“The City of Hermes: Articles and Essays on Occultism” is a recent book
by John Michael Greer. The material isn´t recent, though. Greer has collected
articles on Hermetic occultism he wrote during the 1990´s and republished them
in book form. The reason seems to be that more people are interested in the
material today than when published in various obscure occult journals (some of
them edited by Greer himself) over 20 years ago. At the time, the author was an
occultist in the Golden Dawn tradition. Later, he put the GD aside and
concentrated on the nature spirituality of the AODA, a Neo-Druid order (which
he also headed). Today, it seems Greer wants the best of both worlds, his new
group DOGD combining Golden Dawn ritual magic with Druid Revivalism! I have no
idea why Hermetism is suddenly back in fashion in the American occult
underground, but I wouldn´t be surprised if Greer´s own blogs have something to
do with it…
The book is a virtual smorgasbord where almost everyone with some kind
of interest in Hermeticism should be able to find something of interest. Topics
covered include: Golden Dawn rituals, the structure of secret lodges, Jesus and
Osiris, Pythagoras, swordsmanship, geomancy, and the political background to
the Western “mind-body” problem (a man-made problem according to the author).
The strangest article by far deals with Ars Memorativa, the art of memory often
associated with Giordano Bruno. I admit that it sounds very hard to believe
that the stuff works, but the author says it does! Personally, though, I would
feel claustrophobic walking around in a labyrinth with gazebos inhabited by
weird dream-like characters. I think I´ll stick to written shopping lists!
Seriously, though, Ars Memorativa is interesting – if you have the time to
actually try it – and it´s obviously also a meditation technique which could
come in handy in other occult pursuits.
Since I´m not particularly “occult” myself, I found the three-part historical
study “Magic, Politics, and the Origins of the `Mind-Body Problem´” to be the
most interesting contribution. Greer convincingly argues that the mind-body
problem in Western philosophy and science is really a pseudo-problem, ancient
occultists and Asian philosophies having no problem with it, for instance. The
problem emerged in the Western world as the result of very concrete political
and material factors during the Early Modern Period. Greer argues that three
distinct worldviews clashed during this period, each one of them representing
certain social classes or layers. High Church Christianity in both its Protestant
and Catholic forms represented the aristocracy, materialist science the
bourgeoisie, while esotericism – strangely enough – existed in both
aristocratic and plebeian forms. To make a long story somewhat shorter, the
dualist split between mind and matter typical of the “mind-body problem” was
the result of a historical compromise between the nobility and the bourgeoisie,
as exemplified by the 1688 Glorious Revolution in England. The universe worked
according to mechanical natural laws understood and explained by science, but
God was the creator of the cosmic order, which moreover included occult forces
working at a distance (such as gravity). This willy-nilly gave rise to the “problem”
of how mind and matter could interact at all, if they were dualistically
distinct.
One thing I like about Greer is his heretical, iconoclastic tendency –
even when he smashes all the wrong idols! In the previously mentioned essay on
the mind-body problem, Greer points out that the Jacobites (who are often
idealized in occult milieus) were really French agents and had very little
support in Britain. (As a side point, he mentions that Swedish secret societies
supported the Jacobites!) In the contribution on Pythagoras, he criticizes the
tendency to explain (or explain away?) all “irrational” and “exotic” traits of
Greek culture as foreign influences. Why can´t Pythagoras or the Orphics have
come up with their ideas about reincarnation, dualism and asceticism all by
themselves, or even based them on some earlier *Greek* thinkers? The notion
that these currents within Greek thought really come from Egypt, Thrace or
India is an attempt to paint ancient Greece as more rational-minded than it
really was. This is a very good point, although I suspect that Greek “irrationality”
might just as readily manifest as a readiness for foreign borrowing. Apocalypticism and millenarianism are sharply
criticized in one text, be they Christian, secular or indeed Hermetic. Another “heretical”
article (literal heresy) interprets the Gospels as a mélange of astrological,
agricultural and magical symbolism, including some that could be Indo-European.
The idea that “the man killed by a spear and suspended in the air” is an
Indo-European mythological motif is interesting. (Yes, Jesus = Odin.) I assumed
the dying god (or goddess) was solely a Mideast thing.
Perhaps I´m a bit occult in some of my interests after all… ;-)
Many of the themes found in this volume were developed by the author at
much greater length in later books. Thus, the structure and ritual of lodges is
dealt with in “Inside a Magical Lodge”. Esoteric swordsmanship is the
subject-matter for “The Spirit and the Sword”. The apocalyptic meme is taken
apart in “Apocalypse Not”, which I think was published in 2012, appropriately enough!
The author has also published books on geomancy. When all is said and done, “The
City of Hermes” could therefore be seen as a kind of prequel teaser trailer to
the wider Greerverse.
Will Adocentyn leave the race and endorse Joe Biden?
ReplyDeleteThat was a joke, btw.
ReplyDeleteJag är fortfarande här. Ingen corona ännu så länge. In other news, så shillar DN just nu för...Hillary Clinton! HA HA HA. Pinsamt.
ReplyDeleteVar är Hanne Kjöller? Jag vill höra hennes misantropiska vinkel på corona. "Vaddå, folk blir alltid sjuka, sluta klaga, alla döööör, det är ingen kris, sjukvården har pengar, det är sjuksyrrorna som är lata" blä blä. HA HA HA.
ReplyDeleteTittar just nu på ett klipp om Lemurien. Killen säger helt utan ironi (fast på engelska): "Lemurien kommer från Mu, som betyder moder". Nja, näe, det kommer faktiskt från lemurerna, och lemures på latin betyder "spöke". Och Mu, är inte det en kossas råmande? Jävla pseudovetenskapare.
ReplyDeleteKommer eventuellt posta om något av dessa ämnen: "Varför dialektik bara är bullshit", "Varför mensjeviker och stalinister hade en poäng om den borgerliga revolutionen", "Varför är Myers-Briggs ovetenskapligt medan The Big Five är vetenskapligt", etc.
ReplyDelete