| No relation to Adolf Hitler either! Credit: MennasDosbin |
This is breaking the interwebs right now. I mean, it *is* a bit strange. Especially since this politician represents SWAPO, not the DTA?! See what I just did there? :P
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
| - Welcome, seeker, let me teach you comparative religion! |
Two quotes from the introduction to "The Occult Roots of Religious Studies" (2021), edited by Yves Mühlematter and Helmut Zander. The entire book seems to be available free at Academia.edu, so I might read all of it when I get the time. Another contribution to the genre "everyone was really an occultist", apparently. Bingo!
>>>For example, the anthroposophical milieu has not been researched sufficiently. One could think of the anthroposophist Uno Donner, a Finnish industrialist, who donated a chair for religious and cultural history to the University of Turku/Åbo and and also donated/held one of the largest book collections on religion in Northern Europe.
>>>Another would be the German Diether Lauenstein, priest of the Christian Community, who learned Sanskrit from the Marburg indologist Johannes Nobel, habilitated (presumably) in 1944 at the University of Greifswald, where he subsequently received a teaching assignment for Indo-European Studies and Sanskrit. He was involved in the founding of the Herdecke community hospital (a nucleus of the University of Witten-Herdecke) and died as a supporter of apartheid in South West Africa (modern-day Namibia). We thank Robin Schmidt for the clues.
(...)
>>>However, this problem is not specific to representatives of the cultural sciences; rather, these blurred boundaries can also and especially be found in the “hard” natural sciences, where an even clearer distinction between science and pseudo-science, or religious studies, is often assumed.
>>>Such examples include Marie Curie, who not only stood in the laboratory, but also attended spiritual seances, or Albert Einstein, who was not only a theorist in the field of physics, but also read Blavatsky and attended lectures by Rudolf Steiner.
>>>Georg Cantor, the inventor of set theory in mathematics, who was interested in both Catholic theories of infinity and the existence of the “true” Rosicrucians, may be added to this group, along with the mathematician Jan Arnoldus Schouten, the explorer of differential geometry, who was also interested in Theosophy, or Thomas Alva Edison, who not only invented the light bulb and the two-way telegraph, but was also a temporary member of Theosophical Society Adyar (partly for economic reasons, e.g. to better sell his products in India?).
>>>The separation between the humanities and the natural sciences, which was established in university practice – though always criticised in theory of science – never disappeared on an individual level.
"Mad Max: Fury Road" is a 2015 motion picture, set in a post-apocalyptic landscape, perhaps in Australia. The film also has strong traits of the fantasy genre. It seems to be extremely popular, but I admit that I don´t understand why. To me, it comes across as a parody of a dystopian post-apocalyptic movie. The tropes are so exaggerated that they are difficult to take seriously. But sure, maybe I´m missing some kind of self-referential irony? (Did you note the rock band atop one of the warrior trucks, by the way?)
And if you love action, well, the "plot" of this flick is essentially one long road battle. There is also a "feminist" element, since most of the good guys are females, while all of the bad guys are male (or perhaps male-ish mutant creatures). However, the gorgeous looks of most of the women tells us that "Mad Max: Fury Road" probably isn´t intended for a female audience...
The plot, such as it is, doesn´t really revolve around the road warrior Mad Max, who comes across more like a supporting character. The main protagonists are the female warrior Furiosa and a truly bizarre cult leader, Immortan Joe. The latter´s citadel is inhabited by "warboys", some kind of brainwashed mutants convinced that they are going to Valhalla if killed in combat on behalf of Joe. For some reason, there are also ordinary people in the citadel, mostly treated as dirt by the cultists. Do they use them for organ harvesting, or what? Furiosa, who works for Immortan Joe, decides to escape in a large truck (rig), searching for a mysterious green place inhabited by Amazons with Irish-sounding names. She also takes Joe´s wives with her. After various action-packed situations, Max and a de-programmed warboy decides to help Furiosa find the Promised Land...which turns out to be a pipe dream.
In the final part of "Fury Road", this unlikely band of sisters (and two brothers) decide to turn back to the Citadel and take it by storm. When it turns out that Immortan Joe is dead, both the cultists and the half-crazed ordinary humans apparently start worshipping Furiosa as their new deity, while Mad Max blends with the crowd and presumably absconds, perhaps to a sequel.
Not sure if this counts as a happy ending, tbh. But there you go. Not sure why this moved people almost ten years ago...
![]() |
| Credit: BigSugarDaddy |
"Namib: Skeleton Coast and Beyond" is a BBC nature documentary in the series "Eden: Untamed Planet". This time the BBC crew did manage to find an area almost devoid of Homo sapiens: the Namib, a coastal desert in southern Africa. Unless I´m mistaken, the docu is taped in the Namibian-Angolan border region.
For a "desert", I have to say that the Namib is teaming with life, both large and small. Among the larger are lions, enormous flocks of ostriches, oryx, giraffes, elephants, fur seals, jackals and hyenas. The elephants consume seeds containing water, while the jackals and hyenas (unsurprisingly) eat dead seal cubs, the seals themselves of course consuming fish.
100 days of the year, the sand dunes of the Namib are watered by sea fog, the same fog that makes the coastal area dangerous for ships, earning it the nickname "Skeleton Coast". All kinds of smaller animals thrive on the dunes (and in them): termites, ants, frogs, scorpions...
