Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Vi tänker klippa bort dig från våra gasledningar åxå, din jävel



Eftersom Donald Trump tydligen klipptes bort när kanadensisk TV visade "Ensam hemma 2" kommer här en hel samling som sägs visa *alla* Trumps cameos. 

Den enda jag känner till sedan tidigare (förutom "Ensam hemma") är Trumps uppdykande i "Fresh Prince i Bel Air". Och nej, jag visste inte heller vem fan han var när det avsnittet sändes i svensk TV för många år sedan... 

Gott nytt år förresten! 

Falcons for full employment



America´s strangest job? Yes, falcons are used to scare away "nuisance birds" from valuable crops. This short clip features an abatement falconer at work. Interesting!  

I´m officially off the Trump Train



Hands off our pipelines, Donald. You´re fired!

Note about something else: the pundit interviewed says that Germany claims the Russian gas pipeline will help them switch to renewable energy! 

Er, what? 

This shows what a fucking fraud German "renewables" are. In reality, Merkel is making Germany dependent on fossil fuels from Gazprom, ha ha ha.

End it already, the silly propaganda I mean. 

It begins...




Russia, China and Iran just concluded a joint naval exercise in the Gulf of Oman in the Indian Ocean, close to the Persian Gulf. The clip above is from a Singapore news network. It seems the hunt is on...

An entertaining conspiracy theory



I commented on the Phantom Time theory before (see my review of Emmet Scott´s "A Guide to the Phantom Dark Age"), and here we go again! While I don´t believe in Phantom Time (see debunking in link below), I do suspect that our real history is much *longer* than official archeology would allow for, but that´s just a hunch from my part. At the very least, things such as civilization, agriculture or the human species as such are older than we believe. Which is the second "conspiracy theory" promoted by Sheridan in this clip... 

Phantom Time debunked

Harry Potter and the TERF Phoenix Brigade



Conservative-libertarian gadfly Paul Joseph Watson´s take on the recent drama around J K Rowling, after she supposedly attacked trans-people in a tweet. Trigger warning!

Saturday, December 28, 2019

Meeting with gyrfalcons



Sigurdur Aegisson is an Icelandic ethnologist. I haven´t  been able to find his book on Icelandic monster lore, “Meeting with monsters”, and therefore had to rest contented with a small work on very real animals, “Icelandic trade with gyrfalcons: From medieval times to the modern era”, published in 2015. I readily admit that the book is very narrow, and of interest only to gyrfalcon aficionados, or perhaps hardcore history buffs suffering from an enduring obsession with the West Scandinavian theatre. But then, I know that at least one gyrfalcon aficionado is reading my blog on a semi-regular basis, so here we go… ;-)

The gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus) is the largest falcon in the world, and the diurnal raptor with the northernmost geographic distribution, living in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic regions of North America and Eurasia, including Iceland and Greenland. Due to its large size, the gyrfalcon has long been popular among falconers – we are talking about a sturdy raptor that can attack and kill even swans and herons! The gyrfalcon is famous for its many color morphs, with the Icelandic birds being grey, while many “Greenland falcons” are white. White gyrs in particular were highly prized by European and Muslim royals and aristocrats.

Aegisson has probably read every book on the topic of Icelandic gyrs and the trade in them. When Iceland was an independent “republic”, every landowner could freely catch and sell gyrfalcons which lived on his own land. As Iceland became more integrated into the Norwegian and Danish kingdoms, however, this gradually changed until the catching and trade in gyrs became a royal monopoly. Gyrs were taken to a gigantic aviary at Bessastadir, from which they were taken to Denmark onboard ships. The local peasants were forced to hand over cows and other livestock to feed the birds. This can´t have contributed to the bird´s popularity – indeed, most Icelanders regarded gyrfalcons as an annoying competitor (they often killed eiders), and as the international interest in falconry dropped during the 19th century, the falcons became fair game. At the same time that Iceland adopted the gyrfalcon as its national symbol, the actual birds were threatened with extinction!

