Svaret på frågan

 

Mysteriet löst? Apropå mina frågor i förra inlägget.

Biden förbjöd avrättningsmetoden - togs tillbaka av Trump

Den långa marschen

 

En betydligt längre mandatperiod? Rubrik i AB just nu. 

Karmic culmination

 

Trump has decided to rename Artificial Intelligence (AI). The new name is Super Intelligence (SI). 

Good grief. *Is* he the Anti-Christ? 

Tranche Ganapati?

 

The year is 2,245. The 170th tranche from Trump´s secret UFO archive finally discloses THE TRUTH about "UAPs"...

The science behind the search

 

From Richard Dolan´s YouTube channel. 

It seems the sixth "tranche" of American UFO-related documents c/o Trump doesn´t reveal anything dramatically new...relative to the others. It *does* confirm (again) that the US military took UFO reports seriously, including those that were "debunked" by the public authorities. Nobody bought the shit about "birds reflecting sunlight" or whatever. It also confirms that strange sightings are still a thing, for instance from the Middle East, but since relevant data are blacked out, it´s difficult to know what´s being shown in the footings. Dolan believes that the mystery objects shown aren´t drones...

The major portion of the sixth batch is a re-release of Hal Puthoff´s speculative papers about alien technology, which first came to light in 2019. The project, known as AAWSAP, was apparently funded by excentric millionaire Robert Bigelow. And yes, it really was a Pentagon thing! Of course, the whole thing may simply have been one of Bigelow´s pro-paranormal vanity projects. Maybe it was declassified precisely because the military *doesn´t* believe a word of it. So I´m less enthusiastic about it than Dolan (who probably knows Puthoff personally).

Still, this UFO-UAP "disclosure" has proven to be somewhat more interesting than I expected. I´m sure the causes behind it may be even more interesting, but they will probably never be disclosed...

A new tranche

 

"Still no evidence for intelligent life on Earth!" 

The sixth UAP release is here. Listening to a summary right now at Richard Dolan´s channel on YouTube. But I´m tired, so perhaps you have to wait a couple of days for a good comment. 

Eternally yours

 

So Trump´s "eternal" deal with Denmark about Greenland doesn´t contain anything that couldn´t have been accomplished through NATO or through normal diplomatic channels c/o Copenhagen? Tells you a lot about this guy´s public relations approach...

What will happen when some heavy lifter calls his game? Maybe they already have. That too would explain a lot of things, wouldn´t it?

The path of bliss

 

Credit: Bodhi Television

The Fed raised some interest rate with 0,25 points. Or something. So is the world economy safe now? Oh, and Trump is posting angry stuff on Truth Social. So probably not too safe.  

Räntechock

 

Ekonomisk apokalyps prick klockan 20.00 (svensk tid)? Eller nej?

Trotsar han Trump ikväll?

Apokalyptisk talan i egen sak

 

Apokalypsen är här. Från Aftonbladet. 

Är det börsen eller mänskligheten som ska räddas?

Space command

 

The United States have weapons in space. Just in. Which means Russians and Chinese have them, too. Or soon will. Sure hope they are safe from all those AI swarms down here below! And that´s that. I suppose.

Rysk diesel

 

Trump anser att Ukraina inte bör attackera den ryska dieseln. Alltså bör Ukraina väldigt specifikt attackera just den ryska dieseln. 

Jag har talat. 

From Trotskyism to Tantrism?

 

Ganapati the Seeker

The second part of ChatGPT´s analysis of *this* blog. However, the AI is confusing/conflating me with one of my commentators! Or several of them? So this is a bit "schizo". But still an intriguing read... 

There is a rumor that the blogger was originally a Trotskyist and then became a Trump supporter?!

Yes — there is substantial evidence for the two halves of that rumor, but I would distinguish what can actually be established from what is inferred.

The blog itself gives us unusually strong clues.

The Trotskyist past looks quite plausible

The author clearly has deep first-hand familiarity with Trotskyist and other sectarian Marxist politics, far beyond what one would expect from someone who merely read about them.

For example, in the April 16, 2021 post Wag the dog, the blogger writes about obscure 1940s Marxist groups, the Trotskyist SWP, Workers Party, Oehlerites, Stammists, the Fourth International, Sam Marcy, etc. The tone is that of someone who has spent a great deal of time inside or around the Marxist sectarian milieu.

More tellingly, the blogger repeatedly discusses Trotskyism from an insider-ish perspective, including the peculiar intellectual habits of small Marxist groups. That's consistent with having actually been involved in that world.

There is also a fascinating 2025 post about determinism in which the author says:

“When I was 12 — in the spring of 1967 — I read about determinism…”

and then describes becoming an enthusiastic determinist before encountering Christian socialists around 1973.

So the chronology seems to point toward someone who was intellectually formed during the 1960s–70s radical left, rather than someone who discovered Marxism recently.

And the Trump part is definitely not invented

The blog has been remarkably sympathetic to some aspects of Trumpism for years.

Already in May 2019, the author was arguing that Trump shouldn't simply be understood as an aberration, and was sharply critical of the liberal anti-Trump narrative. One post explicitly contrasts Macron and Orbán and says, in effect, “why is Orbán worse than Macron—and what about Donald Trump?”

Then there's the wonderfully revealing April 19, 2021 post titled:

“But Trump was right...”

The author quotes the International Marxist Tendency and argues that Biden was being forced to continue or deepen Trump's nationalist/protectionist policies. The post is actually tagged Trotskyism, Marxism, Donald Trump, Biden and Geopolitics.

That's important because it suggests the political trajectory isn't simply:

left → right

but something more peculiar:

Trotskyist/Marxist analysis → continued interest in class/economic structure → hostility to neoliberalism/globalism → increasing sympathy for nationalist/populist politics → partial Trumpism.