After seeing this, I wonder whether humans might be the only life form that usually avoids this region!
"Namib: Skeleton Coast and Beyond" ends with the usual climate change pitch, the temperature in the desert rising, but I somehow suspect that these creatures will survive or even thrive regardless...or simply move. The Namib desert has apparently existed for 55 million years, so it´s not clear to me why it would need "saving" at all.
Yes, this is Eden.
| Credit: Eric Hill |
Here´s a second and hopefully better
attempt to review the French nature documentary "L´abominable mystère des fleurs".
Apparently, Charles Darwin regarded the origins and evolution of the flowering
plants or angiosperms an “abominable mystery” due to their seemingly rapid evolution
and diversification. The documentary tries to shed at least some light on the
problematique. One of the scientists featured is named Sarah Darwin and actually
is a descendant of Charles Robert!
If I understand the documentary correctly, 90% of all plant species are
flowering plants. They are believed to have evolved about 100 million years
ago. At the very least, the oldest known fossil of an angiosperm is that old. If
I understand it correctly, this fossil is already quite “advanced”. However, genetic
studies of Amborella – a peculiar species endemic to New Caledonia and believed
to be the last surviving member of a “basal” angiosperm lineage – suggest an
origin already 140 – 250 million years ago. This gives ample time for flowering
plants to evolve and diversify before they were preserved in the fossil record.
Later, 214 million YBP was chosen as the definitive date. Hypothetically, the
first flower was believed to have looked like a water lily! Somehow, I´m not surprised
– I always got some kind of “dinosaur” vibes from those (but maybe that´s
because of some old horror flick).
The most fascinating plant shown in the documentary is easily the
Welwitschia, which is a gymnosperm rather than an angiosperm. Only found in Namibia
and Angola, some specimens can become 2,000 years old (!). It´s also an
extremely ancient lineage. Apparently, the Welwitschia has a kind of “failed
flowers”, which has led scientists to wonder if it could be a (failed?)
transitional form between Gymnospermae and flowering plants. Genetic studies
suggest that there are similarities between how the Welwitschia forms its
pseudo-flowers and how real flowers are formed. This could be a missing link
establishing that the angiosperms are indeed descended from gymnosperms in truly
primordial times.
Other topics covered in the docu are equally interesting. Thus, most
flowers aren´t blue, which is also something of a conundrum, since insects apparently
“like” blue colors! They are easily drawn to them. It seems most flowering
plants have difficulty for various reasons related to chemistry and soil quality
to produce blue pigments. However, there are ways around this. For instance,
some non-blue flowers can produce the blue color by simply reflecting the light
that way. More surprising is the hypothesis that flowering plants can pick up
sounds! The buzzing of an insect can somehow be detected by the petals of a
flower. The producers of the documentary have humorously placed two musicians
in the middle of a poppy field, where they play Rimsky-Korsakov´s “The Flight
of the Bumblebee”!
And yes, the documentary is available in an English-language version, with
the ridiculous title “Flower Power: The Mysterious Conqueror”.
| Credit: Thomas Schoch |
"L´abominable mystère des fleurs" (The Abominable Mystery of Flowers) is a French nature documentary. The title is apparently a reference to a statement by Charles Darwin, who considered the fast evolution of flowering plants to be a serious problem for his theory. It´s therefore somewhat piquant that one of the scientists featured is named Sarah Darwin. And yes, she really is a descendant of Charles Robert!
The docu takes us to a literally blooming desert in Namibia, an 800-year young (and very bizarre) Welwitschia plant (also in Namibia), the French Alps and assorted laboratories. On the main island of New Caledonia, the scientists pluck an Amborella, the only species left of the oldest flowering plant lineage in Earth history (or something to that effect).
The evolution of flowering plants was clearly stimulated by insect pollinators, and geographical isolation can speed up speciation.
But somehow, we knew that already. More intriguing is the research done on the Welwitschia plant, which is a gymnosperm. Presumably, the flowering plants (angiosperms) must have evolved from gymnosperms. And indeed, the Welwitschia turns out to have a kind of pseudo-flowers which are genetically similar to the real thing! Is this an actual "transitional form" still around today?
It seems Charles Darwin was right, after all. Next week: Einstein right, too?
I didn´t know that possession by mermaid spirits (!) was a thing, and that charismatic Christians try to exorcise them. Not just in Namibia, but also in the United States?!
Note how the little girl is being publicly exorcized with the full support of her parents. Her "crime" is apparently that she said she was a mermaid after seeing a fake documentary on YouTube...
I knew that some charismatics were wild, but this trumped even my worst expectations!
The clip is narrated by a former exorcist (!!) who is now an atheist.
| A winged snake? Sounds delicious! |
Cryptozoologist (or perhaps folklorist) Karl Shuker strikes again, this time with a highly entertaining article about "flying snakes", which are apparently seen on a semi-regular basis all around the world. Namibia, Bulgaria, ancient Egypt and even London are some of the places where this cryptid (completely unknown to me until now) has supposedly showed its fangs and, I suppose, wing membranes.
Do I believe it?
Not a chance. I´m not an anatomist, but I´m sure snakes with wings are as impossible as pigs that fly or moose that hover, so *this* won´t worry me a bit when I take a stroll outside tomorrow morning. But OK, I don´t live anywhere near Namibia (or London, for that matter) so perchance I speak too early?