Men snälla...
The blog to end all blogs. Reviews and comments about all and everything. This blog is NOT affiliated with YouTube, Wikipedia, Microsoft Bing, Gemini, ChatGPT or any commercial vendor! Links don´t imply endorsement. Many posts and comments are ironic. The blogger is not responsible for comments made by others. The languages used are English and Swedish. Content warning: Essentially everything.
Redeemed Zoomer strikes again. This is a sequel to his two previous videos on strange and (perhaps) wonderful Christian denominations. A *bit* boring, though! I expected more colorful cults. I mean, what about the 57 versions of Mormonism, bruh?
This content-creator, who calls himself Shaku Joshin, promotes a peculiar form of Buddhism. The group calls itself Amidaji International Temple, Amidaji for short. It seems to be a small breakaway faction from the Japanese Pure Land denomination Jodo Shinshu. Many members (including the founder) are White. This could be a thing, since Amidaji very strongly implies that their little sect are the only true Buddhists. White people telling Asians how to practice the Dharma? OK, bruh.
What struck me most when listening to Shaku Joshin is that he has almost exactly the same mentality as a evangelical or charismatic Christian. Indeed, he was one in his younger days. It´s all in there. The strong emotional investment in a loving savior-figure? Check. Except that the savior in this case is Amitabha Buddha (called Amida in Japanese) rather than Jesus. The evangelistic mindset? Check. The constant attacks on co-religionists for getting it wrong? Check. The sectarian attitude that your path is the only path to salvation, everyone else be damned? Check. While the content-creator doesn´t seem to believe in hell, he does regard this world as rather hellish, so being stuck here rebirth after rebirth might as well be damnation.
There are even doctrinal similarities. Pure Land Buddhists do teach a kind of salvation by faith and grace. Many have remarked on the similarities between this and Protestantism. But just like evangelicals attacking each other, Shaku Joshin claims that only Amidaji teaches *real* salvation by faith/grace alone. I encountered a similar small group of White American Amidists on the web about ten years ago, and I can´t help wondering if this is the sequel! Maybe the two groups actually are connected somehow.
I used to think that White American Buddhists are very tolerant and liberal (or at least pretends to), but here we have an explicit exception. I can´t say Quasi-Japanese Buddhism with a Bible Belt psychology is much of an improvement, though...
Some crazy charismatic chaos. Posted here for no apparent reason. Cures 40 years of depression?
Wtf, I love Billy Graham now! Did Billy Balaam actually believe that there are sinless space aliens on other planets?!
Not sure if this really means that much, but it´s fun listening to. Especially if you´re a nerd. It´s also a good summary of the bewildering diversity of Christian Churches and denominations. In practice, of course, even Churches that are in some sense "close" might hate each other - witness the rather rocky historical relations between Catholics and Orthodox. To mention just one example...
What´s the future of Christianity in general and its various branches? Redeemed Zoomer speculates about what will happen in the next 100 years. I assume this is about the United States?
What will *actually* happen globally (on current demographic trends) is that Euro-Christianity will be replaced by South Asian / Central Asian Islam or West African voodoo.
There, I said it.
The Christian sacrament situation was even more complex than I expected. I had some kind of vague notion that while Catholics and Orthodox had exactly the same seven sacraments, Protestants only had two (or perhaps three). Except for the Salvation Army, which have none.
But naaah. It´s much more complicated. Perhaps I shouldn´t be surprised.
One of my English-language teachers was a Swedish lady who lived for decades in West Virginia. Apparently, the inhabitants of the small town where she was staying warned her about the next town further down the road: "That´s where the snake-throwers live". That is, the crazy charismatic Christians otherwise best known as snake-handlers! It seems WV is the only state of the Union which doesn´t ban religious handling of serpents. Mountaineers are always free?
The YouTube clip above tells the story with remarkable scholarly restraint. It even mentions what species of ophidians the snake-handlers use during their services...
You have been warned. Do not drive further down the highway! Unless you are a scholar of religion...or, I suppose, a herpetologist.
En artikel på finländska YLE:s svenskspråkiga hemsida om Finlands förebedjare (som jag såklart hört talas om tidigare).
What´s the distinction between sola scriptura, prima scriptura and nuda scriptura (or "solo" scriptura)? In case this keeps you up at night, here´s a succinct exposition on this vexing topic. Thank you.
Had I been a Christian, I would probably follow what brother Cooper calls "prima scriptura". He wouldn´t. But then, Cooper is an orthodox conservative Lutheran. And that´s that.
