Bala surrounded by parakeets and hypocoliuses. Which is supposedly the plural of hypocolius. The strangest bird-name in the English language? If you know, you know...
Saturday, April 25, 2026
Dragon Family
A footnote of sorts to the previous blog post on David Wilcock. So who was Neil Keenan, then?
Is there a conspiracy theorist named Neil Keenan who tried to sue an alleged international banking cartel?
Yes, Neil Keenan is a central figure in one of the most sprawling and elaborate conspiracy theories in the world of "alternative finance" and exopolitics.
In November 2011, Keenan filed a legal complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 11-cv-8500), claiming that a staggering $1 trillion (and later trillions more) in financial instruments had been stolen from him and a group known as the "Dragon Family."
1. The Core Narrative
Keenan’s story reads like a high-stakes thriller involving ancient Asian wealth and modern banking corruption:
The Bonds: He claimed he was entrusted by the "Dragon Family" (an alleged ancient, wealthy group in Asia) with Federal Reserve bonds and other financial instruments worth billions.
The Theft: He alleged these were stolen/seized in 2009 at the Italian-Swiss border (the "Chiasso incident") by individuals linked to the Office of International Treasury Control (OITC) and the World Economic Forum.
The Cartel: Keenan sued a massive list of entities including the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the Italian government, and various international banks, claiming they were part of a "banking cartel" or "cabal" using these stolen assets to fund a secret global government.
2. Connection to "The Alliance"
Keenan's narrative is a direct ancestor to the "Alliance" theories we discussed earlier:
He often spoke of Global Collateral Accounts—vast reserves of gold and wealth supposedly hidden in bunkers across Southeast Asia (particularly Indonesia).
He claimed he was working to "free" these accounts to provide humanity with free energy, debt jubilees, and new technologies, all while being protected by a secret "Alliance" of military and spiritual leaders.
3. The Outcome of the Lawsuit
Like many of these conspiracy-related legal challenges, the court case did not result in a trial or a payout:
The original lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed by Keenan in 2012, reportedly so he could refile it with "stronger evidence" and more defendants.
It never successfully moved forward in a traditional court of law, but in the world of online discourse, it became a foundational myth. For his followers, the dismissal wasn't a failure, but proof of how "deep" the conspiracy went.
Conspiracy in Colorado
American Discourse News (further called ADN) is a conspiracist YouTube channel. This video is about David Wilcock, the recently deceased New Age-UFO-conspiracist personality. ADN clearly wants to believe in Wilcock´s conspiracy theories about everything from banking cabals to UFOs. The content-creator questions whether the man´s death was really a suicide (as stated by the Boulder County police) and wonders aloud if he may still be alive.
However...
Inadvertently, the presentation rather reveals that Wilcock´s conspiracy claims were...pretty damn wild. Wilcock backed a lawsuit by a certain Neil Keenan, a conspiracy theorist who tried to sue the Cabal supposedly running the world...in a New York district court! ADN suspects that Keenan´s lawsuit was an elaborate hoax. Later, Wilcock and his friend Corey Goode (a UFO-alien contactee/abductee) worked for the alternative media outlet Gaia. However, Wilcock later resigned from the outlet, claiming that Gaia´s managers were "Luciferians" involved in paedophilia, cannibalism and human sacrifice! Gaia sued him (presumably for libel) and the court case dragged on for years.
Small wonder Wilcock had financial difficulties. He had also invested money in a company based in Niagara Falls which claims to develop new propulsion systems (UFO-related?). The company hasn´t reported any progress in decades. ADN implies that it may be another hoax.
Stranger still is the relation between Wilcock and Goode. Officially, they had a fall out after both had left Gaia. Wilcock even posted a video blaming Goode for his difficulties. However, there are indications that the rift was an elaborate ruse to trick Gaia, and that both men were actually still on good terms. Indeed, Goode was probably the first person to publicly comment on Wilcock´s suicide on YouTube. In that video, he describes himself as a long-time friend of Wilcock.
I get the impression that David Wilcock was a victim of his own conspiracist delusions, constantly staking his credibility (and his personal finances) on extremely far out claims. Judging by his last YouTube video, Wilcock believed in a QAnon-type scenario according to which Donald Trump works for the Alliance, presumably some kind of benign Space Brothers. Wilcock must have experienced a lot of cognitive dissonance when Trump attacked Iran, posted the Jesus/Anti-Christ meme on Truth Social, and so on.
The whole case is tragic. And since the man was a conspiracy theorist, inevitably there are now conspiracy theories about his death. This is probably not the last time we hear about David Wilcock...
