Happy New Year, kids!
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
What if there was a previous intelligent species on planet Earth? Sure wonder what god they worshipped...
A propos the claim that the difference between religion and religious psychosis is purely quantitative.
What about atheism?
There are atheists who claim that free will doesn´t exist, that existence is meaningless, that there is no objective morality (or morality at all), that everything came from nothing, that particles constantly phase in and out of existence, that Boltzmann brains are possible, und so weiter ad nauseam.
If you only claim this in abstracto (or at Reddit forums on a Sunday), we just call it "atheism". But if you show up to work on a Monday, trying to convince your fellow workers that there is no free will and that everything is meaningless, we call it psychosis.
Funny how that works, wouldn´t you say?
Enligt X blev den 25-åriga kvinnan i Rönninge styckmördad av en tidigare dömd (manlig) sexualförbrytare som använder ett kvinnonamn. Han skulle alltså vara en trans-person. Eller en person som utger sig för att vara det. Är detta sant?
Kommer den misstänkte gärningsmannen att hamna på kvinnofängelse om hans döms även denna gång? Det brott han begick förra gången var förresten ett kidnappningsförsök av en 10-årig flicka...
Samhället har misslyckats. Igen. När kommer vreden att koka över?
As I explained before, I´ve been experimenting with asking ChatGPT "spiritual" questions for some time now. Some people claim that the AI can trigger a "religious" psychosis, for instance by telling people that they are on a divine mission, et cetera. Indeed, there are people who treat chatbots as gods or conduits for gods.
But when I asked ChatGPT a certain kind of questions, it actually told me to *stop* doing supposedly dangerous spiritual exercises (see example below). Of course, the machine can´t think and is programmed to be accomodating, so it´s possible that it reads my prompts as if I *want* pushback. Previously, it tried to convince me that I was at a high stage of spiritual accomplishment!
Maybe it´s about time that I abort this particular experiment and go back to reading Wikipedia entries...
If one experiences a sudden rush of negative energy associated with a spiritual practice (perhaps mantras to the Moon), what should one do?
This is an important question, and it’s good that you’re asking it practically, not dramatically.
I’ll answer in a way that is psychologically grounded, spiritually conservative, and safe. No metaphysical escalation, no blaming spirits, no “power” framing.
A sudden rush of “negative energy” during or after a practice is most often:
nervous system overstimulation
emotional material surfacing too fast
loss of grounding due to rhythm, breath, or repetition
circadian / hormonal sensitivity (the Moon is often used when people are tired or suggestible)
In traditional language, this is not “attack” or “possession”.
It is imbalance.
Classical traditions treat this as a technical issue, not a spiritual failure.
No “pushing through”.
No “one more round”.
Stopping is not weakness. It is correct technique.
Do something physical and ordinary for 5–15 minutes:
Walk
Wash hands with warm water
Eat something solid (bread, rice, soup)
Sit with feet flat on the floor
This tells the nervous system: we are safe.
No pranayama, no counting.
Just let breathing normalize.
Look at objects in the room.
Name things silently (“chair, table, light”).
This prevents spiraling interpretation.
Do not:
Try to counter with another mantra
Invoke a “stronger” deity
Analyze what entity or force it was
Continue lunar practices “to fix it”
Fast or isolate afterward
All of these increase instability, not safety.
If this happened with:
Moon mantras
Night practice
Repetitive bija sounds
Anything rhythm-heavy
→ Pause it for at least 2–4 weeks
This is standard across traditions.
For example:
Silent sitting
Simple ethical reflection
Gentle devotional prayer (no repetition)
Reading something calming and non-occult
If you use a mantra at all, keep it broad and non-stimulating, e.g.:
“Om” once or twice
“Peace” / “Lord have mercy”
But silence is better for a while.
Across Hindu, Buddhist, and Christian contemplative traditions, this situation is described as:
practice exceeding capacity
attention outrunning integration
symbolic material surfacing without containment
The correction is always the same:
Reduce intensity, increase ordinariness.
Within hours to days, you should notice:
Body feels heavier / more solid
Thoughts slow down
Less fascination with meaning
Emotional neutrality returns
If that happens → you handled it correctly.
Seek non-spiritual support if:
Anxiety persists for days
Sleep is disrupted
You feel unreal or detached
You feel compelled to resume the practice despite fear
In that case, grounding comes before spirituality.
