Dick Harrison is a Swedish history
professor who has published a long series of introductory books to various
subjects related to Swedish or European history. They are often based on his
more extensive volumes on the same topics. This book, “Kättarna – de kristna
rebellerna”, seems to be an exception. It´s an overview of heretical movements within
mostly Western Christianity from Roman times onwards. I don´t think Harrison has
previously touched on this issue.
Despite being a popularized work, it
is surprisingly comprehensive. The “classical” heretics, meaning the Bogomils,
Cathars and Waldensians, are of course mentioned. So are Giordano Bruno and Michael
Servetus. However, Harrison is at pains
to point out that many suspected ”heretics” were really Christians who simply
happened to belong to the wrong theological faction, such as the Arians or
Pelagians during Roman times, the Spiritual Franciscans and Beguins during the
Middle Ages, or the Protestants during the Reformation. In Protestant lands,
the Catholics were the “heretics”!
Groups considered too socially unruly
were another potential target. Thus, the flagellants during the Black Death (who
were Catholics) often ended their days on the stake after their movement had
gotten out of hand. The charge of heresy could also be a cover for political machinations,
as when Joan of Arc was accused of witchcraft and burned at the stake by the
English during the Hundred Years´ War between England and France. A Swedish
example was the Stockholm Bloodbath in 1520, when Danish king Christian II (who
also claimed the Swedish throne) executed almost 100 opponents from the Swedish
nobility after they had first been accused of heresy by the Swedish archbishop
(who supported Christian). In reality, the conflict was completely political,
both sides being Catholic at the time.
The most interesting chapter deals
with a number of almost unknown Swedish heretics. There is the curious case of
Botulf Botulfsson, an early 14th century peasant with no known
connection to any heretical group, who repeatedly denied the real presence of
Christ in the Eucharistic elements. His ultimate fate is unknown, but since he
was condemned as a heretic by the Church, Harrison assumes that he was indeed
burned at the stake. Another virtually unknown heretic is Hemming of Vadstena,
who started preaching in 1442 and claimed to be a conduit for Virgin Mary. Although
Hemming was supposedly a simple peasant, the fact that he preached in Vadstena
is significant. After all, the Vadstena abbey was founded a century earlier by
Saint Bridget, who claimed to have received visions from…you guessed it…Virgin
Mary.
Although I studied Church history at
college level, there were some surprises in this book even for me. One is the heretical
movement known as Antonianism, which erupted in the Kongo Empire in Central
Africa during the 18th century (Kongo controlled parts of modern
Congo-Kinshasa and Angola). Antonianism was a peculiar blend of Catholicism, an
iconoclasm closer in kind to radical Protestantism, a cargo cult-like
apocalypticism, and Black supremacy. The female prophet, Beatriz Kimpa Vita,
was burned at the stake in 1706 and the movement collapsed three years later
when its “capital” was overrun by Kongo and Portuguese troops.
The last person in the Christian
world executed for heresy was Cayetano Ripoll, who was hanged in Spain in 1826
for being a Deist (the secular authorities had “commuted” the sentence from
death by burning to death by hanging). According to one urban legend, the
Catholic priests insisted on burying his corpse in a barrel on which flames had
been painted! Another tall tale has it that the barrel was later burned on the
stake…
Since “Kättare” is intended as a
brief overview, Harrison never discusses the deeper issues connected to the heresy
meme. Why is this meme a feature rather than a bug of Christianity? Could there
be a connection to monotheism, for instance? He also denies that heresy and
heresy-hunting exists today, surely an ironic statement in a book published in
2020. True, we don´t burn people at the stake today, we just “cancel” them, but
maybe tomorrow…? After all, authoritarian secular movements such as Communism also
combat “heresy”, so what makes us think we are more safe than our ancestors?
With that little reflection, I close
this review of “Kättare – de kristna rebellerna”.
Det är lite lustigt att Jehovas Vittnen någon gång de senaste årtiondena plötsligt upptäckt att de har sina rötter nånstans, och har börjat hylla Arius som en föregångare och äkta kristen. En grupp som i läran, om inte organisationsstruktur, påminner om Jehovas Vittnen är Sjundedagsadventisterna. De ser valdenserna som föregångare. Det gjorde de kanske redan från början, det var länge sen jag läste Ellen White. En lite konstig sak med dem är att deras främsta teoretiker var en kvinna, samtidigt som de inte tillåter kvinnliga präster. Det gäller internationellt, i Sverige vill de gärna ha kvinnliga präster, men för att undvika en öppen konflikt med den internationella organisationen har de istället i praktiken avskaffat präster (eller det bör kanske kallas pastorer) - så både män och kvinnor kan fylla prästens funktion utan att de kallas präst. Liksom Jehovas Vittnen tror de förresten inte på helvetet. Så vitt jag fattar är deras beslutsstruktur demokratisk och inte teokratisk - så där befinner de sig mil från Jehovas Vittnen.
ReplyDeleteIntressant! En möjlig tolkning av Arius är ju att han faktiskt ansåg att Jesus var ett inkarnerat himmelskt väsen, men ett som var skapat av Gud, alltså inte Gud själv...och Vittnena säger ju att Jesus var ärkeängeln Mikael.
ReplyDeleteApropå adventskyrkan så kan Ellen White ha varit "blandras", och svarta adventister betraktar henne tydligen som svart. Jag vet inte vad vita adventister säger...
Eftersom de inte är rasister, lär de väl ändå inte bry sig så väldigt mycket…
ReplyDeleteHar aldrig sett att JV säger att Jesus är ärkeängeln Mikael. När tog det denna ståndpunkt? Det jag sett oi deras materiel är att de anser att Jesus är underordnad Fadern, och inte är Gud.
ReplyDeleteJag har alltid haft intrycket av att det var deras så att säga traditionella ståndpunkt.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/questions/archangel-michael/
ReplyDeleteJag har hittat det! Se ovan.
Intressant!
ReplyDeleteSe även här:
ReplyDeletehttps://ashtarbookblog.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-original-witness-for-jehovah.html