Please note that Sabine Hossenfelder is a real scientist, not just some random YouTuber. Here is what she says about current theories of cosmogenesis. Or "theories". Buckle up!
>>>The currently most popular theory for matter and anti-matter goes like this. Brace yourself: The universe was created from a quantum fluctuation of a field called the inflaton. There is no evidence for such a quantum fluctuation or such a field.
>>>This inflaton field then decays into a lot of other particles including right handed neutrinos. There is zero evidence that these right handed neutrinos ever existed. And those right-handed neutrinos then further decay into matter and anti-matter. Which then needs the CP-violation.
>>>That’s a lot to swallow, but particle physics being what it is, there are many other “theories” for how matter came to dominate over anti-matter that don’t involve neutrinos. Maybe it was some X-particle that makes up dark matter, though there’s no evidence that it exists.
>>>Or a Higgs triplet, though there’s no evidence that this exists. Or meta-stable WIMPs, or a technibaryon, or hylogenesis which requires three new particles, for none of which there is any evidence. And the kicker is that none of those theories even predicts the amount of matter or antimatter.
So it´s all a lie then? Got it in one! Therefore God. Or the Urantia Bible? OK, I´m joking but you get the drift...
No comments:
Post a Comment