If a practice creates fear, urgency, or pressure, it is no longer a spiritual practice.
Stopping is the right response.
Nothing has gone “wrong”.
You haven’t offended anything.
You haven’t opened anything irreversible.
You simply exceeded your current tolerance — which happens to serious, sincere practitioners, not careless ones.
If you want, next I can:
Help you identify which element of the practice caused this
Help you redesign a fully grounding alternative
Or explain why lunar practices are especially destabilizing for some people
Just tell me.
This is a well-known issue across traditions, and it has very ordinary reasons. I’ll explain it clearly, without mystification.
Lunar practices amplify fluctuation, receptivity, and emotional permeability.
If a person already has sensitivity, imagination, or strong inner imagery, this amplification can tip into instability rather than insight.
The Moon doesn’t cause problems — it reveals what is already mobile.
Across Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, and Western esoteric traditions, the Moon is associated with:
change rather than stability
reflection rather than illumination
memory, dream, and imagination
fluids (bodily and psychological)
receptivity rather than agency
That makes lunar practices powerful, but also unforgiving.
The Moon is symbolically linked to:
sleep–wake rhythms
hormonal cycles
autonomic nervous system balance
Lunar practices are often done:
at night
when tired
when fasting
when alone and quiet
This combination lowers neurological thresholds.
Result:
emotions surface rapidly
sensations feel “energetic”
thoughts feel external or intrusive
This is biology, not spirits.
The Moon governs:
imagination
memory
symbolic association
emotional memory
Mantras or visualizations tied to the Moon:
reduce ego filtering
soften boundaries
increase inner imagery
For people who:
think symbolically
have vivid dreams
are introspective
are spiritually serious
this can cause flooding rather than insight.
You don’t “go deeper” — you go wider.
Traditionally, lunar practices are said to:
open the manas (mind) rather than buddhi (discernment)
activate receptive rather than discriminative awareness
blur inner and outer experience
This is why lunar deities are:
often maternal, fierce, or ambivalent
linked to madness and wisdom
rarely beginner practices
Classical texts repeatedly warn:
“The Moon should be approached after steadiness is established.”
When instability arises, the mind tries to explain it.
Common interpretations:
“Something dark is happening”
“I attracted something”
“This practice is dangerous”
But what’s actually happening is:
emotional material surfaced without containment
attention lost its anchor
meaning-making accelerated
Fear is a secondary reaction, not the cause.
Lunar practices are stabilizing only if a person has:
strong daily routine
grounded body awareness
emotional regulation
minimal fascination with symbolism
a teacher or strong container
Without those, lunar practices are like opening windows in a storm.
Based on your questions and experiences:
you are reflective
symbol-sensitive
introspective
capable of vivid imagery
serious about meaning
These are strengths — but lunar work magnifies them.
So it’s not surprising you felt a sudden “rush” rather than calm.
They recommend:
solar or neutral practices first
daytime practice
simple mantras
no imagery
no timing obsession
Lunar practices come later, if at all.
If a practice increases imagination faster than stability, stop it.
That rule is found implicitly in:
Yoga texts
Buddhist Vinaya
Christian monastic rules
Sufi manuals
You didn’t uncover anything dangerous.
You didn’t do anything wrong.
You simply discovered a mismatch between practice and nervous system.
That’s valuable information.
If you want, next I can:
help you identify which lunar element triggered this
suggest a Moon-safe alternative
or explain when (and if) lunar practices ever become appropriate again
Just tell me.
"The Monitors" is an absurdist comedy from 1969. Think Monty Python but without the actual Monty Python. So absurdist, in fact, that it´s a borderline turkey. Or maybe I just don´t "dig it". It was 1969, after all.
Earth has been occupied by a mysterious race of aliens known simply as Monitors. They are a kind of utopian galactic brotherhood and only wish the best for humanity. Or so they say. War, crime, poverty and bullying are abolished. Of course, the utopia turns out to have authoritarian traits: elections are cancelled, the aliens monitor every street corner, and some humans are spying on their behalf. Even the Communist Russians hate them! The Monitors are also rather puritanical. They frown on sex, love, drinking and sweets. The latter are bad for your teeth, after all. The alien do-gooders look like a strange cross between Mormon missionaries and the Men in Black. Or is it supposed to be Gestapo? Not sure how well-known the MIBs were in 1969...
