Monday, July 20, 2026

Materialist Monday

 


If you like your atheism raw, here is Carrier´s attack on the rather notorious Old Testament prophet Ezekiel...

Prophecy and History: Some Pointers

Troy has fallen

 


Breitbart News surrenders and admits that Nolan´s Woke "Odyssey" is a block bluster. It´s over.

Nolte: "The Odyssey" launches best live-action opening of year with 120 million dollars

Questions for Taoists

 


I previously commented Norman Geisler´s "Questions for Atheists, Agnostics and Non-Christians". Just for fun, I asked Gemini to respond to Geisler´s anti-Taoist polemics. Enjoy! 

How would a Taoist respond to these questions from a Christian missionary? [Questions follow]


These questions come straight out of a classic Christian evangelical apologetics framework—specifically designed for proselytizing in Chinese-majority societies by challenging folk religious practices (like burning joss paper) and reframing ancient concepts like Shangdi through a biblical lens.

From a authentic Taoist perspective (drawing on the Tao Te Ching, Zhuangzi, and traditional Taoist philosophy/cosmology), a Taoist priest or practitioner would answer these foundational worldview differences like this:

1. Who sets the standard for goodness? Would it ever be possible for you to reach that standard?

The Taoist Response: No external judge or deity "sets" a moral standard in Taoism. "Goodness" (Shan) is not a checklist of divine commandments, but a state of being in harmony with the Tao (the natural, underlying flow of the universe).

As Laozi writes in Chapter 2 of the Tao Te Ching: "When people see some things as good, other things become bad." Rigid moral standards are man-made constructs. Instead of striving to reach an artificial bar of perfection, Taoism teaches us to return to Ziran (spontaneity/naturalness) and Pu (the uncarved block—our original, uncorrupted nature). You don't "reach" a standard; you simply stop resisting the natural order.

2. What will you be in the next life? Are you confident that you will make it there?

The Taoist Response: Taoism doesn't focus on anxiety over a legalistic "destination" after death. In philosophical Taoism (and concepts like Hun and Po souls), life and death are simply the gathering and dispersing of Qi (vital energy).

Zhuangzi famously celebrated when his wife died, explaining that she merely returned to the giant cycle of seasonal change. "Confidence" about the next life comes from realizing that you are already part of the universe. Whether your Qi recombines into a tree, a bird, another human, or dissolves back into the infinite source, nothing is lost. You cannot be cast out of the Tao, because everything is the Tao.

3. Who can assure you of that final destination and destiny?

The Taoist Response: Nature itself is the assurance. Water does not need a external ruler to assure it that it will eventually reach the ocean; it simply flows downward. The universe does not require a legal contract or a personal savior to guarantee where your energy goes. The natural laws of transformation (Zaohua) handle all creation and dissolution effortlessly.

4. Do you think there is a way to be certain what the heavens want so that we can please them?

The Taoist Response: Chapter 5 of the Tao Te Ching states: "Heaven and Earth are impartial; they treat all things like straw dogs."

Heaven (Tian) in Taoism is not an emotional, human-like monarch sitting on a throne waiting to be "pleased" or offended by human actions. Heaven is the natural law of the cosmos. How do you alignment with Heaven? By observing nature, cultivating stillness, practicing non-contention (Wu Wei), and living without ego. You do not "please" Heaven with flattery; you embody Heaven by living in balance.

5, 6, & 7. Questions about offering food and paper money (Joss Paper) to dead ancestors:

5. Do you think offering food to your dead ancestors once a year will be enough? 6. Do you know how long you will have to do this until your ancestor is reborn? 7. When will you know when you can stop offering the paper money?

The Taoist Response: Here, the Christian question mistakes a ritual of filial piety (Xiao) and remembrance for a literal, commercial transaction.

  • Philosophical View: Offering food and joss paper during Qingming or the Hungry Ghost Festival is fundamentally an act of gratitude and memory. It grounds the living in respect for those who came before. It is not about "paying off a debt" or "buying time." You do it as long as you wish to honor your roots.

  • Religious/Folk View: In religious Taoism, ancestor rituals ease the transition of the Po (earthly soul) and comfort spirits in the underworld (Yindu). The rituals stop when the family line ends or when the ancestral spirit has fully transitioned. But the core purpose is always mindfulness for the living—keeping families connected across generation lines.

8. Should there not be a way to keep one’s descendants informed so as not to waste time/money? Otherwise, the paper money is pocketed by someone unrelated!

