Kids in the area tell stories of shootings and other disturbances.
The reporters interview Mursal Isa, a Somali immigrant who represents the Green Party on a regional government committee. Isa was threatened by criminal gangs from Tjärna Ängar for wanting to speak to SVT. He believes that the failure of integration in the neighborhood is to a large extent caused by the Somali community itself (hardly the official Green Party position). When new Somali immigrants arrive at Tjärna Ängar, the local ethnic networks tell them three things: it´s pointless to learn the Swedish language, it´s not worth the effort to seek employment, and everyone who reports local crime to the police risks being attacked by the criminals (hint hint nudge nudge). Isa believes that the immigrant associations in the neighborhood, which get enormous public grants, form a kind of elite group and do very little to actually solve the social problems. (One of the Somali associations teach Quran classes. I´m sure this aids the integration process.)
Foreign students who study at the Dalarna University have been placed at Tjärna Ängar. Their house has been burglarized several times. When the students complained about the high rate of criminality to the student union, and the union supported them, the union was (surprise) accused of "racism" by the Somali associations. But who are these foreign students? They turn out to be...Black Africans! The irony is palpable. Perhaps the real racists are the politically correct bureaucrats who decided to place Third World students in a "Third World" barrio?
The documentary is concluded by an interview with Borlänge´s long-time mayor Jan Bohman (Social Democrat). He mentions all the programs the local government has initiated to help Tjärna Ängar. They aren´t working and Bohman has no real answers, except that the politicians simply have to stay the course. For instance, he promises an upgrade of the old houses in the neighborhood. I admit that I feel sorry for him - he looks like a typical Swedish local politician who is trying to administer the crisis as best as he can. Bohman at one point says that welfare payments should be the responsibility of the national government. He does have a certain point. And while the alcalde can´t say it, the problems are *created* at the national level, including the Social Democratic Party (which is currently in government).
Here is a heretical thought: what if the overwhelming majority of Somalis *actually don´t want to be integrated into Swedish society*? Why *should they* want to be integrated? Isn´t this just a smug liberal myth, that everyone in the world wants to be like "us", meaning the modern-liberal Western middle class?
Another thought: why was this "racist" program aired on Swedish public service TV? Managed dissent?
With that, I leave you for now.
Riksdagsmannen Peter Helander ÄGER talmannen i det här roliga klippet, tyvärr utlagt av knäppgökarna "Fria Tider". Språket i artikeln är förresten svenska. Jag har ju kommenterat älvdalsmålet tidigare, so here we go again!
"Engelbrekt och bondeupproren" (Engelbrekt and the Peasant Uprisings) is a book by Swedish history professor Dick Harrison, unfortunately only available in Swedish. Harrison must *like* to write about the 15th century Swedish civil wars and unrests, since this is probably the third or fourth time he does so in book format. Or even more, if you count all his partially overlapping popularized books published by Historiska Media.
1434 was the year when Engelbrekt Engelbrektsson started a rebellion of peasants and miners in the Swedish area known as Bergslagen. Engelbrekt acquired legendary status already during his lifetime, and became a virtual martyr after his death in 1436 at the hands of an assassin (ironically, there was no direct connection between the murder and the rebellion). He was worshipped as a saint by many Swedish peasants during the Middle Ages, and is still regarded as a national hero by virtually everyone in Sweden from left to right. The meeting at Arboga in 1435 where Engelbrekt was appointed supreme commander of all Swedish military forces was long regarded as "the first Swedish Parliament". Engelbrekt´s uprising was directed against the unpopular union king Erik of Pomerania, who ruled both Sweden, Norway and Denmark, usually promoting the interests of the latter, but above all his own family interests, at the expense of both the Swedish nobility, clergy and the common people. What began as a peasant uprising soon turned into a general war of liberation against Erik and his foreign bailiffs. The details need not preoccupy us here.