Here we go again. I have a faint memory that we covered this once before? Anecdotal evidence seems to point in the same direction.
Are autistic people more likely to be atheists?
Yes — there is evidence that autistic people are more likely to identify as atheists or non-religious, though, like with IQ and religiosity, it’s nuanced and not absolute. Here’s a breakdown:
Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) suggests that religion is partly rooted in what’s called a “hyperactive agency detection device” (HADD) — the intuitive tendency to perceive minds, intentions, or agents behind events.
Autistic people, on average, show reduced sensitivity to social agency (less intuitive attribution of human-like minds to events).
This may make them less inclined toward religious belief, which often involves unseen intentional agents (gods, spirits).
Study: Cognitive and Religious Beliefs in Autism (Norenzayan et al., 2012)
Found that higher autism-spectrum traits correlated with lower belief in God.
Autistic adults were more likely to self-identify as atheists compared to neurotypical controls.
UK-based studies (2017–2019)
Surveys of autistic adults found higher rates of atheism and agnosticism than in the general population.
Also found more skepticism toward organized religion, though some still described themselves as “spiritual but not religious.”
Large-scale 2021 study (Stewart et al., Religion, Brain & Behavior)
Confirmed that autistic traits predict lower likelihood of religious belief.
Suggested the effect is partly explained by differences in mentalizing ability (theory of mind).
Reduced Theory of Mind: Autistic individuals often find it harder to infer hidden thoughts or intentions; belief in invisible, intentional gods may be less intuitive.
Preference for systemizing over empathizing: Autistic cognition often favors logical, structured explanations over intuitive or social ones, which makes secular or scientific worldviews more appealing.
Social context: Religion is often community-based; since autistic people sometimes feel excluded from group rituals/social bonding, religion may be less compelling.
Not all autistic people are atheists: Some are very religious, sometimes attracted to highly structured traditions (e.g., ritual-heavy forms of Christianity, Judaism, or Hinduism).
Variation by culture: In highly religious societies, autistic people may still identify with religion (though sometimes in less conventional ways).
Autistic spirituality: Some autistic people develop strong, highly individualistic forms of spirituality, even if they reject mainstream religion.
Yes: Autistic people are, on average, more likely to be atheists or agnostics than neurotypical people.
Why: Likely due to differences in theory of mind, reduced intuitive agency detection, and preference for systematic explanations.
But: There’s a lot of diversity — many autistic individuals still find meaning in religion or spirituality, often in unique or non-mainstream ways.
Would you like me to also contrast this with how ADHD or other neurodiverse conditions correlate with religiosity? (Since some conditions show very different patterns than autism.)
Great — let’s compare autism with ADHD (and touch briefly on a couple of other neurodiverse conditions) in terms of religiosity and atheism.
More likely to be atheists or agnostics than the general population.
Tied to reduced intuitive theory of mind and less automatic belief in unseen intentional agents.
Preference for systematic, logical explanations makes secular/scientific outlooks attractive.
But: some autistic individuals are very religious, often drawn to highly structured ritual traditions (e.g., Orthodox Christianity, Catholicism, Hasidic Judaism, ritualistic Hinduism).
The picture looks very different from autism.
ADHD is often correlated with higher religiosity rather than lower.
A 2015 study (Journal of Attention Disorders) found that people with ADHD reported more frequent religious experiences and stronger belief in God than controls.
Other research suggests ADHD traits predict stronger involvement in charismatic or Pentecostal forms of Christianity, where spontaneity, intensity, and emotionality are valued.
Explanations:
Impulsivity & novelty-seeking → attraction to emotionally intense worship.
Community & structure → religious groups can provide support for those struggling with ADHD-related challenges.
That said, ADHD individuals may also switch religions more often, since stability and long-term ritual discipline can be harder to sustain.
Dyslexia: Very little research connecting dyslexia with religiosity; differences seem more about learning style than belief.
Bipolar disorder: Not “neurodiverse” in the strict sense, but studies show higher frequency of religious or mystical experiences, especially during manic or hypomanic states.
Schizophrenia-spectrum conditions: Often associated with heightened religiosity or mystical interpretations, sometimes leading to intense personal spiritual experiences — but these can also be destabilizing.
Autism → More likely atheistic / nonreligious; drawn to logic, systemizing, or ritual-heavy traditions if religious.
ADHD → More likely religious; drawn to expressive, emotional, or charismatic forms of worship.
Other conditions → Effects vary: some increase mystical or spiritual experiences (bipolar, schizophrenia), others show little systematic effect (dyslexia).
