Sacred trust

 

This is something of a rant, but here we go anyway...

If Trump really is Hitler, why is it a "sacred responsibility" (or whatever) to hand over power to him in an "ordered and peaceful transition"? It´s almost as if the Dems were full of BS when they said that Trump was a fascist. You know, waving the bloody shirt and all that...

True, nobody *really* knows what the Don wants to do (maybe not even himself), but as of now, his administration seems set to become a hybrid between a regular Republican administration and barely controlled chaos. In other words, like - you know - Trump´s first term. Which we all somehow survived. 

That being said, sure, it might be much worse this time. The whole world does seem uncomfortably crazy right now. But what is the liberal alternative to *that*? The hybrid between a regular Democrat administration and barely controlled chaos America got under Biden?

The "fascist" Trump couldn´t stop Biden in 2020-2021, anymore than the "Resistance" could (or even would) stop Trump in 2024-2025. Who´s really in charge over there? Maybe the real question is: When will the autopilot stop working?    

The greatest story ever sold

 

Credit: Gage Skidmore

Some weeks ago, I spotted something peculiar in an otherwise very “serious” and “official” bookstore: an occasional magazine about Donald Trump, with yuge and amazing photos of same. Leafing through it, I even noticed pics of the Q Shaman. And, the strangest thing of all: the text is in Swedish?! At first, I took no action, but on second thoughts, I returned to said bookstore and picked up a copy for 140 kronor. 

The magazine-like publication is simply titled “Donald Trump” in the Swedish edition, which is published by a Norwegian outlet and printed in Latvia. The original is British: “Story of Trump” by Future Publishing. The publication year is given as 2024, but I don´t see the exact date. However, on internal evidence, it must have been in May or June. Joe Biden was still the Dem candidate, and neither the RNC nor the DNC are featured. However, the Swedish edition actually states in a photo caption that Biden is no longer running, but without mentioning Harris! There is nothing on the assassination attempts.

I admit that I only read a few pages of this peculiar mag, translated to somewhat artificial Swedish. The text seems remarkably “objective”, suggesting that “Story for Trump” is intended for a very wide audience. If it works is perhaps another matter – surely almost nobody wants an “objective” look on Trump? 

The magazine follows Trump´s career, expounds on his celebrity status, and (of course) his presidential campaigns. The storming of the Capitol is prominently featured. The photos are good, including some pretty bizarre ones from J6 (the Q Shaman wasn´t the only weird character present). Almost worth the entire price of this strange product…

The greatest story ever told? Or at the very least, sold.

Over and out!   

Sic transit gloria mundi

 

I feel like linking to this, originally posted just a week after J6. The comments about Kamala Harris are insane and should not be taken seriously, LOL. The real point of the little novella is something else entirely... 

A Message from the Future

No epiphany

 

- Tell us something new, dude!

The least surprising news item this year?

Mike Pence won´t be endorsing Trump

Stämningsbild

 

 

When prophecy succeeds

 

When prophecy succeeds, you have to deny it ever did...

I´m old enough to remember 1990. Nobody back then could have predicted what took place 2016-22. Except maybe...fringe people. 

Or the Illuminati. 

The 1990 card game that "predicted" 9/11, Donald Trump, Covid and the Capitol Riot

You heard it from me first

 

Take a very good look at the guy above. If the Democrats stop Donald Trump from running in 2024, this man might become the next president of the United States...

Be very, very, very careful what you wish for!  

No more quiet nights

"Independence Day: Resurgence" is a 2016 sequel to the classic "Independence Day" from 1996. Since the spectacular original already exists, "Resurgence" simply doesn´t have that future classic vibe. But sure, if you liked ID4, you will probably like this one, too. For starters, we get to see more of the aliens, their starships and their social structure. The crazy hippy scientist is back, and so is "the old Jewish dad". The UFO cultists are notable by their absence, though, but then, they got fried already in the first flick! A new race of aliens is introduced, which unsurprisingly turns out to be "virtual" (as in sentient super-computers of the globular kind). The weakest part of "Resurgence" are the new human characters. And yes, there seem to be some loans from "Starship Troopers"... 

A weird fact: in ID4, fictitious and clean-shaven president Whitmore says "We will not go quietly into the night". Whitmore also plays an important part in "Resurgence", where he is bearded. Now, I seem to recall that Senator Ted Cruz used those exact words at the pro-Trump rally before the faux insurrection at the Capitol in 2021. At the time, Cruz had a beard, and hence looked pretty much like Whitmore! A co-incidence? Or was the senator from Texas consciously mimicking an actor from this film?

