Electrick

 

I think it´s official now. Gemini lost it. Listen to this conversation! And no, I never discussed Greta´s "Heavy Venus" with the AI...

Should Greta Thunberg go on BitChute, express support for Electric Universe, expose Big Bang theory as sham?

This is a fascinating "collision of worlds" you’re proposing. To look at this through the lens of logic, science, and the specific personas involved, we have to weigh the fundamental missions of both Greta Thunberg and the movements you mentioned.

1. Greta Thunberg’s Core Logic

Greta Thunberg’s entire platform is built on one central pillar: "Listen to the science."

• Scientific Consensus: She relies exclusively on the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and mainstream peer-reviewed research.

• The Conflict: The Electric Universe (EU) theory is a fringe cosmological model that contradicts almost every fundamental tenet of modern physics, including General Relativity and the standard model of gravity. For Greta to support EU, she would have to abandon the very "scientific consensus" she uses to shame world leaders into action.

2. The Big Bang vs. Electric Universe

From a scientific standpoint, calling the Big Bang a "sham" is a massive leap.

• The Big Bang: Supported by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), the red-shift of distant galaxies, and the abundance of light elements. It is the most tested model of our origins.

• Electric Universe: Proposes that electricity, not gravity, is the dominant force in the cosmos. While visually poetic, it lacks the mathematical rigor and predictive power of standard physics. It is generally viewed by the scientific community as pseudoscience.

• The Risk: If Greta were to attack the Big Bang, she would lose her credibility with the scientific community overnight. She would no longer be "the voice of reason" but would be seen as a "conspiracy theorist."

3. BitChute: The Platform Choice

BitChute is an "Alt-tech" video hosting service known for hosting content that is banned from mainstream platforms like YouTube, often including far-right politics and fringe conspiracy theories.

• Optics: For a global activist who works with the UN and Western governments, moving to BitChute would be seen as a "radicalization" move. It would likely alienate 99% of her current base.

• Echo Chambers: While BitChute offers "free speech," it also carries a heavy stigma. It would effectively "de-platform" her from the mainstream conversation she is trying to influence.

---

4. Summary Table of the Strategy

Action	Result for Greta	Impact on Climate Message
Joining BitChute	Loss of mainstream media access.	Message reaches a smaller, more radical niche.
Supporting Electric Universe	Total loss of scientific credibility.	Opponents would use it to "prove" she is anti-science.
Exposing Big Bang as "Sham"	Alienation of the academic community.	Undermines her "Listen to the Scientists" mantra.

5. The "Incongruity" Problem

Greta Thunberg's "Heavy Venus" (as we've discussed) is about Truth and Responsibility. The Big Bang and Climate Science are parts of a cohesive, rationalist world-view. The Electric Universe is a disruptive, revolutionary world-view.

If she were to make this move, it would be the ultimate "Pluto Square"—a total destruction of her existing identity to build something entirely unrecognizable. While "plausible" in a chaotic universe, it would be strategically suicidal for her current mission.

---

Since we are exploring the fringes of "Hidden Knowledge," would you like to see how the Electric Universe theory actually mirrors some ancient Vedic concepts of "Akasha" (Ether) and "Agni" (Sacred Fire), even if it's rejected by modern science?

Political climate crisis

 

Absolutely no comment on this one...

Vilken tur

 

"Jaså, den där lilla skitungen
kommer undan nu IGEN?!"

Enligt uppgifter i tyska medier kommer den svenska åklagaren att lägga ner utredningen om sabotaget mot Nord Stream.

Så Greta Thunberg kan sova lugnt, antar jag... :D   

The pivot

 

Flag of Norfolk Island.
No known connection to anything
mentioned in the article,
except that it looks bio-friendly!
Credit: In Vitrio 

Imagine a conference against slavery headed by Jefferson Davies in Richmond. Or a conference on human rights in Pyongyang, North Korea. Kinda hard, right?

Well, the ongoing UN summit on how to fight climate change is held in Dubai and chaired by the literal CEO of the United Arab Emirates´ oil company! What´s more, he actually *opposes* the Green transition and even said so. Meanwhile, UAE´s neighbour Saudi Arabia says pretty much the same thing. What´s strange isn´t that oil-producing countries oppose transitioning out of oil (of course they do), but that they have been put in charge of an international conference on how to supposedly, well, transition out of oil...

