Showing posts with label Guyana. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guyana. Show all posts

Thursday, February 22, 2024

Implicit Whiteness

 



Why do Woke activists insist on Blackwashing (or POC-washing) succesful Whites (or White-coded people)? Why don´t they talk about actual Black/colored achievements? Instead of claiming Cleopatra, why not talk about the Kandake of Nubia who actually defeated Augustus? What about the West African empires of the Middle Ages? Or, if you really want to be a radical, what about the Haitian revolution, the slave rebellion in Demerara, or some such? 

I see two possibilities. One: iconoclasm. It´s "blasphemy" to claim that succesful White or White-coded people are actually Black, Brown, Gypsy, or whatever. The whole thing can be compared to how Communists destroy religious shrines, Christians or Muslims destroy pagan shrines, and so on. 

But there is another possibility: envy. If so, the oppressed colored masses have internalized their oppression. Their reactions are implicitly White. Why are they envious of the pastimes of their White oppressors? A bit like Blackwashing White slave-owners...

Oh, and another thing. How do we even know that the Woke activists are Black or POC in the first place? 
 


Wednesday, December 6, 2023

Come and take it

 


Does Venezuela really intend to start a war with Guyana? Or is it just another Tuesday as far as centuries-old territorial disputes go?   

Saturday, December 1, 2018

Revelation on the road to Jonestown




“Jonestown: Terror in the Jungle” is a 4-part documentary directed by Leonardo DiCaprio. It deals with a topic so sick and disturbing that sensitive persons should seriously consider not watching it: the November 18, 1978 Jonestown massacre in Guyana, when cult leader Jim Jones convinced or forced 900 supporters to commit suicide. The documentary features eye witness testimony and also plays part of the so-called death tape, recording Jones´ last speech during the actual mass suicide. Of the 900 dead, 300 were children. In that case, murder is the only possible description of what happened. All the victims – except Jim Jones himself – were essentially tortured to death by cyanide poisoning. Jones shot himself, thus dying quickly. The mass suicide became inevitable when Jones had ordered the killing of US Congressman Leo Ryan, who had visited Jonestown to investigate the cult. DiCaprio´s documentary is based on a bestselling book by reporter Jeff Guinn, “The Road to Jonestown: Jim Jones and the Peoples Temple”, which I unfortunately haven´t read.

Jones, who was White, began as an anti-racist preacher and activist in Indiana. His church, later cult, was known as the Peoples Temple. It eventually moved to LA and then to San Francisco, where Jones and his followers soon became an important part of the local political landscape. Jones´ religious message was a bizarre blend of charismatic Christianity (complete with faith healing) and socialism or Communism, with a strong emphasis on racial equality. Judging by “Terror in the Jungle”, many of his followers were Black or Jewish. It´s not clear to me whether Jones really was a Christian of any kind, or simply an atheist huckster playing out a part. He certainly saw the Peoples Temple as a left-wing radical organization of some sort. They must have been the most exotic one around!

Not everything was well backstage, of course. Jones was a drug addict, sex offender and sadistic bully. Eventually exposed by the media, risking to lose his political support in the Bay Area, Jones decided on a daring move. He and his followers built a town of their own in Guyana, an English-speaking nation in South America with a large Black population and a “socialist” government. Jonestown, as the place was called, was in the middle of the Guyanese jungle, and almost impossible to reach…or escape from. Jones, who was obviously a sociopath, soon turned Jonestown into a virtual concentration camp. In 1978, a group of concerned Peoples Temple ex-members persuaded Leo Ryan to visit Guyana on a fact-finding mission. After complicated negotiations, Ryan was allowed to leave Jonestown with a small group of cult defectors, only to be gunned down by Jones loyalists at the nearby Katuma airstrip. Realizing there was no turning back, Jones then ordered the mass suicide which shocked the world. I´m frankly surprised there even are survivors of the Jonestown massacre – one of them was a man who literally saw his own wife and kid suffocate to death after taking the “Kool Aid”. He got away only because Jones ordered him to take a large sum of money in a suitcase to the Soviet embassy in Guyana´s capital Georgetown!

