Sunday, January 3, 2021

Daemonic laughter



"Since everything is but an apparition, perfect in being what it is, having nothing to do with good or bad, acceptance or rejection, one might as well burst out laughing!"

"Tibetan Yoga. Principles and Practices" is a book by Ian A Baker published in 2019. The contents surprised me, and might shock the unwary. For a long time, Tibetan Buddhism has been depicted in the West as a highly spiritual, enlightened and pacifist creed associated with His Holiness the Dalai Lama. But as notorious book-worms like yours truly tried to tell you long ago, actual Vajrayana Buddhism also includes a secret "Tantric" tradition which is essentially the exact opposite of the public messaging of high-ranking lamas. 

Reading "Tibetan Yoga", I realized that I didn't know half of it! 

Ritual sex, ingestion of bodily fluids (no, I won't specify which ones), highly potent psychedelic drugs, awakening of the kundalini through weird "yogic drops", attempts to consciously control your dreams, and Tantric dance are all part of the picture. So are exercises in which the yogi identifies with a wrathful Tantric deity, daemonically laughing at samsara and nirvana. The author even describes an endo-cannibalistic practice in which small quantities of flesh from the corpse of a Brahmin are eaten by the aspirant! There is also a ritual in which the yogi offers his body to flesh-eating spirits, although it seems said spirits have to wait until the naturally-occuring death of the practitioner before claiming the prize... 

And all this time, I assumed Dzogchen was pretty extreme! 

The paradoxical point of Tantric practice is to use the physical body and "embodied experience" as a tool for extra-cosmical transcendence. Thus, orgasm is a "skillful mean" to experience the unity of emptiness and bliss which is the foundation of the world. Dream Yoga teaches that not just dreams, but also the reality we experience when awake, are equally illusory - and equally possible to playfully control. Kundalini or the taking of drugs are other examples of "physical" practices which point to the spiritual inner essence of existence. 

Vajrayana's view of the Divine is - unsurprisingly - difficult to conceptualize, being entirely beyond concepts. Samsara and nirvana are said to be one. Existence is at all times both a divine luminosity beyond all phenomena *and* the constantly arising phenomena themselves. Reality is a grand illusion, but when approached with the right attitude, a blissful illusion. 

Despite this, I get the impression that some kind of "duality" has creeped in even in Tibetan yoga. The goal of some practices is to eject the consciousness at the time of death to a "pure land" of some buddha, really a phenomenal paradise of some sort. There is also the difficult to understand idea of the "rainbow body", when the physical body disappears into rainbow-colored light and presumably merges with the noumenal luminosity (and not with the illusory phenomena). 

The biggest surprise in the book was that Tibetan yogis use psychotropic drugs. I rather naively assumed that was considered incompatible with meditation practices. Datura, cannabis and other plants are freely used by the Tantrikas to induce altered states of consciousness. In passing, Baker reveals what he suspects is the real identity of Vedic soma. Yes, it's the mushroom Stropharia cubensis... 

While "Tibetan Yoga" is interesting and richly Illustrated, I'm not sure if a beginner will be any wiser after reading it. Baker has a strong "scientist" tendency, trying to interpret the yogic exercises and attendant phenomena as non-supernaturally as possible. He constantly claims that the Tantric practices will make the practitioner more compassionate, healthy and happy - which somehow seems to miss the point. Interestingly, the author fears that Vajrayana faces an uncertain future in the West, ironically because the Western world has become simultaneously more egalitarian and more restrictive. The former clashes with the traditionally hierarchic structure of Tibetan Buddhism, while "politically correct" puritanism makes the antinomian character of Tantrism (such as ritual sex between teacher and student) beyond the pale. 

But then, why should this really be a problem? After all, the Left Hand Path has always been a secret minority activity... 

Only a few are called to daemonically laugh at our predicament. 


9 comments:

  1. Most of the contemporary facination in the west with Dalai Lama and Tibet is so embarassing.Hordes of PC zombies projecting their own PC neuroses on Dalai Lama. Then they go full retard and are swept away in facination with their own projections.
    Dalai Lama of course exploit this to give Tibet international leverage against China. Cant blame him. But somtimes he fumbles when trying to live up to the projections. Like when he came to close to revealing his opinions about Islam. Before that several incidents when he talked about homosexuality in a slightly less than 100% flattering way. When this happens his western PC horde become anxious for a short while, then they drench the disturbance in the PC field by projecting even harder.
    I think Dalai Lama is doing his best appease the PC horde but PC is like a very complicated language full of gramatical rules but almost as many exeptions.
    Wesernes find PC easy just beacause they are so marinated in it and cant phantom how difficult this "language" is for a non native speaker.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dalai Lama also opposed mass migration during the migrant crisis, for instance by saying that Germany should remain German! Ooops...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dalai Lama är ibland riktigt intressant. https://kiremaj70.blogspot.com/2011/12/dalai-lama-sager-sig-vara-till-halften.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. För den som inte orkar k9olla länkar. Ett blogginlägg från 2011.

