 |
| Credit: I, Xauxa |
OK, so what about Norte Chicho, then?
Was the Norte Chico or Caral culture in South America peaceful and mercantile for 1000 years?
Short answer: No — the Norte Chico / Caral (Supe Valley) civilization is no longer confidently described as a “peaceful, mercantile civilization for 1,000 years,” although it was unusually non-militaristic compared to later Andean societies, and its economy relied heavily on exchange rather than conquest.
The older picture has been significantly revised, much like with the Indus Valley.
Below is the careful, current scholarly view.
1. Where the “peaceful mercantile” idea came from
Early excavations (1990s–early 2000s, especially under Ruth Shady) emphasized:
-
No obvious weapons
-
No fortifications
-
No iconography of warfare
-
No warrior burials
-
Monumental architecture without defensive walls
-
Heavy reliance on trade between coastal fishing communities and inland agricultural centers
This led to the influential claim that Norte Chico was:
A peaceful, trade-based civilization lasting roughly 3000–1800 BCE
Sometimes framed as the “only pristine civilization without warfare.”
2. What we now know: why that view is too simple
A. Absence of evidence ≠ evidence of absence
Later reassessments point out:
-
Excavations focused on ceremonial centers, not defensive peripheries
-
Weapons made of wood, fiber, or stone preserve poorly
-
Warfare in early societies may not leave dramatic traces
So the claim of total peace became methodologically suspect.
3. Evidence for hierarchy and coercion
Even without warfare imagery, Norte Chico shows clear social hierarchy:
A. Monumental construction
-
Massive platform mounds
-
Sunken circular plazas
-
Labor mobilization at large scale
This implies:
Centralized authority capable of commanding labor, voluntarily or not.
B. Settlement hierarchy
-
Large ceremonial centers (Caral, Aspero)
-
Smaller dependent villages
This suggests:
Regional control, even if not militarized.
4. Violence: subtle but real evidence
Recent studies show:
-
Skeletal trauma consistent with interpersonal violence
-
Evidence of ritualized violence, possibly human sacrifice (still debated)
-
Defensive placement of some settlements in later phases
Nothing like later Moche or Inca warfare — but not zero violence.
5. Economy: mercantile, but not “market-based”
A. Trade was crucial
Yes — exchange networks were fundamental:
-
Fish protein from the coast
-
Cotton from inland valleys
-
Gourds, chili peppers, anchovies
-
Spondylus shells (later)
But trade was likely:
-
Redistributive, not free-market
-
Controlled by elites or ritual authorities
So “mercantile” in the modern sense is misleading.
6. Ideology over armies: power through ritual
What is distinctive about Norte Chico:
-
Authority expressed through monumentality and ritual
-
Music (flutes), plazas, calendrical gatherings
-
Cosmological coordination rather than conquest
This supports the idea of:
Ritual hegemonic power, not warrior kingship.
Comparable to:
-
Early Indus cities
-
Some Neolithic Near Eastern ritual centers
7. Duration: was it really 1,000 years of stability?
The civilization lasted roughly 1,200 years, but:
-
It was not static
-
Sites rose and fell
-
Regional shifts occurred
-
Later phases show more defensive behavior
So:
It was long-lived, but not a single unchanging peaceful order.
8. How scholars describe Norte Chico today
Most archaeologists now say:
-
✔ Early complex society without clear evidence of organized warfare
-
✔ Strong ritual and ideological control
-
✔ Centralized labor mobilization
-
✔ Exchange-based economy
-
✘ Not demonstrably pacifist
-
✘ Not egalitarian
-
✘ Not purely mercantile
9. Why the myth of “peaceful pristine civilization” persists
Because it:
-
Contrasts nicely with Old World war states
-
Fits a modern longing for nonviolent origins
-
Is rhetorically powerful
But archaeology increasingly resists such moralized framings.
10. One-sentence synthesis
Norte Chico / Caral was an early, long-lived civilization that relied heavily on exchange and ritual authority and shows little evidence of large-scale warfare, but it was neither demonstrably peaceful nor mercantile in a modern sense, and it clearly possessed hierarchy and coercive power.
If you’d like, we can next:
-
Compare Norte Chico vs Indus vs early Egypt
-
Ask why ritual authority precedes military states
-
Explore whether these societies represent a “pre-axial” mode of power
Your questions consistently circle an important theme: how early complexity forms without kings, armies, or overt violence — and where that model ultimately breaks down.
No comments:
Post a Comment