Judging by Aegisson´s account, this extremely negative attitude to “Falco rusticolus” can´t have been the original one. During the Middle Ages, Icelandic imports were often paid in money earned by selling gyrfalcons to enterprising European traders. The author believes that huge amounts of flour, timber and wax could be imported by the Icelandic settlers in this manner, making the bird an extremely valuable commodity. This is interesting for another reasons, too. Note that the settlers weren´t self-sufficient, at least not during the High Middle Ages, and actually survived on their desolate island only thanks to large scale trade with the rest of Europe! Somehow, this isn´t the romantic view we all have of rugged Vikings living off the land (and the loot) in their own independent state… My guess is that later, as the gyrfalcon trade became a Danish royal prerogative, the locals developed very different feelings towards the unfortunate birds.

Aegisson believes that most Greenland falcons owned by European and Mideast falconers weren´t caught in Greenland but in Iceland. The white Greenland color morphs regularly migrated to Iceland, following icebergs which in turn attracted enormous flocks of seabirds.

Today, gyrfalcons are protected by law and their Icelandic population is relatively stable at around 2,000 birds. One fun fact not mentioned by the author is that DNA tests apparently show that falcons aren´t closely related to eagles, hawks, vultures and other raptors. Rather, they are on the same line of evolution as – wait for it – parrots and passerines! The idea of a gyrfalcon being an Arctic badass parakeet (or is it psittacoid) does have a certain intrinsic appeal, at least in my intellectual neighborhood…

With that, I leave you for now.

A conservative crusader?




“Theodore the Great: Conservative Crusader” is a curious book by Daniel Ruddy, arguing that Progressive American president Theodore Roosevelt (served 1901-1909) was actually an conservative. What makes the book doubly curious is that it seems to describe the politics of TR relatively correctly – I say “seems” since I frankly only skimmed some chapters (the book isn´t very well written) – and yet reaches the conclusion that his Progressive administration was conservative.

I suppose this means that Ruddy has a somewhat unusual definition of “conservative”. It includes people as diverse as Alexander Hamilton, William Howard Taft, John F Kennedy and Ronald Reagan. If there is any least common denominator at all, it´s the idea that a conservative must be an interventionist and imperialist, making Murica great again (or great for the first time, if you´re Hamilton). Conservationism, huge and federally-funded irrigation projects, a national bank, a fair shake for labor, direct election of senators and finding a third way between laissez faire and socialism are all “conservative” in the mind of the author. I admit that I could probably live with a conservatism of this kind! Ruddy likes the gold standard, too, at least in so far as it brought a certain stability to the economic system – his preferred solution is neither a cross of gold nor free silver, but national banking (which didn´t exist in the US at the time).

Yet, the author isn´t completely uncritical of TR. I don´t think he *really* likes the Bull Moose Party interlude in TR´s career, and he is also uneasy about the US involvement in World War I, interestingly enough given his strong imperialist stances in general. In several chapters, Ruddy actually expresses strong support for Theodore Roosevelt´s diplomatic peace initiatives (which earned TR the Nobel Peace Prize). He also sharply criticizes TR´s record on race. Despite the famous dinner with Booker T Washington, Ruddy believes that TR´s overall politics eroded Black support for the Republican Party, making Northern Blacks gradually embracing the ditto Democrats instead.

Personally, I think bully pulpit aficionado Theodore Roosevelt was pretty much what he claimed to be: a progressive (or Progressive). That is, a really existing progressive. Progressivism with a human face be damned!

Wednesday, December 25, 2019

Merry Christmas!



Merry Christmas to all my American readers! 

Man får ju ofrivilliga sympatier för KD eller nåt

Firar jul? 

Varför i helvete visar SVT en TV-serie om Jesu DÖD på JULDAGEN, har de ingen jävla biblisk allmänbildning över huvud taget, jag är inte kristen men verkar kunna mer om Den Heliga Skrift (och våra helgdagar) än herr redaktören på licens-TV, han verkar läsa kalendern som Fan läser Bibeln...