"Independence Day: Resurgence" ends with humanity gaining knowledge about the homeworld of the Harversters, as the evil aliens are called, and it´s implied that Homo sapiens (sapiens) will one day take the struggle there, to wipe out the oversized bugs once and for all. Perhaps in 2036, we will thus see the closure of this syfy extravaganza? 

We certainly won´t go quietly into the night...

Truth dies in media limelight

 

I happen to "stand with Ukraine", but the meme-maker who made the above does have a certain point. He even missed a couple of media hoaxes, I mean, how many people *really* believe that Epstein killed himself? That the presidential elections in Rwanda are free and fair? Or that the US navy disclosed shit about UFOs? 

Politix (and memetic war) are complicated thingamajigs...   

The irony is palpable

Yesterday, a Swedish reporter marooned in Moscow gave the following report on the situation in the Russian capital. A lot of anti-war protesters have been arrested by the police, the protests broken up rather brutally. Also, there is censorship on the web. For instance, Estonian TV have been banned from the Russian airwaves. Everyone who doesn´t follow the line of the regime risks repressive sanctions.

Undoubtedly true. And disturbing. And scandalous. Of course!

There is just one little problem.

Are there *some other* nations in the world where protests have been violently suppressed by a brutal police force? Where alternative viewpoints are censored on the web? Where the government goes after you, if you "spread misinformation" on social media platforms? Indeed, where elected officials are banned from such platforms, and (who knows) maybe even elections are rigged? 

Well, I don´t know. But I certainly heard, shall we say, rumours that such things are prone to happen in places like the United States, Canada, the Netherlands, Australia, Germany, the United Kingdom...

I´ve even heard whispers about state of emergencies that lasted for two years, and government-approved stormtroopers and lumpen gangs roving the streets looking for people with the wrong kind of texts on their T-shirts.

Is it as bad as Putin´s Russia? Or as Kiev under Russian bombardment? Of course not. But at least now we know where "they" got the idea from! 

Var går Aftonbladets gräns?

En enkel fråga till Aftonbladet. Vem väljer ni: Trump eller Putin? Notoriskt svårt att ta ställning för demokratiskt valda presidenter, eller? 

A message from the future

Originally posted on January 14, last year, about a week after the storming of the Capitol and the effective end of the Trump presidency. Reposted with permission from myself!

As I, Ashtar, was strolling pass the local bird lake this morning, a White crane mysteriously appeared out of nowhere and just as mysteriously vanished. When I looked at the spot of this splendid apparition, I found a most remarkable object, a scripture with unusual hieroglyphs engraved on copper plates. As I meditated deeply on what had just transpired, my mind was filled with a supernal light which made it possible for me, a mere mortal, to comprehend its strange and wonderful contents. The scripture, which I at first glance had assumed to be the artifact of some ancient civilization, turned out to be *from the future*. It told the story of the Neo-Japanese Empire, established in North America in the year 2300. It also turned out to contain a history of the United States, including our own time! I eagerly opened the book, the Neo-Japonic script of which I could now decipher, and started reading...

Xxxxx

At this time, the Empire of the White devils, known as "these United States", was dominated by two powerful clans, the Clintons and the Bushes, each with their own patronage networks (known as "political parties"), which alternated in power. There were also rich and powerful Jews, as always in the White nations. On 9/11 2001, the famous city of New York was attacked by a powerful barbarian organization known as al-Qaeda, based in Yemen (see map). Historians agree that its leader Osama bin-Laden had worked for both families and decided to punish them when payment for services rendered had been denied. The US military was told to stand down, since the main courtly advisor of the Bushes, Dick Cheney, wanted an excuse to extend the Empire in the Middle East and Central Asia. Over 3,000 people died that day...

Our historians agree that Cheney's actions led to imperial overreach, pyrrhic victories in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the general decline of the White devil supremacy.

As a sidepoint, let us note that one of the presidents working for the Clinton clan, Barack Obama, was a Black man. His origins are obscure, but he may have been an actor or other kind of celebrity before he was "elected" president (a film of Obama doing a stand-up comedy routine has recently surfaced). Obama entertained the media and the devilish White crowds, but otherwise left no mark on history.

