 |
| A tulip |
Sometimes I "test" the AI. Like the other day. When I asked the question below.
Provocative question overheard on the internet: "Was Calvin a Calvinist?". Is there a difference between Calvin, Calvinism and Reformed Christianity?
Short answer: yes, there is a real difference, and the provocative question “Was Calvin a Calvinist?” is not just internet trolling—it points to a genuine historical and theological problem.
I’ll lay this out cleanly in three layers: Calvin, Calvinism, and Reformed Christianity.
1. Calvin ≠ Calvinism (strictly speaking)
John Calvin (1509–1564)
Calvin was:
-
A second-generation Reformer, not a system-builder in the later sense
-
Primarily a biblical exegete and pastor
-
Writing in response to concrete controversies, not constructing a closed dogmatic system
Key features of Calvin himself:
-
No “five points”
-
No TULIP
-
No rigid doctrine of double predestination as later formalized
-
Strong emphasis on union with Christ rather than decretal logic
-
Significant theological flexibility (e.g., on church polity, civil authority, even aspects of predestination)
Calvin cared less about speculative metaphysics and more about piety, discipline, and scriptural fidelity.
So in that sense, Calvin was not a “Calvinist”, if by Calvinist we mean later doctrinal packages.
2. Calvinism: a post-Calvin construction
What “Calvinism” usually means
“Calvinism” is largely:
-
A 17th-century systematization
-
Shaped by polemics (especially against Arminians and Catholics)
-
Defined retrospectively
Its classic crystallization:
-
Synod of Dort (1618–1619)
-
The Canons of Dort
-
Later summarized (much later!) as TULIP
This Calvinism emphasizes:
-
Decretal theology (God’s eternal decrees as first principle)
-
Sharp formulations of election and reprobation
-
Logical coherence over pastoral ambiguity
Many of these emphases are:
-
Present in seed in Calvin
-
But intensified, formalized, and sometimes hardened
Hence the historical joke:
Calvin would likely have found some “Calvinists” unsettling.
3. Reformed Christianity ≠ Calvinism
Reformed Christianity is broader than Calvinism
“Reformed” refers to a family of churches and traditions, not a single theology.
Reformed Christianity includes:
-
Swiss Reformed (Zwingli, Bullinger)
-
Genevan (Calvin)
-
Dutch Reformed
-
German Reformed
-
Scottish Presbyterian
-
Later developments (e.g., Barth, Torrance)
Shared Reformed commitments:
-
Scripture as supreme norm
-
Covenant theology (in diverse forms)
-
Emphasis on God’s sovereignty
-
Non-Lutheran Protestant sacramental theology
But within Reformed Christianity, you find:
-
Supralapsarian and infralapsarian views
-
High vs low sacramental realism
-
Different political theologies
-
Different attitudes to natural law and philosophy
Not all Reformed Christians are “Calvinists” in the strict Dortian sense.
4. Why the confusion persists
A. Calvin became a symbol
-
Opponents labeled the movement after him
-
Followers retroactively systematized him
-
“Calvin” became shorthand for an entire tradition
B. Polemical simplification
-
Catholics, Arminians, and later evangelicals needed a foil
-
TULIP is pedagogically useful but historically misleading
C. Modern identity politics
-
“Calvinist” today often signals:
-
A certain spirituality
-
A certain politics
-
A certain internet tribe
-
Which has little to do with 16th-century Geneva.
5. A helpful analogy
Think of it this way:
-
Aristotle ≠ Aristotelianism
-
Aquinas ≠ Thomism
-
Marx ≠ Marxism
Likewise:
-
Calvin ≠ Calvinism
-
Calvinism ⊂ Reformed Christianity
Calvin is a source, not the system.
6. So—was Calvin a Calvinist?
Historically: no
Theologically: partially
Polemically: irrelevant
Calvin was a Reformed Christian theologian whose thought later became one of several organizing centers for a broader tradition.
Bottom line
-
Calvinism is not identical with Calvin
-
Reformed Christianity is broader than Calvinism
-
Asking “Was Calvin a Calvinist?” is a legitimate way to expose anachronism
If you’d like, I can:
-
Compare Calvin and Aquinas on predestination
-
Contrast Calvin and Bullinger
-
Or explain how Barth deliberately rejected Calvinism while remaining Reformed
No comments:
Post a Comment