"The Long Emergency" by James Howard Kunstler is a well-known book (and something of a cult classic) in the doomer genre.
Kunstler argues that world civilization in general and the United States in
particular are going to collapse during the 21st century due to depletion of
fossil fuel reserves and climate change caused by the very same fossil fuels
(an ironic combination). With cheap oil gone forever, our modern way of life
will come tumbling down. Pandemic diseases, mass starvation, inner city riots,
resource wars and terrorism will become common occurrences. So will a rise in
religious fundamentalism and racism.
Kunstler doesn't believe that alternative energy sources will save us. Natural
gas reserves are too tiny to make a difference, turning coal into oil too
expensive, and solar and wind simply aren't feasible. Nor are biofuels. Nuclear
power is a more realistic option, since uranium is relatively abundant, but
nuclear power plants can only produce electricity. Where should we get the rest
of our energy needs? Besides, all these forms of power-generation require cheap
oil to begin with - how else to build nuclear power plants, fuel the machines
needed to grow biofuels, or produce solar batteries? Nuclear power also has the
disadvantage of needing a strong, centralized state apparatus. Who would
finance, operate and defend nuclear facilities in a long emergency in which the
modern nation-states quite simply crack?
The author believes that American society will be forced to revert to local
solutions as the crisis deepens. In a worst case scenario, feudalism might
reappear as desperate city-dwellers look for work in the countryside, becoming
peons to those fortunate enough to own land. Child labour will reappear, and
most people will never get a real education. Horses rather than machines will
be used in agriculture. Of course, it's very difficult to see how a nation of
250 million people can simply revert to 17th century conditions. Kunstler
doesn't see it either, pointing out that a neo-feudal system will be extremely
unstable, especially in a situation when many private citizens own guns and are
ready to use them. A generalized civil war might follow, perhaps between
Whites, Hispanics and Blacks.
What I found interesting about the book is at Kunstler actually *accepts* many
arguments used by pro-establishment writers: the modern economy is dependent on
fossil fuels; these fuels cannot be replaced by solar, wind and biofuels; and
nuclear power could generate most of our electricity. It's almost as if he'd
been reading Vaclav Smil or Robert Bryce! The crucial difference, of course, is
that Kunstler doesn't believe any of this will save us anyway. Fossil fuels are
non-renewable, climate change can neither be stopped nor adapted to, and
nuclear power is too dependent on cheap fuels and political stability to be
feasible in a world on the brink of disaster.
Well, let's hope he's wrong...

No comments:
Post a Comment