So the Phoney War with Iran is resuming. I think...
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
The title of this blog post is click bait, of course. So I´ve been reflecting on the goddess Chinnamasta, whose iconography must be the most bizarre in Hinduism, nay, the world. The goddess is depicted as a naked 16-year old girl with a garland of skulls, standing on a couple engaged in sexual intercourse. Chinnamasta beheads herself (!) and the blood that streams out of her neck nourishes her two quasi-demonic attendants, Dakini and Varnini.
Which may mean...whatever. Different interpretations exist. But here is my (somewhat subjective) take.
Chinnamasta is a very graphic symbol of pantheism or rather the pantheist life-force. This force flows through all of creation, indeed it *is* creation. It feeds and nurtures all beings. It´s inevitably connected with death. However, since the life-force is constantly replenished, the process never ends: life, death, rebirth as new life. Chinnamasta is therefore Shakti, which is further confirmed by stories in which she is identified with Shiva´s wife Parvati (i.e. Shiva´s shakti).
Note that Chinnamasta combines the traits of Kali (the sword and the garland of skulls) with those of Lalita Tripura Sundari (the red skin and her young age). Kali is the most destructive of the secret Tantric Mahavidyas, a group of strange goddesses to which Chinnamasta belongs. Lalita is the most erotic, her erotic desire also being a symbol for creation.
The most common interpretation is that Chinnamasta is a symbol of the kundalini rising. Kundalini is a form of the shakti "sleeping" close to the sexual organs, and when it´s "awakened", it eventually reaches the head, making it metaphorically explode! The three streams of blood coming out from the neck of the goddess are the three "nadis" or energy channels through which kundalini rises. Dakini and Varnini symbolize the "inner" and "outer" aspects of creation, both being nourished by the energy gushing forth.
So is the life-force a curse or a blessing? From a Gnostic or orthodox Buddhist perspective, it´s surely a curse, since it traps you in the material world of death, destruction and desire. Chinnamasta is the Demiurge or samsara personified. From a pantheist perspective, Chinnamasta is full of grace, since she sacrifices herself so the life-force can flow and nourish her children. But note that Dakini and Varnini never seem to change: they remain ugly, immature and (perhaps) insatiable even after drinking the blood of the Goddess! Somehow, this vision of a never-ending pantheistic cycle doesn´t appeal to me.
But then, neither does Gnosticism or "orthodox" Buddhism. A more constructive view would be "panentheist" rather than strictly pantheist or dualist. The process of birth-death-rebirth is both a blessing and a curse. It´s not a "solution" to anything, but the life-force is a blessing since it keeps us alive until we reach liberation. Our souls can never be truly lost. And the life-force is also an instrument we can use to reach liberation. How remains to be sorted out! Although I strongly suspect self-capitating maidens wearing skulls isn´t going to be a very central part of that yoga...
Please don´t ask what prompted me to write this, LOL.
The good people of Northeast Ohio don´t seem to care that the Patterson-Gimlin film has been debunked. But then, California aint the Buckeye State, apparently. The "Cleveland Superbomb snowstorm" supposedly forced an entire pack of Bigfeet out of their hiding, et cetera. You get the drift.
Guys, it seems we just missed a celebration dedicated to the strangest goddess in Hinduism, maybe the world. Yes, that would be Chinnamasta...
Some "based" takes on class, ethnicity and intelligence c/o Edward Dutton. You probably know the drift already. Dutton is reacting to a recent British documentary about the plight of the "White working class", arguing that it´s really the underclass that´s being depicted. He also notes that the docu defines "White working class" as an "ethnic group"!
OK, *that´s* a new one. Either somebody made a silly mistake, or the people behind the documentary assume (perhaps correctly?) that nobody will care about poor Whites in Woke UK, unless these are re-defined as another ethnic minority worthy of our special consideration, alongside Muslims, Blacks, or what have you.
Dutton points out the irony that this was once a super-reactionary position. During the Victorian era, the British elites wondered aloud whether the workers really were British / English, or a completely different (unknown) ethnicity altogether! That, of course, was a form of racism, not progressive politics...
Another interesting question is whether this is some kind of paradigm shift, a trial balloon, or just some stray TV program of little importance.
It seems the Alex Jones era is finally over. InfoWars have definitely been taken over by the satirical liberal magazine The Onion. The new owners have even hired an Alex Jones impersonator, who will presumably make fun of the real one. But for how long? I don´t think the concept can last for more than a couple of episodes. Not even sure if anyone gives a damn about Alex Jones in 2026. It´s not 2006 anymore, guys...