"Irreversible Damage: Teenage Girls and the Transgender Craze" is a book by Abigail Shrier, a writer for the Wall Street Journal. The book speaks for itself and although I didn´t like its style (too much teenage angst - from a grown up woman - and too many Jewish cultural references), I nevertheless recommend everyone to read it. I knew some kind of weird transgender craze was going on, but clearly I didn´t know half of it!
Until about ten years ago, the number of people with gender dysphoria (then usually referred to as transsexuals) was about 0.01% of the population. Most were male, and most had been gender dysphoric since childhood. Today, by contrast, transgendered people are literally everywhere, most of them are girls (a unique situation historically) and the gender dysphoria usually starts suddenly, with no prior history, in adolescence. In just a few years, the number of teenage girls with supposed gender dysphoria has risen by astronomical numbers. This in itself is highly anomalous - unless we assume (as the author does assume) that we´re dealing with a "social contagion". Or, to use stronger language not found in this book, a mass hysteria.
Other factors compound our skepticism. Very often, girls "come out" as the opposite gender in clusters. Peers come out together. Virtually always, the "rapid onset gender dysphoria" (ROGD) is the result of contact with trans-activists on the web. Most girls claiming to be transgendered seem to share a similar profile: White, upper middle class parents, academically gifted, socially awkward or depressed, both the adolescent and the parents have "progressive" political views. Transgenderism seems to be a woke virus. If the phenomenon is really real, it should be distributed more evenly in the population (like homosexuality or bisexuality). Instead, it clusters in precisely the places were political sympathy for the ROGD phenomenon is strongest. Note also the curious fact that the phenomenon seems to have originated on the American West Coast, and then spread gradually to the rest of the United States, Canada and Western Europe. It seems to be largely unknown in, say, Hungary or Baluchistan.
And speaking of that political sympathy...
California has enacted laws threatening health workers with jail time if they don´t use the "preferred pronouns" of their patients. New York State has gone even further, extending a similar law to cover landlords and employers. Over a dozen US state has prohibited "conversion therapy for transgendered individuals", making it effectively illegal for therapists to question the "gender identity" of their patients. But then, most therapists don´t even try. They are really activists, aiding and abetting the "transitioning" of teenagers. The same is true of doctors and surgeons dealing with gender dysphoria issues. In California, 13-year olds have the "right" to transition through hormonal and surgical interventions. In many states, college students can get testosterone without a prescription. The colleges and universities themselves simply sell them! "Obamacare" (the Affordable Care Act) makes it possible to obtain testosterone cheaply. The teachers are in on it, too. Many schools in the US have compulsory "sex and gender identity education" that are really trans-propaganda. This is true of both public and private schools. Many schools refer to the students by their "preferred pronouns" without even informing the parents. And yes, women´s sports are under attack, since mediocre male-to-female trans-persons can compete as women and win medals, destroying the careers of female athletes in the process. Clearly, it's not just the bathrooms!
This is the most disturbing aspect of the phenomenon: the anti-feminist angle, dressed in "progressive" garb. It´s no longer OK to be a girl. You get higher status if you transition to a boy. If you do "typically boyish things", you *must be* a boy, rather than a girl excelling at previously all-male territory. Conversely, boys who transition to girls can now invade female spaces (such as women´s sports). In some schools, nobody identifies as a lesbian anymore, while every other girl claims to be a boy! The whole thing reminds me of how leftists genuflect before Islam and Islamism, two other patriarchal worldviews. It seems feminism is always the loser in the rainbow alliance. (It´s almost as if the feminists are right: yes, there really is a patriarchy!)
Critics are of course silenced. Therapists who question the transgender craze are fired from their jobs, teens who de-transitioned are cancelled from social forums for "hate speech", celebs might lose their sponsors, etc. I wouldn´t be surprised if Abigail Shrier´s book will be cancelled further down the line. The transgender milieu itself seems to be a fanaticized social cult. Yet, the hard facts speak against the transgender ideology. There is no evidence that suicide rates go down if teenagers or young adults "transition" through hormones or surgery. If anything, the opposite seems to be the case. Many live to regret their decisions (which may include surgically removing their breasts). 70% of gender dysphoric children outgrow their gender dysphoria if *no* intervention is made, while 100% of those on puberty blockers will start taking cross-sex hormones. (Yes, pre-pubescent girls are allowed to take puberty blockers!) This is once again different from homosexuality, which is usually set in stone, regardless of whether or not there is an attempt to stop it. However, evidence means nothing to the activists, who are rushing headlong into a disaster.