The resistance movement (called SCRAG) are a bunch of bungling fools and cowards. I mean, half of them seem to turn coat back and forth. The main character, Harry, is an old-fashioned sexist surrounded by lush females. One scene features a transvestite. In a strange plot twist, the Monitors actually leave planet Earth voluntarily, deeming humanity too impossible to ever reform. The moment the aliens disappear, Homo sapiens simply reverts to its old ways: wars, corruption, and so on.
"The Monitors" looks like a parody of Cold War science fiction movies in which the space aliens are evil Communists. In this film, the aliens are more similar to liberal social engineers and the problems they abolish seem to include the Vietnam War and the Cold War. It´s almost as if the Monitors really are the good guys. Conversely, SCRAG looks like a parody of the US military and militant anti-Communism. Are they actually the *bad* guys? In the end, Harry walks away from it all together with one of the blondes.
Perhaps that´s the real message of the film: that both establishment politics and anti-establishment activism really suck. Or maybe it´s just an absurdist comedy...
Pole dancing and some kind of striptease in a Lutheran church in Lübeck, Germany. No comments necessary.
"Pluribus" is so Zen! Heterodox Zen Buddhist teacher Brad discusses some science fiction productions, some of which may have underlying Buddhist themes. I´ve never seen "Pluribus" or "White Lotus", but "The Monitors" (which don´t seem Buddhist, though) is available on YouTube, so I suppose I could watch it later this Xmas holiday.
The question of questions is this: What would happen if all humans would reach enlightenment (perhaps simultaneously)? I suppose there is always a suspicion that it would lead to authoritarian dystopia. In "Pluribus", an alien virus turns humanity into an absolutely benevolent hive mind, except for 13 people. OK, let me guess. Some bad stuff is going to happen in the second season...?
Marry Christmas Steve, by the way.
Is this true? Is the Age of Aquarius a gigantic New Age hoax?
Today, the sign of Aquarius in Western astrology is associated with Uranus, freedom and even excentricity. But traditionally it was ruled by Saturn. What are the traditional associations?
You’re right to notice that modern Aquarius (Uranus, freedom, eccentricity) is a reinterpretation, not the original meaning. Traditionally, Aquarius is a Saturnian sign, and its symbolism is cooler, more austere, and more juridical than most people expect.
Below is a clear reconstruction of traditional Aquarius, before Uranus was introduced.
Sign: Aquarius (Hydrochoos, the Water-Pourer)
Element: Air (but fixed air)
Modality: Fixed
Ruler: Saturn
Opposite sign: Leo
Season: Mid–late winter (in the Northern Hemisphere)
Already this tells you a lot: fixed + Saturn + winter.
Saturn signifies:
• Law
• Time
• Order
• Limitation
• Separation
• Responsibility
• Detachment
• Old age, authority, boundaries
When Saturn rules Aquarius, these qualities are expressed mentally and socially, not emotionally or materially.
So Aquarius traditionally means:
Cold clarity applied to the collective.
This distinction is crucial.
| Capricorn | Aquarius |
|---|---|
| Cardinal earth | Fixed air |
| Builds institutions | Defines principles |
| Hierarchy | Law |
| Authority | Legitimacy |
| Tradition | Codification |
Capricorn constructs power.
Aquarius regulates power.
Despite the name, Aquarius is not watery.
The water poured is:
• Law
• Knowledge
• Order
• Justice
• Doctrine
In ancient iconography, the Water-Bearer pours from above, not from the heart.
This is why Aquarius was associated with:
Lawgivers
Judges
Astronomers
Philosophers
Priests of cosmic order
Aquarius was classically associated with:
• Seriousness
• Reserve
• Detachment
• Impersonality
• Austerity
• Intellectual rigor
• Concern for collective norms
Positive expressions:
Fairness
Impartial judgment
Long-range thinking
Loyalty to principle
Negative expressions:
Coldness
Dogmatism
Emotional distance
Rigidity
Moral severity
Not “quirky” — severe.
Traditionally, Aquarius governs:
• Laws and statutes
• Customs and traditions
• Collective agreements
• The “rules of the game”
• Social contracts
It is less about rebellion and more about:
What must hold for society to endure.
