Credit: Lady Melamori@MeLamoricosplay (at X) |
Swami Lakshman Joo (1907-1991) was a Tantric Hindu
teacher in the Kashmir Shaivism tradition, apparently regarded as extinct during
his lifetime. It´s not entirely clear to me, but it seems that most of what
passes for “Kashmir Shaivism” today (at least in the West) can be traced back
to Lakshman Joo, who taught both Western scholars, beat poets and other
spiritual teachers. I recently read a tribute to Lakshman Joo by British
Indologist Alexis Sanderson, “Swami Lakshman Joo and His Place in the
Kashmirian Shaiva Tradition”, published in the 2007 collection “Samvidullasah: Manifestation
of Divine Consciousness. Swami Lakshman Joo: Saint-Scholar of Kashmir Shaivism.
A Centenary Tribute”. Sanderson´s text is available free on the web, but the collection
as a whole isn´t, so the context is lacking. I get the impression that Sanderson
wants to defend Lakhsman Joo´s place in the Kashmir Shaiva tradition against
unnamed critics who had perhaps questioned his proper credentials. Sanderson
had studied the works of Kashmir Shaiva sage Abhinava Gupta (10th
century) under Lakshman Joo, but I can´t help wondering if Sanderson´s
sympathies go further still. Not that there is anything bad with that, of course!
There are several related problems with the transmission
and survival of Kashmir Shaivism (really a cluster of several different
traditions, some of which Abhinava Gupta tried to syncretize). One is that less
scriptures are preserved the further away we get from Abhinava´s time. During
the 13th century, commentator Jayaratha sometimes misunderstood Abhinava
Gupta´s points, for the simple reason that the source texts were no longer
available. The situation got progressively worse in later centuries, to a large
extent because of the Muslim conquest and rule of Kashmir, and the decline of
the Brahmin estate in the Kashmir Valley. Two of the traditions synthesized by
Abhinava Gupta, Trika and Krama, no longer existed in their respective ritual
forms. Other Kashmir Shaiva rituals were still carried out during the 19th
century, but only by very small groups of Brahmins who evidently were just going
through the motions. When Lakshman Joo was born, Kashmir Shaivism in this “living”
sense no longer existed.
However, Sanderson argues that this isn´t
really a problem for Lakshman Joo´s credentials, since the great Abhinava Gupta
had argued that the Shaiva rituals themselves are only efficacious if conjoined
to gnosis. It´s the gnosis that liberates, not the ritual as such (the latter
position was taken by the more exoteric Shaiva Siddhanta tradition). Sanderson
has even found evidence of a post-Abhinava Gupta but pre-Lakshman Joo tradition
according to which a non-ritualist Trika gnosis can be combined with mainline
Brahmin (Smarta) rituals, rather than with specifically Trika ditto. Which just
happens to be exactly the practice of Swami Lakshman Joo! The scripture in question
is called the Mrititattvanusmarana (well, I think) and can´t be older than the
15th century (since it excommunicates all Brahmins who learn Persian
– the language of the Muslim administration - something that firstly became
common during this period). According to this apparently unpublished text, one
path to liberation is precisely to go from Smarta rituals to Trika gnosis.
Alexis Sanderson´s article is very narrow and
scholarly, but I admit that it was a fascinating read (after a fashion). It was
also intriguing to learn that Sanderson studied under Lakshman Joo for six
years (!), and that the old teacher never tired of explaining and exegeting Abhinava
Gupta´s works for the Western student, despite the latter´s seeming
incomprehension of all things non-dual. And yes, the number of religious
traditions of Homo sapiens are almost endless…
No comments:
Post a Comment