Sunday, October 11, 2026

The heretics are leaving

 


The Mormon Church is shrinking in membership, at least in the United States. About 50% of people raised Mormon leave the Church later in life. And most of these become "religiously unaffiliated" (perhaps atheists?) rather than joining some other Christian Church. 

Below, I also reproduce the two most interesting critical comments to the video above. 

It struck me that the Mormons could still "save the day" by mass immigration to the United States (perhaps Utah) from other parts of the world, where their Church is still growing... 

xxxxx

LucasGuerreiro says:

This post is a perfect example of how legitimate research can be used to promote a misleading narrative. First, the Pew Research Center study examined religious retention in the United States, not worldwide. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is a global religion, and American trends cannot automatically be applied to millions of members living across the world. Second, while the decline in retention from 70% to 54% is real, the claim about young women is misleading. Pew found no statistically significant difference between younger women (49%) and younger men (54%) in retention rates. Third, the study does not establish that Church teachings on sexuality, gender roles, finances, or Republican politics caused people to leave. These are the author’s personal interpretations, not scientific conclusions supported by the research. Correlation is not causation. Now, let’s look at the bigger picture. According to the Church’s latest official statistical report, released in April 2026, worldwide membership reached 17,887,212 at the end of 2025, an increase of 377,431 members (2.16%) in just one year. The Church also reported 385,490 convert baptisms in 2025, almost 25% more than in 2024. Worldwide congregations increased to 32,046. And here’s another finding from the same Pew study that this post conveniently ignores: 69% of American Latter-day Saints report attending religious services at least weekly, compared with just 25% of American adults overall. Of course, increasing membership does not eliminate legitimate concerns about retention, and official membership totals are not the same as active attendance. Every person who leaves deserves to be heard and treated with respect. But acknowledging challenges is very different from portraying a worldwide, growing religious community as a failing institution. The Church is not defined by American political divisions, and its mission is not to represent Republicans, Democrats, or any political ideology. Its mission is to invite all people, everywhere, to come unto Jesus Christ. We should welcome serious research. But we should also distinguish scientific evidence from ideological commentary.

xxxxx

andrewsuryali8540 says:

Don't wanna rain on everyone's parade, but let's just say that the LDS is rich enough to be able to commission a more detailed and focused study on their own people, and depending on how Monson wants to treat Nelson's legacy, this might come out in the next several months as either leaks or actual publications... Anyway, what looks to be the case isn't that LDS members are becoming more open to liberal ideas. In many cases it may be the opposite. See, in 2018 Nelson tried to rebrand the LDS to try to make it look more "Christian non-denominational", at least in the way he understood it. He also allowed the loosening of some of the purity laws in trying to make the LDS look "less weird". The problem is that this was done almost immediately in the wake of a massive WILDLY POPULAR multibillion-dollar "proud to be Mormon" campaign where the church asked its members to double down on their Mormon identity. Then starting in 2020 there was an acceleration in the rate of members leaving. The main reason behind this isn't Mormons becoming more liberal-progressive and getting disenchanted by their church's conservativeness. The rate of more progressive youngsters leaving didn't really change. What changed was that more of the older generation and the LESS progressive young women started leaving in droves. The main culprit among the older generation is "loss of distinctiveness". These are people who have invested decades of their lives on being Mormons, who had just recently been "rewarded" by their church with a confirmation of their efforts and a public doubling-down of their identity. Then suddenly they were told to pretend they were regular Christians and asked to try to blend in with the very people who had rejected and tried to marginalize them all their lives. For many that was the last straw. The younger, more conservative women also have a similar complaint. They had also invested their lives into upholding the purity culture, had been rewarded, then had their lifelong effort annulled by Nelson. If you're a Mormon girl who had felt vindicated by not having piercings in 2018, then you'd feel utterly betrayed in 2025 when the leadership said it's OK for boys to date girls with piercings. So it isn't that the Mormons are becoming more open to liberal ideas and leaving because of that. Rather, it's Nelson's misguided effort to "normalize" the LDS within Christianity that's alienating the most hardcore Mormons and making them leave. It's actually really strange that he still made that mistake after seeing the example of the RLDS as they shed more than 60% of their members while transitioning into becoming the Community of Christ.

Nine nights

 




Some Navaratri stuff. Apparently, the Hindu Navaratri festival starts today. 

Fred i vår tid

 


Har jag ju tyckt länge...

Nobelpriset är ett skämt: Lägg ner det - Sverige bör ta över ansvaret

Saturday, October 10, 2026

The daily heretic

 


Richard Dawkins still on the war path, pun intended. 

Everyone´s wrong

 


Not sure exactly what this means, other than modern cosmology having problems. And yes, it´s the pesky dark matter again! Ad hoc, anyone?

A question of control

 


"The Heretic" (2024) is a bizarre American film. It´s actually a kind of philosophical or even theological horror film. I admit that I have no idea what the message might be. 

The main character Mr Reed (starred by Hugh Grant of all people) is a crazy, murderous atheist who captures two female Mormon missionaries in a maze-like house. His intentions are unclear, but revolve around attempts to prove that all religions are fake. Their real purpose is control. During the confrontation, it turns out that the Mormon girls are really skeptics. One of them claims that near-death experiences are caused by purely natural causes, while the other says that prayer is purely metaphorical or psychological in nature. Before they visit Mr Reed, the girls discuss sex and pornography.

The atheist arguments sound more convincing than the simplistic faith the missionaries pretend to have at the outset. However, I also get the impression that Reed might not be an atheist in the strict sense. He believes that all religions (or at least the "Abrahamic" ones) go back to a kind of primordial revelation, the exact nature of which is left unclear. It also seems that he is trying to convince himself, first and foremost, that all God-belief really is bunk. Note also that Reed has turned into a kind of cult leader. His personal paranoia is tied to Simulation Theory, which could be interpreted as Gnostic. Maybe the house of horrors is a "simulation" all its own?

