“1689 års
katekes av Olaus Swebilius” is a very narrow product I bought mostly because it
was temporarily sold cheaper than usual. The book is in Swedish, so most of
this blog´s readers won´t be able to read it. In fact, I found it difficult to
read, too, despite Swedish being my de facto first language. The reason? The
bulk of the material is in 17th century Swedish. Brace yourself for
some *very* weird (and weirdly inconsistent) spelling and a decidedly old
fashioned grammar. Still, it seems the denizens of the 17th century
were even worse off, since the original “1689 Catechism” contained frequent typing,
or perhaps we should say setting, errors – including in the Biblical references…
Clearly,
the good Lord wanted to test the faith of poor Olaus Swebilius, his trusted
servant!
So who was
Olaus Swebilius (or Olof Svebilius)? I admit I never heard of the man before
buying this slender volume, but it seems he was quite the personality in his time.
Swebilius was the Archbishop of Uppsala from 1681 to 1700, and hence the
effective leader of the Lutheran Church of Sweden, at the time the only legal church
in the Swedish kingdom (which was much larger than today). At this time, the clergy
were represented in the Swedish Parliament, and as archbishop, Swebilius was
the speaker of the clerical estate. He was a confidante of Karl XI, one of the
most powerful kings in Swedish history. After Karl XI´s death, Swebilius crowned
Karl XII king of Sweden – according to legend, the rash youth grabbed the crown
from the hands of the archbishop and placed it on his head himself!
The 1689
Catechism had official status and contained the archbishop´s expositions on
Martin Luther´s Small Catechism. The Swebilian Catechism is an expression of
the Lutheran confessionalist orthodoxy (or perhaps supposed orthodoxy) dominant
within the Church of Sweden at the time. I´m obviously no expert on Lutheran
theology, orthodox or otherwise, since I frequently gasped when reading it. Thus,
I had no idea that Lutherans believed Mary was ever virgin, but there it is. Nor
does the Catechims deny the existence of saints, on earth or in heaven. It
simply calls on the believer not to pray to them or worship them, since this
dignity belongs to God only. I was also struck by the “high church” view of
priestly authority and the strong sacramentalism. Swebilius expounds at some
length on the need and necessity of confession before a priest.
I *did*
know that Lutherans believed the flesh and blood of Christ is really present in
the bread and wine consumed during communion (indeed, Luther´s position on the
question is more logical if you have a Chalcedonian Christology than the
Catholic one, which sounds Monophysite). The Apocrypha are referenced alongside
the OT and the NT. The political perspective is strongly hierarchical and calls
on servants to obey their masters, and everyone to obey the worldly
establishment. Under Karl XI and Karl XII, royal absolutism in Sweden reached
its apogee.
On a funnier
note, the Catechism attacks certain folk beliefs and folk traditions. Thus, we
are sternly admonished not to seek the aid of “tomtegubbar” (gnomes) or “skogzråå”
(a female spirit and shape-shifter associated with the forest, today spelled “skogsrå”).
This is idolatry and hence verboten.
We can´t
say we haven´t been warned.
Det där med Maria som evig jungfru var intressant. För idag tror INTE lutheranerna på det. Frågan är då hur den frågan utvecklades inom protestantismen.
ReplyDeleteNär det gäller de tidiga protestanternas hets mot skogsrån i Sverige nämnde jag den faktiskt redan i radio den enda gång jag intervjuats i de stora media om skogsrån, den 8 april 1993.
Jag hade just bytt avhandlingsämne (vilket kom att bli en dålig vana - det slutade med att det inte blev någon avhandling alls) och det nya var skogsrån (som jag senare gick tillbaka till tio år senare, 2003, efter att jag hade förbjudits att fortsätta med ämnet satanism!).
I början av 1993 hade reportern Pia Gadd ringt till institutionen och frågat om det fann någon doktorand med ett intressant nytt ämne. När hon fick höra om ämnet skogsrån blev hon entusiastisk, och ringde upp mig, tidigt på förmiddagen den 19 februari.
Så vi träffades för intervju den 28 februari (i en skogsdunge!) och det ganska så udda programmet sändes den 8 april i (om jag minns rätt) Vetandets värld, av alla respektabla program. Jag hade lite mindre än en kvart på mig men jag kunde inte låta bli att surt berätta att protestanterna när de tagit makten började en kampanj mot folktrons väsen, inklusive skogsrån.
Svebilius katekes var inte det enda uttrycket för det, det fanns fler mer eller mindre officiella varningar för hur djävulen verkade genom dessa gruvligt onda väsen...
Lustigt förresten, jag drömde om Marin Luther (!) strax innan jag vaknade nyss. Det har jag så vitt jag minns aldrig gjort förut. Synkronicitet?
Aha, intressant. Det betyder att Svebilius attack är en del i ett större sammanhang.
ReplyDeleteDet där med evig jungfru måste gå att kolla upp på något sätt, ramlade nästan av stolen när jag såg *det*...