Showing posts with label Joe Rogan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Rogan. Show all posts

Sunday, April 19, 2026

Psychedelic

 


Trump signed a new law legalizing research into psychedelic drugs for medical purposes to help war veterans. Both RFK Jr and Joe Rogan were there. Kind of ironic that it happens now. For a number of reasons...

Thursday, March 12, 2026

Wake up to politics

 



I´ve covered this before, but opinion polls supposedly suggest that most Trump/MAGA supporters are in favor of Operation Epic Fury. The number of MAGA Republicans who support the war is much larger than the number of non-MAGA Republicans who do so. This is true both in percentages and in absolute numbers. Only 3% of Republicans identify clearly as both MAGA and anti-war. From this, some gadflies conclude that there isn´t a "split in MAGA" over the Iran war. It´s all sound and (non-epic) fury from the legacy media, signifying nothing. 

However, there seems to be a problem with the relevant polls.  

Those who self-identify as MAGA usually take that to mean "100% support for Trump". The label is ideologically empty and is used to express extreme trust in the person of Donald J Trump. Those who oppose the Iran war will probably not identify as MAGA for that very reason. But this skews the result. If "MAGA" just means "I love Trump", then almost *by definition* MAGAs will be much less likely to oppose Trump´s policies on any issue. 

The writer of the first article linked below believe that the midterm elections *will* cause trouble for Trump since many new Trump voters in 2024 were independents and are likely to switch their allegiance (many of these might be opposed to the war or dissatisifed for other reasons). However, he believes that this isn´t the same thing as a major split in MAGA, since the MAGAs who are "Trumpier than Trump" (Steven Bannon, Tucker Carlson, MTG) command very little support.

I can´t help wondering if political commentators are simply talking pass each other. They have different definitions of what "MAGA" is supposed to be. The ideologically orthodox populists may be a minuscule group and perhaps nobody outside their circles gives a damn about what Bannon is saying, but if a larger group of independents leave the "MAGA coalition" (in the broader sense), Trump is in trouble anyway! And that´s true even if this particular group is smaller than the MAGA cultists for whom Trump simply can do nothing wrong. Elections can be decided by a few swing voters... 

Another interesting finding (second link) is that 26% of Republican voters believe that Trump started the Iran war to distract from the Epstein files, while a whopping 81% of Democrats think so. 


Thursday, February 5, 2026

27D chess

 

- Do you play red or blue? 

Ron Unz is a far right alt-media personality (und so weiter), but the article linked below is quite interesting. About half of it is a summary of a recent piece by longtime GOP strategist Karl Rove in the Wall Street Journal, arguing that Trump is losing the electorate even on his central campaign promise: putting an end to illegal immigration. The Greenland shenaningans were even less popular.

Unz then points out that America´s most important pod caster, Joe Rogan, seems to be fed up with Trump. More people follow the Joe Rogan Show than read newspaper or watch CNN. Rogan (who usually sounds like a somewhat left-leaning independent) may have played a role in Trump´s re-election, since he interviewed Trump on his show. Could Rogan´s criticism lose Trump the midterms? 

Unz wonders aloud whether Trump might be going literally insane. He isn´t the only one. And yes, it´s Trump´s bizarre craving for the Nobel peace prize which triggered those reactions (same on my end). The article also references some less important people on the far right who are fed up with the Donald.

As I said, interesting.   

Is Donald Trump playing 27-dimensional chess? Probably not.

Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Fidelio...again

 




I´m sure these are just rumors, right? I mean, I´m sure "Eyes Wide Shut" can´t be about...you know...people with eyes wide shut, or something. 

Friday, June 27, 2025

Feralization

 


If you know, you know. Muh-hah-hah-hah! 

How long does it take for a domesticated species of plant to turn wild again? Does this have any bearing on the question of when agriculture began?

Excellent and deep question — let’s tackle it in two parts:


🌱 1. How long does it take for a domesticated plant species to “turn wild” again?

This process is called feralization — when a domesticated species reverts to a wild or semi-wild state after escaping cultivation or human management.

⏳ How fast can it happen?

  • In some cases, feralization can begin within a few generations (e.g., 5–50 years), especially in annual plants that reproduce quickly.

  • Traits that are lost or reduced during domestication — like seed shattering, seed dormancy, or thorn production — can re-evolve under natural selection if beneficial in the wild.

  • Full reversion to a wild-type genome is rare, but feral plants often show:

    • Increased seed dispersal

    • Decreased yield

    • Resumption of natural defenses (e.g., toxins or spines)

📌 Example: Weedy rice (Oryza sativa f. spontanea), which evolved from domesticated rice and re-developed wild traits in only a few centuries (possibly faster in some regions).


📜 2. Does this affect how we date the beginning of agriculture?

Yes — feralization complicates the archaeological record of agriculture in important ways:

🧭 Here's how:

  • Early farming was likely intermittent, small-scale, and low-intensity.

  • If agriculture was abandoned for even a few decades or centuries, domesticated crops could go feral and vanish from the landscape and archaeological visibility.

