C.S. Lewis is easily the most well-known Christian apologist and writer.
Like many people outside the Christian fold, I probably read Lewis even before
I started reading the actual Bible he was defending! Francis Schaeffer is
another well known apologist, at least in the United States. Here in Sweden, by
contrast, Schaeffer is virtually unknown, although (curiously) the very first
Christian book I ever read was authored by a former L'Abri student, a certain
Stefan Gustavsson.
"C.S. Lewis and Francis Schaeffer" by Scott Burson and Jerry Walls is
a book summarizing and comparing the two thinkers and their respective
apologetics. Personally, I found the book a very easy read, but other reviewers
apparently fought with it longer. I'm therefore not sure who could be best served
by this work - perhaps students of theology who already have a working
knowledge of Lewis and/or Schaeffer? I think Burson and Walls do a good job
summing up Lewis' ideas, but since I've only read one work by Schaeffer, I
can't really vouch for their description of him.
Lewis and Schaeffer had very different theological perspectives and
backgrounds. Lewis was a well-educated Oxford literature professor and
something of a bon vivant, while Schaeffer was a teetotaller, had an American
blue-collar background and spent most of his life evangelizing people from all
walks of life. He also made forays into partisan politics, something Lewis
never did. Frankly, Schaeffer seems to have been somewhat eccentric as well.
But then, perhaps Lewis' friendship with Owen Barfield, Charles Williams and J.
R. R. Tolkien could be seen as pretty weird, too! Strangely, the two men never
met, despite being rough contemporaries, Schaeffer even visiting Oxford at one
point. Within American evangelicalism, both Lewis and Schaeffer seem to be
about equally popular, which may explain the need for a book of this sort. (In
more intellectual circles, they are about equally unpopular, their respective
apologetics being seen as too populist and unsophisticated.)
Theologically, Lewis was a conservative but nevertheless pretty broad-minded
Anglican, while Schaeffer was a strict Calvinist and
"fundamentalist". He had been educated by the likes of J. Gresham
Machen and Cornelius Van Til. Indeed, Burson and Walls have great difficulties
in harmonizing the two apologists (their ostensible aim). On virtually all
theological issues, they seem to side with Lewis: inclusivism, libertarian
freedom, the atonement, natural law, the problem of pain, the
"errancy" of scripture, etc. Often, the authors sharply criticize
Schaeffer. They find his Reformed views of predestination and election
particularly hard to swallow. However, Burson and Walls also believe that
Schaeffer was contradictory on a number of points, claiming that he somehow
preached both libertarian freedom and predestination, much to the chagrin of
his former teacher Van Til. Essentially, Burson's and Walls' irenic
harmonization of the two men takes the form of combining the (supposedly)
Lewisian side of Schaeffer with Lewis himself, while rejecting the more
specifically Calvinist ideas. I'm not sure if Schaeffer's admirers would agree
with this approach...
Interestingly, Burson and Walls don't define Schaeffer as a
"presuppositionalist", but rather as a "verificationist".
Van Til is once again called in as a hostile witness. Apparently, the old
Dutchman could be quite mean if you didn't follow *his* kind of apologetics to
the T! I think the authors are on to something here. Schaeffer's method of
apologetics does seem different from Van Til's (or Jonathan Sarfati's, for that
matter). I state that with the reservation that I've only read one book each by
Van Til and Schaeffer, although I've read more than my fair share of Sarfati...
"C.S. Lewis and Francis Schaeffer" is a relatively good book, but
it's really a sneak attack on Schaeffer from a broadly Lewisian perspective,
while being marketed as a balanced study somehow harmonizing both. I'm not a
Christian, and I admit that Lewis strikes me as more congenial than Schaeffer
(minus the beers, cigars and that crackpot friend of his, Owen-something), but
why is a polemical attack on Schaeffer posing as something else entirely? Is it
because evangelicals wouldn't buy the book, had it been called "C.S. Lewis
VERSUS Francis Schaeffer"?
The back matter informs us that Burson is employed by a Wesleyan university and
writes for a C.S. Lewis Society, while Walls is a professor who organizes
regular Lewis seminars at another Wesleyan institution. In other words, the
authors are Arminian "heretics"! Small wonder they don't like
Schaeffer, and I don't mean the knickers, LOL.
In a sense, this book is "mere Lewis".
That being said, I nevertheless recommend "C.S. Lewis and Francis
Schaeffer" for those seriously interested in a systematic treatment of the
two authors' defences of Christianity, their potential applications today, and
the differences between them.