Sunday, July 5, 2026

The nine-grade lotus pond

You need some kind of really childlike faith to accept this kind of stuff...

Andevärlden har humor

Tydligen. Många videor på den här YouTube-kanalen är ovanligt humoristiska, men det verkar vara en riktig medial eller spiritualistisk kanal?!

Synkroniserade nuffror har jag ju sett halva livet (11:11 är en klassiker) och ovanligt mycket rådjur det senaste året eller så. Annars kan jag inte säga att jag vibrerar på samma frekvens som Christoffer Norén...

I´ve got these strange dreams, man!

A tale of two revolutions...or were they three?

Since the United States is often regarded as "the world´s first modern democracy", I asked ChatGPT about it and got the following (very balanced!) response...

Short form: it´s a tie between the United States and France. No surprise there, to be honest. But what about the Netherlands? Then, ChatGPT revised its response and included the Batavian Republic (1795) in its short-list of early modern democracies. It seems we´re back were we started with the "AI"...

It´s still a dumb machine that has to prompted to give you the "right" answers.

What nation could be considered "the first modern democracy"? What nation was the first with universal male suffrage?

There isn’t a single uncontested answer to either question, because it depends a lot on what counts as “modern democracy” and what counts as “universal male suffrage.” But the short version is:

First modern democracy: the strongest candidates are usually the United States, France, or Switzerland, depending on definition.
First country with universal male suffrage: the best-known early claimant is France in 1792/1793 (in revolutionary form), while the first durable national state to implement it and keep it is often taken to be France again in 1848, with some important earlier and rival cases such as Switzerland and certain Latin American republics.

Here is the cleaner breakdown.

1) “First modern democracy” — what are the main candidates?

A) The United States is often called the first modern democracy

Why people say this:

It created a large-scale representative republic with an elected legislature, written constitution, separation of powers, and regular elections.
The constitutional order from 1787–1789 was unusually durable and influential.
It helped establish the modern model of constitutional representative government.

Why this answer is incomplete:

The early United States was not a full democracy in the modern sense:
- slavery remained
- women could not vote
- Native peoples were excluded
- many states still had property requirements or other restrictions on voting
So it may be better called an early modern constitutional republic with democratic elements, rather than a full modern democracy from the outset.

So if someone says “the first modern democracy was the United States,” they usually mean:

the first durable large-scale modern constitutional representative republic that became a major democratic model.

B) France is another major candidate

Why:

The French Revolution pushed the idea of popular sovereignty much further than most earlier regimes.
In 1792, France became a republic and moved toward universal male suffrage for the National Convention elections.
In principle, revolutionary France articulated democracy in a much more radical way than the early United States.

Why it is complicated:

The revolutionary period was unstable, violent, and short-lived.
France oscillated among republic, empire, monarchy, and republic again.
So if “first modern democracy” means a stable democratic regime, revolutionary France is a difficult fit.

So France is a strong candidate if by “first modern democracy” you mean:

the first major state to proclaim popular sovereignty and near-universal male political citizenship in a recognizably modern way.

C) Switzerland sometimes enters the discussion

Why:

Some Swiss cantons had very old traditions of assembly government.
The Swiss federal state of 1848 became a durable democratic republic.
Swiss political institutions, referenda, and citizen participation became very important in the history of democracy.

Why it usually isn’t called the first modern democracy:

The old cantonal traditions were not “modern democracy” in the same sense as a national representative democratic state.
The 1848 federal state is later than the American and French revolutions.

D) Some scholars would point to Britain, but usually with caveats

Britain is central to the history of parliamentary government, cabinet government, and constitutional monarchy. But it generally was not the first modern democracy because:

suffrage remained heavily restricted for a long time
the political system was oligarchic well into the 19th century

Britain is crucial for the history of liberal constitutionalism and parliamentarism, but not usually the best answer to “first modern democracy.”

2) So what is the best answer to “first modern democracy”?

It depends on the standard:

If you mean:

“first durable large-scale modern representative republic”

then the usual answer is the United States.

If you mean:

“first state to embody modern democratic sovereignty in a radical egalitarian sense”

then revolutionary France is a very strong answer.

If you mean:

“first democracy by today’s standards”

then honestly none of the late-18th-century candidates fully qualify, because all excluded major parts of the population.

So my own concise formulation would be:

The United States is often called the first modern democracy in the sense of being the first durable large-scale constitutional representative republic, while revolutionary France is often the strongest claimant if one emphasizes popular sovereignty and universal male suffrage.

3) What nation was first with universal male suffrage?

This also needs a definition.

The key issue is whether you mean:

first to proclaim it, even briefly or in unstable revolutionary conditions, or
first durable state to establish it in normal national politics.

4) The strongest early answer: France (1792/1793)

During the French Revolution, elections to the National Convention in 1792 are usually treated as one of the first major cases—arguably the first national case in a modern state—of universal male suffrage (at least in principle for adult men, without property qualifications).

That is why France is so important in this story.

