The compassionate exorcist

 

- Go away, or I´ll call a Hindu exorcist next time!

From Quora, a contributor named Parama Devi writes this in response to a question about Hindu exorcism. 

>>>

The concept of exorcism that is found in abrahamic cultures is drastically different from the Vedic-hindu perspective.

In Hinduism we know that people “possessed” by hostile spirits are troubled by “hungry ghosts” who are stuck between dimensions and unable to enter the dynamic of reincarnation, due to some serious karmic problem. Therefore they are LESS POWERFUL than a human being and try to suck the energy of the human and use his/her body to perform actions it would not be able to do otherwise.

Hinduism offers the solution to APPEASE (tarpana) the poor confused and suffering soul by elevating its level of consciousness, presenting sacred water (usually from Ganga), sanctified food (pinda, etc), and reciting glorification of divine Personalities of Godhead, from Puranas etc. It is not an act of war, but an act of compassion comparable to the recently developed “secular” concept of “ghost whisperer”.

In Hindu tradition there are rituals to oppose demonic forces, but they are fundamentally different, because they do not involve a “possessed” human.

Such demonic forces are not interested in possessing the body of a poor human being, as these demonic beings are by nature much more powerful than mere human beings. For them, trying to possess the body of a puny human would be like an eagle trying to ride a bicycle to move around - it would just make no sense.

I believe that the “evil spirit” in “demonic possession” cases among abrahamics are actually very angry (not just hungry) ghosts of deceased abrahamic believers, who after death have discovered that they had been very wrong in their behavior and choices during their previous life, and become frustrated, full of hatred and malice, and try to take revenge in whatever manner they can. This explains why they have reactions against abrahamic religious symbols, that HAVE NO MEANING TO NON-ABRAHAMICS (including non-abrahamic ghosts).

>>>

Original posting

Did the Devil made Darwin do it?

You´re lying, Lucifer!
*I* told Darwin to write that book to destroy
the Church of England. 
I was getting tired of all their BS!

Or was it actually the other way around? Quora really is a weird forum, the place to ask the *really* bizarre questions...

Confusion in the original. 

>>>>

Q: Did Satan really personally tutor Darwin to create the fake theory of evolution? Or is Morneau just making that up?

A: The attached Utube video shows Morneau describing in great detail a general staff meeting of Satan and all his demons. If taken literally, then this story is true every word and sentence. So I have a very important questions to ask you.

1. How could Morneau have recorded this conversation unless he was there at the staff meeting, or had a contact that was at the staff meeting?

Further, Satan talks to Darwin.

2. How could Morneau have known what Satan was saying to Darwin unless he talked to Satan, or unless he was in Hell talking to Darwin?

Morneau could not provide witness and testimony without help from the Devil. The Devil would have to let him in on the staff meeting and past conversations. Furthermore, Morneau couldn’t tell us about it without Satan’s implicit acceptance. Morneau must have been told by Satan to tell the public all this.

So if Morneau is not making it up, then he must have made a deal with the Devil. He is a Satanic Warlock. Further, telling people that Darwin talked to the Devil must be part of the Devil’s evil plan for world domination.

My tentative conclusion is that Morneau is a Satanic sorcerer. Morneau is up to his neck in the occult. Morneau is intentionally presenting these factoids so as to lead vain and arrogant Christians to Hell.

Morneau is not making it up! He was there all the time!

Please read the link. Morneau is claiming second hand information. He talked to a Satanic priest who himself is describing a vision. The priest could not have personally been at Hell’s staff meeting.

So there are two levels of credibility here. I don’t believe Morneau actually met such a man. Maybe he did, but it could only be while he was a member of such a cult. Morneau could have been using drugs. Even should such a priest be found, I would seriously doubt this fellows testimony.

This fellow was most likely taking drugs. Should one really trust the testimony of someone who calls himself Lucifer ?-)

>>>>

Link to original exchange

Quora: Even worse than Wikipedia?

 

Emma Thorne is quite the character, but I´m not sure why I link to her content at all. Maybe it´s the Quora thing, I don´t know...

Creating your own spirit is called "tulpamancy", btw.

Come and meet your maker

 

"Quora" is considerably worse than Wikipedia as a source, since any Tom, Dick or Harry can write more or less anything there. Just now, I saw a statement that some Hindus regard Krishna as an avatar of Kali, while Radha in the same scenario is Shiva. Note the gender-swapping! 

No idea if this is true, but it wouldn´t surprise me a bit. The picture above (also posted on Quora) illustrates this syncretism, with Kali and Krishna fused into the same deity. At least I *think* that´s what´s going on here...

There are certainly Shaktas who regard Krishna as Kali´s child. Pun maybe intended.

Planet Venus strikes again

Somebody asked about the William Gill UFO case at Quora and got some interesting responses. The best are the ones at the top of the thread, from Kaiser Tarafdar and Donald Soryu. 

The Gill & Co "close encounter" with a UFO took place at New Guinea in 1959 and is still considered one of the classical UFO observations. It´s also one of my favorites. 

It *is* hard to explain away, although the skeptics sure tried! Myopia, the planet Venus and a fisherboat are some of the proposals. Or was it Jupiter, Saturn *and* Venus that had been mistaken for a *flying saucer shaped craft with four humanoids on board, waving in response to the observers below*. 

I´m pretty near-sighted myself, but I *think* I could tell the difference...   

The William Gill UFO case