Some (perhaps really silly) reflections at 4AM in the morning...
Does
God have free will? If so, how come he never choses evil? Is he never tempted
to do so? But if so, how is his will “free”? Doesn´t a free will imply an
actual possibility of a choice between at least two options? But who could
tempt god, if he is alone and perfect?
Perhaps
God is free in the “compatibilist” sense. In other words, he doesn´t have free
will “internally”, being all-loving and ever-loving by his very nature, but he has
free will “externally” in the sense that nothing outside of Him compels Him to
act as He does.
But
this too leads to problems. For instance, where does free will even come from,
if the Creator and Ground of Being lacks it? If God created or emanated creatures
with a free will, how did they get this “free will”? This has led some mystics
to propose that the ground of free will exists in God´s very nature or essence,
this essence being somehow “dual”, having both a constructive side and a
destructive ditto. Or this ground being somehow a void from which anything can
rise. Or even that God´s primary attribute is precisely his radical freedom,
his ability to do whatever he chooses. There is also the idea of “self-limitation”,
but that sounds self-contradictory, for how can a perfect god limit himself? Where
does God´s power of self-limitation even come from? His nature must be very
strange indeed!
Or
is free will actually an imperfection? After all, the “freedom” to chose
between good and evil (or freedom to in effect *create* evil by turning away
from God) certainly looks imperfect! But where does this imperfection come
from? If God created/emanated everything, does it come from God himself? Or is
everything God creates/emanates necessarily less perfect than God himself? But
isn´t even that a form of imperfection? A perfect god would only expand Himself
as He already is. Also, if every creation of the Divine is *somehow* less
perfect than God, doesn´t this imply that *there are no guarantees against a
fall*? Somewhere, somehow, there will always be suffering. But what kind of
shitty universe is that, in which not even the Creator-Emanator can stop his
creations from attacking each other? Indeed, isn´t the Devil really the
strongest party in such a universe, since there will always be room for him somewhere?
At the moment, he seems to be reigning in a universe 93 billion light-years
wide!
One
“solution” to be above is to meekly say that we don´t know, but we need faith
in Jesus, who was resurrected, und so weiter. But surely there is an error in
reasoning here: we seem to be perfectly able to *ask the questions*, so how
come we can´t find any answer? Maybe it´s because we don´t want to hear the
obvious answer: there is no god and hence no “mystery” to be solved in the
first place. Perhaps the atheists are right. Or some kind of very orthodox
Buddhists. Our hallowed ideas about Perfection might simply be abstractions (as
in “the perfect triangle” or the mathematical certainty of 1 + 1 = 2) or empirically-derived
fantasies writ large (Charlie´s chocolate factory turns into the New
Jerusalem).
Another
solution is to redefine our ideals of perfection. Perhaps the cosmos we live in
(God, warts and all) really is the best possible? After all, we can return to
Him when we´re ready for it, right? How is that not perfect? Still another solution
is the one given by Osho in one of his books: “There are no answers to the questions
about the meaning of life. But if you start to meditate, all those questions
will just disappear.” Go figure! Somehow, all these “solutions” to our intellectual
predicament sound kind of overlapping…
Gurdjieff explained and taught an interesting theory called the Ray of Creation. Laws change at different 'stops' on the Ray, our Earth being under 48 laws. The 'higher' one goes, the lesser the laws to govern. Of course it's not truth in the hard sense but points to something...
ReplyDeleteNext time you're around at 4 am try a google search or watch a you tuber try and explain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCON2KqyEm0
:-)
ReplyDeleteWill look it up!
The most likely explanation to our divine conundrums is probably just "we-don´t-know". We simply don´t have the supersensible senses to pick up and process such information. Maybe that´s why we get stuck in dichotomies such as "personal god-impersonal divine", "free will-determinism", even "atheism-theism" perhaps? We can´t even process revelation, the supposed solution to our epistemological predicament according to some religions...
ReplyDelete"A buddha will always be misunderstood"
ReplyDeleteI read that one! No profundity there! And Gibran's short parables were all the fad in my 1960's high school literature classes. I think I have 'The Madman' around here somewhere. More AI content back at the Drag Queen Hour too...
Delete