Excellent — this is one of the most illuminating comparisons in late antique thought.
To understand Maximus the Confessor, we have to place him in dialogue with Plotinus and the broader Neoplatonic tradition.
Maximus is deeply influenced by Neoplatonism — but he decisively transforms it.
1. The Basic Neoplatonic Structure
In classical Neoplatonism (Plotinus):
Reality unfolds in three primary levels:
-
The One (absolute unity beyond being)
-
Nous (Divine Intellect, containing the Forms)
-
Soul (mediating principle)
-
The material world
Multiplicity arises by emanation from the One.
The Forms (intelligible archetypes of things) exist in the Divine Intellect (Nous).
2. Parallel with Maximus
Maximus’ structure looks superficially similar:
This is not accidental.
But the differences are crucial.
3. Unity: The One vs. The Logos
Plotinus:
The One is:
-
Beyond being
-
Beyond intellect
-
Impersonal
-
Ineffable
Maximus:
The Logos is:
In Neoplatonism, unity is metaphysical abstraction.
In Maximus, unity is personal communion.
That changes everything.
4. The logoi vs. the Forms
In Neoplatonism:
-
The Forms exist in the Divine Intellect.
-
They are archetypes of things.
-
Multiplicity is structured but static.
In Maximus:
-
The logoi are dynamic divine intentions.
-
They are not separate ideas but personal wills within the Logos.
-
They are teleological (purpose-oriented).
This is a major shift.
Neoplatonic Forms are ontological patterns.
Maximian logoi are purposeful divine intentions.
5. Emanation vs. Creation
Neoplatonism:
Reality flows necessarily from the One.
Maximus:
Creation is free.
God did not have to create.
This preserves:
-
Divine freedom
-
Real contingency
-
Love as motive
Emanation implies metaphysical necessity.
Creation implies personal generosity.
6. The Problem of Matter
Plotinus:
Matter is the lowest level of reality — almost non-being.
Maximus:
Matter is good.
It participates in divine logoi.
It is destined for transfiguration.
Because of the Incarnation, materiality is elevated.
7. Return (Epistrophe) vs. Recapitulation
Neoplatonism:
All things return to the One through contemplative ascent.
Maximus:
All things are recapitulated in Christ.
This return is:
-
Historical
-
Incarnational
-
Eschatological
It is not just philosophical contemplation — it is cosmic salvation.
8. The Role of Will
This is one of the deepest divergences.
Plotinus:
The return to the One is contemplative union.
Maximus:
The key issue is will.
Human beings must align their will with the divine Logos.
That’s why Maximus fought against monothelitism (the idea that Christ had only one will).
For him:
If Christ does not have a human will,
human will cannot be healed.
Neoplatonism focuses on intellect.
Maximus integrates will and love.
9. Mystical Experience
Plotinus describes union with the One as:
-
Ecstatic
-
Beyond thought
-
Non-dual
Maximus also speaks of deification (theosis).
But for him:
Union never abolishes personhood.
The human person does not dissolve into divine simplicity.
Instead:
Communion without confusion.
This is a fundamentally relational metaphysics.
10. Where Maximus Radicalizes Neoplatonism
You could say:
Maximus Christianizes Neoplatonism by:
He takes the vertical metaphysical ladder of Plotinus and bends it around the Incarnation.
11. A Deeper Structural Comparison (Given Your Interests)
You’ve explored non-dual frameworks before.
Neoplatonism:
Unity → Intellect → Multiplicity → Return
Maximus:
Personal Logos → logoi → Creation → Incarnation → Deification
The difference lies in:
-
Personhood
-
Freedom
-
Love
-
History
Neoplatonic unity is metaphysical necessity.
Maximian unity is personal communion.
Final Summary
Maximus stands at the meeting point of:
-
Greek metaphysics
-
Christian revelation
-
Mystical theology
He preserves Neoplatonic structure but transforms its center:
The One becomes the Logos.
The Forms become logoi.
Return becomes Incarnation and theosis.
Emanation becomes love.
If you'd like, we could go one level deeper and compare this with Dōgen’s view of multiplicity and unity — there are fascinating resonances and differences there.