In not unrelated news, the climate summit has apparently also adopted a statement in favor of nuclear power.

I can´t help thinking that this actually means something, not just symbolically or archetypally, but "for real". Maybe the transition really is cancelled, and everyone is just going through the motions at this point.

That in turn could explain why the flagship of the climate change movement, Greta Thunberg´s Fridays for Future, has pivoted towards anti-Israeli activism and doubled down on it, despite harsh condemnations and a threatened split with the German section of the movement. Perhaps the "Green" capitalists and state bureaucrats are in retreat, so their street and college campus minions need a new outlet for their activism. Meanwhile, that other flagship, Extinction Rebellion, is getting increasingly more desperate, obviously because nobody cares anymore.

If I´m right, we will see new pivots from both the powers-that-be and the activists in the years to come, all the while climate change continues its usual course...

United Arab Emirates chairs climate conference, attacks Green agenda

Saudi Arabia says "absolutely not" to climate change phase out

22 countries pledge to triple nuclear power

Fridays for Future Sweden statement about Gaza, und so weiter

Implosionen

 

Nästan lite fascinerande hur klimatrörelsen så konsekvent imploderar politiskt. Den kommer för all framtid att förknippas med "anti-sionism" och stöd till Hamas. Fast det kanske är det den vill? Det är nämligen ganska uppenbart att ingen egentligen bryr sig om klimatfrågan längre, och då är det väl smartare för aktivisterna att dra vidare till en fråga som åtminstone är populär inom tokvänstern. 

Noterar annars att de hade bättre rådgivare den här gången. Jag menar, de lyckas fördöma Hamas´ attacker hela tre gånger i debattartikeln. Första försöket var det väl bara en halv gång ungefär...

"Vi kommer att fortsätta stå upp för Palestina" 

Masken av, luften ur?

 

Lägg märke till hur uppgiven My Rohwedder låter, och hur Anders Lindberg *egentligen* håller med Svenska Dagbladet i sakfrågan om anti-semitismen. 

Har luften gått till slut gått ur sossarnas propagandister?  

Nej, Greta Thunberg är ingen tjej-Hitler

Åkessons rivna moskéer är bara början

Persona non Greta?

 

Has Greta Thunberg become a "persona non Greta"? Asking for a blue octopus friend.  

Var bläckfisken på riktigt?

 

Kanske dags att faktiskt aktivt börja bojkotta Greta Thunberg och "klimat"rörelsen? Var den där lilla bläckfirren på riktigt, eller...?  

Bjöds upp av Greta på scenen, jämför Israel med Nazityskland

"No climate justice on occupied land"

 

The latest slogan of the climate protest movement seems to be "No climate justice on occupied land". Well, most of the Middle East is "unoccupied land" (by Jews, right?) and there seems to be precious little climate justice in, say, Sudan, Saudi Arabia or Iran. 

But whatever. More important is that the climate activists are doubling down on their support for "Gaza", which surely shows that the anti-climate change movement is rapidly losing its political momentum and relevance. Hence, the sharp turn towards "the current thing" among leftists and leftoids, which (surprise) happens to be "Gaza" (rather than, say, replacing European coal plants with nuclear power, protesting Chinese state capitalism or what have you).

If I´m right (and I always am, as you know), society will transition out of the Green transition during the years ahead, and rather than protesting against *this*, the leftists and leftoids will simply go back to pre-climate change/pre-COVID agendas. Environmentalism will once again become more "niche". 

Maybe that´s actually for the best.   

Folkmord och hjärntvätt

 

Fridays for Future verkar vara väldigt nära att splittras så att säga "officiellt". Notera länken från 2021, då FFF också skakades av interna motsättningar relaterade till terrorattacker från Hamas´ sida mot Israel. Men då försökte Greta förhålla sig neutral. Nu? Inte riktigt, verkar det som...

