Swedish Ethno-Nationalist prepares to PUNISH Swedish Democrats after sell-out to globalist-liberal cabal. Rare pic, RT for luck!
OK, I´m joking but I couldn´t help myself, LOL.
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
Swedish Ethno-Nationalist prepares to PUNISH Swedish Democrats after sell-out to globalist-liberal cabal. Rare pic, RT for luck!
OK, I´m joking but I couldn´t help myself, LOL.
I have no idea what this means, but its from a "based" account on YouTube, so I suppose it´s "based" somehow.
Alt Right gadfly Vox Day is currently enbroiled in some drama with Erika "Gutsick Gibbon", a science influencer on YouTube who questioned his critique of evolutionary theory.
Says Vox: "It’s probably best that Ericka runs away now, considering what happened to the last woman who tried to debate me. For those of you who weren’t around then, she literally abandoned the debate after three rounds and ran off to Las Vegas to start a new career as a prostitute at a legal brothel. I’m neither kidding nor exaggerating for effect. You can look it up. You can probably still buy her services, for that matter."
Oookay. The Internet is forever, as they say...
| Ganapati the Seeker |
The second part of ChatGPT´s analysis of *this* blog. However, the AI is confusing/conflating me with one of my commentators! Or several of them? So this is a bit "schizo". But still an intriguing read...
There is a rumor that the blogger was originally a Trotskyist and then became a Trump supporter?!
Yes — there is substantial evidence for the two halves of that rumor, but I would distinguish what can actually be established from what is inferred.
The blog itself gives us unusually strong clues.
The author clearly has deep first-hand familiarity with Trotskyist and other sectarian Marxist politics, far beyond what one would expect from someone who merely read about them.
For example, in the April 16, 2021 post Wag the dog, the blogger writes about obscure 1940s Marxist groups, the Trotskyist SWP, Workers Party, Oehlerites, Stammists, the Fourth International, Sam Marcy, etc. The tone is that of someone who has spent a great deal of time inside or around the Marxist sectarian milieu.
More tellingly, the blogger repeatedly discusses Trotskyism from an insider-ish perspective, including the peculiar intellectual habits of small Marxist groups. That's consistent with having actually been involved in that world.
There is also a fascinating 2025 post about determinism in which the author says:
“When I was 12 — in the spring of 1967 — I read about determinism…”
and then describes becoming an enthusiastic determinist before encountering Christian socialists around 1973.
So the chronology seems to point toward someone who was intellectually formed during the 1960s–70s radical left, rather than someone who discovered Marxism recently.
The blog has been remarkably sympathetic to some aspects of Trumpism for years.
Already in May 2019, the author was arguing that Trump shouldn't simply be understood as an aberration, and was sharply critical of the liberal anti-Trump narrative. One post explicitly contrasts Macron and Orbán and says, in effect, “why is Orbán worse than Macron—and what about Donald Trump?”
Then there's the wonderfully revealing April 19, 2021 post titled:
“But Trump was right...”
The author quotes the International Marxist Tendency and argues that Biden was being forced to continue or deepen Trump's nationalist/protectionist policies. The post is actually tagged Trotskyism, Marxism, Donald Trump, Biden and Geopolitics.
That's important because it suggests the political trajectory isn't simply:
left → right
but something more peculiar:
Trotskyist/Marxist analysis → continued interest in class/economic structure → hostility to neoliberalism/globalism → increasing sympathy for nationalist/populist politics → partial Trumpism.
In other words, the blogger seems to have carried certain analytical habits from the far left into a radically different political position.
There's an important complication.
The blogger frequently discusses Trump critically or ironically, and often seems more interested in the contradictions surrounding Trump than in Trump personally.
The 2025 material, for instance, comments on MAGA, Trump's bombing of Iran, Peter Thiel, Richard Spencer, the far right, etc. The blog labels material Far right, Anti-semitism, Donald Trump, MAGA, and so forth.
And the blogger explicitly warns that:
“Many posts and comments are ironic.”
So one has to be careful about interpreting every favorable-sounding Trump statement as an endorsement.
There is also a revealing 2019 post about Trump that describes the liberal opposition to him as a kind of “fetish”, while arguing that the deeper problem is globalized capitalism. That's a very distinctive post-left rather than conventional Republican argument.
