 |
| Dick Cheney watching the 9/11 attacks |
Suspicions are growing stronger that Saudi Arabia, or at least some people in elite circles in Saudi Arabia, aided and abetted the al-Qaeda terrorists who attacked the American mainland on 9/11 2001. But why would Saudis do such a thing?
Now, it´s certainly true that Saudi Arabia isn´t a *pure* client state to the United States. The relations between the US and Saudi have been pretty complex for a long time. One example is the 1973 oil crisis. Another is the Saudi support to (or creation of) IS, ISIL or ISIS in Iraq, who attacked Americans and prolonged the Iraqi War. Still another is the Saudi opposition to Israel. But when the chips are down, Saudi Arabia is obviously dependent on US military and political support for its base survival. This was most obvious during the Gulf War. Without strong US military defenses "on the ground", Saudi Arabia would probably have been invaded and partitioned between Iraq and Iran long ago!
Presumably, Saudi elites know this. So why would some of them support a massive terrorist attack against New York City and Washington DC?
There is one possible explanation, but it´s not one likely to be met with cheers from any establishment faction in the US.
It´s a deep state conspiracy, stupid.
Maybe the US deep state and the Saudi ditto planned 9/11 in advance, or something just like it? *Then* there would suddenly be a reason for Saudi Arabian circles to support the operation. It was a large scale provocation, the purpose of which was to give the US an excuse to attack Iraq, and topple everybody else´s geopolitical applecarts. And Saddam Hussein´s regime in Iraq was an enemy of Saudi Arabia. Al-Qaeda were the patsies and fall guys of the operation.
When Iraq descended into chaos instead of becoming an American Protektorat, Saudi Arabia changed tack and started to support ISIS against the Shia Muslim/Iranian influence, the Americans being caught in the middle. Even later, US pressure forced the Saudis to back down, leading to their split with Qatar. In return, they got lucrative arms deals and (I suppose) a continued black out of the FBI report on Saudi involvement in 9/11 (please insert the name "Donald Trump" here, and also the cryptic sentence "Steve Bannon´s sword dance in Riyadh"). I assume Joe Biden´s decision to declassify parts of the secret report is some kind of warning to the Saudis not to rock boat?
The cynicism of all these people is simply breathtaking.
Now, read this:
There are too many anomalies surrounding the World Trade Cntr buildings bombings that there is not room to go into them. These two buildings were built specifically to withstand a hit from an airliner. The buildings fell straight down onto their foundations, a dead giveaway of demolition (planted explosives which are also evident on videos of the collapse). Particulate dust from their remains show a residual sample of an explosive manufactured in only one place, Los Alamos National Laboratory. The concrete and steel girders were melted at a far more extreme temperature than would ever be achieved by "jet fuel". The dust from the buildings was in such a fine particulate state that would only be accomplished with a thermite weapon. George Bush owned the security company watching over these towers during the two weeks prior to their demolition, also these towers were insured by same entity two weeks prior to their demolition for millions of dollars (coincidence??). The Pentagon ordered the air defense system around the capitol to be inactive on the morning of 9/11. It is impossible to go anywhere near DC airspace without a digital code to send to the tower from your aircraft to enter this airspace. Commercial airline pilots have stated it is next to impossible (at least it is for them) to fly a plane at that low altitude into a building. The grass surrounding the hole (created by explosive) in the side of the pentagon, which, btw, was at the finance center offices of the military (how convenient), was undisturbed. The day previous t 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld announced there being several trillion dollars "not accounted for". This scenario did not happen the way official sources claimed. The "pilots" supposed to have flown these jet airliners could not pass the flight test for a single engine Cessna in he class they were placed in in Florida. The "hijackers" who supposedly overcame the flights were found alive and well elsewhere when researchers began to catch a wiff of some highly potent animal dung surrounding this ridiculously invented story. The list goes on from there also. The official narrative is physically impossible to prove.
ReplyDeleteThe Middle East was targeted by Pentagon officials after coercion by the ET (higher intelligence) beings they're in contact with, which most folks will immediately dismiss as nonsense, but there it is. You cannot accomplish the intricacy and timing of the false flag events that have been perpetrated globally without the use of artificial intelligence or extremely complex computer technology, it simply is not humanly possible. Which leads me to want to say that most people are in a serious coma regarding the world they live in and the events occurring in front of them. This ET race, claimed to be Draco Reptilian, has given governments advanced technology in exchange for "biological material" in the form of citizens. This is exactly why the Southern border has been more or less open to visitors per Joe Biden, the current Liar in Chief. Also there's the obvious issue of a pull out of our military forces in Afghanistan, which couldn't have happened in a less inefficient way. Leaving behind estimates of 13,000 military and civilian, 5 airbases, one of which is the most advanced on the planet, equipment and weapons and money for the Taliban to readily acquisition. Sounds all too convenient for someone wishing to place a terrorist group in power. Then of course is the global push for placing a physically debilitating injection in every person, supposedly in response to a "virus" that's not much more worse than a bad case of the flu (98% recovery rate). What level of idiocy must people be living in to believe that a government has their "safety" and "better good" in mind? Has it ever been that way in the past? Do a little research on your own and see if I'm wrong.
ReplyDelete