Watzinger (the real one) |
“Kon-Tiki”
is a 2012 Norwegian historical drama film about Thor Heyerdahl´s famous
Kon-Tiki expedition, which took place in 1947. The film exists in two different
versions, one with most of the dialogue in Norwegian, the other with dialogue
in English.
Both
Heyerdahl, the journey of Kon-Tiki and his later expeditions were world famous
in their day, Heyerdahl becoming a virtual national hero in Norway. He was of
course well known in Sweden, as well. I heard about the Kon-Tiki and Ra
expeditions already as a kid. Ironically, Heyderdahl´s theories about
trans-oceanic contact between ancient civilizations were rejected by the
scientific community and remain so to this day. I also remember how Heyerdahl
was dethroned a few years before his death when archeologists and others
attacked his latest project, which was to prove that the Norse god Odin was a
real historical person, hailing either from Azerbaijan or the Russian region around
Azov (unless I´m mistaken, this is freely based on medieval Icelandic
chronicler Snorri Sturluson´s claim that Odin came from Troy in Asia Minor). Heyderdahl´s
idea that some of the ancient navigators were White Europeans ruling over
Natives doesn´t exactly chime with the present ideological climate, either.
Interesting fact: Graham Hancock claims to have known Heyerdahl…
Heyderdahl set
out to prove that Polynesia was settled from South America rather than from
Asia. To this end, he built a raft christened Kon-Tiki and recruited a small
crew. The primitive raft then sailed from Peru all the way to French Polynesia.
In 1950, Heyerdahl released his own documentary about the Kon-Tiki journey,
which went on to win an Academy Award. Ironically, this old documentary
(available on YouTube) is actually more interesting, and in its own way, more
dramatic than the quasi-Hollywood drama “Kon-Tiki” from 2012. Some of the real
action isn´t even included in the 2012 film, while other details are simply
wrong (as in made up). In the film, Heyerdahl´s second-in-command aboard the
raft, Herman Watzinger, is depicted as a cowardly fool who constantly disobeys
direct orders, something which led to protests from his family in Norway. In
reality, Watzinger was a stereotypically Aryan-looking former elite soldier and
athletics champion. (If Dolph Lundgren had been younger, he could have starred
this man in a flick!) Another difference between the film and real life is that
Heyerdahl had considerably more support IRL.
While “Kon-Tiki”
(2012 flick version) does have its dramatic moments, most of the film feels
dragging, and it also has that slightly annoying low comedy factor typical of
American releases (which the Norwegian film-makers clearly mimicked). By all
means, watch it if crazy exploration is your thing, but then, turn to
Heyerdahl´s own “Kon-Tiki” from 1950/51. As for the ancient Polynesians or
All-Father Odin, who knows…?
OK, parallellen med Snorre kom du tydligen också på själv... ;-) Troligen hade Heyerdahl läst Snorre, och kanske inspirerats. Att Oden var en kung är en ganska spridd teori, som finns antydd lite överallt. Jag har ex,vis träffat personer som hävdar att Oden i själva verket var Attila.
ReplyDeleteIntressant. Måste läsa Snorre på nytt. visst är det den yngre eddan där han skriver detta om Troja eller något sådant? Annars är ju kopplingen Skandinavien-Skytien intressant, fanns om den innefattar Oden är kanske mer tveksamt...
ReplyDeleteDäremot finns det klara paralleller mellan hur Oden offrar sig själv i världsträdet Yggdrasil och blir genomborrad av ett spjut, och Jesu Kristi korsfästelse. Alltså själva akten. Syftet var givetvis helt annorlunda. (En kristen hade kunnat se det hela som en satanistisk parodi på Jesu lidandes historia!) Man undrar om likheten är en slump, kristet inflytande eller något slags mysteriekult som nått Skandinavien...?
Ja, Snorre skrev "den yngre" Eddan. Den äldre, den poetiska Eddan, är anonyma handskrifter. Som anses vara från hednisk tid.
ReplyDeleteVilket får mig att tycka att den är mer intressant. Dessutom tycker jag att den är bättre skriven.
Jag tror att Oden offrade sig är ett kristet lån. Oden fick konkurrera med Jesus på detta område...
Anledningen att Snorre skriver detta om Troja misstänker jag beror på att han vill att asatron PÅ NÅGOT SÄTT ska beskrivas som "verklig" utan att han själv blir avrättad. Vilket han nog skulle blivit om han hävdat att det var "verkliga" gudar...