HA HA HA, this is so confused that it becomes unintentionally funny. Erich von Däniken, come back, all is forgiven! So apparently the Hindu god Ganesha has evolved in a way similar to elephants. Or something. Or maybe something else.
DS-Max and Cobra Group are interconnected entities operating within a network of direct sales companies that have garnered significant criticism for their business practices.The Devil Corp
🏢 What Is DS-Max?
DS-Max (short for "Direct Sales to the Maximum") originated in Canada in the 1980s, evolving from earlier ventures like W.M. Industries Inc. and Wholesale Warehouse Industries. It expanded rapidly by employing a door-to-door sales model, promoting products such as perfumes, toys, and household items. The company emphasized a "Management Training Program," where sales representatives were encouraged to recruit others, promising swift advancement to owning their own sales offices. This structure closely mirrors multi-level marketing (MLM) schemes, focusing on recruitment and sales volume. The Truth Behind Door-to-Door JobsThe Devil Corp
🐍 What Is the Cobra Group?
The Cobra Group, also known as Appco Group, was established in the 1980s by Chris Niarchos, a former DS-Max employee. Based in Sydney, Australia, it expanded its operations to the UK and other countries. Cobra adopted the DS-Max business model, emphasizing face-to-face sales and aggressive recruitment strategies. Over time, it became a significant player in the direct sales industry, operating under various brand names and subsidiaries. Reddit+2The Truth Behind Door-to-Door Jobs+2The Devil Corp+2
⚠️ Common Criticisms and Controversies
Both DS-Max and Cobra Group have faced numerous allegations and criticisms:The Truth Behind Door-to-Door Jobs+1The Devil Corp+1
-
High-Pressure Sales Tactics: Representatives often engage in door-to-door or street sales, promoting products or services with aggressive pitches.
-
Misleading Recruitment: Job advertisements may present roles as marketing or management positions, but recruits often find themselves in commission-only sales roles with long hours and minimal support.
-
Pyramid-Like Structure: The emphasis on recruitment and the promise of rapid advancement resemble pyramid schemes, where success is heavily dependent on bringing in new recruits rather than product sales.
-
High Attrition Rates: Due to the challenging work conditions and low earnings, many recruits leave within a short period.
These practices have led to widespread criticism and have been documented in various forums and investigative reports. Reddit
🔍 Conclusion
While DS-Max and Cobra Group have provided opportunities for some individuals in direct sales, their business models have been widely criticized for exploitative practices and misleading representations. Potential recruits and consumers are advised to conduct thorough research and exercise caution when engaging with these or similar organizations.
If you're considering a position with such a company or have encountered related job offers, it's essential to scrutinize the company's background, employee reviews, and business practices to make an informed decision.
Could DS-Max and Cobra be the same business operating under two different names?
Yes, DS-Max and the Cobra Group are widely considered to be closely connected — many researchers, former employees, and investigative reporters describe them as essentially the same business model operating under different names, or as part of a loosely affiliated global network of direct sales companies. Here's how they're related:
🧩 1. Common Origin
-
DS-Max originated in Canada in the 1980s and became a global door-to-door sales empire.
-
Chris Niarchos, a prominent figure in DS-Max, later founded the Cobra Group (sometimes called "The Cobra Group of Companies").
-
Many of the sales techniques, management systems, and internal jargon used in Cobra were inherited directly from DS-Max.
🔄 2. Identical Business Model
Both organizations rely on:
-
Aggressive direct sales (door-to-door, event booths, street corners).
-
A "Business Ownership Program": new recruits are promised they can run their own office if they prove themselves in sales.
-
Commission-only pay with no base salary.
-
A pyramid-like recruitment hierarchy: reps recruit new reps, who hope to rise to "owner" by building a team.
🕸️ 3. Franchise-like Network
-
DS-Max and Cobra (and associated names like Appco Group, Cydcor, Credico, etc.) operate through hundreds of smaller offices worldwide.
-
These independent offices use different names to avoid public scrutiny and bad press.
-
Critics often refer to this web of companies as the "DS-Max system" or the "Devilcorp" network.
📜 4. Rebranding After Scandal
-
After facing mounting legal troubles and public criticism, especially in the early 2000s, many DS-Max offices rebranded as Cobra or Appco to distance themselves from the negative associations.
-
Former insiders have stated that the switch to Cobra was often just cosmetic, with the same practices and leadership structures underneath.
❗ 5. Widespread Criticism
Both DS-Max and Cobra have been:
-
Accused of running predatory pyramid-style operations.
-
Criticized for deceptive job ads (promising management or marketing roles that turn out to be sales jobs).
-
Known for extremely high turnover, with many recruits quitting within days or weeks.
✅ Conclusion
Yes, DS-Max and Cobra Group are not just similar — they are part of the same evolving business structure, with shared leadership roots, nearly identical methods, and a continuous history of rebranding to escape regulation and reputational damage.
