I actually agree with a recent statement by Pete Hegseth that Ukraine can´t become a NATO member and can´t go back to the pre-2014 borders. The maximum Ukraine can get would be a return to the 2022 status quo bellum ante. The problem, of course, is that Russia would see this as a defeat. They started the war precisely to upend this status quo. So they are unlikely to settle for anything less than keeping what they are currently holding - which is far more than they had before 2022.
And what is Hegseth proposing to do about *that*? He says in a recent interview that the EU should take most of the responsibility for lethal and nonlethal aid to Ukraine. This is a recipe for defeat since the EU simply doesn´t have enough military equipment (or even stamina) to defeat Russia. Hegseth´s proposal to hurt Russia by crashing the oil market prices is more interesting, but how realistic is it? Wouldn´t the Democrats have tried it already if it´s an obviously winning strategy? I don´t think they were *that* afraid of the Green lobby!
It´s also peculiar that Hegseth says he wants to prioritize the US confrontation with China, since Russia (for the nth time) *is a Chinese ally* and perhaps even a kind of Chinese proxy. How is winning the war in Ukraine *not* part of "confronting China"?
One reason why the war started is that Russia gave the Western powers a bizarre ultimatum, essentially demanding the dissolution or emasculation of NATO. Letting the European NATO members fight Russia alone sounds a bit too close for comfort to that scenario...
Pete Hegseth calls for end of Ukraine war