And yes, I did notice the allusion to blood atonement and the in-house *skeptical* joke about Mormon "magical underpants" (but here used by the Mormons themselves). The usual pun on Moroni´s name ("Moron I") is also included. 

"The Heretic" ends with two miracles, but these are less convincing (I´m tempted to call them deus-ex-machina) than the bulk of the movie, making me wonder if they were tacked on simply to make the production somewhat less shocking to a religious audience. Well, at least it manages to portray consistent atheism-materialism as meaningless, brutal and absurd! 

Not sure if anyone really did become a heretic due to this flick. 

Friday, October 9, 2026

Världen kan inte vänta

 


En...ska vi säga "intressant"...artikel i Aftonbladet. Några utdrag nedan. 

Jag försöker förstå implikationerna av detta. Det första man undrar över är vad som hade hänt om samma enorma summor istället investerats i klimatanpassning. Exempelvis thorium-reaktorer? Eller åtminstone i åtgärder som mildrar följderna av klimatförändringarna. Låt säga enorma havsvallar. 

Det andra jag undrar över är om pengarna ens existerar. Det antyds nämligen senare i artikeln att det kanske inte är så. Fantasisummorna är faktiskt fantasi. Det kanske är samma pengar som bokförts typ tre gånger om. Å andra sidan är ju datacenter och chip verkliga. Teknologin finns ju bevisligen. Fast det kanske är enklare (rent ingenjörsmässigt) att bygga datacenter än nya kärnkraftreaktorer...?

>>>> 

Nästan 9 miljarder kronor per dag eller totalt 800 miljarder. Så mycket gjorde den sydkoreanska elektronikjätten Samsung i vinst under tredje kvartalet.

Det är nio gånger (!) mer än under samma period ifjol.

Samsung är världens största tillverkare av minneskort och när hela världen kapprustar om vem som kan smälla upp flest datacenter snabbast så verkar det inte finnas någon gräns för efterfrågan på bolagets produkter.

Samsungs försäljning under tredje kvartalet steg med 127 procent till 1 460 miljarder kronor. Det motsvarar en årsomsättning som närmar sig 6 000 miljarder kronor. Om Samsung var ett land skulle dess ekonomi vara i klass med Norges eller Thailands och hamna runt 30:e plats i världen.

Bolagets börsvärde har i år fördubblats till 13 000 miljarder kronor.

(...)

Å andra sidan de närmast ofattbara summor som nu plöjs ned i AI. De totala investeringarna, mätt som andel av ekonomin, är större än vad som tidigare i historien satsades på att bygga ut järnvägarna, elsystemen och telenäten. Tillsammans.

Snabbt stigande räntor har satt fokus på de stora budgetunderskotten och höga statsskulderna i länder som USA, Japan, Storbritannien, Frankrike och flera andra av världens största ekonomier.

Men den offentliga sektorn är bara en del av ekonomin. För privata företag har det aldrig sett ljusare ut.

(...)

Av världens 25 bolag med högst börsvärde är nu tio tillverkare av halvledare och chip, ledda av Nvidia. Dessa tio bolag är värda sammanlagt 160 000 miljarder kronor eller en tiondel av värdet på hela världens aktiemarknad.

Vinsterna ökar också i andra branscher med koppling till AI-utbyggnaden, alltifrån energibolag till byggföretag, tillverkare av grävmaskiner och gruvbolag.

Företagsvinsterna i USA väntas sätta nytt rekord i år och är som andel av ekonomin på den högsta nivån sedan andra världskriget.

Samtidigt har andelen som går till arbetare sjunkit till rekordlåga nivåer.

>>>>

Världen badar i vinster

Principles

 


Last year, the Norwegian peace prize committee "awarded the prize to Trump without awarding it to Trump" by giving it to Trump´s rather obvious ally Machado. But now, *the very same committee* (I checked) instead gave it (de facto) to the ICC, against which the Trump administration has imposed sanctions. This year´s peace prize will 100% be seen as anti-Israeli, anti-American and anti-Trump. 

Translation: the current Norwegian Nobel Committee are spineless bastards. They are probably banking on Trump becoming a lame duck after the midterms. But when the Don looked like the future Master of the World, the brave Norwegian Vikings chose to hand him the goodies. Or at least some crumbs.

Amazingly, it now looks as if Donald Trump is the winner in this ridiculous spat. He, after all, haven´t changed...

Snaran dras åt

 

Credit: Prophet666.com

Next, do Lundsberg! 

Tre elever anhållna i Sigtuna - polisen utreder misstänkt sexualbrott

On the brink

 

Credit: Mheidegger

The situation at the Horn of Africa is even more complex than I imagined. 

Note that Eritrea has switched sides in the Ethiopian conflict, from backing the government of Abyi Ahmed against the rebel TPLF to backing the rebels instead. Despite Eritrea´s reputation as a pseudo-Communist authoritarian regime, the United States recently lifted the sanctions against its ruling party, probably to lure the country into an alliance against the pro-Iranian Houthis in Yemen. 

The Saudis also back Eritrea, while Israel prefers Abyi, and so do the United Arab Emirates! All four are supposed to be US allies against Iran. And in neighboring Sudan, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are on opposite sides in the genocidal civil war...

I´m old enough to remember when the West supported Abyi Ahmed, even giving him the hotly coveted Nobel Peace Prize, but it seems the man may no longer be our prime "asset" in this part of the world. Who is? Does anyone know? Do we even *want* to know?  

Fighting in Ethiopia threatens renewed civil war, destabilising the Horn of Africa