Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Converting Calvinists

 



The video above is from a Catholic YT channel. I never heard of this particular Marian apparition before (to Protestants!), so I asked my amigo ChatGPT about it...

Is it really true that the entire country of Lithuania was at one point Calvinist or very close to becoming Calvinist?

No — Lithuania as a whole was never Calvinist, but there was a remarkable period in the 16th century when a significant portion of the Lithuanian nobility (szlachta) adopted Calvinism (Reformed Protestantism), and for a moment, it looked as if the Grand Duchy of Lithuania might tilt toward a Reformed identity. It never became the state religion, but the influence was unusually strong — stronger than in many other parts of Eastern Europe.


🇱🇹 Lithuania and Calvinism: A Forgotten Episode (16th Century)

🕰 Historical Context

  • Mid-1500s: The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was in a union with Poland (Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth).

  • The nobility began adopting Protestant ideas, especially Calvinism, brought in by traveling scholars, Reformers, and Italian exiles.

  • The Radziwiłł (Radvila) family, one of the most powerful noble dynasties, became major patrons of Calvinism.


🏛 Noble-Led Reformation

Key FamilyInfluence
RadziwiłłsFounded Calvinist synods, printing presses, schools
Pac & Sapieha (briefly)Supported Reformed ideas and anti-Trinitarians
  • Calvinist churches, academies, and printing houses were established.

  • The first Lithuanian Bible (1579, known as the Radziwiłł Bible) was published under Calvinist patronage.

Some towns, like Biržai and Kėdainiai, were nearly entirely Reformed Protestant under the Radziwiłłs.


🛑 Why It Didn’t Become a Calvinist Nation

ReasonExplanation
Jesuit Counter-ReformationThe Jesuits arrived strongly in the late 1500s, founded schools, reconverted nobles
Religious ToleranceThe Commonwealth allowed many faiths; no single Protestant unity
Internal Protestant SchismCalvinists vs. Lutherans vs. Anti-Trinitarians
Catholic Identity of the PeasantryThe countryside stayed deeply Catholic

🕇 Outcome

  • By the 17th century, most Lithuanian nobles had returned to Catholicism.

  • A small Remnant of Reformed Churches (Evangelical Reformed Church of Lithuania) still exists today, descendants of those Calvinist communities.


🗣 So, Was Lithuania Ever “Calvinist”?

The elite almost were
The nation as a whole never was

It came closer than most people realize, especially under the influence of the Radziwiłł family — but the Counter-Reformation ultimately restored Catholic dominance.


Would you like a list of Calvinist churches still standing in Lithuania or maps of the Protestant strongholds (like Kėdainiai or Biržai)?

What is "Our Lady of Siluva"? Was Siluva Calvinist?

Our Lady of Šiluva is a Marian apparition and shrine in Lithuania, deeply connected to a powerful Catholic revival. It is also directly tied to the question of Protestantism in Lithuania — yes, Šiluva had become Calvinist before the Catholic faith dramatically returned through the reported apparition of the Virgin Mary.


🕊️ Our Lady of Šiluva

Location: Šiluva, northwest Lithuania
First Apparition: ~1608 (one of the earliest approved Marian apparitions in Europe)
Significance: Sparked a major Catholic reconversion in a region heavily influenced by Calvinism


🌿 Was Šiluva Calvinist?

Yes — before the apparition, Šiluva was under the influence of Calvinism.

  • In the mid–16th century, during the Reformation, the local landowners of Šiluva had converted to Calvinism.

  • The Catholic church was confiscated and turned into a Reformed (Calvinist) congregation.

  • Catholic worship ceased, and Catholic property was lost due to legal disputes.

Lithuania was never fully Protestant, but Šiluva was one of its strongest Calvinist footholds.


🌟 The Apparition (1608)

According to Catholic tradition:

  1. Shepherd children saw a lady holding a baby and weeping on a stone.

  2. When asked why she wept, she said:

    “Once, my Son was worshiped in this place, but now they have taken it away.”

  3. Word spread; Catholics and Protestants alike were stunned.

  4. Legal records later led to the recovery of Catholic land.


🔁 Impact of the Apparition

OutcomeEffect
Catholic revivalRegion returned to Catholic worship
Pilgrimages beganŠiluva became a major shrine
Identity symbolA bulwark against further Protestant spread

🛕 Modern Shrine

Today, The Basilica of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Šiluva is one of the most important Catholic pilgrimage sites in Lithuania. The annual Šilinės Feast attracts thousands every September.


