Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Still Wednesday

 



Åsa Linderborg ger upp

 


På Aftonbladets startsida har denna artikel rubriken "Pedofilerna får mig att ge upp". 

Åsa Linderborg brukar ju normalt sett vara "övergreppsförminskare", men inte ens hon kan förneka det som händer i en nyproducerad dokumentärserie om polisens "pedofiljägare". Lägg också märke till hur lagstiftningen i vissa fall skyddar pedofilerna! Inte undra på att Linderborg - som tydligen inte vill hamna på samma sida som Dumpen - funderar på att "ge upp". 

Vi andra fortsätter kampen.  

Pedofilerna tar fram monstret i mig

Operation Midnight Climax

 


Jay Dyer is a notorious controversialist in the conspiracist demimonde, but his take on the Epstein Files is surprisingly moderate (at least relatively speaking). Yes, there is a rather obvious connection to "Eyes Wide Shut". Also: MK-Ultra, the intelligence services, sexual blackmail and paedophilia. 

In the last ten minutes or so, Dyer and his hosts go off the deep end with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, UFO disclosure speculations and such. But since I like to live dangerously on the web, I´m linking to this video anyway...

Wall of Ice

 


This could be click bait or trolling, but this content-creator at least seemingly claims that Elon Musk´s Starlink has discovered the infamous "Ice Wall" in the Antarctica. That is, Elon confirmed that the Earth is flat?! 

Yeaaah...

Just harvesting some loosh

 










From RFH:s X account.

No big deal?

 


America´s resident "Epstein-minimizer" Michael Tracey explains(?) why he isn´t scandalized by the Epstein Files. Hmmm... 

>>>However much they now might want to try to deny it, amid this torrential downpour of extreme hindsight bias, the reality is that 10-15 years ago, it would've been perfectly reasonable for most people to meet with Jeffrey Epstein.

>>>Especially if it was in the context of being invited to some function featuring other interesting, noteworthy people. >>>Sure, they might have googled him in advance, and found he had pleaded guilty to some prostitution charges in the past. But that would've been widely seen as no big deal. >>>Prostitution? Really? Who cares? Even if it's not your cup of tea, it's not something to get overly exercised about. >>>The same year Epstein was convicted, Eliot Spitzer also had to resign as governor of New York after he got caught patronizing a high-end escort service. >>>As I recall, Spitzer was never banished from polite society, nor was anyone told they must refuse to ever associate with him again. In fact, he was not long thereafter given a show on CNN.

Wednesday

 



On the fence

 

Credit: Wil Michael

Me, essentially all my life. The person on the right, obviously. 

To the contrary

Credit: The Fourth Way


I have no idea what this is. Probably some kind of weird midnight conversation I had with the AI, probably Gemini. Might as well post it here, cuz why the heck not?

xxxx

1. The Problem of Evil: If God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good, why does evil exist in the world? This question challenges the idea of a benevolent God in the face of suffering. 

To the contrary: But this doesn´t disprove God. It simply "proves" that he isn´t both all-powerful, all-knowing and all-good. Or that *you* don´t understand those attributes when applied to God. Or that there is karma and reincarnation... 

2. Lack of Empirical Evidence: There is no scientific or empirical evidence to prove God's existence. Arguments for God's existence often rely on faith, personal experience, or philosophical reasoning, which are not universally accepted as proof. 

To the contrary: Why can´t a personal experience count as "empirical evidence"? Paranormal phenomena, mystical experiences, and consciousness itself points to God. But sure, it may not be the God of the Bible... 

3. The Argument from Inconsistent Revelations: Different religions offer conflicting accounts of God's nature, will, and actions. This inconsistency suggests that religious claims may be human inventions rather than divine truths. 

To the contrary: Or they could be faulty interpretations of a very real phenomenon... 

4. The Argument from Natural Explanations: Scientific explanations for the origins of the universe (e.g., the Big Bang theory), life (e.g., evolutionary biology), and natural phenomena often undermine the need for a creator God. 

To the contrary: The hard problem of consciousness remains. 

5. The Argument from Religious Diversity: The vast array of religions and belief systems suggests that religious belief is culturally and historically contingent rather than a universal truth. 

To the contrary: Which (again) doesn´t disprove God, it simply shows that humans can´t fully grasp him yet. 

6. The Argument from the Absence of Miracles: Despite claims of miracles throughout history, there is no verifiable, repeatable evidence of supernatural events that can be attributed to divine intervention. 

To the contrary: Yes, there are. Near-death experiences, shared-death experiences, but above all consciousness itself. 

7. The Problem of Divine Hiddenness: If God wants to be known, why is he so difficult to find? The lack of clear and consistent evidence of God's presence and actions raises questions about his intentions. 

To the contrary: Is he difficult to find, though? Many people claim to have met Him... 

8. The Argument from Psychological Explanations: Some argue that belief in God is a psychological phenomenon, a coping mechanism, or a product of human psychology rather than a reflection of objective reality. 

To the contrary: Why have we evolved to have that particular coping mechanism? 

9. The Argument from Lack of Coherence: Some philosophical arguments for God's existence, such as the ontological argument, are considered logically flawed or based on faulty premises. 

To the contrary: Who cares? Philosophical arguments aren´t evidence either way. 

10. The Argument from Lack of Necessity: The universe and life could exist without the need for a creator God. The concept of God is not logically necessary to explain the existence or nature of the universe. 

To the contrary: Again, what about the hard problem of consciousness?

xxxx

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

How the West was won

 


I heard rumors about this before, but usually rolled my eyes at it. Until now. Ever heard of the Progressive Western Republicans, some of whom were Mormons?

