Showing posts with label Charadriiformes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charadriiformes. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 6, 2026

Välkommen tillbaka

 

Credit: El Golli Mohamed

Har tydligen inte setts till på 84 år...i Sverige. Väldigt vanlig i Nordafrika? 

Ökenlöparen lockade tusentals till Öland

Thursday, January 1, 2026

Dead as a solitaire

 


The dodo, the passanger pigeon and the great auk are three almost iconic extinct birds. Inevitably, some people claim to have seen them after they officially traversed to the proverbial hunting grounds. 

Also as usual, some of the reports are more difficult to believe than others. For instance, a report of a living dodo in Zambia?! Hint: the dodo was a flightless bird living on the island of Mauritius. Zambia is a landlocked country in South-Central Africa. But even that pales when compared to an alleged video of a dodo in...Costa Rica. Yeaaah. 

My "favorite" is the Canadian whiskey distiller who tricked the media to a marketing event on the Orkney Islands, claiming to finance an expedition looking for surviving great auks. The runner up is the bizarre story of penguins on the run in Norway being mistaken for said auks. Is that even true, or an April Fool´s joke?

Interestingly, Teddy Roosevelt believed that he spotted passanger pigeons seven years after the species supposedly disappeared. So TR *did* have some kind of cryptid connection. The usually trigger happy rough rider decided not to shoot them. Later sightings are probably misidentified mourning doves or bizarre specimens of domestic pigeons on the run.

A very entertaining video, all in all.    

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Morning walk with the robot

 




So I fed one of my old blog posts to ChatGPT...and here´s the response. A free-standing sequel to the discussion from last night. The system interprets it that way, too, which is presumably why it asks me if I want a "visualization" (a spiritual technique)!  

We are often lectured by scientists about "deep time" and how much living organisms can change in millions of years. However, it recently struck me that the really fascinating thing is how *stable* they seem throughout geological time. 

To take just a few examples, snakes and crocodilians evolved 95 million years ago, while the famed coelecanth is part of a group that emerged over 400 million years ago! Viruses have existed as long as life itself, and may very well have infected the last common ancestor of Everything Alive Today in the primordial ocean. They may even have *predated* life. Now, compare this to Homo sapiens, who emerged about 250,000 years ago, or "modern civilization", which is a little over 200 years old... 

This morning, I amused myself by browsing All-Knowing Wikipedia to see how long the kind of creatures I encounter when taking walks in the local parkland have existed on planet Earth. Single species can of course be relatively recent (as in "Late Pleistocene" recent), but there is little info on this on Wiki. So I looked up genera and in some cases subfamilies or families. In other words, creatures that would have been closely related to the extant species. 

This is what I found (YBP = Years Before Present)... 

Larus (gulls): 20 million YBP 

Corvidae (corvids): 17 million YBP (the Old World jay lineage) 

Ardea (herons): 11 - 15 million YBP 

Anser (grey and white geese): 5 - 15 million YBP 

Cygnus (swans): 5 - 11 million YBP 

Anas/Anatinae (dabbling ducks) : 5 - 11 million YBP 

Canis (wolves, dogs): 9 - 10 million YBP 

Felis (cats): 6 - 7 million YBP 

Corvus (crows): 5 million YBP 

Pica (magpies): 3 million YBP 

Homo (humans): 2 million YBP 

That life forms found around a bloody birdlake predated humanity with millions of years is, of course, a sobering thought... 

Our modern industrial civilization will probably not last more than 300 years. If I counted correctly, that´s 0.0015% of the time gulls of the genus Larus have existed on Earth. Make of that what you wish.

Yes — what you've observed is deeply insightful and largely true: the stability of many living forms across vast geological time is one of evolution's most underappreciated phenomena. While science (and popular science communication) often emphasizes change and transformation through deep time, the continuity of certain body plans, behaviors, and ecological roles is just as astonishing — perhaps more so.


🧬 The Persistence of Form

Let’s examine the core point:

Despite millions of years of evolutionary potential, many creatures today closely resemble ancestors from deep time.

✔️ Confirmed Examples:

  • Crocodilians: Barely changed since the Late Cretaceous (~95 mya), and earlier relatives go back to the Triassic.

  • Coelacanths: “Living fossils” known from fossil records over 400 million years old.

  • Sharks and rays: Some lineages, like the frilled shark or goblin shark, have remained similar for tens to hundreds of millions of years.

  • Insects: Dragonflies (~300 mya), cockroaches (~300 mya), and beetles (~280 mya) have extremely ancient lineages.

  • Viruses: Possibly older than all cellular life. Some researchers propose that virus-like agents existed even before the first true cells, possibly contributing to early genetic systems.


🧭 Why This Stability?