The Taoist Response: This reflects a Western, literalist view of a symbolic, spiritual medium. Joss paper (Mingbi) is not paper legal tender sitting in an earthly bank account; the fire acts as an alchemical medium converting physical matter into symbolic, spiritual intent (Qi).

Nobody "pockets" burned ash. The "currency" being transferred is the emotional devotion, love, and respect of the living descendant. That spiritual intent cannot be stolen, diverted, or wasted, because the act of offering purifies the heart of the person giving it.

9. Would you like to hear about the One and Only God, Shang Ti, whom even the great Chinese emperors worshipped?

The Taoist Response: A Taoist would likely smile at this clever historical argument, as Christian missionaries (starting with Matteo Ricci) often attempted to merge the ancient Chinese concept of Shangdi (The Highest Emperor/Ruler) with the Biblical God.

A Taoist's response would be: "Shangdi was indeed worshipped by ancient Chinese emperors as the high lord of the heavenly court. But in Taoist cosmology, even Shangdi, the gods, and the heavens themselves are bound by and birthed from something even higher: The Tao."

As Chapter 25 of the Tao Te Ching says:

"Man conforms to the Earth.

Earth conforms to Heaven.

Heaven conforms to the Tao.

And the Tao conforms to its own nature."

In short: A Taoist would respect your belief in a supreme personal God, but would gently remind you that any deity who can be named, conceptualized, or given a personality is a manifestation of reality, not the unnamed, limitless Source of reality itself.

Back to Nebadon

 


For some reason, I feel like linking to this old blog post of mine. OK, not *that* old. It´s from December 2024.

On a fandor to Nebadon

See also here:

Not a very good blog post

Answers for atheists

Frihet och välstånd

 


Hade Trump bara gjort den här typen av dumheter, hade det hela nästan varit roligt...

Trump vägrade lämna firandet

God in the dock

 


Many of these lawsuits failed since G-d doesn´t have a home adress and hence can´t be served?!

Lawsuits against supernatural beings

The flight of theurgy to the Alone

 


No surprises here, but good summary c/o ChatGPT. 

How is "salvation" or "liberation" achieved in Neoplatonism (as far as we know)?

Neoplatonism does have something very much like a doctrine of liberation, although its emphasis is on return (epistrophē) rather than on forgiveness of sins or escape from divine judgment. The goal is the soul's return to its divine source, ultimately to the One (to Hen), the absolute principle beyond all being and thought.

The precise details differ somewhat between thinkers like Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus, and Proclus, but the basic pattern is remarkably consistent.

The human condition

According to Plotinus (204/5–270 CE), every soul originates in the intelligible world. It "descends" into the material cosmos, where it becomes preoccupied with bodily life, desires, emotions, and sensory experience.

Importantly, this descent is not exactly a moral fall comparable to the Christian Fall. Rather:

  • the soul becomes distracted by multiplicity,
  • forgets its true nature,
  • identifies itself with the body and ego instead of its higher self.

The soul is therefore alienated from its true home.

One famous Plotinian phrase is:

"The flight of the alone to the Alone."

That summarizes salvation in a single sentence.


The path of return

The ascent occurs through several stages.

1. Ethical purification (katharsis)

The first step is living a virtuous life.

This includes

  • moderation
  • justice
  • courage
  • wisdom
  • freedom from excessive passions

Virtue is not merely moral obedience; it is a process of making the soul resemble its divine origin.

One becomes less ruled by bodily impulses and more governed by reason.


2. Philosophical contemplation

The next stage is intellectual.

The soul turns away from external objects and begins contemplating eternal realities.

Instead of asking

"What do I desire?"

one asks

"What is Beauty itself?"
"What is Justice itself?"
"What is Truth?"

Through philosophy the mind awakens to the realm of Intellect (Nous), where the eternal Forms exist.


3. Interiority

Plotinus repeatedly tells his readers:

"Withdraw into yourself."

Rather than seeking God outside, one discovers that the higher soul is already rooted in the intelligible realm.

This is not introspection in the modern psychological sense.

It is discovering the deepest level of consciousness beyond personality.


4. Contemplation of Nous

The purified intellect eventually comes to contemplate Nous, the Divine Intellect.

At this stage the soul participates in

  • Truth
  • Beauty
  • Wisdom
  • the eternal Forms

Yet even this is not the highest goal.


5. Union with the One

Beyond Intellect lies the One.

The One cannot be grasped by concepts because it is beyond all distinction.

