Can you tell me something about Maximus the Confessor and his idea about Logos and logoi?
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
A propos nothing in particular...
Certainly. Maximus the Confessor (c. 580–662) is one of the most profound metaphysical theologians in Christian history. His teaching on the Logos and the logoi is central to his vision of reality — and it is remarkably sophisticated.
Given your interest in metaphysics and contemplative traditions, I think you’ll find this especially rich.
Maximus distinguishes between:
The Logos (singular)
The logoi (plural)
The Logos is:
The divine Word
The Second Person of the Trinity
Identified with Jesus Christ
The eternal divine principle through which all things were made (John 1:1–3)
The logoi are:
The divine “reasons”
The intelligible principles
The inner meanings or purposes of created things
Every created being has its own logos.
For Maximus:
Each creature has:
A divine idea
A purpose in God
A unique participation in the Logos
The logoi are:
The eternal divine intentions according to which creatures exist.
They are not separate entities floating in heaven.
They exist within the Logos.
So:
Logos = Divine unity
logoi = Divine plurality of meanings
This is the key metaphysical move:
The many logoi are unified in the one Logos.
All created diversity is grounded in one divine source.
Creation is not random.
It is structured, meaningful, intelligible.
Each being:
Expresses a unique aspect of the divine wisdom
Participates in the Logos
Moves toward fulfillment in the Logos
Maximus goes further.
The incarnation of Christ is not just about human salvation.
It is:
The gathering of all logoi into unity in the Logos made flesh.
Christ is the center and fulfillment of the entire cosmos.
The universe is Christologically structured.
This is why Maximus speaks of:
Cosmic recapitulation
The unification of divisions
The healing of fragmentation
Maximus describes five great divisions in reality:
Uncreated / Created
Intelligible / Sensible
Heaven / Earth
Paradise / World
Male / Female
Christ unites these divisions.
This is not metaphorical poetry — it is ontological healing.
Humans are unique because we can:
Contemplate the logoi in creation
Recognize their unity in the Logos
Freely align ourselves with divine intention
For Maximus, sin is:
Failure to live according to one’s logos.
Salvation is:
Conformity of one’s personal will to the divine Logos.
This is why he was central to the defense of dyothelitism (two wills in Christ) — because proper willing is essential to cosmic restoration.
Maximus is deeply contemplative.
To perceive the logoi is a spiritual act.
It requires purification of:
passions
ego
disordered desire
Then creation becomes transparent.
You begin to see:
The inner rationality of things
Their divine grounding
Their movement toward unity
Maximus avoids two extremes:
He avoids Platonic dualism (creation is not inferior illusion).
He avoids materialist randomness.
Instead:
Creation is real, good, meaningful, and divinely intentional.
Multiplicity is not chaos.
It is structured expression of divine wisdom.
You’ve previously explored:
Śiva as silent ground (unity)
Ganesha as structured multiplicity
Bala Tripura Sundari as manifesting consciousness
Maximus’ Logos/logoi framework performs a somewhat analogous move:
Logos = divine unity
logoi = differentiated expressions
But in his case, the unity is personal and incarnate in Christ.
For Maximus:
The Logos is the eternal Word of God.
The logoi are the divine principles of each created thing.
All multiplicity is unified in Christ.
Salvation is cosmic integration.
Human freedom participates in this unification.
If you’d like, I can also explore how Maximus compares to Neoplatonism — or to non-dual metaphysical systems you’ve shown interest in.
Excellent — this is one of the most illuminating comparisons in late antique thought.
To understand Maximus the Confessor, we have to place him in dialogue with Plotinus and the broader Neoplatonic tradition.
Maximus is deeply influenced by Neoplatonism — but he decisively transforms it.
In classical Neoplatonism (Plotinus):
Reality unfolds in three primary levels:
The One (absolute unity beyond being)
Nous (Divine Intellect, containing the Forms)
Soul (mediating principle)
The material world
Multiplicity arises by emanation from the One.
The Forms (intelligible archetypes of things) exist in the Divine Intellect (Nous).