Why the answer is still messy

Age and residency rules still existed.
“Universal” never literally means every male person without exception.
The revolutionary system was unstable and interrupted.

Still, if you ask:

“What was the first nation to adopt universal male suffrage at the national level?”

a very standard answer is:

France, during the Revolution, especially 1792.

5) The first durable universal male suffrage system: often France in 1848

The French Revolution of 1848 established universal male suffrage in a more stable and administratively modern form under the French Second Republic.

That is why many historians treat 1848 France as a landmark:

clear national implementation
mass electorate
modern electoral administration
major symbolic influence on Europe

So if the question is:

“Which major state first established universal male suffrage in a durable modern sense?”

then France in 1848 is one of the best answers.

6) Were there earlier or rival claimants?

Yes—depending on how strict you are.

A) Very small republics or local polities

There were earlier cases of very broad male political participation in places like:

some Swiss cantons
some revolutionary or post-colonial polities
arguably certain frontier or settler republics

But these often fail one of the tests:

not a nation-state
not a modern representative democracy
not clearly universal
not durable

B) Latin American republics

Some 19th-century Latin American constitutions were, on paper, quite broad in suffrage, and in some cases earlier than parts of Europe in removing property qualifications. But the details are complicated because literacy, dependency, military status, or local political realities often narrowed the electorate.

So they are important in the broader history, but the most standard “first” answer still tends to be France.

7) A careful two-part answer

If you want the safest historically defensible summary, I’d put it like this:

First modern democracy

Most common answer: the United States, if by that you mean the first durable modern constitutional representative republic.
Alternative strong answer: France, if you emphasize modern democratic sovereignty and mass male citizenship during the Revolution.

First nation with universal male suffrage

Best short answer: France in 1792 (revolutionary France), at least as the first major national example.
Best “durable implementation” answer: France in 1848.

8) My own bottom-line answer in one sentence

If you forced me to give the most defensible compact answer, I’d say:

The United States is often regarded as the first modern democracy in the constitutional-republican sense, while France was the pioneering state for universal male suffrage, first in revolutionary form in 1792 and more durably in 1848.

If you want, I can do a country-by-country timeline of suffrage expansion from 1776 to 1920—US, France, Britain, Switzerland, Norway, Sweden, and the major Latin American republics—so you can see exactly where each one sits on the spectrum of “modern democracy."

250 years of tall tales

A short "4th of July video" about crazy Americans literally hunting alleged monstrous creatures. Well, or allegedly hunting them...

I never heard of the White River Monster in Arkansas before, nor of the Green (and slimy) Bigfoot! Note that many locations in the US have laws against hunting cryptids, probably because of problems with private citizens misusing their Second Amendment rights...

I mean, dude.

Even so, congratulations to your Semiquincentennial!

Kalmar-unionen eller mest bara calamares?

Aftonbladets Anders Lindberg vill ha en nordisk förbundsstat. LOL! Be careful what you wish for, tror inte att du vill ha en Nordische Bundesstaat dominerad av Danmark. Du vet, deras invandringspolitik...

Planen är kanhända att den ska domineras av Sverige! Eller?

Fast lite roligt är det ju att den gamle sossekoryfén plötsligt låter som en nationalist. Han citerar t.o.m. nationalsången. Det hela blir ännu roligare om man betänker att Lindberg är en rent usel stilist. En stor del av artikeln är skriven på det där infantiliserade kvasi-talspråket som Aftonbladet verkar älska.

Lär dig högsvenska, Anders. Eller danska...

Vi borde börja prata om en nordisk förbundsstat

Still silent

Taylor Swift´s silence on the recent fall of Kostiantynivka is not a little damning, and given the extremely serious nature of the present geopolitical situation, entirely disqualifying!

Extra ecclesiam nulla salus

Credit: Ranveig (?)

The Catholic Church has excommunicated the SSPX. Not sure why most news outlets spin this as "Vatican excommunicates six bishops". Ahem, no, read the rest of the declaration for crying out loud. Everyone connected to the SSPX, including lay people, are excommunicated. Since the SSPX is a priestly association, this presumably means that lay *sympathizers* of the group are also to be cast out. How are they identified? Perhaps by regular attendance at an SSPX chapel. Do the Jesuits keep lists?

So it´s not six people. It´s more like 60,000 people. Or whatever the number might be.

I assume the (rather fickle) love affair between conservatives and Pope Leo is definitely over now. Not that I care, tbh. SSPX aren´t exactly my guys. Either.

Claiming Catholicism

I didn´t know some American Catholics claimed George Washington. He supposedly converted to the Catholic Church on his death bed. Evidence? "Oral tradition" from Washington´s Black slaves and some others (see one of the comments in the commentary section). In other words: no evidence.

Please move on.

Oh, and the Black slaves are referred to as "enslaved people" in curiously colorblind fashion...

Burn in hell

Look what I found...

Saturday, July 4, 2026

Make the revolution great again?

Today is the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States. Apparently. The "bourgeois" revolution was "progressive" for its time. And...here we are.

Goodbye!