🧭 In Summary

QuestionAnswer
Was Šiluva Calvinist?Yes, the town became Calvinist during the Reformation
What is Our Lady of Šiluva?A Marian apparition that marked the Catholic revival of that region

Would you like the official Church account versus the historical-critical view of this apparition? The contrast is fascinating.

Yes, please.

Certainly! The apparition of Our Lady of Šiluva can be viewed through two very different lenses:

1️⃣ The Traditional Catholic Account
2️⃣ The Historical/Critical (scholarly) Perspective

Both offer meaningful insight — one theological, one historical.


🕊️ 1. Traditional Catholic Account

🌟 Context

Šiluva had become Calvinist, the Catholic church was abandoned, and Eucharistic worship ceased.

👁 The Apparition (~1608)

  • Several shepherd children saw a beautiful lady holding the infant Jesus, standing on a rock, weeping.

  • When questioned by a Calvinist catechist:

    “Why are you crying?”
    She replied:Because once my Son was worshiped in this place, but now they have taken it away.

🪔 Effects Considered Miraculous by the Church

  • Religious fervor returned even among Protestants.

  • Lost Catholic deeds were rediscovered.

  • Catholic Mass was restored.

  • Šiluva became Lithuania’s first major Marian shrine.

Interpretation:
Mary intervened to restore Eucharistic worship in a land turning away from Christ.


📜 2. Historical / Critical Perspective

Most historians accept key facts:

  • Šiluva was indeed a Calvinist stronghold.

  • The Catholic Church sought legal means to reclaim lost property.

  • A legend of a Marian apparition emerged during a legal dispute over religious land.

🔍 Critical Observations

Scholar’s PointInterpretation
☁️ Apparition narrative appeared decades laterPossibly expanded orally before written form
⚖ Legal property dispute ongoing at same timeApparition bolstered Catholic legal claims
✝ Marian devotion spreading in Counter-ReformationSimilar Marian revival as at Guadalupe, Loreto, La Salette, etc.

Historians believe the apparition story helped solidify Catholic identity during the Catholic Counter-Reformation, countering Calvinism through popular devotion rather than force.


Two Views, One Legacy

LensMeaning of the Event
Devotional / ReligiousA miraculous intervention of Mary to reclaim sacred ground
Historical / SociologicalA powerful myth that helped restore Catholic unity and identity

🗝 The Deeper Mystery

Even historians admit that the sincerity and fervor with which people responded cannot be dismissed. Something happened — mystical or psychological — that transformed a community.


Would you like to explore other Marian apparitions with similar historical dynamics, like Guadalupe, Lourdes, or Pontmain?

Did the Catholics claim that a Calvinist clergyman saw the Marian apparition?

Yes — in traditional Catholic accounts of Our Lady of Šiluva, it is indeed claimed that even a Calvinist clergyman (or catechist) witnessed the apparition or at least spoke directly to the apparition. This detail is significant, because it serves as a theological argument that the vision could not be dismissed as simply “Catholic imagination.”


👁‍🗨 The Calvinist Witness — Key Element of the Šiluva Story

💬 The Dialogue According to Catholic Tradition

A young Calvinist theologian or catechist approached the apparition and asked:

“Why are you crying?”
Mary replied:
“Because once my Son was worshiped in this place, but now they have taken it away.”

This exchange is said to have deeply moved him and became a turning point in the restoration of Catholic worship in Šiluva.


🕯 Why This Detail Matters in Catholic Tradition

ThemePurpose of Including a Calvinist Witness
Ecclesial LegitimacyShows apparition wasn’t hallucination or Catholic-only vision
Doctrinal ImpactSuggests even opponents were confronted with divine truth
Symbol of MercyMary reaching even those outside the Church

🧾 Historical vs. Legendary Interpretation

ViewAnalysis
Catholic TraditionThe Calvinist catechist physically saw and spoke with the Virgin
Critical HistoryPossibly symbolic or later embellishment to strengthen Catholic claims during the Counter-Reformation
Modern Pilgrim NarrativesOften present it as fact to emphasize Marian universality

🧠 Did a Calvinist actually see it?

  • No original 17th-century sworn testimony survives.

  • The story solidified in later retellings and pilgrim literature.