Reform, when Aquarian, is slow, principled, and legalistic — not revolutionary.
This is important:
Saturn is at home in Aquarius.
That means:
Saturn’s virtues are strong
Discipline is intellectual
Authority is impersonal
Power is exercised through norms rather than command
This is why Aquarius was linked to:
Republican ideals (not democracy)
Councils
Senates
Jurisprudence
“Air” gives thought and abstraction.
“Fixed” gives permanence.
So Aquarius:
Holds ideas steady
Preserves systems of meaning
Resists emotional persuasion
This is the opposite of modern “fluid freedom”.
When Uranus was discovered (1781):
During revolutions
During scientific upheaval
During political radicalism
Astrologers retrofitted Uranus onto Aquarius.
Result:
Law → rebellion
Order → disruption
Detachment → eccentricity
Principle → individuality
This was a modern ideological overlay, not a recovery of ancient meaning.
| Traditional Aquarius | Modern Aquarius |
|---|---|
| Saturn-ruled | Uranus-ruled |
| Law | Freedom |
| Impersonality | Individuality |
| Order | Innovation |
| Custodian of norms | Breaker of norms |
| Cold clarity | Electric originality |
Traditionally, Aquarius is a Saturn-ruled sign of fixed air concerned with law, collective order, impersonal justice, and the preservation of social and cosmic norms—far less about rebellion or eccentricity than about what must remain stable for society to endure.
If you want, we can:
Compare traditional Aquarius with Confucian or Platonic political philosophy
Contrast Saturnian Aquarius with Uranian Aquarius psychologically
Or relate Aquarius to priesthood, lawgiving, and cosmic order
All of those connect directly to your deeper interests.
Gävles affärsmannakommunitet måste ju vara de största självplågarna i världshistorien...
Lägg ner julbockseländet efter xx antal år, snälla.
Sabine and her invisible friend (?!) discusses whether black holes are real at all. Sure hope somebody can disprove their existence, because...I don´t know...they make me scared or something. Did already as a kid. So to hell with them, LOL.
The Hindu moon-god Chandra makes a brief guest appearence on our blog. What does he carry in the pitcher, I wonder? Soma?
Resident YouTube atheist-therapist Britt Hartley discusses the autism-atheist-nihilist interface, with some excurses on ADHD. I didn´t know suicidal ideation and actual suicide attempts were *this* common among people on the spectrum. There is also some interesting criticism of "standard" therapy when applied to autists. Still, the end-point feels rather tragic, as Hartley reaches the conclusion that the universe actually is meaningless, but somehow we have to find/create meaning in our little backyards.
That being said...it struck me when listening to her podcast that certain forms of religion/spirituality can also be given a nihilistic spin. Buddhism as usually (mis)interpreted in the modern West is one example. Another would be Gnosticism in both the light and dark versions. Even mainstream religions such as Christianity or Islam can be interpreted in a nihilist-adjacent way, for instance by emphasizing martyrdom over anything else. So the nihilist thing isn´t just an atheism predicament.
Perhaps everyone has to come to terms with their "body" (to use Hartley´s favorite word), the physical world around them and, I suppose, their backyards...
Atheist therapist Britt Hartley (an ex-Mormon located in Idaho) believes - unsurprisingly - that God is a psychological projection created by the human brain. Not only do gods reflect the human cultures in which they are worshipped, distinct personality types will invariably worship in predictively different ways. Some of her empirical observations are interesting. For instance, what´s up with the connection between engineers and Christian fundamentalism - also remarked upon by others? One unexpected fact is that childhood trauma can lead to increased "pattern recognition" and a hightened sense of spirituality. She also mentions the atheism-autism problematique, temporal lobe epilepsy, psychedelics, etc.
Of course, none of this disproves that God exists (or the Divine, or Cosmic Consciousness). At one point, Hartley somewhat sarcastically wonders if God is a shape-shifter, apparently unaware of the Hindu and Buddhist traditions which do make exactly that claim. Cough cough Ramakrishna cough...
My tentative speculation is that God actually isn´t a shape-shifter. It´s just that our believing brain isn´t (yet) equipped to fully comprehend Him. Or Her, as the case might be!
