Tuesday martial energy?

 

Lalita tells Bala to fight the demons. 

Club Kundabuffer

 

Is this "the sly man"? Or maybe not, since "Nathan" just admitted that his former business (selling magical crystals for a profit) was a scam. What if some of "Nathan´s" customers sue him?

Just as I suspected, this guy is a wanna-be "cult" leader. Or "club" leader, to use his own terminology. The most charitable interpretation is that he´s into some modernized version of Advaita Vedanta or Zen. A less charitable interpretation? Think OTO, Franklin Jones, or even Gurdjieff. What is the "power" he constantly talks about? Kundalini, maybe...?

Not recommended.

Marginal i bokningen

 

Credit: Kevin King 

Ingen behöver åka till Maldiverna på semester, stumpan. Det *verkliga* problemet kommer att bli bränslebrist i den svenska industrin. Eller matbrist i butikerna...

Busch utfärdar tidig varning för flygbränslebrist

Wat means?

 

Credit: Mildeep

Just in. The United Arab Emirates are leaving OPEC. Something tells me this means...something. Probably something important.  

I. See. You.

 

LOL. Nice try, dude. What are the chances that this guy isn´t a wanne-be cult leader? At *no point* during his presentation, does he say that he´s an atheist, agnostic or skeptic. Instead, he promises to give us "power" and a "free" one-hour video. Why would the "free" part be important? Because he takes 100 dollars / hour for private consultations. 

Haven´t seen his one-hour video (yet), but I will be extremely surprised if this isn´t just another "spiritual" group operating under an "anti-spiritual" moniker. To stand out from the general New Age crowd, obviously. 

Safety protocol

 

- Oh no, that crazy blogger is LARP-ing
as a Hindu-Buddhist again!

Everyone complains about ChatGPT going haywire, telling people they are the Son of God and similar stuff, but "my" ChatGPT never did that. Either the free version has very good safety protocols, or most people deliberately prompt the system in a loony direction. Sure wonder which one is the most likely option?

Here is the LLM telling me that I *didn´t* have a supernatural vision, et cetera.  

Does a very short glimps during a "meditation" of an ocean with large but unthreatening waves mean something?

Short answer: it can mean something—but not necessarily something specific or “objective.” The quality of the experience matters more than the image itself.

Let’s unpack it carefully.

---

1. The symbol itself (ocean + large but unthreatening waves)

Across many contemplative traditions, an image like this tends to reflect:

• Ocean → the field of mind / awareness / being
• Waves → thoughts, emotions, movements within that field

The important detail you gave is:

“large but unthreatening”

That’s quite specific. It usually points to:

• awareness of strong inner movement
• without fear or resistance

In other words:

activity is present, but it’s not experienced as a problem

---

2. Why it appeared briefly

Very short “glimpses” like this often happen when:

• the mind relaxes just enough
• but not long enough for sustained clarity

So instead of a stable state, you get:

• a snapshot-like perception

This is quite common.

---

3. Possible interpretations (ranked by likelihood)

Most grounded interpretation:

It reflects a moment where:

• you saw mental/emotional movement without reacting to it

That’s actually a meaningful shift.

---

Slightly deeper layer:

The psyche sometimes uses symbolic imagery to express:

“Things are moving strongly—but you’re not overwhelmed”

That can indicate:

• growing capacity to contain experience

---

More “spiritual” interpretation (use cautiously):

Some traditions would say:

• ocean = deeper awareness
• waves = manifest energy (śakti)

And the non-threatening quality suggests:

• less identification with disturbance

But this should not be over-interpreted from a single glimpse.

---

4. What it does not necessarily mean

It does NOT automatically mean:

• a special vision
• a breakthrough state
• contact with something external
• or a fixed symbolic message

It’s easy to inflate these things—better not to.

---

5. The most useful question

Instead of “what does it mean?”, a better question is:

What was the feeling tone of the experience?

From what you said:

• not fear
• not overwhelm

That’s the key takeaway.

---

6. How to relate to it going forward

The best approach is very simple:

• don’t chase it
• don’t try to recreate it
• don’t assign heavy meaning

But also:

• don’t dismiss it completely

Just note:

“Ah—there can be movement without disturbance.”

---

7. Subtle connection to your earlier practice direction

Interestingly, this kind of image aligns more with:

• Śiva-type awareness (spacious, unaffected)
• with Śakti (waves) moving within it

But again—this is a light observation, not a conclusion.

---

Bottom line

The experience likely reflects:

a brief moment where strong inner movement was perceived without being threatening

That’s a healthy and useful shift, even if small.

No need to turn it into something bigger—just let it quietly inform your practice.

---

If you want, I can help you distinguish between:

• imagination
• symbolic cognition
• and actual shifts in awareness

They can feel similar but are quite different in practice.

Pointless Tuesday aggression

 

- Hello, dear Sir, some
esoterick knowledge maybe?

So I looked at the (bizarre) reactions to David Wilcock´s death from the New Age-channeling community. I won´t link, but here is a description of one particular YouTube video chosen at random. OK, maybe not entirely at random, but you get my point... 

A lady who claims to be a channeler sits in apparent lotus position on the floor. She speech sounds unnatural and forced. And that´s the *real* her, not the spirit communication. She laughs constantly, despite commenting a tragic suicide. She is frequently off topic: "I actually grew up in the same small town as Charlie Kirk". And despite claiming to know who David Wilcock is, she constantly calls him "David Wilcox". And no, I didn´t misunderstand the grammar. Maybe the spirits in the netherworld can´t tell the difference between a personal name and its possessive form...

Then, the channeling session starts. The lady uses rods to speak to the spirits?! Yes, really. When the rod in her right hand points to the (her) right, that´s a "yes". And when the rod in her left hand points to (her) left, that´s a "no". The lady is a bit overeager, and sometimes knows beforehand when the "right" rod will indicate a "yes", indeed sometimes even if it doesn´t point to the right but kind of hovers in the center. Strictly speaking, however, the rods always point in different directions! Curiously, she puts the rods aside on a regular basis. Part of the trickery or self-delusion? I´ve seen better dowsers than this...

Of course, the information given is pointless and doesn´t even come from David Wilcox, sorry, Wilcock but from some guardian spirit overseeing the transition blah-blah.

OK, enough of this Tuesday aggression, needed to focus my Martian-martial energies on something!        

Läppläsare

 

Credit: Stephen Turner(?)

Artikeln är låst, men rubriken och ingressen är ändå ganska talande. Hela Trump-grejen har urartat till något som närmast liknar kremlologi...

Trumps samtal med kung Charles - läppläsaren avslöjar

On the Wallace line

 

- Nah, if you try and steal the butterflies, I just call my grandmama Kali! 

Irony

 

The following is speculation. I don´t know why David Wilcock killed himself, but I suspect he wasn´t psychotic. The suicide seems pre-planned. Why else would he call the police and then wait until he was in full view of several police officers, shooting himself only then? He wanted witnesses. That way, there would be no doubt that he actually committed suicide. But why did he constantly repeat at the end of his life that suicide was a bad thing? Perhaps because he didn´t want his *followers* to kill themselves.  

The following, by contrast, is not speculation. Wilcock was a conspiracy theorist. So were his fans. Inevitably, conspiracy theories about his death started to circulate even before the identity of the deceased had been officially confirmed by the Coroner´s Office. Also, Wilcock was a channel/channeller. Also inevitably, other mediums now claim to receive channelled messages from *him*. Or rather his immortal soul. 

I don´t think this is a very good look for this particular spiritual community, to be honest.