Why has transgenderism been so succesful, while other strange subcultures on the web have remained marginalized? Shrier never discusses this problem, but it did struck me when reading her book. Why are Otherkin (adolescents claiming to be animals and hence suffering from "species dysmorphia"), Tulpamancers (ditto claiming that their imaginary friends are real) or Plural Systems (ditto claiming to be more than one person inhabiting the same body) not "affirmed" in the same manner as transgendered individuals? My guess is that the neo-trans-people have succesfully piggybacked on the gay rights movement (the current acronym is LGBTQ, after all). In the process, they have all but obliterated the "L" and will probably turn on the "G" soon enough, too. (Not to mention the original transsexuals.) However, something even more sinister might be going on.
Shrier never discusses the role of Big Pharma in the equation. Indeed, it seems to be a kind of elephant in the room. Of course it is: Shrier is an opinion writer for the Wall Street Journal. Just as Big Pharma was prescribing opiates for any conceivable depression, leading to the opiate crisis, *somebody* must be making big bucks on all the "T" (testosterone), other hormones, surgical interventions, and hours spent in "affirming" therapy. Let me guess. Big Pharma meets Big Shrink? The whole thing is a capitalist venture, to some extent even paid for by the tax-payers, with equally disastrous results as the opiate crisis. The "progressives" have been hoodwinked by Woke Capital. Not the first time! Yet, Shrier is more interested in confiscating kids´ android phones, than with wrestling this elephant...
There is another thing, too, which struck me as odd about "Irreversible Damage". When all is said and done, I think it´s obvious that the teens with ROGD really are deeply depressed. *That* part of the equation is real. Yet, the words "autism spectrum disorder", "Asperger´s" or "ADHD/ADD" doesn´t seem to be anywhere in the book. But surely *this* is a large portion of the explanation? The profile of the typical ROGD sufferer seems to fit the autism spectrum: a socially awkward "nerd". Transgenderism is the weird coping mechanism of these kids in the hypocritical, popularity-obsessed, perfection-obsessed "liberal" upper middle class American milieu. Presumably, other teens with autism spectrum disorders and similar conditions cope in other ways, perhaps by becoming Alt Right trolls, turning autism into another "identity" or, ahem, by actually doing something real about their situation.
It will be, shall we say, interesting to see how this will end. For end it will. Will the transgender craze be stopped cold by the American people, perhaps after trying to destroy women´s sports? Will people who were brainwashed into "transitioning" by the cult sue their therapists ten years from now? Or is the craze too deeply ingrained in the collective psyche, making the only "solution" a terrible backlash in 25 years or so? A backlash that will affect victim and perpetrator equally, and also spread to gays, lesbians and transsexuals, who have little or nothing in common with the ROGD teens?
One thing is certain. This moment in time will be remembered as another example of "extraordinary popular delusions and the madness of crowds".
Det finns ett land det även långt tidigare det vanligare med kvinnor som ville bli män än tvärtom. Det är Iran (där Khomeini öppnade för att tillåta "könskorrigerande" operationer redan på 80-talet!).
ReplyDeleteVad gäller Iran var det ganska så uppenbart att det berodde på de sociala fördelar som män hade.
I våra delar av världen var det ju tvärtom så att det var vanligare att det kön som hade mest makt ville byta till det kön som hade minst makt.. vilket talade för att orsakerna här var psykologiska mer än sociologiska.
Själv har jag en massa gånger tänkt på att jag vill byta kön men aldrig gjort något åt saken. Nu är jag väl för gammal, men dessutom skräms jag av fanatismen i trans-miljöer.
Just den kompakta övertygelsen att man ÄR det kön man vill vara, och inte endast VILL vara det. Jag tycker att det närmast är metafysiskt. Jag har haft mycket starka upplevelser av att vilja vara kvinna, men jag har aldrig utgått från att det beror på att jag med säkerhet FÖDDES som kvinna i allt utom det kroppsliga... Hur skulle jag kunna veta det?
Jag är lite för skeptisk (och mina åsikter lite för psykodymamiska...) för att känna mig säker på en sån sak.