While the Jonestown massacre is the single worst cult suicide in recent history, perhaps all of recorded history, cult suicides are nothing new and have continued to happen. Why some “scholars of religion” actually defend cults baffles me to no end. “Jonestown: Terror in the Jungle” paints the sad picture of a charismatic psychopath systematically manipulating young, gullible and idealistic followers looking for meaning and purpose in their lives. I also got the impression that Jones had planned the mass suicide months, even years, in advance when Jonestown failed living up to his expectations. He started preaching “revolutionary suicide” and probably saw his chance when Ryan, apparently suspecting very little, stepped right into it. The left-wing message may have been real once (I assume small town Indiana didn´t have a huge market for anti-racist activism) but became just another tool of cultic self-aggrandizement by the time Jones moved his operation to liberal urban California. I admit that “Jonestown: Terror in the Jungle” made me feel very pessimistic. What are the guarantees that it won´t happen again? None, of course. It *will* happen again, just as sure as war and genocide will do so.

Somehow, it feels that the only winner in this competition is “Reverend” Jim Jones, the worst serial killer in American history.

Friday, September 14, 2018

Stuck in the Burnham era




“Guyana: Politics, Economics, Society. Beyond the Burnham Era” is, despite its title, a book about the Burnham era in Guyana. The British edition is, somewhat confusingly, titled “The Co-operative Republic of Guyana: Politics, Economics and Society”. As far as I can tell, it's the same book.

Guyana is a former British colony on the South American mainland. Culturally, it's part of the Caribbean. The main ethnic groups are the Afro-Guyanese (descendants of Black slaves) and the Indo-Guyanese (descendants of immigrants from India). During the Cold War, Guyanese politics revolved around attempts by the Western powers to undermine the Marxist and pro-Soviet People's Progressive Party (PPP) of Indo-Guyanese activist Cheddi Jagan. The PPP was the largest single party in the country. Jagan briefly served as prime minister. One of the Western “assets” in the struggle against Jagan was Forbes Burnham, the leader of a predominantly Afro-Guyanese breakaway from the PPP, the People's National Congress (PNC). Ironically, Burnham later “moved to the left” and turned Guyana into an authoritarian socialist state, known officially as the Co-operative Republic (but apparently without much cooperatives)!

Burnham's regime nationalized 80% of the economy, supported the struggle against apartheid in southern Africa (Cuban fighter planes on their way to Angola were allowed to refuel in Guyana) and had good relations with Black nationalists in the United States. An unfortunate result of the latter policy was that Burnham's government allowed American reverend Jim Jones and the Peoples Temple to settle in Guyana. Jones was White but his cult was apparently part of the Afro-nationalist milieu. Due to Guyana's precarious geopolitical position as a socialist state on the US backyard, Burnham preferred non-alignment to full pro-Sovietism. Initially, he had better relations with China (during the US-Chinese thaw á la Kissinger) than with the Soviet Union, and the idea of “co-operative socialism” sounds similar to Tito's “self-management” schemes in Yugoslavia. Relations with Cuba and the Soviet Union were cautiously developed over time.

Internally, Burnham's regime proved repressive. The elections were rigged, opposition meetings frequently broken up, anti-government activists murdered (most notorious is the 1980 killing of Walter Rodney, a left-wing radical critical of Burnham's rule) and labor unions with the wrong political affiliations dumped from negotiations. The strongest opposition party was still Jagan's PPP. Burnham based his power on the state bureaucracy and the military, while his political party, the PNC, was actually a rather weak organization. It consisted mostly of candidate members, since full members were expected to contribute a large portion of their incomes to the party (or perhaps the Burnham machine at large).

Burnham seems to have used the pro-Soviet PPP as a foil in order to cast himself in the role of “lesser evil”. His delicate balancing act between East and West seems to have worked. The PNC managed to stay in power even after Burnham's unexpected death in 1985, but in 1992, Burnham's perennial nemesis Cheddi Jagan finally became president after a democratic election. By then, the Soviet bloc had already collapsed and the world had changed fundamentally. But that, as they say, is another story.

“Guyana: Politics, Economics and Society” is badly written, and often sounds more like a sociology treatise or detailed report on every little sub-committee of the Guyanese state apparatus or PNC ditto. You have to sift through this book really carefully to find the information that might be useful. For that reason, I only give it two stars. And yes, the title (or titles) are confusing…