“South
Vietnam. A Political History 1954-1970” is an anonymous book published in 1970
as “Keesing´s Research Report 5”. The book tries to be as objective as possible
(must have been difficult during the Vietnam War!), but is probably anti-war
and pro-NLF. Somewhat curiously, it mentions the US role in the war mostly in
passing, instead concentrating on internal troubles in South Vietnam, including
near-esoteric conflicts between different regime factions.
After the
overthrow of “emperor” Bao Dai in 1955, power in South Vietnam (the
non-Communist zone of Vietnam) ended up in the hands of Ngo Dinh Diem, whose
authoritarian Catholic regime alienated the Buddhist majority of the country
(and pretty much everyone else, too). There are still strong suspicions that
the United States had foreknowledge of, or even approved, the murder of Diem
during a military coup in 1963. After the murder of Diem, the new rulers never
quite managed to put their act together, the regime splintering into a myriad factions and competing cliques (including supporters of the ousted Diem). The
book becomes more difficult to read as the story progresses through the 1960´s.
South
Vietnamese elections were never particularly representative, since Communists
and “neutralists” (real or perceived pro-Communists) were excluded from the
electoral process. Of course, the Communist-dominated National Liberation Front
(the “Viet Cong”) weren´t interested in the elections anyway, preferring to
take power through armed struggle. The Buddhist opposition was also largely excluded
from the political process, and seems to have become increasingly friendly
towards the NLF as a result, making the regime even less willing to make
concessions. Interestingly, the National Assembly elected under these highly
restrictive conditions *also* proved unruly, and sometimes tried to veto decisions
taken by the military-controlled government. Under intense pressure, the
Assembly always backed down in the end. The book also confirms that the South
Vietnamese state entity probably wouldn´t have survived without American aid.
Apart from the US military presence, the United States also gave South Vietnam
enormous amounts of financial aid, without which basic government functions wouldn´t
have worked. The money was also needed to combat inflation, famine, etc.
The strong
support of the NLF is, ironically, visible in official South Vietnamese
government statements about the number of Communists killed or otherwise
incapacitated, the number of villages “pacified”, etc. Those numbers are always
very high, and if taken at face value, therefore show that Uncle Charlie was pretty
popular outside Saigon. Otherwise, I must say that this Research Report gives a
very rosy picture of the NLF, essentially taking its pronouncements about free
elections, broad coalition governments, neutrality and gradual (not immediate) reunification
with the Communist North Vietnam at face value. In reality, the southern zone
was speedily conquered and incorporated by the Hanoi regime after the US
withdrew its troops. No surprise there – study Stalin´s and Mao´s strategy and
draw your own conclusions…
The book
ends with the South Vietnamese House of Representatives (the local constitution
was nominally very similar to that of the United States) approving a Land
Reform Bill, apparently at the prodding of one Richard Nixon. The interesting
thing to note is that the land reform was de facto a massive expropriation of
the landlords, since only 20% of the compensation was in cash, the remaining 80%
being given in the form of government bonds (which must have been pretty worthless
in South Vietnam during the war). The US pledged 10 million dollars in aid to
help implement the land reform. I have no idea what happened to this
last-minute proposal to let the Vietnamese peasants eat something more than
cake, or if anyone else than “Keesing´s Research Reports” ever noticed. The
South Vietnamese regime simply couldn´t be saved by 1970. In hindsight, its
downfall looks inevitable. (How peasants in North Vietnam were treated, see my
review of “From Colonialism to Communism” by Hoang Van Chi. Not a pretty story
either.)
With that,
I end my review of “South Vietnam. A Political History 1954-1970”.
Om USA inte hade intervenerat massivt skulle FNL med all säkerhet gått in i Saigon senast 1966. Nu blev det istället 1975, med ofattbart dödande och lidande under perioden mellan dessa årtal.
ReplyDelete