My tentative reconstruction would be something like:
1960s/70s radical left → Marxist/Trotskyist intellectual milieu → disillusionment with sectarian Marxism → continued anti-capitalist/class analysis → hostility to neoliberal globalization → interest in populism and nationalism → sympathy for some Trump positions.
And this explains something that otherwise looks bizarre about the blog.
The author can simultaneously:
That isn't necessarily ideological inconsistency. It may represent someone who left Trotskyism but never entirely abandoned the analytical framework through which he originally understood politics.
And that would also explain why the blog's politics are so difficult to place on an ordinary left-right spectrum.
The author seems almost fascinated by political metamorphosis itself.
The blog repeatedly returns to people and movements that move between ideological camps: Marxists becoming nationalists, leftists becoming conservatives, conservatives becoming dissidents, former radicals becoming religious, etc.
That makes me suspect that the author's own trajectory is part of the intellectual background of the blog.
So, yes: I think the rumor has a substantial factual basis. I would phrase it more cautiously as:
The blogger appears to have had a serious Trotskyist/Marxist background and subsequently developed strong sympathy for some Trump/populist positions.
I would not yet state as established fact that he was formally a member of a particular Trotskyist organization, nor that he is currently a straightforward Trump/MAGA supporter.
There is actually enough material on the blog to try to reconstruct the political biography decade by decade—especially the transition from the 1960s/70s left to the later anti-globalist/populist position. That could be quite revealing, because I suspect the political evolution is closely connected to the blogger's later religious/philosophical evolution as well.
Or just sportswashing? The Alt Right´s obsession with Sydney Sweeney continues. Something tells me it has nothing to do with, you know, politics...
Jaså, den ökände ryssagenten (från nästa blogginlägg) Chang Frick ligger bakom parodiska "valaffischer". Han har ju en *viss* poäng när det gäller den svenska valkampanjen. Eller åtminstone affischerna!
Some contrarian content from Michael Tracey. Note that the prosecutor seems to be "Woke" and looks like a stereotypical "evil feminist", so presumably the Alt Right keyboard warriors who demand the death penalty for Lindsay Clancy are siding with "the damn liberals"? And in Massachusetts! Ironic if true...
Har valt att inte engagera mig i kulturkriget kring filmen "The Odyssey". Har inte sett den och tänker aldrig läsa det ursprungliga eposet. För vem fan bryr sig om ett järnåldersepos som mytologiserar ett bronsålderskrig?
Den extrema vänstergruppen "RKP" och deras brittiska moderparti "RCP" har dock några intressanta tagningar på filmen. Har Christopher Nolan inverterat Odyséen och förvandlat den till en antikrigsfilm med ett samhällskritiskt budskap om den moderna civilisationens nedgång? Okej, någon gång om tio år (när filmen äntligen visas på SVT Play) kanske jag kan tänka mig att faktiskt titta på den...
Nolan´s "The Odyssey": An anti-war epic (på engelska)
| Credit: kiomoi |
Skulle inte förvåna mig om den här konspirationsteorin faktiskt vore sann. Nolan skapade uppmärksamhet kring sin film genom att trolla näthögern med noga utvalda "politiskt korrekta" scener (som är av underordnad betydelse i den faktiska filmen). Vi får se om Nolan så småningom erkänner...
Men det finns väl inga snygga tjejer inom vänstern? Skulle inte en sådan infiltratör väcka uppmärksamhet? :P
Men okej, det kryllar som bekant av homosexuella män och t.o.m. "blattar" inom alt-högern, så Peterson kanske faktiskt kan hitta någon som passar.
Förutsägelse: personen Peterson rekryterar för att infiltrera vänstern, kommer egentligen visa sig arbeta på Dagens ETC i syfte att infiltrera *honom*!
Söker "blatte, bög eller snygg tjej" för att infiltrera vänstern
"God blesses his most retarded soldiers" is the title of this YouTube video, which discusses something called "retardmaxxing". The message is that it´s actually a good thing for Christians (specifically conservative Catholics) to be retarded?!
It´s irony, of course, but I can´t help thinking that *this* approach is doomed to failure. Especially on-line. It reminds me of Tucker Carlson´s "Low IQ" hats...
Donald Trump finally purges his "Strasserites". Apparently, the Great Leader went nuclear on Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Candace Owens and some other Alt Right influencers who oppose his war on Iran. If "MAGA" means something like "isolationist conservative populism with some QAnon fringes", then MAGA is now definitely over. At least as a Trump-centric movement broadly within the Republican Party.