  • Even skeptical historians acknowledge that Protestants were shaken enough to reopen discussion of Catholic property — meaning some kind of impactful event did occur locally.


⚖ Summary

ClaimStatus
A Calvinist clergyman saw MaryAffirmed in Catholic tradition
Historically verifiableDifficult to prove, seen as legendary by scholars

Would you like me to compare this with other apparitions witnessed by non-Catholics (e.g., Muslims at Zeitoun in Egypt or atheists at Fatima)? This pattern is fascinating.

Yes, please.

Here are some remarkable Marian (and Marian-type) apparitions in which non-Catholics — including Protestants, Muslims, and atheists — were said to have witnessed or confirmed the phenomenon. These accounts are often used by Catholics to argue for the universality of Marian intervention, while historians note their role in broader cultural reconciliation.


🌍 Apparitions Witnessed by Non-Catholics

A comparison with Šiluva, where a Calvinist reportedly saw Mary


1️⃣ Our Lady of Šiluva (Lithuania, 1608)

👤 Non-Catholic witness noted: Calvinist catechist or pastor

  • Asked Mary: “Why are you crying?”

  • Mary answered: “Because once my Son was worshiped in this place…”

  • Led to restoration of Catholic worship in a Calvinist region.


2️⃣ Our Lady of Zeitoun (Egypt, 1968–1971)

👀 Witnessed by thousands — including Muslims, Copts, atheists

  • Apparitions occurred atop a Coptic Church in Cairo.

  • Muslim taxi drivers, soldiers, crowds shouted: “Ya Maryam!”

  • Egyptian government photographers took official photos.

  • No verbal messages — only luminous form of Mary.

Importance:
Seen as a pan-religious sign, reinforcing Marian presence even in the Islamic world (Mary is revered in the Quran as Maryam, mother of Isa).


3️⃣ Our Lady of Knock (Ireland, 1879)

👁 Witnesses included Protestants and skeptics

  • Silent apparition of Mary, St. Joseph, and St. John

  • Some Protestant locals confirmed seeing a bright figure but did not interpret it doctrinally.

  • Church commission recorded 15 official witnesses, including those outside Catholic practice.


4️⃣ Fátima (Portugal, 1917) — The “Miracle of the Sun”

🟡 Witnesses: Believers, atheists, journalists, Freemasons

  • The sun phenomenon was observed by 50,000–70,000 people, including known anti-clerical atheists.

  • Newspaper O Século (secular, anti-Church) reported:

    “The sun danced… It was impossible to deny.”

This event gave Marian devotion national power in post-monarchy Portugal.


🌐 Comparative Table

ApparitionNon-Catholic WitnessesNature of Vision
Šiluva (1608)Calvinist ministerPersonal, spoken message
Zeitoun (1968)Muslims, secular crowdsPublic, silent luminous form
Knock (1879)Protestants, skepticsPublic tableau, motionless
Fátima (1917)Atheists, pressCosmic phenomenon (sun)

🧭 Interpretation

ViewpointInterpretation of Non-Catholic Witnesses
Catholic MysticalMary's universality transcends doctrine
EcumenicalShared symbols of the Sacred Feminine
Psychological / JungianArchetypal eruption of the “Divine Mother” into collective psyche
SkepticalMass suggestion, atmospheric optical events, retroactive embellishment

Would you like a Jungian or archetypal interpretation of why Marian figures appear even to non-Catholics — as the Great Mother, Sophia, or Anima Mundi?



5 comments:

  1. Enligt Marija Gimbutas dominerades Litauen av en hednisk folklig tro så sent som i tidigt 1300-tal. Hon utvecklar dessa tankar här. Gimbutas, Marija, Ancient symbolism in Lithuanian Folk Art, Memoirs of the American Folklore society, volume 49, Philadelphia 1958. Hon kom ju själv från Litauen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. PS. Om "Our Lady of Siluva"befriade Litauen från kalvinism bör man ju vara tacksam.Kalvinismen är en av mest otäcka formerna av kristendom.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Litauen verkar definitivt ha blivit katolskt först 1387. Det sista landet i Europa som övergav "hedendomen".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Å andra sidan var kalvinismen kopplad till en slags borgerlig revolution, vilket katolicismen inte var. Se även Oliver Cromwell i England.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Men eftersom det idag inte finns någon feodalklass har alla progressiva drag hos kalvinismen försvunnit.

    ReplyDelete