Jag får spontant sympatier för indiska Hijras som består av män som opererar sig till kvinnor, men som kombinerar detta med någon sorts biologisk realism. De ser sig själv som ett "tredje kön" eftersom de menar att de som inte kan föda barn inte kan definieras som kvinnor. Jag skulle välkomna den typen av realism även i vår del av världen.
PS. Vad har Trotskij med saken att göra?
ReplyDeleteIngenting alls, jag hade i brådrasket ingen bra rubrik till blogginlägget.
ReplyDeleteDet störande med transrörelsen är ju just att den närmast vill tvinga sig på kvinnor, vilket är problematiskt i ett patriarkalt samhälle. Anta att vita plötsligt skulle kalla sig svarta och göra anspråk på deras raskvotering...
Varför inte göra anspråk på att vara ett tredje kön eller helt enkelt bredda "den manliga erfarenheten"?
De nya trans-personerna förstår på något sätt det där med patriarkatet (de är tjejer som vill bli killar) men de anpassar sig till det genom att försöka bli killar...
Det där med könsidentitet är ju svårt, särskilt om man vill tro pp en odödlig själ och reinkarnation, vilket jag kanske vill. Kan själen ha ett annat "kön" än kroppen?
ReplyDeleteÅ andra sidan är vi materiella varelser. En man kan per definition aldrig ha exakt samma upplevelser som en kvinna eftersom upplevelserna inkluderar hormoner, etc.
Så det pekar fortfarande på en bredare manlig erfarenhet eller en tredje kategori, inte entydigt "kvinna född i manskropp".
Hela idiotin påminner om när boken "Den unge Werters lidanden" utlöste en självmordsvåg bland unga kärlekskranka män i europa. Så kan det bli ibland med konst och litteratur och är inget man kan lasta konstnärer och författare för.
ReplyDeleteNär sjukvården och politiskt drivna forskare utlöser något liknande hos unga och dessutom assisterar i verkställandet av självskadan med hormonbehandling och kirurgi så är det krimminelt och motbjudande på alla sätt och vis.
"Det störande med transrörelsen är ju just att den närmast vill tvinga sig på kvinnor, vilket är problematiskt i ett patriarkalt samhälle."
ReplyDeleteI USA har det lett till krav på att man-till-kvinna-transsexuella ska få tillgång till specifikt kvinnliga utrymmen som ex.vis toaletter eller omklädningsrum för kvinnor. Jag skulle kunna stödja det endast under en förutsättning, nämligen att de är färdigopererade. Innan dess bör de betraktas som män i alla dessa sammanhang...
För att inte tala om MMA-matcher. Ett ökänt exempel är Fallon Fox som gav sin biologiskt kvinnliga motståndare flera skallfrakturer. Motståndaren hade inte informerats innan om att det var en opererad man hon tackat ja till att möta. Hon tog rätt illa upp när det kom fram.
ReplyDeleteFår 1984-vibbar av etablisemangets transerier. Vi förväntas idka dubbeltänk kring helt absurda saker.
Tänk tortyrscenen i 1984. Istället för att tvinga Winston att se ett annat antal fingrar på O Briens hand så tvingas Winston att uppfatta O Brien som en ung attraktiv kvinna.
Antalet fingrar i sig var oviktigt i 1984. Det var den kognitiva underkastelsen som var målet. Samma sak med verklighetens transhets. Får man medborgarna att gå med på det här kan man få dem att gå med på vad som helst.
Den kognitiva aspekten har jag inte tänkt på tidigare...
ReplyDeleteEn annan grej som slog mig nu. Detta verkar vara en av de få ungdomsrevolter etablissemanget faktiskt stödjer...
ReplyDeleteMan stödjer dårskapen men tycks även ha planterat dess frön. Finns många saker folk vill revoltera med i sin ungdom. Sprit, knark, hulliganvåld etc. Kan dock inte tänka mig att denna "revolt" uppstått organiskt.
ReplyDeleteDet är som om man kastrerar sin katt men först får honom att tro att det är hans egen brillianta upproriska ide.
Det gäller att i tid böja det som krokigt ska bli:
ReplyDeletehttps://thefederalist.com/2019/03/19/houston-library-features-convicted-child-molester-reading-trans-books-children/
Jaså, den där skiten har spridit sig utanför Kalifornien också...
ReplyDeleteHar redan varit samma sorts samkväm med konstiga farbröder och småbarn på svenska bibliotek med. Kom väl av sig i.o.m. coronan.
ReplyDelete