However, I suspect The Young Turks (link above) are wrong when predicting that this will affect the midterms. No, it won´t. Most GOP voters - including those who support Trump - seem to back the Iran War. The Democrats might win, of course, but for other reasons, not because of a so-called "split in MAGA". At least not if MAGA is defined in the sense above. *That* MAGA is a small current.
That being said, US politics can take strange turns (cough cough), so predicting anything at this point might be a fool´s errand. But that´s my foolish two cents!
Yes, Trump actually tweeted this on Truth Social: "Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the Fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah. President DONALD J. TRUMP"
Allah? I assumed Waheguru was the only true god. Seriously, though, I think it´s officially over now. If the war against the Iranian regime is legitimate, I say it´s high time for a new war leader. And if it isn´t...well!
Still, I wonder how his Christian Nationalist supporters react? Not at all, it seems, since Trump´s Pravda (Breitbart) calls the tweet "blunt, unambiguous and straight to the point".
Praise be to Allah. If you pardon my Quranic Arabic.
| Credit: JJ Harrison |
So I just watched "Dune: Part Two" from 2024. The film is well-made and interesting after a fashion, but it moved me much less than I had expected. Certain aspects flet dragging. Such as...Chani, Chani and Chani. Did I mention Chani?
This female Fremen warrior constantly tries to sway the main protagonist, Paul Atreides, from fulfilling his dark destiny. And of course fails. The whole thing isn´t just boring. It´s also similar to the Padme-Anakin drama from "Star Wars". Maybe George Lucas got the idea from the "Dune" novels, who knows, but in Hollywood terms, Lucas has the primogeniture. Oh, and Atreides accepts his fate without too much questioning. The choice is grey-grey rather than black-or-white. Again, like Anakin´s choice in "Star Wars".
I never read Herbert´s novels, and probably never will, but I did notice that all other film or TV adaptations of this space opera are extremely colorful and flamboyant, to the point of cringe. Or is it camp? Denis Villeneuve´s style is markedly different. We´re obviously on a desert planet, and part of the film is actually in black-and-white (the gladiator fight). Not even the pseudo-Russian aristocrats look too fancy.
The reactions to "Dune: Part Two" from "Alt Right" trolls on-line were...interesting. Sure, they complained about Chani, but nobody seemed to notice that "Muad´Dib" (i.e. Paul Atreides) is really *the bad guy*. But perhaps the Alt Right really likes the idea of a Muslim jihad destroying the based Space Empire? As long as a *man* is in charge who refuses to listen to His Annoying Girlfriend. LOL. Besides, isn´t Paul (who looks rather whimpish for a Muslim Mahdi) really manipulated backstage by a cultish matriarchal sisterhood?
Funny have people can miss even the most obvious things.
With that, I close this little review.
| Credit: Ecosophia |
Apparently, Nick Fuentes (the Groyper Führer) is going to vote Democrat in the midterms. To punish the Republicans and Trump. Or something. Oh. Amazing that guy still thinks he´s relevant...
| Credit: The Fourth Way |
I´m not so sure. Many conspiracy theorists had pretty wild scenarios back in 2020 (why *that* date, btw?) which didn´t come to pass.
For instance, that the COVID pandemic wasn´t real. Or that the vaccines would kill off the entire White race within a few years, entire cities being emptied of people. Or that, you know, Trump would lead a fight against the Satanic paedophile cannibals running the world. How well did *that* little prediction turn out?
The most plausible conspiracy theory was that the Dems rigged the 2020 elections. After all, everyone cheats in America. And yet, Trump hasn´t presented any evidence that this was the case now when he´s back in office. Instead, he has been more busy trying to derail the Epstein Files. Indeed, the Don seems more interested in the disclosure of (obviously non-existent) UFOs!
Are there true conspiracies? Of course there are. See above! But my main problem ever since this fracas started (around 2015) is that the opposition forces - including the out-of-control ultras - seem just as hopelessly clueless, stupid or even evil as the establishment they are opposing. They are decadent, too.
So I don´t expect the local unfriendly paranoiac in a trailer to make any sensational new discoveries any time soon. Except maybe by chance. And even then, they would have no idea what to do about it.
Maybe it´s time to bug out and take to the hills...