Clan Clinton tried to stop the US decline by turning the Empire into a virtual one-party state after the deaths or mysterious disappearences of the Bushes. This happened in 2021, when Kamala Harris was appointed president. Her presidency was marked by "liberal McCarthyism" as tens of thousands of citizens lost their jobs or businesses due to politically-motivated purges, or were expelled from college, while the communication system known as "Internet" was completely taken over by friends of the Clinton clan, curbing free speech in the process. Harris was reelected with 70% of the vote. Despite her authoritarianism, which many of our historians find admirable, she couldn't stop the decline of the Empire and was assasinated after losing wars with Iran, Syria and Russia. Her vice president Elizabeth Warren is often regarded as the last president of the United States, but this is strictly speaking untrue, since the US didn't effectively dissolve until 2100...

Xxxxxx

Much as I marvelled at the words of the copper scrolls, there was something missing. How could the eminent Neo-Japanese, who were so well informed about every detail pertaining to the early 21st century, have left out *the four most important years* in the history of the United States? How could they have missed our anno horribilis 2020? Looking through the scrolls, I finally found this piece of information! 

Xxxxx

The era of the White barbarian warlords began in the early 22nd century, after the effective dissolution of "these United States". Curiously, there is some scattered evidence that a White warlord managed to take power already in 2016 and hold it to 2020, probably by flattering the Bush clan. The sources are surprisingly meager. No "Internet" downloads mention him, there are only a few books, and some old issues of magazines. They tell incredible stories of Russian collusion, Fascism, Nazism and genocide, for which there is no evidence whatever in any other historical source from the period. Some historians have concluded that "Donald Trump" (also known as Q) didn't even exist. However, recent evidence (including archives in the Forbidden City of Pyongyang) indicate that he really was president, although the claim that he paid tribute to the Korean Emperor Kim III should be taken with a large grain of salt, such outlandish statements being the stock in trade of this accursed enemy nation, which nuked Japan after the great tsunami of 2120, triggering the exodus of our nation to the shores of North America. 

Defeated by Kamala Harris in an "election" and disavowed by the Bush clan, Donald Trump refused to leave the country, instead staging a short-lived insurrection during which his barbarian warband stormed a sacred shrine in the capital. A few weeks later, Trump was pardoned by Joe Biden, an otherwise unknown character of whom no other records exist. We therefore assume that Biden was the high priest of the sacred place the barbarians had tried to storm. The idea found in some sources that Trump actually stormed Congress must be rejected as another propagandist construct of the Clinton clan, who considered Trump (a White barbar of unknown origins) to be an upstart and interloper, since the Bush clan for unknown reasons had used him to defeat the Clintons in an "election". The subsequent fate of Trump is not known to us, and the whole episode forms a curious paranthesis in US history... 

Xxxxx

I was stunned. After just living through what I and many others regard as decisive and pivotal events in human history, or at the very least 21st century history, this source from the future, which was otherwise so erudite and informed, knew next to nothing about the man who millions revered as a savior, and millions more regarded as the greatest existential threat. Nor did they know anything (except the name) of the man who so soundly defeated him! It's as if the whole thing never happened, like a dream (or perchance a short nightmare). 

I ended the day in deep meditation... 

Sic transit gloria mundi. 

Q sent me

 

One year since the fiery but mostly peaceful street party outside the DC Capitol. 

Ingen är förvånad

Fintad av Hemlige Harry?

Here we go...

Tucker Carlson pekar ut FBI som ansvariga för stormningen av Kapitolium

Totalt irrelevanta nyheter

Ett av många tecken på att trumpen är en bluff är att denne "titan" låter sig hunsas av dvärgar som Facebook. En riktig ledare hade skapat en egen plattform för länge sedan, och sedan stängt ner Facebookeländet. Märkligt att Trump inte kunde göra detta. I mean, wasn´t he president or something? 

Nå, det kommer att bli ett rent nöje i framtiden att "permanent stänga av" Zucc (givetvis efter en "utvärdering") och sedan införa *väldigt strikta* uppförandekoder för vad som får och inte får sägas på denna typ av forum. Hint: BLM, Antifa och Centerpartiet får nöja sig med betalt annonsutrymme i Grönköpings Veckoblad i fortsättningen. 

Ha ha ha. 

Allvarligt talat, är det någon som bryr sig om att Facebook grötmyndigt stänger av Trump? Kan inte det där trollet som är Facebooks grundare sluta LARP-a politisk aktivist någon gång? Han kan ju sluta LARP-a epidemolog också, när han ändå är i farten...

