Is this weird article some kind of mistake? The product of a senile mind, perhaps? Note that it identifies economic development with "capitalism" and reaches the conclusion that nobody should live at higher elevations in Nepal?! The article sounds almost primitivist, despite also (implicitly) denying climate change. The SWP (US) is becoming increasingly less coherent...
In case anybody gives shit.
Nepal flood shows capitalism, not "climate", caused disasters
No comments:
Post a Comment