Showing posts with label Pennsylvania. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pennsylvania. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Cross-references aren´t divinely inspired, you fuckheads

 


This is *really* low IQ, or perhaps an early April Fool´s joke? Or is there a "Christian" version of Reddit? 

Anyone who takes this seriously deserves a punch in the face. Modern cross-references doesn´t fucking prove that God wrote the Bible. Anymore than ditto footnotes or maps of Paul´s journeys. Note also that the Bible is said to have 66 books. Ahem, yeah, so about that...that´s the Protestant version of the canon, you morons, which isn´t even original.

So the "research" was simply to program a computer with all the standard (Protestant) Biblical cross-references? You know, the ones put there by a 21st century editor. "The Bible Code" wasn´t true either, but at least it wasn´t this lazy! The skeptics had to do *some* legwork on that one.

Somebody should be fired for this.   

New Bible analysis uncovers thousands of clues suggesting scripture written by God

Monday, January 19, 2026

Sasquatch contactee

 


This pro-Bigfoot channel on YouTube has taken a paranormal turn lately. This long video is about something the content-creator dubs "the New Skinwalker Ranch". It´s a location in rural Pennsylvania where cameras are picking up some strange stuff which may or may not be Bigfoot-related. The owner of the ranch seems to be a virtual Sasquatch contactee who claims that there´s a lot of cryptid and paranormal activity in the area, including mysterious handprints. DNA studies have been inconclusive so far. There are also spooky vocalizations, small rocks thrown seemingly out of nowhere, and *something* knocking on the farm walls in the dead of night...

Hauntings of this type do happen here and there, suggesting that something "objective" might be going on. But what? Electromagnetism? Hallucinations induced by said electromagnetism? A really obsessive prankster? Maybe "They" move in and through the EM effects. I´m not sure if anything conclusive ever came out of the original Skinwalker Ranch (the one in Utah), but I can hadly fault our fellow citizens for trying to find out! 

Wednesday, December 24, 2025

Bellwether counties

 


???!!! Scott Carney believes that the Trump campaign stole the 2024 POTUS elections by manipulating the computer software. Some of the counties reporting election results *don´t even exist*. Yes: phantom counties?! 

Of course, Trump supporters believe that the large number of (very real) "bellwether counties" switching to Biden in 2020 proves *those* elections were rigged. 

Still, fake counties is surely a new one! 

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Blasphemy

 


And today we have Woke cancel culture and hate speech laws. And soon, anti-Woke ditto in the wake of a certain recent event. Each time has its own blasphemy, it seems...

Is it true that blasphemy laws existed in the early United States despite the First Amendement?

Yes, it is true that blasphemy laws existed in the early United States even after the ratification of the First Amendment (1791). These laws were primarily at the state level, and they coexisted with federal constitutional protections for freedom of religion and speech. The apparent contradiction stems from the limited scope of the First Amendment in its early interpretation.


🧾 Historical Context

🔹 The First Amendment (1791)

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

  • At the time of its adoption, the First Amendment applied only to the federal government.

  • It did not initially restrict state governments, which continued to enforce their own laws on religion and speech, including blasphemy laws.


⚖️ Examples of Early Blasphemy Laws

1. Massachusetts

  • Had a blasphemy law as early as the 17th century, carried into the 19th.

  • In 1838, Abner Kneeland, a freethinker and former Universalist minister, was convicted of blasphemy under Massachusetts law for publishing writings that denied the existence of God.

2. Pennsylvania

  • Maintained laws criminalizing blasphemy well into the 1800s.

  • The 1824 case Commonwealth v. Kneeland upheld a blasphemy conviction.

3. Maine and New York

  • Also had blasphemy statutes on the books during the 18th and 19th centuries.

These laws typically prohibited denial of the Bible, mockery of Jesus, or offensive speech against Christian doctrines.


🧠 Why Were These Laws Possible?

  • The Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment, was seen as a limitation on federal power only.

  • States retained the authority to define public morality and regulate religious expression until the 14th Amendment (1868) and its later interpretation in the 20th century.


⚖️ Shift in Legal Doctrine: Incorporation

  • The “incorporation doctrine” (developed through 20th-century Supreme Court cases) applied most of the Bill of Rights to the states via the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.

  • Key decisions:

    • Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940) — Incorporated the Free Exercise Clause.

    • Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (1952) — Struck down a New York blasphemy law as unconstitutional, recognizing blasphemy bans as violations of free speech.


✅ Summary

AspectExplanation
Blasphemy laws existedYes, in many U.S. states, especially in the 18th and 19th centuries
First Amendment protectionInitially limited to federal laws only
States could criminalize blasphemyUntil mid-20th century incorporation of the First Amendment
Current statusBlasphemy laws are unenforceable and unconstitutional under modern interpretations of free speech

If you’re interested, I can provide original texts of some early state blasphemy laws or details about famous blasphemy trials in U.S. history.

Details about famous blasphemy trials in US history.

Certainly. Here are some of the most notable blasphemy trials in U.S. history, which illustrate how Christian morality and legal authority shaped early American legal systems—despite the First Amendment—and how courts eventually shifted toward greater freedom of speech and religion.


⚖️ 1. Abner Kneeland (Massachusetts, 1838)

🧑‍🏫 Background:

  • Abner Kneeland was a former Universalist preacher who became a freethinker, atheist, and publisher.

  • He founded a secular newspaper, The Boston Investigator, in which he published critiques of Christianity and statements denying God’s existence.

💥 The Charges:

  • Convicted under the Massachusetts blasphemy statute, which prohibited public statements "contumeliously reproaching" the Christian religion.

  • Offending quote: He declared that he “did not believe in a God any more than he believed in any other non-existent being.”

⚖️ Verdict and Significance:

  • Found guilty of blasphemy in 1838 and sentenced to 60 days in jail.

  • His conviction became a national free speech controversy.

  • Ralph Waldo Emerson and others defended him as a victim of religious intolerance.

📌 Legacy: Last person jailed for blasphemy in U.S. history. Sparked debate about religious freedom vs. public morality.


⚖️ 2. Ruggles Case (New York, 1811)

(People v. Ruggles, 8 Johns. R. 290 N.Y. 1811)

🧑‍🏫 Background:

  • John Ruggles, while drunk, gave a public speech in which he denounced Christianity and Jesus in vulgar terms.

  • He was charged with blasphemy under New York common law, which protected Christian doctrines.

⚖️ Verdict:

  • Found guilty by the New York Supreme Court, which ruled:

    “Christianity is part of the common law... to revile it is to threaten the moral foundations of society.”

📌 Legacy: Landmark case confirming that blasphemy could be prosecuted under common law, even without a written statute. Later overturned by evolving constitutional interpretation.


⚖️ 3. Commonwealth v. Kneeland (Massachusetts, 1838)

Note: This is the official case title of the Abner Kneeland trial. Included here again because it's one of the few well-documented blasphemy prosecutions under a written statute.


⚖️ 4. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (New York, 1952)

(Also called “The Miracle Decision”)

🧑‍🏫 Background:

  • A short film by Roberto Rossellini, The Miracle, was accused of being blasphemous by Catholic authorities and banned in New York.

  • The state’s censorship board revoked its license, citing a law banning sacrilegious content in films.

⚖️ Verdict:

  • The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the New York law as unconstitutional.

  • Ruled that "blasphemy is not a valid ground to suppress free expression."

📌 Legacy: This decision ended the enforceability of blasphemy laws in the United States.


⚖️ 5. Kalman v. Cortes (Pennsylvania, 2010)

🧑‍🏫 Background:

  • A satirical church, "The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster," challenged Pennsylvania’s ban on blasphemous corporate names after its application was denied.

⚖️ Verdict:

  • The state eventually revoked the blasphemy clause, recognizing it as unconstitutional under modern free speech law.

📌 Legacy: Confirmed that blasphemy statutes are obsolete under the First Amendment.


📜 Summary Timeline

YearCaseOutcome
1811People v. Ruggles (NY)Blasphemy upheld under common law
1838Commonwealth v. Kneeland (MA)Conviction under statute; jailed
1952Burstyn v. Wilson (SCOTUS)Blasphemy law struck down
2010Kalman v. Cortes (PA)Blasphemy provision repealed

📌 Conclusion

  • Blasphemy prosecutions were real in early American history, especially in states like Massachusetts and New York, and upheld on the basis of Christian moral order.

  • These laws gradually eroded due to the expansion of First Amendment protections in the 20th century.

