A Neo-Traditionalist (pun intended) analysis of world history. I suppose there is *some* truth to this, but in contrast to this content-creator, I don´t see why the Kshatriyas or Brahmins in power are necessarily better than the Vaishyas. Indeed, the Shudras (I´m definitely one) had more power under "Vaishya" regimes (i.e. Western mixed economy democracies) than under the two other "castes".
Nor is it clear why Neo-Feudalism should be considered Vaishya. Rather, it seems to be an alliance between Vaishyas and an autonomous state apparatus, representing a "caste" wholly its own. If succesful, Neo-Feudalism would no longer be capitalist sensu stricto, but rather a completely new system, in which part of the ruling caste would be ex-Vaishyas. (There is some inkling of this in the clip, since the narrator says that the globalists are trying to create a pseudo-religion, i.e. a "Brahmin" caste.)
Communism doesn´t fit the neat scheme either, unless you think it really does represent the rule of the Shudras, which seems questionable. Rather, the Communist regimes can be seen as some kind of neo- or pseudo-Kshatriyas and ditto Brahmins.
Seems like Another somewhat far fetched projektion of a westerner on hindu history. Im not by any means an expert om the subject, but after my own retarded Animal rights projections on hinduism(Animal rights is not a retard idea but me projecting it on hinduism was) i have a very sensitive radar for western projections on other cultures. Its an almost excusive western typpe of retardism and very embarrasing when you think about it.
ReplyDelete