Hopefully not an urban legend |
This is a review of a Swedish book titled “101 Historiska Myter”. The authors, Åke Persson and Thomas
Oldrup are two history nerds who previously edited, respectively, the Swedish
and Danish editions of the magazine “Allt om Historia”. Their book, published
in 2010, busts (or supposedly busts) 101 historical myths, urban legends and
misconceptions. Or supposed myths, urban legends and misconceptions! Inevitably
in a book of this type, some claims are stronger than others, many are
nit-picking, and a few are flat-out wrong. Conversely, some popular urban
legends about history are not covered, such as the claim that Sweden and the micro-nation
of San Marino have been technically at war for the past 400 years or so. Is
there a sequel somewhere? Still, the book *is* good and I recommend it both as
light bedtime reading or as a passage way to more serious research on the
topics covered. And no, I haven´t double-checked every claim by ÅP and TO, so I
presumably have something to do this summer, as well…
Some of
the tall tales covered are well known and apparently still quite common, such
as claims about Napoleon´s diminutive height, Marie Antoinette´s splendid recommendations
concerning finer pastry (actually a double tall tale, since the statement
falsely attributed to her wasn´t originally about cake!), the existence of Pope
Joan, Mussolini´s expertise in making trains go on time, or the idea that
people during the Middle Ages assumed that the Earth was flat. Others strike me
as more “nerdy”, such as the claim that Hitler´s real name was Schicklgruber
(used to believe that myself – imagine the comedy if Nazis at Nuremberg would
shout “Heil Schicklgruber”). I was disappointed to learn that Henry VIII only
executed two of his queens – he has nothing on George R R Martin! It also turns
out that Greek and Roman art wasn´t all white marble, nor did most Romans wear
white togas. Wow, does this mean that all of Neo-Classicism is based on a
ridiculous misunderstanding? Another red pill: ÅP and TO claims that Albert
Einstein, wait for it, was *good* in school! Blasted. I *did* know that you
can´t see the Chinese Wall from the Moon, or that Vikings didn´t have horns on
their helmets.
The book
becomes more problematic when claiming that no matriarchy has ever existed, as
if the term “matriarchy” only means one thing, or archeological excavations
could only be given one possible interpretation. The authors take a
surprisingly positive view of the Viking Age, claiming that the Old Norse were
really a bunch of rather nice chaps all things considered, a claim I think
could be problematized by some competing archeology nerd. Their foray into the
morass of Bible interpretation also strikes me as perhaps a bit too daring,
since the source material (the Bible itself) is highly contentious in its own
right. But the biggest howler is surely the bizarre claim that the US Civil War
wasn´t for or against slavery! No?! What was it about, then? And why did the slaves mysteriously become
emancipated at Union-held territory? Of course it was about slavery. Only
Kluxers and ultralefts deny it. Another howler can be found in the chapter discussing
Muhammad´s supposed pedophilia. There are indeed different ideas within Islam
about when Muhammad consummated his marriage with Aisha, but the authors end up
claiming that pedophilia is essentially a social construct. (Perhaps slavery and
trafficking are other ones?) Ahem, no guys, pedos are pedos…
Finally, I
noticed that since the book was written, Sweden has gotten another “real”
saint: Elizabeth Hesselblad, properly canonized in 2016.
With that
I leave you for now. Almost. I already mentioned that the book, surprisingly
enough, doesn´t mention the “state of war” between San Marino and Sweden. Here
are some other claims which may or may not be true, but which certainly merits
a mention in a book exploring urban legends about our past: Lenin or Stalin
called pro-Soviet fellow travelers “useful idiots”, Khrushchev threatened to
nuke Amerika hard by saying “we will bury you”, Hitler was an occultist and
Satanist, George Orwell was anti-socialist, Alexander the Great was homosexual (or Greek), the Roman Empire collapsed in 476 AD, the Soviets defeated
Hitler all by themselves, Swedish king Karl XII brought the Travelers to
Sweden, St Erik led a Swedish crusade to Finland, Karin Söder was the first female
party leader in Sweden, well, you get the drift…
They should also debunk the bizarre idea that Sigismund was the legitimate king of Sweden.
ReplyDeleteSo who was the first female party leader in Sweden? Was it Eva Åsbrink or Kerstin Tegin-Gaddy? Please leave comments below...
ReplyDeleteRagnhild Pohanka?
ReplyDeleteI will get many likes from NORTH Macedonia now!
ReplyDeleteHere´s another myth for you: the claim that Jesus admitted failure when he screamed "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"
ReplyDelete"They should also debunk the bizarre idea that Sigismund was the legitimate king of Sweden."
ReplyDeleteDenna enligt dig så "bisarra" idé försvarades i en artikel i Svenska Dagbladet för några veckor sedan. Tyvärr är den låst.
https://www.svd.se/ett-av-de-grovsta-justitiemorden-i-svensk-historia
Jaså,jag visste inte att Dick Harrison är agent för jesuiterna. Vem omvände honom? Påven Franciskus?
ReplyDelete