A propos a discussion on another blog...
This question sits right at the boundary between physics, philosophy of limits, and what people sometimes call cosmic pessimism. There is no single “proof” that interstellar travel is impossible — but there are several deep, mutually reinforcing arguments suggesting it may be permanently infeasible for any technological civilization, not just us.
I’ll lay out the main ones.
1. The relativistic energy wall
The universe enforces a hard speed limit: light speed.
From Albert Einstein’s relativity, the energy required to accelerate mass increases without bound as you approach . Even at modest fractions of light speed, the energy cost becomes absurd.
Example:
A tiny 100-ton probe at 0.2c requires energy comparable to the entire annual output of a major nation — just to accelerate it, not to slow it down.
For crewed ships or colony ships:
-
You need propulsion
-
Radiation shielding
-
Life support for centuries
-
Deceleration fuel at the destination
This is not “hard engineering”.
It is thermodynamic brutality.
The Solar System is energetically cheap. Interstellar space is not.
2. The interstellar medium is lethal at high speed
At relativistic velocities, even a dust grain hits with the energy of a bomb.
At 0.2c:
-
A grain of sand delivers explosive-level kinetic energy
-
Hydrogen atoms become hard radiation
To survive, a ship needs:
-
Shielding thicker than meters of metal or ice
-
Or massive electromagnetic fields
-
Which themselves require huge power and mass
This creates a feedback loop:
More shielding → more mass → more energy → more shielding
This is a classic runaway constraint.
3. No plausible propulsion system escapes this
Every speculative drive hits a wall:
| Concept | Fatal problem |
|---|---|
| Fusion rockets | Fuel mass > payload |
| Antimatter | Impossible to produce at scale |
| Light sails | Laser arrays must be planetary-scale |
| Bussard ramjets | Interstellar gas is too thin |
| Warp drives | Require negative energy not known to exist |
| Wormholes | Require exotic matter + stability we have no evidence for |
Nothing in known physics allows cheap relativistic mass transport.
You can send tiny probes.
You cannot send civilizations.
4. Time kills civilizations
Even at optimistic speeds:
-
Nearest stars: decades to centuries
-
Colonization waves: millennia
-
Galactic travel: millions of years
But technological civilizations are fragile.
On Earth:
-
Industrial civilization is ~200 years old
-
Writing ~5,000 years
-
Empires collapse in centuries
Interstellar projects require:
Unbroken political, economic, and cultural continuity for longer than any civilization has ever survived.
That may be a deeper barrier than physics.
5. The Fermi silence is real
If interstellar colonization were easy, the galaxy should already be full.
This is the Enrico Fermi paradox:
“Where is everybody?”
We see:
-
No probes
-
No megastructures
-
No astroengineering
-
No alien signals
The simplest explanation is:
Interstellar expansion is not viable, even for advanced civilizations.
6. Von Neumann probes still haven’t appeared
Even self-replicating AI probes — far easier than sending humans — should have filled the galaxy in a few million years.
They haven’t.
This suggests either:
-
They are impossible
-
Or they are universally avoided
-
Or civilizations reliably destroy themselves before building them
All three point to a hard barrier.
7. The cosmic prison hypothesis
Putting this together yields a bleak but coherent picture:
Stars are islands. Civilizations are trapped on them.
You can explore your own solar system.
You can send robotic scouts to nearby stars.
But no species migrates between stars in a meaningful way.
The universe looks empty not because life is rare — but because distance is fatal.
8. Why aliens probably aren’t here
If aliens could travel between stars cheaply:
-
Earth would have been visited billions of years ago
-
The Solar System would show obvious artifacts
Since it doesn’t, the simplest inference is:
They can’t get here.
Not because they aren’t smart — but because the universe is bigger than technology.
Final thought
The dream of starflight may be psychologically irresistible — especially to a species like ours, so shaped by exploration myths — but the universe may be telling us something very Buddhist in spirit:
Desire does not cancel limitation.
We may be a brilliant, tragic species:
able to see the stars,
but never to reach them. đ
No comments:
Post a Comment