  • This means that early domestication events could have occurred thousands of years before the earliest definitive archaeological evidence.

🔄 Agriculture as a long process:

  • Modern archaeology sees domestication as a gradual, multi-generational process, not a single moment.

  • Some species show pre-domestication cultivation — early humans planted them before the genetic signs of full domestication appear.

  • If early farming societies collapsed or moved, their plants may have reverted — making it seem like agriculture started “later” than it actually did.

🧬 Genetic evidence shows that domestication traits (like non-shattering ears in wheat or barley) accumulated slowly, and can be lost under feral conditions.


🧾 Summary

✅ Domesticated plants can revert toward wild forms surprisingly quickly (within decades to centuries), depending on the species and environment.

🧠 This means that early, failed, or abandoned attempts at agriculture may have left no clear trace in the archaeological record.

📆 As a result, the true origins of agriculture may be older and more complex than previously thought, with cycles of cultivation, abandonment, and re-domestication.


Would you like examples of specific plants (like wheat, barley, or maize) and how quickly they can feralize or re-domesticate?

Yes, all three. Also rice!

Great — let’s explore how wheat, barley, maize, and rice behave when feralized (i.e., revert from domestication) or re-domesticated, and what that tells us about the timing and complexity of agriculture’s origins.


🌾 1. Wheat (Triticum spp.)

🧬 Domesticated Traits:

  • Non-shattering spikelets (seeds stay on the stalk, making harvesting easier)

  • Larger grains

  • Softer seed coats

🔄 Feralization/Reversion:

  • Under wild conditions, non-shattering becomes a disadvantage (seeds don’t disperse).

  • Studies show that feral wheat lines can evolve partial shattering again within ~20–50 generations (500–1,000 years).

  • However, wheat is less weedy and does not easily naturalize without human help.

🧠 Implication:

Wheat domestication was slow, taking 1,000–2,000+ years, and could reverse partially if early agriculture was abandoned.


🌾 2. Barley (Hordeum vulgare)

🧬 Domesticated Traits:

  • Like wheat: non-shattering spikes, larger grains

  • Shorter dormancy, more uniform germination

🔄 Feralization:

  • Weedy barley populations (H. vulgare f. spontaneum) are common near fields.

  • Barley can hybridize with wild relatives, rapidly reintroducing wild traits like:

    • Seed dormancy

    • Rough awns (barbs)

    • Shattering

📌 Some barley reverts to near-wild form within <500 years when left uncultivated.

🧠 Implication:

Barley is more plastic than wheat, showing frequent gene flow with wild forms. This makes archaeological dating of “fully domesticated” barley complicated.


🌽 3. Maize (Zea mays)

🧬 Domesticated Traits:

  • Derived from teosinte (wild grass from Mexico)

  • Maize has:

    • Larger cobs

    • Multiple rows of kernels

    • Non-shattering seeds (fully dependent on humans to spread)

🔄 Feralization:

  • Maize is highly domesticated and does not easily revert.

  • However, teosinte-maize hybrids can arise spontaneously if maize is grown near wild relatives.

  • Some “wild maize” types in Mexico are likely re-wilded hybrids, but they don’t fully return to teosinte.

🧠 Implication:

Maize is an outlier — it’s so altered that it can’t survive as-is in the wild. But gene flow with teosinte can blur the archaeological record.


🌾 4. Rice (Oryza sativa)

🧬 Domesticated Traits:

  • Shorter seed dormancy

  • Non-shattering grains

  • Compact panicles (grain heads)

  • Reduced awns

🔄 Feralization:

  • Rice rapidly feralizes — a major modern problem known as weedy rice or red rice.

  • This happens through:

    • Escape from fields

    • Hybridization with wild rice (O. rufipogon)

  • Traits like seed shattering, dormancy, and red pericarps reappear in <10 generations.

📌 Weedy rice is genetically part-domesticated but behaves wild — showing how quickly selection pressure can undo human cultivation traits.

🧠 Implication:

Rice demonstrates how fast domesticated traits can be lost in just decades. This has serious implications for interpreting early rice domestication in East and Southeast Asia.


🧾 Overall Takeaways

PlantSpeed of FeralizationKey Points
WheatSlow–moderate (centuries)Stable once fully domesticated; partial reversions
BarleyFast–moderate (decades–centuries)Hybridizes easily; common weedy forms
MaizeRare, via hybridization onlyCannot survive without human aid, but gene flow with teosinte confuses the picture
RiceFast (within decades)Weedy forms arise quickly; feral rice is a major modern issue

🌱 Final Thought

These examples show that:

  • Domestication is reversible, especially in early stages.

  • Many early agricultural episodes could disappear from the archaeological record within centuries, due to feralization.

  • Therefore, true beginnings of agriculture may predate the first archaeobotanical evidence by millennia.

Would you like a diagram or timeline showing how these crops evolved across time and geography? 