    "Dalai Lama säger sig vara till hälften marxist och till hälften buddhist

    Dalai Lama har ju ofta använts i antikommunistisk propaganda. Om man läser hans egna uttalanden får man dock ett annat intryck. Alla gånger jag har sett honom diskutera marxismen har han uttalat sig positivt om den.

    OK, jag är inte alls naiv. Ett Tibet med Dalai Lama som ledare skulle knappast bli "marxistiskt". Å andra sidan är det en ganska så teoretisk fråga eftersom vi med all säkerhet inte kommer att får se ett Tibet med Dalai Lama som ledare. Åtminstone inte den nuvarande Dalai Lama, mänskligt att döma...

    I en intervju med Dalai Lama säger han bland annat nedanstående. Som sagt, jag är inte naiv, men på något sätt tycker jag att det är intressant att han ganska så så klart markerar sig mot de anti-marxister som ser honom sin en symbol för kampen mot "kommunism" och "marxism".

    "Of all the modern economic theories, the economic system of Marxism is founded on moral principles, while capitalism is concerned only with gain and profitability. Marxism is concerned with the distribution of wealth on an equal basis and the equitable utilization of the means of production. It is also concerned with the fate of the working classes--that is, the majority--as well as with the fate of those who are underprivileged and in need, and Marxism cares about the victims of minority-imposed exploitation. For those reasons the system appeals to me, and it seems fair….

    As for the failure of the Marxist regimes, first of all I do not consider the former USSR, or China, or even Vietnam, to have been true Marxist regimes, for they were far more concerned with their narrow national interests than with the Workers' International; this is why there were conflicts, for example, between China and the USSR, or between China and Vietnam. If those three regimes had truly been based upon Marxist principles, those conflicts would never have occurred......

    The failure of the regime in the former Soviet Union was, for me, not the failure of Marxism but the failure of totalitarianism. For this reason I still think of myself as half-Marxist, half-Buddhist."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Intressant. Frågan är dock varför han säger så. Vill han ha stöd av vänsterliberala intellektuella? Är marxismen populär i Indien, där han befinner sig i exil? Är det en förhandlingstrevare till Kina?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ja. det kan ju vara något av detta. Men det *kan* ju också vara så att han på något sätt... anser det.

    Om en person är tillräckligt högt upp politiskt finns det ju en tendens att tro att allt denne säger endast är en del av ett maktspel. Det kan ju ligga mycket i det, men det hindrar ju inte att de dessutom *skulle* kunna ha några åsikter som inte enbart var en del i ett rent taktiskt spel

    Jag köpte en gång en bok av Dalai Lama som jag nu inte minns vad den hette. Den var inte speciellt tjock.

    Den handlade om relationen mellan religion o0ch vetenskap. Mycket i den var intressant. Bland annat hade han en riktigt sofistikerad kritik av den rent materialistiska utvecklingsläran. Han medgav att utvecklingen kunde vara en kombination av naturligt urval och mutationer. Men menade sedan att mutationerna ju inte behövde vara helt slumpvisa och att de kan finnas en andlig kraft som har något att göra med vilka mutationer som ska uppstå i olika lägen.

    Jag tyckte att det var en ganska bra förklaring till varför utvecklingen verkar gå snabbare än vad rena slumpprocesser skulle kunna åstadkomma.

    Jag blev imponerad av hans sätt att argumentera.

    Varför säger jag detta? Jo, jag fick intrycket att Dalai Lama hade förmågan att ställa sig intressanta frågor, utifrån ett tänkande som definitivt inte var ytligt. Därför vill jag inte automatiskt avfärda alla åsikter han uttrycker som en del i ett manipulativt maktspel.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jag läste nyligen "Den röde Buddha" av Tore Zetterholm. Visserligen en skönlitteratur bok men mycket intressanta skildringar av det tibetanska proletariatet och de feodala styggelser man levde under. Väldigt lätt att förstå deras initiala sympatier för en kinesisk annektering. Dessa sympatier svalnar dock påtagligt när man inser att kina planerar spä ut den tibetanska kulturen till homeopatiska nivåer genom folkutbyte.
    Hade kina spelat sina kort annorlunda från början hade tibet kanske kunnat bli ett intressant exempel på världens första buddhistiskt-socialistiska teokrati.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Intressant. Jag har också hört på spridda håll att de tibetanska bönderna till en början hade vissa sympatier för kommunisterna p g a jordreformen, men några ultravänster-svängar senare var förtroendet förstås som bortblåst...

    ReplyDelete