Maximus’ structure looks superficially similar:
Logos (divine unity)
logoi (intelligible principles)
created world
return to unity
This is not accidental.
But the differences are crucial.
The One is:
Beyond being
Beyond intellect
Impersonal
Ineffable
The Logos is:
Personal
Identified with Jesus Christ
Trinitarian
Actively loving
In Neoplatonism, unity is metaphysical abstraction.
In Maximus, unity is personal communion.
That changes everything.
In Neoplatonism:
The Forms exist in the Divine Intellect.
They are archetypes of things.
Multiplicity is structured but static.
In Maximus:
The logoi are dynamic divine intentions.
They are not separate ideas but personal wills within the Logos.
They are teleological (purpose-oriented).
This is a major shift.
Neoplatonic Forms are ontological patterns.
Maximian logoi are purposeful divine intentions.
Neoplatonism:
Reality flows necessarily from the One.
Maximus:
Creation is free.
God did not have to create.
This preserves:
Divine freedom
Real contingency
Love as motive
Emanation implies metaphysical necessity.
Creation implies personal generosity.
Plotinus:
Matter is the lowest level of reality — almost non-being.
Maximus:
Matter is good.
It participates in divine logoi.
It is destined for transfiguration.
Because of the Incarnation, materiality is elevated.
Neoplatonism:
All things return to the One through contemplative ascent.
Maximus:
All things are recapitulated in Christ.
This return is:
Historical
Incarnational
Eschatological
It is not just philosophical contemplation — it is cosmic salvation.
This is one of the deepest divergences.
Plotinus:
The return to the One is contemplative union.
Maximus:
The key issue is will.
Human beings must align their will with the divine Logos.
That’s why Maximus fought against monothelitism (the idea that Christ had only one will).
For him:
If Christ does not have a human will,
human will cannot be healed.
Neoplatonism focuses on intellect.
Maximus integrates will and love.
Plotinus describes union with the One as:
Ecstatic
Beyond thought
Non-dual
Maximus also speaks of deification (theosis).
But for him:
Union never abolishes personhood.
The human person does not dissolve into divine simplicity.
Instead:
Communion without confusion.
This is a fundamentally relational metaphysics.
You could say:
Maximus Christianizes Neoplatonism by:
Personalizing unity
Historicizing return
Affirming matter
Centering love and will
Anchoring everything in Christ
He takes the vertical metaphysical ladder of Plotinus and bends it around the Incarnation.
You’ve explored non-dual frameworks before.
Neoplatonism:
Unity → Intellect → Multiplicity → Return
Maximus:
Personal Logos → logoi → Creation → Incarnation → Deification
The difference lies in:
Personhood
Freedom
Love
History
Neoplatonic unity is metaphysical necessity.
Maximian unity is personal communion.
Maximus stands at the meeting point of:
Greek metaphysics
Christian revelation
Mystical theology
He preserves Neoplatonic structure but transforms its center:
The One becomes the Logos.
The Forms become logoi.
Return becomes Incarnation and theosis.
Emanation becomes love.
If you'd like, we could go one level deeper and compare this with Dōgen’s view of multiplicity and unity — there are fascinating resonances and differences there.
Saturn and Neptune conjoined at zero degrees Aries. The planet of illusion meets the planet of hard limits in the sign of martial action...
Welcome to 2026. But we don´t believe in this superstitious astrological crap, right?
"America, America, you´re a fever in my veins. Spinning like a satellite, calling out my name." LOL. If this is the best AI can do as lyrics are concerned, I don´t think song writers need to worry about future gigs. But sure, maybe AI could still destroy the cringe pop scene?
I didn´t know Seventh Day Adventism was a "science fiction" religion? OK, I actually suspected it, but this is a confirmation of sorts. According to the video above, intelligent physical-biological aliens do exist on other planets but they are unfallen (!) and therefore have no contact with Earth.
The Bible never mentions what *we* would call "space aliens", so the exegesis is more strained than usual. Especially so since the video explicitly makes a distinction between real aliens and spiritual beings (angels or demons). Note that the AI narrator misquotes the parable of the lost sheep!
