Sunday, January 2, 2022

Patient Zero


The link below goes to an article from Newsweek - a mainline media outlet - arguing in favor of a supposed "conspiracy theory": the claim that Anthony Fauci´s US government agency funded dangerous "gain-of-function" research on COVID viruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China. You know, the same Wuhan were the COVID pandemic actually started...

Note the source of the claim: documents obtained by another media outlet, the Intercept, by filing a FOIA request. In other words, the Fauci people didn´t want the paperwork to become public. 

If and when Fauci becomes the Biden administration´s "fall guy" for everything that went wrong with the COVID pandemic response, this will suddenly become the new orthodoxy on Facebook!

Some pertinent quotes:

>>>For half a year, Anthony Fauci, the nation's top infectious-disease official, and Kentucky senator and physician Rand Paul have been locked in a battle over whether the National Institutes of Health funded dangerous "gain of function" research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and whether that research could have played a role in the pandemic. Against Senator Paul's aggressive questioning over three separate hearings, Dr. Fauci adamantly denied the charge. "The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology," he said in their first fracas on May 11, a position he has steadfastly maintained.

>>>Recently, however, a tranche of documents surfaced that complicate Dr. Fauci's denials. The documents, obtained by Freedom of Information Act requests, show that the NIH was funding research at the Wuhan lab that involved manipulating coronaviruses in ways that could have made them more transmissible and deadly to humans—work that arguably fits the definition of gain-of-function. The documents establish that top NIH officials were concerned that the work may have crossed a line the U.S. government had drawn against funding such risky research. The funding came from the NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which Dr. Fauci heads.

>>>The resistance among Dr. Fauci and other NIH officials to be forthcoming with information that could inform the debate over the origins of COVID-19 illustrates the old Watergate-era saw that the coverup is often worse than the crime. There's no evidence that the experiments in question had any direct bearing on the pandemic. In the past, Dr. Fauci has made strong arguments for why this type of research, albeit risky, was necessary to prevent future pandemics, and he could have done so again. But the NIH has dragged its feet over FOIA requests on the matter, handing over documents only after The Intercept took the agency to court.

>>>The apparent eagerness to conceal the documents has only raised suspicions about the controversial research and put the NIH on the defensive. Fauci told ABC, "neither I nor Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the NIH, lied or misled about what we've done." The episode is a self-inflicted wound that has further eroded trust in the nation's public health officials at a time when that trust is most important.

4 comments:

  1. Ytterst anmärkningsvärt. Och antagligen sant också. Om det skulle komma fram att något av de experimentella virusen faktiskt orsakade pandemin, kan det bli riktigt, riktigt obehagligt för vissa personer...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry for the Swedish interlude there.

    I still don´t understand why the Biden admin made a U-turn and made the Wuhan lab "conspiracy theory" acceptable. After all, *they* don´t want the Fauci angle to become widely known.

    Are they coldly calculating that the US media will manage to cover it up? Well, that doesn´t seem to be working, does it? Once they pointed to the Wuhan lab, the Fauci connection would become known, sooner or later.

    And here we are.

    Or are they so cynical that they coldly calculate that nothing will happen to them, even if some media outlets break rank?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Imagine the reactions if people somehow draw the conclusion that Fauci or the US were "behind" the COVID pandemic. Which I don´t think they were, in any literal sense.

    Indirectly, Fauci (and China) could be said to be responsible. Directly? Probably not.

    However, I doubt very much "fiery but peaceful protesters" will make those fine distinctions. Or the even finer one between Faucism and fascism...

    This could become very, very ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I´m of course willing to forgive Mr Fauci and his cronies, and let them leave quitely into the night, on one little condition.

    That they tell us everything they know. EVERYTHING!

    ReplyDelete