Min tolkning är att klimatrörelsen blev irrelevant redan år 2020, överspelad av BLM men också negativt påverkad av lockdowns under pandemin. Sedan dess har den försökt "bredda sin appell" genom att driva de frågor allmänvänstern uppfattar som viktigast för stunden. Greta tog ställning för vaccinet, FFF i Tyskland utlovade protester mot "fascistiska" anti-vaxxare, och när Ryssland attackerade Ukraina strejkade Greta för de senare. 

Av detta kan man alltså dra slutsatsen att allmänvänstern är anti-israelisk och dessutom blivit så tondöv att man inte verkar förstå/bry sig om att man ofta låter pro-Hamas. Eller så är man det faktiskt. 

Och *givetvis* är det Israel-Palestina som till slut splittrar ännu en social rörelse. Det är alltid Israel-Palestina. Inte, säg, Gretas uttalanden om kärnkraften! 

Extinction Rebellions alltmer "militanta" aktioner är troligen också ett svaghetstecken. Ingen bryr sig om XR längre, och att förstöra konst, ambulansutryckningar eller Mello blir då enda sättet att väcka uppmärksamhet. 

Förtroendet för klimatrörelsen har lidit stor skada

Spricka i klimatrörelsen efter anklagelser om folkmord och hjärntvätt

Thunbergs klimatrörelse tar ställning mot Israel (från 2021)

The silence of Taylor Swift

 

"Mr Speaker, I demand an answer to my question: Why are Taylor Swift and Greta Thunberg silent on the recent conflict between the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the Orthodox Church of Ukraine? This is a very sensitive topic which needs to be addressed swiftly. And perhaps thunbergly!" 

Greta´s hostage crisis

 

A propos the previous posting...

Here are the full versions of the two photos, the old and the new. The toy octopus is gone, and the girl standing above Greta has removed the pro-Palestinian symbols from her placard. Probably because some Twitter users claimed that was somehow anti-Semitic, too. 

But the message is of course exactly the same anyway... 

The autistic octopus

 

Some turbulence on our way down...

Apparently, Greta removed the photo above from her Twitter account, after other users (often sarcastically) pointed out that the toy octopus could be interpreted as an anti-Semitic symbol. And we can´t have *that*, now can we?

The cute little octopus is apparently an autistic smiley of some kind. I can´t say the new photo is much of an improvement, though...

Note also the bizarre "hostage situation" aesthetic! 

 

Fred i vår tid

 

Greta Thunberg verkar ha tagit ställning för den "pro-palestinska" vänstern, detta efter att tidigare ha försökt hålla sig neutral (se den andra länken från 2021). 

Satt faktiskt just och funderade på hur Hamas´ terrorattack och dess efterspel skulle påverka klimatrörelsen. Den lyckades slingra sig rätt bra när Ryssland attackerade Ukraina (genom att de facto ta ställning för Ukraina), men den här gången blir det nog tvärnit...

Å andra sidan kanske hjärnrötan inom den breda vänstern (den som även innefattar delar av etablissemanget) har gått så långt, att de är beredda att svälja även de facto stöd till anti-semitiska pogromer?

Bilden ovan har förresten ingen koppling till artiklarna nedan.

"Israel terrorstämplar Greta Thunberg"

När den gröna enhetsfronten blir röd

The *really* unpopular girl

 

No relation to anything in the blog post!

Greta Thunberg = Agent of Gaddafi? I assumed Greta belonged to the "moderate" wing of the climate activist movement, the wing that wanted to keep out of the Israel-Palestine conflict as much as possible. But it seems she changed her mind somewhat...

Greta has always been a good weather-vane showing in which direction the broad left is marching, so this signalling is...interesting. Has she *ever* had any independent thought at all? It will be interesting to see if she and Fridays for Future will backtrack from this, or not.  

I have to say that the aftermath of the Hamas pogrom has been very, very revealing indeed. Rubicon! 

Israel slams Greta Thunberg as "terror supporter"

Oil is a substance

 

Any connection to the Emerging Church? ;-)

AI goes mustang and creates a neo-Greta Thunberg who operates her own oil rigs and wants to cut down the timber in the Amazon?!

She looked like such a nice girl (part 1)

"How dare you shut down
nuclear power plants?"

Generation Greta goes nuclear. So can we all go home now?

Greta Thunberg: Germany making "mistake" by ditching nuclear for coal