Still Wednesday

 

- Geezus, I have to tell Matangi that she has to stop her damn pets from breeding so profusely! 

Vaggvisa

 

Vilka låtar / sånger är *egentligen* mest populära? Det verkar vara...vaggvisor! Åtminstone i Sverige där duon "Humlan Djojj" dominerar stort. Åååkej...

Vaggvisor dominerar topplistorna

DKA

 

A disturbing but serious video about David Wilcock´s suicide. I actually watched his last pod cast (it´s still up on YouTube). I never heard about diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) until now, but it´s apparently a potentially lethal condition caused by a lack of insulin in the body. Wilcock described most of the symptoms exactly in his podcast and even said that a doctor would probably diagnose him with diabetes. He left out one salient symptom, however... 

DKA can trigger psychosis. 

Which seems to have happened the next day, when Wilcock called the police, said he had diabetes (!) and strongly implies that he would shoot himself. Which he subsequently did, in front of the police sent out to investigate the situation. It seems that DKA can develop very fast and become life-threatening within 24 hours. Which may explain why Wilcock could still make a podcast on the evening of April 19 and then kill himself around lunch time on April 20. 

While the diagnosis DKA is (of course) speculation at this point, it certainly does fit the format. Since Wilcock was a conspiracy theorist, UFO believer and New Age prophet, his untimely death started a seemingly never-ending avalanche of speculations about foul play. Was he abducted by MIBs, killed by the Cabal, or placed in witness protection? His fans just can´t accept that his death was a very human tragedy, rather than some kind of QAnon-type martyrdom related to the Passion of Donald Trump (et cetera).

Maybe that´s the real tragedy.

Wednesday

 

- Yeah, so I have a lot of pet birds, what´s that to you, huh huh? 

Tuesday martial energy?

 

Lalita tells Bala to fight the demons. 

Club Kundabuffer

 

Is this "the sly man"? Or maybe not, since "Nathan" just admitted that his former business (selling magical crystals for a profit) was a scam. What if some of "Nathan´s" customers sue him?

Just as I suspected, this guy is a wanna-be "cult" leader. Or "club" leader, to use his own terminology. The most charitable interpretation is that he´s into some modernized version of Advaita Vedanta or Zen. A less charitable interpretation? Think OTO, Franklin Jones, or even Gurdjieff. What is the "power" he constantly talks about? Kundalini, maybe...?

Not recommended.

Marginal i bokningen

 

Credit: Kevin King 

Ingen behöver åka till Maldiverna på semester, stumpan. Det *verkliga* problemet kommer att bli bränslebrist i den svenska industrin. Eller matbrist i butikerna...

Busch utfärdar tidig varning för flygbränslebrist

Wat means?

 

Credit: Mildeep

Just in. The United Arab Emirates are leaving OPEC. Something tells me this means...something. Probably something important.  

I. See. You.

 

LOL. Nice try, dude. What are the chances that this guy isn´t a wanne-be cult leader? At *no point* during his presentation, does he say that he´s an atheist, agnostic or skeptic. Instead, he promises to give us "power" and a "free" one-hour video. Why would the "free" part be important? Because he takes 100 dollars / hour for private consultations. 

Haven´t seen his one-hour video (yet), but I will be extremely surprised if this isn´t just another "spiritual" group operating under an "anti-spiritual" moniker. To stand out from the general New Age crowd, obviously. 

Safety protocol

 

- Oh no, that crazy blogger is LARP-ing
as a Hindu-Buddhist again!

Everyone complains about ChatGPT going haywire, telling people they are the Son of God and similar stuff, but "my" ChatGPT never did that. Either the free version has very good safety protocols, or most people deliberately prompt the system in a loony direction. Sure wonder which one is the most likely option?

Here is the LLM telling me that I *didn´t* have a supernatural vision, et cetera.  

Does a very short glimps during a "meditation" of an ocean with large but unthreatening waves mean something?

Short answer: it can mean something—but not necessarily something specific or “objective.” The quality of the experience matters more than the image itself.

Let’s unpack it carefully.

---

1. The symbol itself (ocean + large but unthreatening waves)

Across many contemplative traditions, an image like this tends to reflect:

• Ocean → the field of mind / awareness / being
• Waves → thoughts, emotions, movements within that field

The important detail you gave is:

“large but unthreatening”

That’s quite specific. It usually points to:

• awareness of strong inner movement
• without fear or resistance

In other words:

activity is present, but it’s not experienced as a problem

---

2. Why it appeared briefly

Very short “glimpses” like this often happen when:

• the mind relaxes just enough
• but not long enough for sustained clarity

So instead of a stable state, you get:

• a snapshot-like perception

This is quite common.

---

3. Possible interpretations (ranked by likelihood)

Most grounded interpretation:

It reflects a moment where:

• you saw mental/emotional movement without reacting to it

That’s actually a meaningful shift.

---

Slightly deeper layer:

The psyche sometimes uses symbolic imagery to express:

“Things are moving strongly—but you’re not overwhelmed”

That can indicate:

• growing capacity to contain experience

---

More “spiritual” interpretation (use cautiously):

Some traditions would say:

• ocean = deeper awareness
• waves = manifest energy (śakti)

And the non-threatening quality suggests:

• less identification with disturbance

But this should not be over-interpreted from a single glimpse.

---

4. What it does not necessarily mean

It does NOT automatically mean:

• a special vision
• a breakthrough state
• contact with something external
• or a fixed symbolic message

It’s easy to inflate these things—better not to.

---

5. The most useful question

Instead of “what does it mean?”, a better question is:

What was the feeling tone of the experience?

From what you said:

• not fear
• not overwhelm

That’s the key takeaway.

---

6. How to relate to it going forward

The best approach is very simple:

• don’t chase it
• don’t try to recreate it
• don’t assign heavy meaning

But also:

• don’t dismiss it completely

Just note:

“Ah—there can be movement without disturbance.”

---

7. Subtle connection to your earlier practice direction

Interestingly, this kind of image aligns more with:

• Śiva-type awareness (spacious, unaffected)
• with Śakti (waves) moving within it

But again—this is a light observation, not a conclusion.

---

Bottom line

The experience likely reflects:

a brief moment where strong inner movement was perceived without being threatening

That’s a healthy and useful shift, even if small.

No need to turn it into something bigger—just let it quietly inform your practice.

---

If you want, I can help you distinguish between:

• imagination
• symbolic cognition
• and actual shifts in awareness

They can feel similar but are quite different in practice.