Is it true that there have been Republican politicians after World War II in Utah, Idaho and other places who took "progressive" political positions usually associated with the Democrats?

Yes — very much so.
In fact, for several decades after World War II, parts of the American West (especially Utah, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Montana) produced a distinctive kind of “Western Republican” who was economically progressive, pro-labor, and pro-government investment, even while being culturally conservative.

This now-forgotten tradition is one of the great buried chapters of U.S. political history.

Here are the clearest examples.


🏔 1. The Western Republican tradition

From the 1930s through the 1970s, many Republicans in the interior West believed:

  • The federal government should build dams, roads, and power plants

  • Labor unions were legitimate

  • Social Security and Medicare were good

  • Antitrust law should restrain corporations

  • Public land should serve the people, not just private industry

This was not seen as “left-wing” — it was seen as practical Western development policy.

Western states were poor, rural, and underdeveloped, so Republicans there wanted federal investment.


🏔 2. Utah’s progressive Republicans

Wallace F. Bennett (Senator, 1951–1974)

A conservative Mormon, but:

  • supported Social Security

  • backed Medicare

  • supported federal water projects

  • voted for civil rights laws

He opposed big business monopolies and supported labor protections.


🏔 3. Idaho’s progressive Republicans

Frank Church

Church was actually a Democrat, but Idaho’s Republicans were often not much different from him on economics.

The most important Idaho Republican was:

Len Jordan

  • Pro-welfare

  • Pro-public works

  • Pro-federal land protection

  • Backed Social Security and labor law

Idaho Republicans routinely supported:

  • unions

  • environmental protection

  • anti-corporate regulation


🏔 4. The Pacific Northwest Republicans

The most famous was:

Mark Hatfield

A Republican who:

  • opposed the Vietnam War

  • supported civil rights

  • supported food stamps

  • supported public housing

  • backed environmental protection

Today he would look like a Bernie Sanders–style Democrat on economics — but he was a lifelong Republican.


🏔 5. Washington State

Dan Evans

Republican Governor and Senator who:

  • expanded higher education

  • created environmental protections

  • supported abortion rights

  • supported welfare programs

Washington Republicans were often to the left of Southern Democrats.


🏔 6. Why this existed

The Western GOP came from:

  • small farmers

  • miners

  • loggers

  • Mormons

  • rural communities

They feared:

  • Wall Street

  • Eastern corporations

  • railroad monopolies

  • oil and mining trusts

So they wanted:

A strong federal government to protect the people from corporate power.

That was Republicanism in the West.


🏔 7. Why it disappeared

This tradition died after:

  • the Civil Rights Act

  • the Southern realignment

  • the rise of evangelical politics

  • Reagan’s transformation of the GOP

The Republican Party became:

  • Southern

  • evangelical

  • anti-government

  • anti-union

The Western progressive Republicans were pushed out or retired.


🏔 Final answer

Yes — for much of the 20th century, Republicans in Utah, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Montana were often economically progressive, pro-labor, pro-environment, and pro-welfare.

They were not Democrats in disguise.
They were a now-extinct species:

The Western Progressive Republican.

If you’d like, I can show how this tradition connects to Mormon political culture, conservationism, and even Teddy Roosevelt’s legacy — it’s a fascinating lineage.

What´s the connection to Mormon political culture?

The connection is deep, old, and very specifically Mormon — and it explains why Utah-Idaho Republicans once looked so “left-wing” on economics.

Let’s go step by step.


1. Mormonism was born anti-capitalist

Early Latter-day Saint society under Joseph Smith and Brigham Young was built on ideas that would today be called:

  • communitarian

  • cooperative

  • anti-corporate

  • anti-speculation

They practiced:

  • the United Order (shared property)

  • church-run industries

  • cooperative stores

  • price controls

  • collective land settlement

The goal was:

prevent rich outsiders from exploiting Mormon farmers.

Wall Street capitalism was seen as spiritually dangerous.


2. Federal government as protector of the Saints

Mormons had been:

  • expelled from Missouri

  • driven from Illinois

  • murdered and dispossessed

So Western Mormons developed a paradoxical view:

  • They hated federal interference in religion

  • But they loved federal money and infrastructure

Because:

Federal dams, railways, irrigation, and land law protected them from Eastern corporate power.

This produced a political instinct:

Government should defend the community against monopoly.


3. Why Mormon Republicans supported welfare and labor

In Mormon theology:

  • The church must care for the poor

  • No one should be left without food, land, or work

Utah built:

  • church welfare farms

  • church-run job systems

  • mutual aid societies

So when Republicans like Wallace F. Bennett supported:

  • Social Security

  • Medicare

  • federal housing

  • labor protections

they were not betraying Mormon values — they were translating them into federal policy.


4. Why they hated big corporations

Mormon settlers believed:

  • mining companies

  • railroads

  • oil firms

were tools of Gentile exploitation.

They wanted:

  • public land

  • cheap power

  • irrigation

  • antitrust law

That’s why Western Republicans backed:

  • the TVA model

  • dam building

  • public power

  • conservation

All of which look “left-wing” today.


5. Why this vanished

After WWII:

  • Mormons became middle-class

  • Utah became suburban

  • the Cold War made “collective” sound dangerous

  • evangelicals took over the GOP

Mormon Republicans shifted from:

communitarian populism

to:

suburban capitalism.

The old Mormon Republicanism quietly died.


Final truth

The reason Utah and Idaho Republicans once sounded like New Deal Democrats is simple:

They were practicing Mormon communitarianism through Republican politics.

It was not secular socialism —
It was theocracy-flavored welfare capitalism.

And for about 40 years, it quietly shaped the American West.