This pamphlet reprints several documents from the so-called Vern-Ryan Tendency within the U.S. Socialist Workers Party (SWP). The documents were originally written in 1952-53. At the time, the SWP was a Trotskyist organization in political solidarity with the Fourth International. I know next to nothing about the dissidents Sam Ryan and Dennis Vern apart from this material. Their opposition group is often accused of being “pro-Stalinist” in its analysis of East Europe. However, the Vern-Ryan Tendency is most famous for its criticism of the Trotskyist party in Bolivia, the POR of Guillermo Lora. Most of the material reprinted here deals with this issue.
In 1952, the nationalist MNR took power in Bolivia. What began as a classical
coup soon turned into a virtual revolution, as the labor union federation COB
mobilized thousands of armed workers in support of the MNR. The nationalist
cabinet consisted of several different factions, its left wing represented by
COB leader Juan Lechín. Eventually, the revolution entered a more moderate
phase (or was “betrayed”) as the MNR center faction around Victor Paz
Estenssoro got the upper hand.
What made the Bolivian situation almost unique was the important role played in
the events by a Trotskyist party, the previously mentioned POR. While the POR
was numerically weak, it did exercise a strong influence within the COB
leadership and the MNR left wing. POR leader Lora was Lechín's secretary,
Lechín's speeches were written by POR cadres and Lechín himself was briefly a
member of the Trotskyist party. The mineworkers' union FSTMB (likewise headed
by the ever-present Lechín) had adopted a Trotskyist-sounding program. The POR
also had several parliamentary deputies, elected as part of a FSTMB-backed
union ticket. When the MNR took power backed by COB, FSTMB and Lechín, POR
naturally acted as a ginger group on the MNR left wing.
The Fourth International supported Lora's policy, while the Vern-Ryan Tendency
accused the POR of selling out the revolution to the nationalists. Instead,
Vern and Ryan argued, the POR should have mobilized the working masses against
the “bourgeois” MNR government, like Lenin's Bolsheviks had mobilized the
Russian masses against the provisional government of Kerensky. Lora's failure
to do this was a “betrayal” of the Bolivian revolution. I admit that I find
their analysis surreal, but that's another show. Part of the disconnect is that
the Vern-Ryan Tendency assumed that the POR was a mass party with a strong
working class base, and hence resembled the Bolsheviks in that respect. But as
we have already seen, Lora's group was actually quite small. They were
influential precisely because they *didn't* oppose the MNR lefts, but rather
mingled with them. Mainly, however, we are dealing with a political problem,
Vern-Ryan opposing all nationalism (including Third World nationalism) to begin
with.
In 1953, the Fourth International split. Neither the “orthodox” International
Committee (dominated by the SWP) nor the “revisionist” International
Secretariat (led by Michel Pablo) criticized Lora's policies in Bolivia. This
is what makes the Bolivian issue so contentious for Trotskyists. If the
International Committee was the true embodiment of revolutionary Trotskyism,
how could it fail to notice that one of its member parties (POR supported the
Committee) had betrayed a working-class revolution? From this, some really hard
line Trotskyist elements eventually drew the conclusion that Vern-Ryan had been
right, and that the entire Fourth International ceased to be a revolutionary
organization in 1952-53. The International died on the Altiplano. These groups
either call for the creation of a Fifth International, or the recreation of the
true revolutionary Fourth International. This pamphlet is published by such a
group, the small League for the Revolutionary Party (LRP) in New York City.
This material clearly isn't for the general reader. However, if you are
interested in Trotskyist splits and fusions, “Bolivia: The Revolution the
`Fourth International' Betrayed” may be a useful addition to your collection.
No comments:
Post a Comment