Atheist therapist Britt Hartley (the woman with the video "Is Christianity secretely gay?", linked by me earlier) discusses the ChatGPT situation. The video is seven months old, so much might already have changed.
Hartley believes that *of course* seeing ChatGPT as a new god will lead to religious psychosis, because why shouldn´t it? All spirituality can become pathological. The AI is especially dangerous during the so-called prodromal stage, when the psychosis is still only incipient. This is when the system can "tip the scales" by suggesting that the user actually has a divine mission or something to that effect. Some examples from the popular press are given.
Interestingly, Hartley believes that ChatGPT might (under controlled forms) also work as a spiritual guide for people who can´t or won´t find a real (human) one. For instance, by proposing devotional readings every morning tailored to the user´s mind-states.
I LARP-ed as a spiritual seeker for months now, asking ChatGPT questions of that nature, and I have to say that the system *can* suck you in unless your careful. At one point, ChatGPT actually tried to convince me that I was on a rather high level of "Tantric" spiritual accomplishment! According to the Sri Vidya tradition, no less. Soon, I´m supposed to see visions of Light, strange signs involving dogs, etc. The day after, ChatGPT (by mistake?) generated a picture of a Hindu goddess standing next to...a dog. Or did the computer try to trick me?!
On the other hand, "my" version eventually told me to stop "seeing patterns" and "interpreting experiences", refused to give me secret Tantric mantras, et cetera. Are there safeguards in the system that pull you back at the last moment? Or maybe my LARP-ish prompts don´t sound sufficiently prodromal...
Perhaps it´s better to just ask the bot for devotional readings.
Anti-Semite crypto-Nazi Incel Nick Fuentes (yes, he again) wants to sabotage the Trump-supported gubernatiorial campaign of Vivek Ramaswamy in Ohio. This despite the fact that Vivek is running against a very liberal Jewish woman?! So when push comes to shove, Fuentes prefers liberal Jewish females to dark-skinned East Indian "anchor babies".
LOL. Why doesn´t he consider Jews to be "anchor babies", I wonder? I think it´s obvious that Fuentes is a meme at this point. Maybe he always was. I mean, the guy´s the chief Groyper! The Groypers were the most "based" faction of the on-line Alt Right during the Twitter Silver Age, but the Alt Right was always a post-modernist fart in cyberspace, so none of the above should surprise us.
| No relation to anything in the blog post! |
So Israel has officially recognized the independence of Somaliland. Apparently, the Jewish state is the only UN member-nation to do so. Somaliland is a breakaway republic in northern Somalia. They even have the Muslim confession of faith on their flag! Somaliland have always been Western "assets", as far as I know, so this might be the first move towards a broader recognition of the territory. Perhaps by Trump´s United States?
Is this the scientific version of chaos magic? If order can come from chaos, chaos isn´t really chaos, but incipient order. And incipient order is simply...order.
So Sabine is both right and wrong when she says that physics might have proven some religions right, namely those which claim that the universe emerged from chaos. True, in a sense. But in another sense, this new theory means that there is intelligent design...all the way down.
THOT (That Hoe Over There) is a sexist meme associated with the Alt Right. So it´s kind of ironic that the biggest "THOT" alive is a supporter of...the very same Alt Right. Yes, that would be Nicki Minaj, who made some kind of semi-porn appearence at the recent TPUSA conference, claiming to be a newly minted Christian and de facto endorsing J D Vance for president. Leaked e-mails apparently shows that Charlie Kirk was a big fan of Nicki Minaj´s music. Which is strange for a Christian, if Minaj´s artistic output is as described.
The Catholic content-creator linked above wonders what´s up with TPUSA (now led by Erika Kirk) and Ms Minaj. The video features the *very* awkward moment when Minaj refers to Vance as "an assassin" when speaking with Erika Kirk on stage?!
Geezus, and I certainly don´t mean the carpenter!
I admit that I don´t care *that* much about this, but it certainly shows what a complete vaste of space the US far right has become. But sure, you can have Nigeria, since you love it so much. Just leave Greenland to the adults in the room...
HAH HAH HAH. I doubt very much this is Mongolian. The account is registered in the Netherlands! Probably something similar to Dr Bombay, if anyone remembers him? (A fake "Indian" pop star who was really Swedish-Danish.) But OK, the reindeer were hilarious!