Would you like me to map this onto future religious trends (e.g., if rising autism/ADHD diagnoses might shift the balance of religious vs secular outlooks in society)?
When I visited Stockholm recently, I actually spotted the Swedish office of the "Universal Church" from the bus and obviously asked the AI about it. Answer in five seconds. Sometimes all that nuclear power is well spent!
What is UCKG Universal Church?
The UCKG (Universal Church of the Kingdom of God) is a large Pentecostal / Neo-Pentecostal Christian denomination that began in Brazil in 1977. In Portuguese it’s called Igreja Universal do Reino de Deus (IURD), founded in Rio de Janeiro by Edir Macedo, who later became a billionaire media owner and one of Brazil’s most influential religious figures.
Here are the key points:
Type: Neo-Pentecostal megachurch.
Theology: Prosperity gospel, spiritual warfare, deliverance from demons, and faith healing.
Style: Very charismatic — services are emotional, with loud preaching, exorcisms, and testimonies.
Prosperity Theology: God blesses true believers with financial success and health. Giving tithes and offerings is emphasized as a way to “unlock” blessings.
Exorcism / Spiritual Warfare: A central feature. Pastors often perform public exorcisms, “casting out” evil spirits blamed for illness, addiction, poverty, or family problems.
Faith Healing: Prayer and laying on of hands for healing physical and emotional issues.
Strict Lifestyle: Members are discouraged from participating in Afro-Brazilian religions (like Candomblé or Umbanda), which the church frames as demonic.
Since the 1980s, UCKG has expanded massively, especially in Latin America, Africa, Europe, and North America.
Today it claims millions of members worldwide in over 100 countries.
Its headquarters is the colossal Temple of Solomon in São Paulo (inaugurated 2014), built as a modern replica of the biblical temple.
Prosperity gospel critics accuse UCKG of exploiting poor people by urging them to give money in exchange for promises of miracles.
Exorcism practices have been controversial, sometimes staged in sensational ways.
Founder Edir Macedo has faced accusations of fraud, money laundering, and abuse of power — though he remains highly influential in Brazilian politics and media.
Its antagonism toward Afro-Brazilian traditions has drawn strong criticism as religious intolerance.
In Brazil, UCKG is not just a church but a cultural and political force.
It runs TV and radio networks, publishing houses, charities, and has close ties with political parties.
It represents the new wave of Pentecostalism that blends religion, mass media, and prosperity ideology.
✅ In short: The UCKG is a Brazilian-born neo-Pentecostal megachurch known for exorcisms, prosperity teaching, and massive global expansion — deeply influential but also highly controversial.
Would you like me to also compare UCKG’s style with traditional Catholicism and Afro-Brazilian religions, since it defines itself partly against those?
Hittade detta på nätet just nu. Vet förstås inte om det är sant, eftersom jag bara träffade Wolmar Holmström två eller tre gånger (på Ortodoxa bokhandeln i Stockholm). Kanske omkring år 2000? Minns att han var med i TV en gång också. I något slags ekumenisk dokumentär om trossamfund i Sverige.
Och apropå ekumenik...
Första gången jag besökte bokhandeln (på jakt efter "Den Ortodoxa Kyrkan" av Kallistos Ware) utspelade sig en "situation" i den lilla lokalen. Wolmar storgrälade med en mycket märklig gubbe. Han såg ut att vara 90+, hade stora stövlar och en gigantisk överrock. Ärligt talat såg han ut att vara hemlös. Gubben skrek något i stil med detta: "Jehova, Jehova kommer att STRAFFA ER på domedagen, ni kommer att BRINNA". Till svar skrek Wolmar "Ut, ut härifrån!!!". Han lyckades på något sätt slänga ut den galne gyben genom dörren (där jag också stod).
Jag frågade förstås (något chockad) vem i allsin dar gubben var. Var han ett Jehovas Vittne? Som alltså trängt sig in på Ortodoxa Kyrkans bokhandel och öppet hotade föreståndaren med yttersta dagens ljungeldar. Till min stora förvåning svarade Wolmar: "Det där? Nej, nej, det där är en gammal pingstpastor. Vi har känt varandra i 40 år. Han brukar låtsas att vara ett Jehovas Vittne, och jag låtsas att slänga ut honom. Vi brukar kalla det rå men hjärtlig stil".
????!!!!
Det kan man kalla kristen gubbhumor, det.
