A known nebula |
SPOILER
WARNING! CONTAINS HUGE SPOILERS!
“Star Trek
Beyond” (2016) is the third neo-Star Trek film, the two previous being “Star
Trek” (2009) and “Star Trek Into Darkness” (2013). The actors try their best to
mimic the old crew of the original TV series, and succeed to a great extent -
it´s actually quite funny! “Bones” and his hard boiled exchanges with Mr Spock
are particularly convincing. Perhaps inevitably, “Captain Kirk” is less
convincing, but it must be difficult to star one of the most famous fictitious
space ship captains in galactic history.
The plot is
(frankly) basic bitch, with all the usual sci fi tropes we love to hate: the
unknown nebula which makes communication with Star Fleet impossible, the
hostile aliens hiding (surprise) inside the nebula, and the unredeemable mad
scientist. More typical for Star Trek is the peacenik UN-style rhetoric, and
the constant destructions and recreations of the starship Enterprise. While the
franchise is “liberal”, I suppose it could shock a few people that the Russians
are on *our* side in this particular intergalactic confrontation. But then, “Star
Trek Beyond” was made before the Russian narrative took over the chattering
classes in true nano-probe fashion.
The plot
revolves around an attempt by a mysterious alien civilization to attack the
Federation base “Yorktown” with a highly advanced super-weapon. The aliens need
an ancient artifact stashed onboard the Enterprise to rebuild the bio-weapon
and hence complete their nefarious designs of conquest and fascistic-vitalistic
militarism (their leader Krall sounds like a blend of Heraclitus and a Klingon).
They also need the crewmembers themselves – Krall rejuvenates himself by
killing other sentient beings and harvesting the electric energy of their dying
bodies. Think the revenge of Frankenstein´s monster or something to that
effect. Several major plot holes later, Kirk and a marooned female alien with a
penchant for kickboxing attack Krall´s compound and succeeds in rescuing most
of the crew. The twist of the story is that Krall isn´t really an alien at all.
He is actually a former Star Fleet captain, real name Edison, who went missing beyond
the Nebula and turned mad in the belief that the Federation had abandoned him.
Edison discovered the technology of a vanished alien race and used it to stay
alive – which, of course, turned *him* into an alien look alike.
While most
of “Star Trek Beyond” is vintage Star Trek, it does contain nods to other franchises.
Or is just me seeing things? Star Wars, Babylon 5, Tomorrowland, Alien…maybe it
*is* difficult to make an original scy fy flick! Still, “Beyond” gets the gold
star for being the only known production in existence (this side of the Unknown
Nebula) which contains references to both “Lord of the Rings” and the Beastie
Boys!
Three
stars. Live long and prosper.
Have you read Fred Hoyles "The black cloud"?
ReplyDeleteSimply put no. Why? Does it feature an unknown nebula?
ReplyDeleteJag antar att "nebula" är samma ord som svenska "nebulosa". Det som kallades "nebulusa" i slutet av 1800-talet visade sig vara två typer av objekt. Dels avlägsna galaxer, dels gasmoln i vår galax. Hoyles svara moln var i vilket fall som helst ett jättelikt gasmoln som trängde in i vårt solsystem. I motsats till nebulosor msn kan se på avstånd lös det inte, utan var som sagt svart.
ReplyDeleteDet visade sig vara en levande organism, som verkade vara fientlig mot mänskligheten. Den blev fientlig på allvar, när försvarsmakter på jorden började skicka atombomber på det..
Men till sist visade det sig att det I GRUNDEN inte var fientligt och några forskare lyckades få kontakt med det.
Historien är oerhört fascinerande, med en lite komisk poäng. Och det är när Hoyle låter molnet vederlägga Big Bang-teorin. En av forskarna säger förtjust ungefär "åh, där fick de där gossarna med sin exploderande universum".
Jag tycker boken var en av de bästa sf-romaner jag läst. Vill bestämt rekommendera den....
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFinns massa slarvfel i min kommentar. jag vet...
ReplyDeleteAha låter intressant...
ReplyDeleteFred Hoyle trodde förstås inte på big. Ang eller hur?
ReplyDeleteHan var ju dess mest kända motståndare på 50-talet.
ReplyDelete