Would you like a timeline or organizational chart of how these companies evolved and rebranded?
Was there at one point a strange religious cult in South Africa with a YouTube presence which was really a direct sales company?
Yes, there have been instances in South Africa where organizations exhibited characteristics of both religious cults and direct sales companies, often utilizing platforms like YouTube for promotion.
One notable example is the KwaSizabantu Mission, a Christian mission station in KwaZulu-Natal. In September 2020, News24 released an exposé alleging that KwaSizabantu operated as a cult, with former members reporting various forms of abuse, including financial exploitation. These revelations led to investigations by local authorities and caused several South African vendors to temporarily cease selling the mission-owned bottled water brand, aQuellé. However, subsequent reviews by the Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Rights Commission and an Independent Panel did not officially classify the mission as a cult. Wikipedia
Another organization with a global footprint, including in South Africa, is Swissindo. Founded in Indonesia, Swissindo presents itself as a debt relief initiative but has been widely criticized and labeled as a scam. The group claims to eliminate personal debts and offers financial salvation, often requiring members to pay fees and recruit others, resembling a pyramid scheme. Swissindo has been particularly active in targeting vulnerable and marginalized communities, promising financial freedom through questionable means. Wikipedia
These examples highlight how certain organizations can blend religious or spiritual rhetoric with direct sales or financial schemes, leveraging online platforms to expand their reach and influence.
What are the criticism levelled against Herbalife?
Herbalife, a global multi-level marketing (MLM) company that sells nutritional supplements and weight management products, has faced significant criticism and legal scrutiny over the years. Below are the key areas of criticism:
🧱 1. Pyramid Scheme Allegations
-
Core criticism: Herbalife has been accused of operating a business model that more closely resembles a pyramid scheme than a legitimate direct-selling company.
-
Reason: The emphasis on recruitment over actual retail sales to customers. Many critics argue that distributors earn more from recruiting new members than from selling products.
-
Legal impact:
-
In 2016, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reached a $200 million settlement with Herbalife.
-
The FTC did not label it a pyramid scheme, but mandated Herbalife to restructure its business model and better document retail sales.
-
📉 2. Unrealistic Income Claims
-
Herbalife has been accused of misleading potential recruits with stories of financial freedom and lavish lifestyles.
-
Reality: Most distributors earn little or no money, and many actually lose money due to expenses like purchasing inventory and attending training sessions.
-
Internal data (revealed during the FTC case) showed that a vast majority of distributors made minimal income or none at all.
🧪 3. Product Health Concerns
-
Some critics and healthcare professionals have raised concerns over the safety and efficacy of Herbalife products.
-
Issues include:
-
Allegations of liver damage linked to Herbalife supplements in some case reports (although not proven conclusively).
-
Lack of FDA approval for many of its products, although this is common for supplements in the U.S.
-
Concerns over aggressive weight-loss claims and insufficient evidence for some advertised benefits.
-
🌍 4. Targeting Vulnerable Populations
-
Herbalife has been criticized for targeting:
-
Low-income and immigrant communities, particularly in Latin America and among U.S. Latino populations.
-
People with limited financial literacy or job alternatives, luring them in with promises of entrepreneurship and independence.
-
-
Critics argue that this amounts to economic exploitation, as many end up losing money instead of achieving financial stability.
🎯 5. Bill Ackman vs. Herbalife
-
In 2012, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman publicly declared Herbalife a fraudulent pyramid scheme and took a $1 billion short position against the company.
-
This led to a media and regulatory spotlight, especially as other influential figures (like Carl Icahn) took the opposite side.
-
Though Ackman eventually exited the short in 2018, his campaign amplified public scrutiny and played a major role in the 2016 FTC settlement.
⚖️ 6. International Investigations
-
Belgium: A Belgian court ruled Herbalife to be a pyramid scheme in 2011 (later overturned).
-
China: In 2019, Chinese regulators launched an investigation into Herbalife’s business practices as part of a broader crackdown on health product companies.
-
Other countries have taken a cautious stance or conducted consumer protection investigations into the company.
✅ Herbalife’s Defense
Herbalife has maintained that:
-
It is a legitimate direct-selling company, not a pyramid scheme.
-
It has reformed its practices following the 2016 FTC settlement.
-
It provides high-quality, science-backed nutritional products, with many satisfied customers and successful distributors.
🧾 Summary of Key Criticisms:
| Category | Key Issues |
|---|---|
| Pyramid scheme | Focus on recruitment, not retail |
| Income claims | Misleading earnings potential |
| Product safety | Liver health concerns, unproven benefits |
| Exploitation | Targeting vulnerable groups |
| Legal scrutiny | FTC settlement, international investigations |
Let me know if you’d like details on specific legal cases, internal compensation data, or critical documentaries (like Betting on Zero).