The first video (about Ozzy Osbourne) is extremely infuriating. The second one is about a new trend among charismatic Christians: to speak in tongues and then ask ChatGPT to "translate" it?! Yes, really. Gives an entirely new meaning to the term "Large Language Model"! Ironically, both presenters sound AI-like so there´s that...
I won´t even tell you what the third video is about. But yeah, chances are that´s just another AI end times deception...
But look what I posted on this blog in 2018 (and on Amazon years earlier)...
Some spiritual groups demonize autism. Others sacralize it. This video deals with a third variant: sacralizing autism and other forms of neurodivergence without even knowing what it is! The content-creator Darante´ LaMar is a former charismatic preacher (it shows!) turned atheist. He argues that many "gifts of the Spirit" are really natural psychological abilities, typical of people who are autistic or extremely empathic.
I previously blogged about the autism-religion interface, and here we go again. Very interesting video, although the brother preaches too much at the end!
The "angel Emma" is a controversial figure that has appeared in some circles of American Charismatic Christianity, particularly among proponents of the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) and prophetic movements. The story of this angel is most closely associated with Todd Bentley, a Canadian evangelist who gained prominence in the early 2000s.
Todd Bentley, during his ministry, especially around the time of the Lakeland Revival in Florida (2008), claimed to have regular encounters with angels and other supernatural beings.
He spoke specifically of an angel named Emma, describing her as appearing in female form and associated with finances, revival, and the prophetic.
Bentley claimed that Emma was involved in previous revivals and would release anointing for healing and financial blessing.
The idea of an angel named Emma raised serious theological concerns within broader evangelical and Charismatic communities.
Critics argued that naming and gendering angels in this way goes beyond biblical precedent, where angels are typically unnamed (with a few exceptions like Gabriel and Michael) and are never said to appear as female.
Some saw it as a form of spiritual sensationalism that detracted from orthodox Christian teachings and potentially opened the door to deception or false spiritual experiences.
Others questioned whether this was a marketing tactic to generate interest and support for revival events.
The angel Emma story is emblematic of certain extreme prophetic practices found in fringe Charismatic or neo-Charismatic groups.
It reflects the experiential emphasis in many of these movements—where personal encounters with the supernatural are not only accepted but often expected.
This belief system often includes:
Modern-day apostles and prophets
An emphasis on spiritual warfare
The pursuit of signs and wonders
Belief in ongoing revelation from God beyond Scripture
However, it's important to note that not all Charismatic Christians accept or endorse these practices. Many within the mainstream Pentecostal and Charismatic world have distanced themselves from Bentley and similar figures.
Would you like to dive more into the Lakeland Revival, Todd Bentley, or the NAR?
Yes, there is a significant connection between the belief in the "angel Emma" and the prophetic ministries of Bob Jones and Paul Cain, both of whom were influential in shaping parts of the Kansas City Prophets movement—a precursor to what later became the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) and broader Charismatic prophetic culture.
Bob Jones was a prophetic figure associated with the Kansas City Prophets in the 1980s. He was known for having highly mystical, visionary experiences, often involving angels and symbolic dreams.
Paul Cain was another influential prophetic figure in the same stream, often regarded as a father of the modern prophetic movement. He was known for accurate "words of knowledge" and was linked with movements promoting healing and revival.
Both men heavily influenced figures like Mike Bickle, Rick Joyner, and Todd Bentley—the latter being the one who made "Emma" widely known.
According to Todd Bentley, Bob Jones was the first person who told him about the angel Emma.
Bentley claimed that Jones described Emma as an angel who had appeared during past revivals and was associated with prosperity and revelation.
Bob Jones reportedly referred to Emma as an angel who helped birth movements or bring in finances, and Bentley claimed that Emma appeared to him shortly after Jones mentioned her.
Bentley once said (paraphrased): “Bob Jones told me about this angel Emma, and then I had a visitation. She had long hair, and she came with gold dust and a sense of peace, and miracles followed.”
This was met with significant pushback even within the prophetic movement, particularly due to the gendering of an angel and associating her with financial blessing, which many viewed as unbiblical or sensationalistic.
Bob Jones and Paul Cain both experienced falls from grace related to moral failings, which further complicated their legacies.
The angel Emma narrative became a flashpoint for criticism of Charismatic excesses and was cited by those warning against "unmoored spirituality" that prioritized mystical experiences over scriptural grounding.
Bob Jones was the originator (or at least a key transmitter) of the "angel Emma" concept.
Todd Bentley ran with it, publicizing the name and linking it to his revival meetings and personal angelic encounters.
Paul Cain’s direct link to Emma is less documented, but he was part of the same prophetic ecosystem that accepted angelic visitations as part of Christian life.