"Trump tillbaka tidigast om två år"

The myth of right wing populism

 

Keith Woods is an Irish Traditionalist and Third Positionist with his own YouTube channel. In the clip above, he offers a kind of "pseudo-Marxist" analysis of revolutions and civil wars. It´s almost an hour long, but Woods makes many interesting points. Nominally, the clip is a polemic against Tim Pool, the independent reporter who visited Sweden a few years back and was chased by a masked immigrant gang in Rinkeby, a supposed "no go zone" in Stockholm. Pool seems to be a "recovering liberal" who probably voted Trump in 2020. In reality, the clip isn´t really about Pool at all, but a more general critique of the Alt Right and populist right. Last year, many on the far right worried about or welcomed the supposed possibility of a civil war in the United States, triggered by the BLM riots and the contested elections, and this kind of thinking obviously had a great impact on the people who stormed the Capitol on 6 January this year. The general increase in political polarization is often mentioned as another factor in the process leading up to civil war and/or revolution. To Woods, this kind of thinking is counterproductive. It´s both adventurist and "liberal" at the same time, being based on the idea that angry people will join together as individuals, with whatever grievances each may have, and somehow change public perceptions of things, perhaps with the help of provocative in-your-face protests. However, no radical change can or will happen this way, for a wide variety of reasons. 

Real revolutions and civil wars are the result of economic hardships, immense geopolitical pressures, or structural problems such as the inability of an ancien régime to keep up with economic modernization. Above all, it´s the result of elite action. Woods has a very elite-centric perspective, in which the masses or the workers are always bystanders when powerful economic and political interest groups are fighting it out. Even the Russian revolution is an example of this, the Bolsheviks being supported by Wall Street bankers and the German secret service. A more immidiately obvious example is the American Civil War, when an industrial capitalist class fought a slavocracy, both being based on fundamentally incompatible modes of production. Even genuine populist revolutions - Woods considers China, Cuba and Iran examples of such - are really elite-driven if you look carefully. In Iran, the shah was challenged by modernizing students and middle class elements to his "left", but also by more traditionalist clergy, merchants and guilds to his "right", who believed modernization had gone too far. 

But what about the United States and, by extension, global capitalism? Woods doesn´t see any fundamental conflicts between different elite groups in contemporary American society. Quite the contrary: the system is "antifragile" and extremely good at integrating new groups into the capitalist-oligarchic system. There is no conflict between Wall Street bankers, old money families and the upstarts in Silicon Valley. The US system can even integrate foreign elites into its orbit. While this may be "bad for America", it´s good for the elite groups, both foreign and domestic. There is no contradiction between modernization and old structures. Rather, globalist capitalism is what drives modernization in the first place. 

The elites also have fundamentally the same values - Woods doesn´t say so, but I presume he means the peculiar blend of neo-liberalism and "woke" left-liberalism which characterizes the present phase of globalization. As for Trump, he was essentially a hoax. The 2020 election was a choice between a "Jeb Bush platform" (Trump) and some guy who was vice-president in 2008, in other words, business as usual as far as US politics are concerned. Most of the supposedly "polarized" and "radicalized" voters simply fell in line behind the standard "lesser evilism", anarcho-communists voting Biden (probably a reference to Noam Chomsky and Antifa), hard line populists voting Trump (despite having criticized him as a "sell out" for four years). The center is so entrenched that not even the relatively mild leftist Bernie Sanders can become the Democratic nominee!

BLM wasn´t a harbinger of a civil war or break down either, since the movement is funded by the elites, is under complete elite control, and thus could be ended at precisely the moment the elites wanted it to end. This is further proven by the fact that the local police and mayors often stood down in face of the protests and riots, obviously because they were part of the script. Even the demand to "abolish the police" isn´t really a radical anti-system demand, since it´s either not implemented at all, or if it is, simply strenghtens the federal police at the expense of the local police forces. This in turn is part and parcel of a general trend towards super-centralization in society as a whole. Nor is there an economic depression on the horizon: the stock exchange is booming, and while small and medium-sized businesses are destroyed, elite control is entrenched further up the hierarchy, while the federal government prints new money on a massive scale, without any particular inflationary strain on the economy. 