What prompted the video above is (of course) the strange claim by Trump that he will direct the federal government to disclose all secret UFO files. The Adventists who made the video suspect a mass deception and strongly imply that the last days may soon be upon us. Mass deception there will indeed be (one way or another), but hardly the literal apocalypse described in the Book of Revelation and elsewhere.
But you knew that already. So let´s move on. I actually toyed with the idea of "unfallen worlds" myself, but from a slightly different angle. Since we live in a gigantic "cosmic void", maybe that´s why no alien civilization ever comes visiting us? The distances are enormously large even by space standards, so why bother? Hopefully the strange and wonderful alien worlds in distant galaxies are indeed unfallen...
The crazy Irishman (but I´m repeating myself) Thomas Sheridan has a little prediction. This guy is nuts, but I can´t help wondering if there may be something to this...
"Yes, there actually was a conspiracy. But it was the Russians/Chinese/Muslims/liberals/conservatives" (insert name of "the other guy" here).
Is it finally unravelling?
I have no idea whether this is true. Candace Owens is...shall we say...a notorious contrarian. And by promoting her, Jimmy Dore is becoming one, too.
So I´m just asking questions, bruh. Do your own research.
Here we go again...
The first clip is a long conversation featuring UFO-logist Steven Greer, released on YouTube in late November last year. The second clip is brand new. Greer comments Trump´s order to disclose previously classified UFO files.
I commented Greer many times before. My main problem with this guy is that he´s been saying pretty much the same thing for almost 30 years now. "Disclosure" is always behind the next corner, he´s got friends in high places, yada yada. So far, the only tangible result from his endeavours is a string of books, documentaries, shirts and baseball caps. One of the books supposedly contains Greer´s briefing for Donald Trump!
Greer claims that the aliens are benign. The real national security threat comes from a secret cabal of very human conspirators who has repeatedly shot down UFOs, abducted aliens and retro-engineered their advanced technology. Most of the UFOs we see are human devices controlled by this cabal. It´s a transnational criminal organization and stands above both the American and Russian governments. This neatly explains why the US haven´t used the alien technology to defeat Russia - the tech isn´t controlled by the US military. Presumably, it also explains why neither Russia nor the US have been able to defeat the cabal. Their space ships are simply too strong.
What this scenario *doesn´t* explain is why the aliens can´t attack or otherwise expose the conspirators. It´s also rather remarkable that Greer himself is still alive, able to brief Bill Clinton, Marco Rubio, and so on. He claims to know whistle-blowers who can prove everything he says and has handed over their names and stories to the good guys in the military and administration?! If the cabal is so powerful, why can´t it track down these whistle-blowers and make them disappear?
In other words: none of this makes sense. In the second clip, it´s revealed that Greer has written a speech for Donald Trump in the case of disclosure. Which I suppose could be true - with the addendum that the president will probably never see it! He also claims to have briefed a lot of people surrounding the POTUS, including Rubio, and expresses a hope that an annoucement will actually be made. But then, he said that before, too, and nothing happened.
So I´m not holding my breath.
Yesterday (February 20), Neptune conjoined Saturn. Which happens roughly once every 35 years. In mundane astrology, this signifies dramatic regime change. Especially in Russia. The two planets were in conjunction in 1917, 1953 and 1989. That is: during the fall of Czarism, the death of Stalin and the collapse of the Soviet bloc.
Hmmm...
So if this pattern holds, something very important will happen in Russia very, very soon. Will Putin die and Ukraine in some completely bizarre way defeat the Russian army, leading to the collapse of the Federation as we know it?
Apparently, Neptune also enters Aries, which it last did during the American Civil War. So perhaps we should be careful what we wish for! As for China, they just entered a Yang Fire Year of the Horse. Last time that happened was in 1966. You know, the beginning of the Cultural Revolution...
I admit that I don´t believe a word of it. Still, maybe I should replenish my private stash of snacks just in case.