Would you like a timeline of how all this unfolded, or a deeper dive into the Kansas City Prophets’ influence on modern Charismatic movements?
ADDENDUM:
There is no direct evidence that Bob Jones (the prophetic minister associated with the Kansas City Prophets) ever personally taught or believed in the existence of an angel named Emma. The entire connection between Bob Jones and the so-called Emma angel seems to originate solely from the testimony of Todd Bentley.
Todd Bentley is the one who publicly claimed to have encountered an angel named Emma.
Bentley linked Emma to Bob Jones, suggesting that Jones had prior experiences or recognition of this angel.
However, Bob Jones himself never wrote about, preached about, or confirmed belief in an angel named Emma in any of his publicly available teachings or prophecies.
Many within the prophetic and charismatic communities have distanced themselves from Bentley's Emma angel story, and it has been a point of controversy.
So, to summarize:
➡️ Yes, the Emma angel narrative is entirely based on Todd Bentley’s testimony.
➡️ No direct, independent statements from Bob Jones confirm this belief.
Would you like a quote or video reference from Todd Bentley's original account for context?
An extremely interesting "discussion about everything" featuring Emerson Green and Jon from the podcast "Christianity on the spectrum". Jon has tried to get to the bottom of the question "Are autists more likely to be atheists" and the answer seems to be "yes". But why? The idea that autists lack a theory of mind and therefore can´t understand religion and spirituality (i.e. the minds of invisible gods) seems intuitively true, but Jon believes its much more complicated.
After all, not all religious traditions are the same. Indeed, Jon´s research suggests that autists who are Christian gravitate towards liturgical and ritualist forms of religiosity, while shunning more emotionalist and spontaneous versions. Which makes perfect sense. It also turns out that many Christian autists are preoccupied with doctrinal orthodoxy. Perhaps because they can´t stand ambiguity and inconsistency?
So why do many autists de-convert and become atheists? The main reason seems to be precisely that they find themselves unable to uphold orthodoxy due to Bible contradictions or illogical theology. The cognitive dissonance becomes too great. However, there does seem to be another more sinister reason: Christian fundamentalists are often uncomprehending or downright hostile to autists. Children on the spectrum may be subject to exorcisms to cast out their "demons". In general, these groups tend to shun people with real or perceived mental health issues. There are theologians who argue that the "image of God in man" includes having a complex theory of mind - precisely what autists lack. One theologian even referred to the state of non-belief as "spiritual autism"!
Yet another factor could be that many autists are...ahem...a bit weird. And many Christian groups don´t tolerate weirdness (or *this* kind of weirdness). Thus, many autists have gender dysphoria and identify as trans or non-binary. Jon was at one point invited onto a Christian autists´ forum and soon realized that he was the only person there who *wasn´t* a Furry?!
Jon also discusses the phenomenon of "autistic" influencers on TikTok and other social media platforms. They don´t know squat about autism and broaden the definition to include as many people as possible. These groups are usually Woke and exclude people with the wrong opinions. Jon himself is diagnosed with "autism 1" (what used to be called Asperger´s or high-functioning autism), suffered from gender dysphoria as a teenager, and left Christianity for atheism. Later, he re-converted. He has worked for the US military and is presumably more conservative in orientation.
I´ve heard of many of these things before, so it was nice to get them confirmed. One thing I didn´t know about was that some Christian theologians define "the image of God" or "communion with God" in such a way that people with autistic traits are excluded. I mean, that´s...wild.
Recommended. Although Jon, as a typical "aspie", talks too much!
Two videos about William Branham, an American Pentecostal preacher who some followers believe was "God come in the flesh". But sure, the more moderate faction says that he was "only" a new Elijah and hence the harbinger of the Lord´s second coming. Branham was at the very least an infallible prophet and his words are therefore God´s words. Or the Word of God? When Branham died in a car accident, a competing charismatic leader said that God had taken "the prophet" home to stop him from spreading heresy!
Branham´s teaching (The Message) isn´t always easy to follow and may even have been contradictory. Anti-Trinitarianism, "Jesus Only" and the Serpent Seed doctrine (!) were some of the staples. Another was the idea that hell isn´t eternal and that its denizens will eventually be annihilated completely (although it may take a very long time). Branham still has millions of followers, including in Africa and Latin America. However, the clips above say almost nothing about his movement, which I assume is badly split between different groups.
There may be *some* kind of connection between The Message and the NAR, but I haven´t gotten that far yet in my current studies...