35 years

 

Yesterday (February 20), Neptune conjoined Saturn. Which happens roughly once every 35 years. In mundane astrology, this signifies dramatic regime change. Especially in Russia. The two planets were in conjunction in 1917, 1953 and 1989. That is: during the fall of Czarism, the death of Stalin and the collapse of the Soviet bloc. 

Hmmm...

So if this pattern holds, something very important will happen in Russia very, very soon. Will Putin die and Ukraine in some completely bizarre way defeat the Russian army, leading to the collapse of the Federation as we know it?

Apparently, Neptune also enters Aries, which it last did during the American Civil War. So perhaps we should be careful about what we wish for! As for China, they just entered a Yang Fire Year of the Horse. Last time that happened was in 1966. You know, the beginning of the Cultural Revolution...

I admit that I don´t believe a word of it. Still, maybe I should replenish my private stash of snacks just in case.  

Contrarian

 

Believe it or not, but I actually agree with Cenk here. America´s foremost "Epstein-minimizer" Tracey is a born contrarian, not some kind of secret agent of the Zionist-Epstein-ite Organism or whatever people accuse him of this week. 

I saw the contrarian tendencies already back in 2020, when Tracey managed to provoke both Trump´s, Biden´s and Sanders´ fans. But during a near-chaotic election campaign (or was it a regime change operation), this kind of attitude still smacked of independent journalism. He *did* write interesting stuff back then. Still does, after a fashion. 

But when Tracey at some point (2023?) began to sound almost like a Holocaust denier on Xwitter, I realized that the man has a trollish side. Which perhaps also explains his peculiar collaborative relation with Richard Hanania, another notorious troll/gadfly (you know, the Palestinian-American who supports the Israeli far right). That is: he´s trolling on the opposite side of the political spectrum (Tracey comes across more like a dissident liberal).

How this will end is still an open question. I´m refering of course to the Epstein Files. Born contrarians will probably be part of the American alt-media landscape for years to come...

Metaphorically

 

Not sure why Scott Carney (the first clip above) is so happy about Nick Fuentes calling on his supporters to boycott the midterms. Fuentes is a marginal character and hasn´t been MAGA (sensu stricto) for years. He tried to influence the 2024 presidential elections with a similar boycott call, and it didn´t work out (obviously). So a few Nazi wannabes won´t vote GOP in 2026 or 2028, who cares?

The second clip (from TYT) discusses the Steven Bannon situation. I find it amazing that Bannon *still* has some traction on the far right after all the revelations in the Epstein Files.

Maybe Fuentes the Groyper Führer has a certain point, after all. Time to burn it all down. Or at least walk away now and avoid the rush!  

Tariffs, something, something

 

We are monitoring the situation. 

Falskmyntare

 

Det här är såklart ett misstag i mjukvaran, eftersom artikeln om de falska sedlarna inte har något med Trump att göra, men det är ändå rätt kul att gubbens nuna dyker upp här, LOL. 

Portal to the Underworld

 

The episodes of this bizarre series have titles like "Portal to the Underworld", "Reptoids of Lassen Park" and "Demonic Dominion" (the latter not linked here). And no, it´s not a documentary about current American politics, LOL. I actually watched this series perhaps ten years ago, when it was called "Mysteries at the National Parks". It seems to have been retitled "National Park Secrets and Legends" (at least sometimes). 

Weirdly, I don´t remember how *scary* this series actually is. Or have I just become more paranoid lately? (Any connection to US politics?) It could easily be turned into a "real" horror flick!

Even if taken at face value, many of the incidents could (perhaps) be given natural explanations. Maybe something in the forests make people hallucinate? We´re talking EM effects, volcanic vapor, that kind of stuff. Note also that some of the eye witnesses are self-proclaimed paranormal researchers. Others are Native elders or New Age seekers. Perhaps they are "primed" to have strange experiences? But sure, there is a much simpler hypothesis: ghosts, aliens and unruly spirits are real...

This aint no country for White men. Or any men for that matter.  

Still Friday

 

Bigfoot massacre

 

I never heard of this conspiracy theory before. Complete bunk, if you ask me. And virtually everyone else. IN THIS HOUSE, PATTERSON AND GIMLIN ARE HEROES. 

There is a conspiracy theory called "The Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot Massacre". Can you tell me about it?

The “Patterson–Gimlin Bigfoot Massacre” is a modern internet conspiracy theory, not a historically documented event.

To understand it, we need to start with the real historical reference point:

The Original Context

In 1967, Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin filmed what became known as the Patterson–Gimlin film in Northern California.

The footage shows a large, hairy, upright figure walking away from the camera. It is one of the most famous pieces of alleged Bigfoot evidence.

The film itself has been debated for decades:

• Believers argue it shows authentic biological motion.

• Skeptics argue it was a man in a costume.

There is no verified evidence of violence or a massacre connected to that event.

---

What the “Massacre” Theory Claims

The conspiracy theory circulating online claims that:

• Patterson and Gimlin (or other parties) allegedly killed multiple Bigfoot creatures.

• The U.S. government or military supposedly covered up the incident.

• The famous film is said to be only part of a larger, suppressed event.

Some versions claim:

• Military intervention.

• Secret burials.

• Suppressed film reels.

• Witness intimidation.

These claims emerged decades after the original 1967 filming and are primarily found in:

• fringe cryptozoology forums

• YouTube conspiracy channels

• anonymous online postings

There are no contemporaneous reports, no documents, no physical evidence, and no credible witnesses supporting the massacre story.

---

Where the Story Likely Came From

The “massacre” idea appears to be a later embellishment built on:

1. General Bigfoot lore.

2. Broader government cover-up narratives (similar to Roswell-type mythology).

3. The cultural tendency to escalate a mystery into a darker hidden narrative.

Importantly:

• Neither Bob Gimlin nor credible researchers associated with the Patterson–Gimlin film have ever substantiated such claims.

• No serious cryptozoologist considers the massacre story well-supported.

---

Scholarly Assessment

Among:

• historians,

• anthropologists,

• wildlife biologists,

• mainstream cryptozoologists,

the “massacre” theory is regarded as an internet-age fabrication layered onto an already controversial but much older mystery.

Even within Bigfoot-believing communities, the massacre claim is generally treated with skepticism.

---

Bottom Line

There is:

• No physical evidence

• No documentation

• No credible eyewitness testimony

• No historical record

The “Patterson–Gimlin Bigfoot Massacre” is a modern conspiracy narrative, not a historical event.

If you’d like, I can also explain how and why these kinds of “escalation myths” tend to develop around already-mysterious events.

Daily reminder

 

Most reports of supernatural events are wrong. Most reports of natural events are also wrong. Or unreliable. Or uncertain. And no, postulating some "metaphysical principle" doesn´t change our predicament. 

Go ye forth into the world with this in mind, my brethren. 

Midwits and maintainers

 

Overheard on a very controversial blog (I disavow...disavow...disavow). 

>>>The fundamental challenge is that neither midwits nor maintainers are capable of seeing problems coming from down the road. Their perspective is always a limited one of the last 15-20 years. If something hasn’t caused a problem yet, that means it never will. 

>>>The maintainers ignore everything but their day-to-day responsibilities and the midwits devote themselves to aggressively attacking every problem solver or genius who is concerned about the problems the midwits can’t yet perceive.