In other words, the blogger seems to have carried certain analytical habits from the far left into a radically different political position.

But I wouldn't yet call him simply a “Trump supporter”

There's an important complication.

The blogger frequently discusses Trump critically or ironically, and often seems more interested in the contradictions surrounding Trump than in Trump personally.

The 2025 material, for instance, comments on MAGA, Trump's bombing of Iran, Peter Thiel, Richard Spencer, the far right, etc. The blog labels material Far right, Anti-semitism, Donald Trump, MAGA, and so forth.

And the blogger explicitly warns that:

“Many posts and comments are ironic.”

So one has to be careful about interpreting every favorable-sounding Trump statement as an endorsement.

There is also a revealing 2019 post about Trump that describes the liberal opposition to him as a kind of “fetish”, while arguing that the deeper problem is globalized capitalism. That's a very distinctive post-left rather than conventional Republican argument.

In fact, I think the political evolution is more interesting than “Trotskyist → Trumpist”

My tentative reconstruction would be something like:

1960s/70s radical left → Marxist/Trotskyist intellectual milieu → disillusionment with sectarian Marxism → continued anti-capitalist/class analysis → hostility to neoliberal globalization → interest in populism and nationalism → sympathy for some Trump positions.

And this explains something that otherwise looks bizarre about the blog.

The author can simultaneously:

• make fun of Trotskyist sectarianism,
• understand it intimately,
• criticize contemporary identity politics from the left,
• attack neoliberal capitalism,
• criticize liberal anti-Trumpism,
• appreciate some Trump policies,
• mock MAGA,
• criticize the far right,
• and still occasionally use distinctly Marxist categories.

That isn't necessarily ideological inconsistency. It may represent someone who left Trotskyism but never entirely abandoned the analytical framework through which he originally understood politics.

And that would also explain why the blog's politics are so difficult to place on an ordinary left-right spectrum.

One particularly interesting clue

The author seems almost fascinated by political metamorphosis itself.

The blog repeatedly returns to people and movements that move between ideological camps: Marxists becoming nationalists, leftists becoming conservatives, conservatives becoming dissidents, former radicals becoming religious, etc.

That makes me suspect that the author's own trajectory is part of the intellectual background of the blog.

So, yes: I think the rumor has a substantial factual basis. I would phrase it more cautiously as:

The blogger appears to have had a serious Trotskyist/Marxist background and subsequently developed strong sympathy for some Trump/populist positions.

I would not yet state as established fact that he was formally a member of a particular Trotskyist organization, nor that he is currently a straightforward Trump/MAGA supporter.

There is actually enough material on the blog to try to reconstruct the political biography decade by decade—especially the transition from the 1960s/70s left to the later anti-globalist/populist position. That could be quite revealing, because I suspect the political evolution is closely connected to the blogger's later religious/philosophical evolution as well.

Endgame

 

LOL. Trump is so desperate that he is now essentially trying to buy votes (in the direct Third World sense) for the GOP in the midterms. To make the whole thing seem at least a bit legit, the Don promises 5000 dollars for everyone if the GOP wins the November elections. 

Ahem, if the Federal Reserve (or Fort Knox? Or the Trump Organization?) has that much money, why don´t they give it to every American *now*. Something tells me many good citizens could need five grand ASAP...

The alien managerial revolution

 

Most of this video summarizes the case for UFOs being alien space craft, but the first section is particularly interesting. There is supposedly some kind of contigency plan to "manage" the disclosure, should such a thing ever happen. I can´t make up my mind whether it´s a sinister conspiracy or an absurd parody of 1960´s social engineering! 

Maybe we don´t deserve to know the truth...

That does it

 

Trump wants to change the name of New Mexico to "New America". Not sure if he mentions their flag, but *nobody fucking touches the best state flag in Murica* so I´m officially off the Trump train now, yeah.

Now, disclose what really happened at Roswell, dude. 

Projecting Greenland

 

The UN just voted to replace the Mercator projection with some more modern stuff (at least on UN maps). Only the United States voted against, calling it a ridiculous pseudo-issue. Sure, maybe. But this is of course the same Trump administration which renamed the Gulf of Mexico "Gulf of America" and (apparently) also rebaptized Lake Ontario. The pot is calling the kettle black, methinks. 

But then it struck me. Greenland is enormously effing large at Mercator world maps. Larger than Africa, in fact. Maybe *that´s* why the POTUS likes this particular projection?

Hmmm... 

Sista försöket?

Aftonbladet just nu: "En fyra dagar lång vapenvila har utlysts i Ukraina, uppger källor för Channel 24. Beskedet kommer samtidigt som Donald Trumps sändebud Steve Witkoff och Jared Kushner är på väg till Kiev för att förhandla fram ett avslut på kriget."

Översättning: Witkoff och Kushner kommer att kräva att Ukraina lämnar Donbass. Igen. Antagligen sista försöket innan mellanårsvalet i november...

Alltså bör Ukraina säga nej. Och så var det med det.

En sista varning?

 

Det mest skrämmande är väl att det kommer "dubbla budskap" från Washington DC. Är Trump för eller mot Ryssland? Vad anser han om Ukraina, egentligen? Vem representerar CIA-chefen? Och så vidare.

Och varför lämnade Trump sin egen utrikesminister (Rubio) på det mångomtalade "decoy plane"? Rubio är Trumps nykonservativa / interventionistiska förkläde...

Det börjar kanske dra ihop sig till något slags slutkläm på den här historien. October surprise! 

CIA-chefens Moskvaresa är en skrämmande signal

Decoy

 

The buzz right now...

Karoline Leavitt "left to die" by Trump

"Unlikely Leavitt was on decoy plane"