  • Today, blasphemy laws are unenforceable in the U.S., though some remain on the books in outdated statutes.


Would you like full-text excerpts from any of these trial decisions, or a global comparison of how other countries still enforce blasphemy laws? 

Saturday, December 14, 2024

DRONE INVASION

 

AI´s dramatic take on a drone fleet
above New Jersey!

Geezus, I´ve been looking at YouTube clips (often from local news broadcasts) and it seems the United States is *lit* at the moment. EVERYONE IS SEEING THE DRONES. The flap has now extended to at least half a dozen states, the westernmost being Indiana. A reporter saw 50 of them over New Jersey in just one night and even filmed two of them?! A talking head on TV claims that this stuff has been ongoing since 2017, yet none have ever been captured or shot down...

Et cetera.

No idea what´s going on, obviously. I suppose it could be a ChiCom or Russian intelligence operation, but more likely explanations include mass hysteria (I mean, people in NJ see the Jersey Devil on a semi-regular basis), mad engineering dorks testing little trinkets in their spare time, USAF finally getting their drone acts together, or MK-Ultra psy-opping everyone in the Lower 48. 

Probably not the fairies, then. And most certainly not aliens, either.

Chill, guyz. They are yours!   

   

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

"Genocide Josh"

 


A recent poll in Pennsylvania suggests that Kamala Harris may have lost the battleground state due to her decision *not* to make Josh Shapiro her running mate. 

Maybe.

But would it have helped the Democrats overall to have the pro-Israeli Jew Shapiro as their VP nominee? They might have lost Michigan even faster than they actually did. Even more "progressive leftists" might have stayed away from the elections altogether. Conversely, *really* hardcore supporters of Israel, Jew and Gentile alike, would still have found Trump more to their liking. 

So I´m not entirely convinced.   

Choosing Walz over Shapiro hurt Harris in Pennsylvania

Josh Shapiro may have been too pro-Israel

"Anti-semitic campaign" against Josh Shapiro

Sunday, November 10, 2024

Unsustainable

 


Michael Tracey´s first post-election article on Trump´s victory. It´s interesting to note that Tracey called the elections in 2016, 2020 and 2024. So what need is there for pollsters and pundits if a "roving reporter" in a rented car can make better predictions? 

Liberal anguish over Trump

Saturday, November 9, 2024

Just get out the vote, dude

 


This is a transcript of a weird statement by an actual Democrat staffer in Pennsylvania, who presumably identifies as Queer, made in the aftermath of Trump´s election victory.

His/her point seems to be that the Harris campaign didn´t hire enough Queers of color and that the White Queers (and autists?) who were hired are racists. So are all other White people. The whole thing comes across as a Woke therapy session, rather than a serious post-election analysis.

A propos recent claims *by Democrats* that the emphasis on transgenderism may have lost Harris the White House...

>>>One common theme a lot of the people of color on this campaign experienced was that whenever they actually had concerns or elevated microaggressions or weren't feeling heard, and they tried to elevate these they were pushed to the side, brushed to the side, not listened to, not taken seriously, and we see what the results of that have been. Now this is no surprise. This is what the Democratic Party has always been. However, it is shocking and highly, highly irresponsible to be putting people in positions of power that act this way on a campaign for a black woman.

>>>It makes no sense to me, and as a direct result of my experience on this campaign, I feel the need to remind white people that even if you are queer or neurodivergent and you identify with a minority group, that does not exclude you from acts of racism, from doing microaggressions, from centering yourself in conversations where you don't need to be centered.

>>>If you want to be a true ally to people of color, if you want to be a true ally to the positions you say that you believe in support, you need to make room in space for the people who are directly impacted by those decisions, and not center yourself just because you think you identify with one or the other minority identities.

>>>Far too often in this campaign, we felt like we were settling our diversity quota by taking queer white people and putting them in positions of power, not understanding that at the core of their being, if they haven't unlearned their toxic whiteness and white fragility, that they would see all of their decisions through the lens of a person that is more aligned and more fitting with a Trump presidency than that of a presidency of Kamala Harris. >>>One thing that we know is that this country runs on racism, and so it should be no shock that the same thing our country runs on, so do our parties, both left and right. So I'm not surprised that we lost, and a lot of people of color weren't surprised that we lost, but there were a lot of tears from white faces wondering, how could this happen? >>>Crying, not because their rights are going to be stripped. Crying, not because they are going to lose access to health care or lose access to getting their transition medication or being demonized for their mere existence, not because they're going to be continually priced out of the things that they deserve as American people, or have their parents deported back to a different country, but because they were at the center of something and they didn't get what they wanted...