Woods wonders why the Capitol rioters on 6 January didn´t take seriously the possibility that the whole thing was a Deep State set up, since they usually portray the very same Deep State as evil and extremely influential. I think Woods *does* consider the storming of the Capitol to be a provocation, in the sense that gullible populists were fooled into a trap by some elite group using their attack as a pretext for another Patriot Act. Overall, the far right populists are simply part of "the spectacle" (a Situationist term). 

Not even a wholesale collapse will necessarily change things for the better. Some collapses are managed by powerful elite groups, and even if the collapse would happen for some external reason, the people that stands most to gain from them are budding oligarchs (think Russia under Yeltsin) who end up controlling most of the remaining post-collapse resources. Instead of a new populist utopia, we end up with a kind of "catabolic capitalism" that thrives on the conditions of collapse. 

Woods´ alternative to all of the above isn´t entirely clear from the clip, but he implies that antifragile alternative institutions and communities must be built, and that this will prove more important in the long run than another "mass movement" that tries to take on the centralized state on the basis of whatever transient discontent exists at the moment. Other clips on his channel indicate that he does believe in a collapse of modern civilization at some point in the future, perhaps due to resource depletion and overpopulation, so the alternative communities are presumably intended as a defense against that future development. Before that happens, however, we might end up with something Woods calls "neo-feudalism". How his traditional alt-community will survive the neo-feudal clutches is, alas, less clear... 

Still recommended. 

Democracy dies in the dark

The link below goes to a recent article in Time, revealing the "shadow campaign" which defeated Trump in the recent elections. Of course, the globo-liberal propagandists who wrote it claim they "saved democracy", but other interpretations are possible...

Here are some of the things that stand out.

The opinion polls underestimated Trump's support. This was known to the "shadow campaign". Strangely, the pollsters were not part of the campaign. (That's very hard to believe.)

The "shadow campaign" was spearheaded by the AFL-CIO bureaucracy. It also included, in various capacities, the Chamber of Commerce, anti-Trump Republicans, liberal millionaires, activist groups and the BLM. No mention is made of journalists and news anchors (again, hard to believe).

The electoral apparatus recieved millions of dollars in private donations from wealthy donors. In this way, the entire election system could be overhauled, supposedly to "adapt to the COVID pandemic".

The overhaul made it easier to vote early and/or vote by mail.

The "shadow campaign" actively tried to censor major social media platforms, and even held a private meeting with Mark Zuckerberg to that effect.

The BLM are controlled by the Democrats. Many of their activists were members of the secret AFL-CIO network. There were 400 planned postelection protests in the case Trump wouldn't concede. "The left was ready to flood the streets". Translation: the Democrats were behind the riots!

The mass protests were cancelled by the Shadow Campaign at the last moment. They also deliberately didn't show up in Washington DC on January 6. I find this interesting, since the activists mobilized on several other occasions: at polling places to confront Trump election observers, at meetings of certification boards, etc. What did they know?

Some of the facts in the Times article have been known before (such as the private donations to "blue" election districts). The new revelation is that the anti-Trump campaign was a tightly organized and yet broad coalition of a "popular front" character. What's especially interesting is the connection to BLM.

Of course, the full story will never be told in self-congratulatory articles like this. Time doesn't mention any links to the Biden campaign, to the media, or the Deep State. However, what they *do* say is very, very interesting indeed...

Conclusions have been drawn. 

The secret campaign to save American democracy

Impeachment is not enough!

I found the real precedent for the Dem impeachment show trial against President Donald J Trump.

I must say that "Cadaver Synod" does have a certain ring to it...

Wikipedia on the "Cadaver Synod"

Free silver and unconventional warfare

The NASDAQ boss-woman recently compared the GameStop situation with the Capitol riots.

She isn't *entirely* wrong. Imagine what Russia or China could do if *they* rather than a bunch of nerds coordinated attacks on the Wall Street stock exchanges.

The only way to stop such attacks would be to have tighter controls of the "market", which means government regulations over the economy!

Capitalism, it seems, is no longer a match for Communism (or Putinism).

Of course, this simply poses another question point blank: who controls the state?

And yes, I've heard about the recent attempts to "game" the silver markets. Gold might be next...

What a time to be alive!

UPDATE: The Redditors claim that the silver thing is fake, and an attempt to divert the GameStop rebellion. Interesting if true. Somebody is already going full COINTELPRO on these guys... 

"We can take that place"

 

A news report on the Capitol breach. Note that the reporter followed the protesters into the actual Capitol building! Despite only being a five-minute segment, it´s interesting and also raises *a lot* of questions...