More importantly, the success of the uprising (Erik of Pomerania de facto lost his Swedish throne) marks the beginning of a remarkable period in Swedish history, which would last for almost 100 years, during which the peasantry played a central role in Swedish politics. The peasants were well organized, armed, and quite conscious of their power to make or break kings and lords. Sweden was extremely politically unstable, with constant wars against Denmark and civil wars between different Swedish factions. Coups, counter-coups and shifting alliances were part and parcel of the political landscape. What makes the period interesting is that the various factions of the nobility were forced to appeal to the peasantry for military support. Some nobles could almost be described as "peasant-friendly", such as Erik Puke, the de facto successor of Engelbrekt as main rebel leader. But even nobles who would rather do without peasant support, such as the treacherous power-player and opportunist Karl Knutsson (Bonde), who was Swedish king three times, eventually realized the need for it. Indeed, even the Danish kings, who tried to take back control over Sweden, sometimes appealed to the peasantry to back their cause.
The original reason behind the peasant unrest may have been high taxes and unpopular foreign bailiffs, but eventually the peasantry demanded de facto self-government in their respective communities, some kind of say in the appointments of regents, and general respect for their social class. (Harrison seems to regard the Västerås meeting of 1466 as the first Swedish Parliament, since the peasantry was heavily represented.) During some periods, taxation was virtually zero. No man could be drafted by force into the army, and in some regions, there was a lucrative cross-border trade with the territories still under Danish control. The peasants and burghers of the border regions had more in common with each other than with their respective rulers in far-away capitals.
The beginning of the end of this "golden age" came in 1520, when the Danish king Kristian II decided to subdue Sweden once and for all, and treacherously executed about 100 nobles, burghers and others after a sham trial in Stockholm (the Stockholm bloodbath). He then turned his attention to Bergslagen, and issued a series of provocative demands, including royal control of the mines and the disarmament of the peasantry. In response to this and other outrages, the Swedish peasantry once again rose in rebellion, this time under the leadership of Gustav Eriksson (Vasa). Unfortunately, Gustav Vasa was no Engelbrekt or Puke. As regent and later king (1521-1560), he turned on his earstwhile allies and created a centralized monarchy financed by heavy taxation of the peasantry, state control of mining, and massive confiscations of Catholic church property (Sweden became Lutheran during this period). Attempts to unseat Gustav Vasa were met by hard repression. The last "medieval" peasant rising in Sweden was the Dacke War (Dackefejden) in 1542-43. This time, the peasants really did fight alone, with no noble faction supporting them.
During the 17th century, Sweden became a heavily centralized, autocratic and militarized state, in which the peasants were expected to obey, pay their taxes and get their sons drafted. During the 100-year long "great power period" (circa 1618-1718), Sweden lost one third of its male population due to constant wars! Yet, there were no peasant rebellions anymore. This is remarkable, since constant peasant uprisings (and other civil wars) constantly plagued the rest of Europe. It´s also remarkable given the fighting traditions of the Swedish peasantry and certain other groups. What on earth happened? The explanation favored by the author is that the Swedish high nobility was pragmatically smarter than many other European elite groups. Even Gustav Vasa, no friend of seditious commoners, permitted the peasants to have a certain amount of representation in Parliament. Sweden´s "peasant estate" was almost unique in Europe, and gave the peasantry a certain amount of room to voice their grievances. On the local level, the organ of local self-government known as sockenstämma (a kind of parish council) was often dominated by the peasants. Both the peasant estate in the Diet and the parish councils functioned as a kind of safety valve. Somehow, they did manage to blow off sufficient steam to avoid active armed resistance against the regime. Of course, there was also a lot of passive resistance to the early modern state, including a wide-spread refusal to be drafted in eastern Finland (where escape into the woods was relatively simple). But no actual uprisings. The last large-scale peasant uprising in Sweden was "the Great Dala Dance" in 1743, at a time when the Swedish regime had become less repressive, and the nobility was split into warring factions. Yet, it too failed.
Dick Harrison ends the book by pointing out that the 19th century saw a transition from peasant violence to urban-worker violence. Weirdly, he mentions the Fersen murder of 1810 as an example of the generally unsafe and riotous conditions of the capital, Stockholm. Ahem, surely a history professor should at least suspect a conspiracy in this case? Axel von Fersen was a prominent noble who belonged to the "wrong" faction in an internal elite power struggle. I´m not the only one to suspect that the mob who killed Fersen was at somebody´s payroll (not to mention the "guards" who didn´t lift a finger to defend him). That being said, Harrison is of course right in a general way. The 19th century saw the dawn of new struggles. As the peasantry became increasingly more conservative, the fallen mantle of Engelbrekt was taken up by...the working class.