Original tweet/video

Wednesday, November 6, 2024

The Tracey trifecta

 


OK, I´m going to wrap up this election night with a third contribution by Michael Tracey, this time about the end of the election campaign and undecided voters in Pennsylvania. Also quite interesting!

Happy Election Day

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

They can send men to the Moon...

 


...but they can´t make election machines work in a battleground state in 2024. Makes you wonder about a lot of things. Like, did they ever go the Moon in the first place?!

My understanding is that this is "Trump country", so probably not election fraud, since the local GOP officials presumably want the votes to be counted. Maybe this is the first and only time Cambria County has been in the international news! 

Or at least in Denmark and Sweden. Below is the original US (or Cambrian County) news story.  

Voting issues in Pennsylvania

Monday, October 21, 2024

Friendly fascism?

 


Would you buy a used McDonald´s from this guy? I admit that this made me laugh, for good or for worse. 

And yes, it really is Donald Trump, who now claims that he worked at McDonald´s "fifteen minutes longer than Kamala"...

Clip from YouTube.  

Thursday, October 3, 2024

Wednesday, September 11, 2024

"Alla vet att hon är marxist"

 


Har inte orkat kolla på debatten mellan Trump och Harris, men den roligaste repliken verkar ha varit när Trump sade "alla vet att hon är marxist". Eh?

Antagligen p.g.a. ett utspel från Harris om prisstopp. Richard Nixons osalige ande harklar sig besvärat...

Friday, August 16, 2024

On the campaign trail

 

Me, trying to sit out the POTUS elections

The election campaign in the US is heating up. Links below are to the pro-Trump Breitbart News site. Some cynical comments...

Even if the allegations against Walz about Chinese ties are true, I´m pretty sure most American politicians did pretty much the same thing until, say, 10 years ago. So the only difference would be that Walz was stupid enough to continue in the same vein throughout the Trump years. 

As for pro-Palestinian activists not voting for Kamala Harris...LOL. What are the chances? So probably a nothingburger. But sure, the slogan "Kamala, you can´t hide, we won´t vote for genocide" is almost bizarrely brilliant. I mean, who´s behind it? The Revolutionary Communist Party? The Revolutionary Workers League? Dude!

The polling results from Pennsylvania (an important swing state) are strange. Note that voters under 40 prefer Trump with a 18-point margin! Less surprising, perhaps, is that atheists overwhelmingly (84%) support Harris. If Robert F Kennedy Jr is included in the polls, Trump and Harris are tied at 47% each of the total Pennsylvanian vote. So perhaps RFK Jr can still play a role in the November elections? Or at least create havoc!

And it´s only August. Still awaiting the October surprise with much fear and trembling...  

House Oversight Committee to launch investigation into Tim Walz´s Chinese connections

Pro-Palestinian protesters set to crash Harris-Walz coronation

Trump leads Kamala in Pennsylvania

Tuesday, August 6, 2024

I speak in love

 

Sheikh Hassina, no relation to US elections!


Why did Kamala Harris pick Walz rather than Shapiro to be her running mate? 

Because Jews and "asshole" Pennsylvanians will vote Democrat even if she picks Walz. However, Muslims, Arabs and Antifas will *not* vote Democrat if she picks Shapiro. So Walz it is.

Simple as.  

Monday, July 15, 2024

Suicide by Trump?

 


It would be bizarre (and yet fitting somehow) if the suspected attacker in the Trump assassination attempt turns out to be a radicalized right-wing Incel who had a mental breakdown and wanted to be killed. Fitting? Well, look around you. 

Our entire society is insane, the opposition is frequently just as bad as the establishment, there is a mental health crisis both "left" and "right", so *of course* Trump and his supporters were attacked by somebody who "should" have been one of them...

Which doesn´t exclude a conspiracy, of course. Or even rank incompetence. Which may be even worse in the long run. Image being governed by a bunch of fools who can´t even hatch a conspiracy properly!

Will the center hold, I wonder?