Friday, April 24, 2026
Disclosure update
Some interesting points in this one...
xxxx
Burchett recalled a discussion he had with a Navy admiral who told him about an aircraft they saw on sonar that was “almost as big as a football field” and “traveling over 200 miles an hour” underwater.
“We don’t have anything of that capability or that size,” Burchett said.
According to Burchett, one of the most outspoken legislators on the subject:
I’ve seen pictures and video of things that defy any reason that we have, and everybody says, ‘Well, it’s our stuff, it’s the Russians, it’s the Chinese.’ If it’s the Chinese, ma’am, they would own us. If it was the Russians, they wouldn’t be bogged down in Ukraine.
If it was ours, we would never risk our military fighting men and women in half-a-billion-dollar aircraft out with these things that they’re spotting. These things can hover for hours on end, then they can just shoot straight up, they can do angles.
In another appearence on Pierce Morgan Uncensored, the Tennessee congressman also cited the underwater craft report and said servicemen who report such things are often “pulled off the line and will get a psych evaluation.”
He also criticized a lack of transparency by the federal government, predicting material could very well still be kept secret despite President Trump’s release order.
“I feel like this is something that’s being held back for whatever reason,” Burchett told Morgan. “I have no faith in our federal government will release any of this stuff.”
xxxx
Link here:
Based Bala
Is Bala Tripura Sundari "based" or what? Ahem, this wasn´t what I intended when I gave Gemini the relevant prompts, but there you go...
Btw, aren´t her attributes those of Lalita Tripura Sundari?
No conspiracy
I don´t usually link to police reports or true crime stories, but since I mentioned the death of David Wilcock and the conspiracy theories on YouTube about the same, here is the official Boulder County police timeline, plus a statement from Wilcock´s family.
Las Malvinas Argentinas?
 |
| Credit: Nigel Voaden |
The Trump administration is contemplating withdrawing US diplomatic support for the continued existence of British overseas territories. Recently, Argentina´s pro-Trump president Milei apparently reiterated the position that the Falkland Islands belong to Argentina. Could Trump trigger a new Falklands War between the Latin American nation and Britain? I suppose that would be...ironic. Especially if the US would support Argentina.
Of course, a safer bet is that this is another "isolationist"/Western Hemispherist move (or rather trial balloon). The more nationalist subsection of the Argentine population might get a bit disappointed when Las Islas Malvinas will become The Trump Islands and the Don takes 100% of the proceeds from the oil, the albatross eggs, or whatever is the territory´s main natural resource.
Of course, an even safer bet is that Trump will make another TACO next week. So I assume the rump British Empire doesn´t have to worry too much about the US Marines being dispatched to take Bermuda or the Cayman Islands anytime soon...
Can confirm...I think
A very interesting video! Note the clear distinction between atheists and agnostics. Note also the terms "closed atheist", "open atheist", "closed agnostic" and "open agnostic". Bingo! Finally we have a good typology. The on-line lacktheist sperges can´t muddy the waters anymore. They are "open atheists", but the openness is mostly abstract and theoretical. In other words: they are closed atheists pretending to be open-minded. Another interesting finding is that atheists have a misotheist streak. They would move away from God even if he did exist!
The main difference between atheists and agnostics according to this study is psychological. Agnostics score higher on neuroticism, are (supposedly) more emotional, but also more open to experience and new ideas. They are more positive towards God (or the idea of God) and have more "spiritual struggles" about meaning and morality. Many agnostics want to believe in God. Atheists by contrast are (or at least think they are) more "analytical" and "rational". However, their misotheism shows that deep down their reaction to God is also emotional. They see God as a rather unpleasant character who would threaten their autonomy if He existed (I assume it´s a He in this case!). Facts, of course, don´t care about your feelings.
One thing not mentioned in the video is whether there are gender differences between atheists and agnostics. Other surveys show that at least in the United States atheists are usually male, while women are overrepresented among the religious believers (including fundamentalists). Being "analytical" and "rational" is usually coded as "male" (and "good"), while "emotional" - not to mention "neurotic" - is coded as "female" (and "New Age").
If this survey gets widely known, it may shake things up quite a bit. Christian apologists will use it to prove that atheists just want to sin, closed atheists will use it to show that agnostics are weak and irrational, while I will use it to show that "lacktheism" isn´t a thing at all. But you knew that already.
According to this typology, I´m actually an "open agnostic". I suppose that means I´m a neurotic, emotional woman (?!) who is (thankfully) open to new experiences and ideas. Not sure if that´s how I self-identify, but I suppose I have to struggle with that question a little bit longer...
Thursday, April 23, 2026
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)