Sunday, May 25, 2025

Drama

 


Derek Lambert and Richard Price on Joe Rogan Show, when? Reconciliation between Derek and Wes Huff, when? If you know, you know! 

Friday, May 16, 2025

Joe Rogan ex nihilo

 


There could be some context missing here, but...yeah, I suppose you could say that the resurrection of Christ is easier to believe than the Big Bang! 

The resurrection contradicts the laws of *nature* but not the laws of *logic*. Modern science frequently contradicts both. So either the universe is insane or...there´s something wrong with certain scientific theories. Or the minds of certain scientists. 

"I am sticking with Jesus" 

Monday, March 17, 2025

Death and lying

 


Emerson Green on the Christian apologetic claim "Nobody dies for a lie". Here promoted by none other than Mel Gibson! Unfortunately, people die for lies all of the time. Including self-conscious ones. Personally, I don´t think the apostles died for something they knew was a lie, but the claim that *nobody* would do this is gullible in the extreme. The opposite is also the case: true believers in other religions may chose to die for *their* beliefs based on allegedly supernatural events. Say a Hindu who believes that one of his gods (or his deceased guru!) have actually appeared to him... 

Saturday, February 1, 2025

A voice crying in the wilderness

 


Joe Rogan talks to outdoorsman Steven Rinella who cracks a tale (or tall tale) about a crazy Canadian hippie in Alaska who claimed to be the Biblical character John the Baptist?! The hippie turned out to be a parasite and petty thief, but ultimately met his doom in a small cabin during the unforbidding Arctic winter. Apparently, he lacked the proper Essene survival skills. Anyhow...

Rinella´s friend evidently gave the hippie a classical "sky burial". He just threw his corpse outside and the next day it was gone, presumably consumed by some hungry denizen of the Alaskan hinterland.

I admit that this story didn´t move me as much as I expected, but perhaps I´ve been hardened by too much consumption of Tantric material from the happy generations of Tibet...

Sunday, January 12, 2025

Predicament

 


A disturbing perspective on the LA fires. Maybe we can´t do anything at all to stop them? From Joe Rogan Show. 

Sunday, October 27, 2024

Too big to rig

 


There was a peculiar rumor back in 2016 that Hillary Clinton had a body double. Vox Day goes even further. After having claimed that there are six Bidens, he now says there is a fake Trump, as well! Or is Vox just trolling us?

I don´t rule anything out during crazy year 2024, but...naaah. Highly unlikely for a variety of reasons. One of them being Trump´s ego (the real Trump). Another being that both campaigns leak like sieves, so how likely is it that a doppelgänger could be kept secret for long?

On the other hand, I suppose a double could come in handy during the next assassination attempt...   

Fake Trump on Rogan

Friday, October 11, 2024

The trouble with Dibble

 


Some months ago, writer and explorer Graham Hancock debated an archeologist with the peculiar moniker "Flint Dibble" at Joe Rogan Show. Dibble declared victory and the debate have been given almost mythological proportions by Skeptics (compare Huxley-Wilberforce). 

Above is Graham Hancock´s response to Dibble´s points about ship wrecks, Stone Age ship farers, the supposed lack of evidence for metallurgy in Greenland ice cores, the legends of the conquista, and "White supremacy".

I admit I´m more skeptical to Hancock´s speculations than I was around, say, 2018. But he does defend his case ably here. So maybe the Skeptics (TM) spoke to soon, after all...  

Saturday, June 29, 2024

A magnificent failure?

 


The latest Atlantis drama. Mainline archeologist Flint Dibble (that *can´t* be his real name!) recently declared total victory over pro-Atlantis writer and documentary film maker Graham Hancock after a debate between the two on Joe Rogan Show. 

The YouTube clip above is from the channel "DeDunking", which is more on the Hancock side. It´s almost an hour long, but could be worth watching if alternative history is your thing. 

Monday, June 24, 2024

Polysemic conspiracy

 


It seems everyone is talking about Terrence Howard! Sicilian wonderboy Metatron believes that Howard´s problem isn´t really with mathematics, per se, but with a weird inability to grasp language. Also, his "Terryology" is a monist philosophy and a conspiracy theory. 

While I disagree with the Metatron on his blanket denial of conspiracy theories, he probably does have a point that Howard has a "Truther mindset" (my term), this being the deeper drive behind the actor´s new theory of everything...  

Monday, May 27, 2024

1 x 1 = 2

 


"Professor" Dave takes on the weird ramblings of actor Terrence Howard (who claims that 1 x 1 = 2). Entertaining, after a fashion. Especially since Dave (the skeptic) doesn´t come across as particularly smart or balanced either.

Note the bizarre purge mentality at the end: Professor Dave claims that Howard is mentally ill, but then goes on to recommend that he´d be systematically bullied?! Dave is a "science educator" with a mostly high school audience...

Dude.

 

Saturday, February 4, 2023

Jordan Peterson ON FIRE

 



Jordan Peterson makes many good points here. On Joe Rogan Show, of course. Maybe Peterson can still save the world somehow!