Ultimate liberation occurs in a mystical union called henosis ("oneness" or "union").

Plotinus describes it as

  • beyond thought,
  • beyond subject and object,
  • beyond language.

One does not "know" the One in the ordinary sense.

Rather, one becomes united with it in an ineffable experience.

Plotinus claims to have experienced this several times during his life (according to his student Porphyry).


Is grace involved?

This is an interesting question.

Neoplatonism is often portrayed as entirely self-powered, but that is only partly true.

Plotinus certainly emphasizes personal purification and contemplation.

Yet he also says that union cannot simply be forced by human effort.

The One is always present.

The soul prepares itself, but the actual moment of union comes almost like an unexpected illumination.

Many scholars therefore compare Plotinus' account to later ideas of grace, though Plotinus himself does not develop a theology of divine grace comparable to Christianity.


What role does ritual play?

Here the Neoplatonists disagree.

Plotinus

Plotinus places little emphasis on ritual.

Philosophy, contemplation, and virtue are sufficient.


Porphyry

Porphyry accepts traditional religious practices but still regards philosophy as the highest path.


Iamblichus

Iamblichus makes a major change.

He argues that the human intellect alone cannot ascend to God.

Instead, one requires theurgy ("divine work").

Theurgy involves

  • sacred rituals,
  • prayers,
  • invocations,
  • symbols,
  • consecrated objects,
  • hymns,
  • participation in divine powers.

These rites do not compel the gods but allow the gods to elevate the soul.

This is significantly closer to later sacramental religion than Plotinus' philosophy is.


Proclus

Proclus combines rigorous philosophy with elaborate ritual and theurgy.

For him the universe is filled with divine "chains" (seirai) linking every level of reality to the gods.

By participating in these chains through ritual, contemplation, and virtue, the soul gradually ascends.


Does individuality disappear?

This is debated.

Plotinus describes union as transcending individuality.

However, the soul does not seem permanently cease to exist.

Henosis is generally portrayed as an ecstatic union rather than annihilation.

Unlike some interpretations of Advaita Vedānta, Neoplatonism does not explicitly teach that individual souls are ultimately unreal.

Rather, individuality is surpassed during union while remaining meaningful within the ordered cosmos.


Is reincarnation involved?

Yes.

Most Neoplatonists accepted some form of reincarnation inherited from Plato.

The soul may experience many lives.

The quality of one's next embodiment depends on the state of one's soul.

Liberation ends the cycle of descending into bodily existence.


Comparison with other traditions

There are striking parallels, though also important differences:

TraditionProblemGoalMeans
NeoplatonismForgetfulness of the divine sourceHenosis with the OneVirtue, contemplation, and (for later Neoplatonists) theurgy
Advaita VedāntaIgnorance (avidyā)Realization of BrahmanKnowledge (jñāna) and meditation
Mahāyāna BuddhismIgnorance and attachmentBuddhahood / NirvāṇaWisdom, compassion, meditation
ChristianitySin and separation from GodCommunion with GodDivine grace, faith, virtue, prayer, and the sacraments (depending on tradition)

Among these, Plotinus' vision is often considered especially close in spirit to Advaita Vedānta, although the metaphysical systems differ in significant ways. Later theurgic Neoplatonism (Iamblichus and Proclus) has more in common with ritual traditions such as late antique paganism, certain forms of Hindu Tantra, and esoteric currents in Christianity, in that ritual participation in divine realities complements philosophical contemplation.

Overall, Neoplatonic liberation is best understood as a gradual reorientation of the soul: from attachment to the changing world, to contemplation of eternal realities, and finally to an ineffable union with the One. The journey is not primarily about being pardoned or escaping punishment, but about becoming what one most deeply already is by awakening to one's divine origin.

Providence lost

 


So I just read a book about the East Indian companies (read: European colonization in Asia). Currently, I´m reading another book, about a certain Hannibal and the Second Punic War.

War, war, war. Constant war with no end in sight. And no resolution either. Blessed are those who believe in Divine Providence (or it´s secular version: the Western Idea of Progress), because I certainly don´t.    

Sunday, July 19, 2026

It´s over

 


The end of science fraud? Or the end of science as such? I suppose we´ll live to tell...

Concrete-operational

 

- Hello, guyz! Wazza up?
Credit: Charles J Sharp 

ChatGPT is supposedly down. Except that it doesn´t seem to be. Mine is up. Ironically, I haven´t used it for a couple of days!