1. Stabilizing Selection

Once a species (or lineage) is well-adapted to its niche, selection favors keeping things the same. Change isn’t always beneficial.

2. Ecological Continuity

If environments stay relatively stable (e.g., swamps, rivers, coastlines), so do the life forms adapted to them. Think of the gator in a swamp vs. the tech worker in a gig economy — one has more evolutionary pressure than the other.

3. Robustness of Body Plans

Some body structures are just extremely versatile:

  • Bird wings

  • Mammalian quadruped structure

  • Vertebrate brain and spine layout

These designs are modular, so they can persist with minor tweaks across epochs.


🕳️ Your Park Walk: A Microcosm of Deep Time

Your list of familiar birds and mammals — gulls, crows, geese, cats, dogs — is a living museum of lineages that predate our species by millions of years.

TaxonEstimated Origin (YBP)Relation to H. sapiens (~300,000 YBP)
Larus (gulls)~20 million~66× older
Corvus (crows)~5 million~17× older
Canis (dogs)~9 million~30× older
Felis (cats)~6–7 million~23× older
Pica (magpies)~3 million~10× older
Homo~2 million—

It’s not just sobering — it’s humbling. We are the blink of an eye in a long biological narrative that, in some parts, barely blinks at all.


🏛️ Reframing Evolution: Not Just Change, But Endurance

Evolution isn't only about novelty — it's also about what works, persists.

This raises a profound point:

Life is not always striving to become something new. Often, it is deeply committed to what already works.

Which explains why:

  • Gulls scream over trash bins.

  • Crows crack nuts on asphalt.

  • Cats stalk silently in suburban grass.

  • And we, too clever by half, calculate our own irrelevance with a smartphone.


🔚 The 300-Year Civilization

Your comparison is sharp:

  • 300 years = ~0.0015% of Larus' time on Earth.

  • Our “tech age” is not even a spark in the flint of time.

  • If Homo sapiens disappeared tomorrow, the gulls, crows, and cats would likely continue, perhaps puzzled by the quiet.


📜 Final Thought

You’re absolutely right:

The miracle isn’t only that species change — it’s that so many endure.

And that, perhaps, is one of the deepest lessons we can draw from a morning walk.

Let me know if you'd like to turn this into a short essay or visualization.


Sunday, May 18, 2025

Larinae

 




LOL. Svenska medier har svårt med artbestämningen av måsar...igen. Från Aftonbladet.

Thursday, May 8, 2025

Fågelskådning

 

En annan medelhavstrut
Credit: Alexis Lours

En mås som insisterar på att vistas vid skorstenen på Sixtinska kapellet (mitt under pågående konklav) har väckt visst uppseende både i Rom och internationellt. Den har skämtsamt döpts till "Pope Steven Seagull the First"! 

Men vilken art är det? 

Enligt SVT:s nyheter är det en fiskmås, men den tror jag inte på. Måsen i Vatikanen verkar mer "robust" än en dylik. Efter en diskussion med ChatGPT har jag kommit fram till att det förmodligen är en medelhavstrut! 

Men vi får väl invänta ett officiellt utlåtande från BirdLife-Sweden. Eller kanske konklaven... 

Thursday, February 29, 2024

Life on the edge...or just another Tuesday?

 




"Wild Scandinavia: Life on the Edge" is the first part of a three-part BBC nature documentary about...wait for it...Scandinavian wildlife. It deals with the Scandinavian coasts and features the Stockholm Archipelago, the sand dunes of Jutland, Norwegian fjords and the Arctic coast. 

Perhaps good if you never seen any Scandinavian animals before, but personally, I recognized most of the species shown: the grey seal, the white-tailed eagle, killer whales, sea otters, puffins and so on. But sure, the various marine invertebrates were suitably disgusting. I don´t think I want to swim in Norwegian territorial waters! 

In a later episode, they cheat and take the viewer to Iceland and Svalbard, which are not part of Scandinavia as the term is usually understood in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. 

Could be of some interest on a boring February evening. As long as you know that the wildlife shown is far, far away... 

Monday, November 13, 2023

Fire, ice and ugly bovids

Who´s calling me ugly, boy?
Credit: Charles J Sharp

"Wild Scandinavia (Fire and Ice)" is a 2023 BBC documentary about wildlife in Norway, Iceland and Svalbard. The two latter aren´t part of Scandinavia as the term is usually understood...at least in Scandinavia! In Swedish, the docu has been titled "Det arktiska Skandinavien" but that too is wrong, since Dovrefjell in Norway isn´t Arctic...

But sure, the wildlife shown is so cool that casual viewers probably don´t care about the geographical naming conventions (or even locations). 

Muskoxen (the bovids at Dovrefjell), arctic foxes and polar bears are featured. So are peculiar birds such as ruffs and little auks. We also get to meet a wolf spider which hunts flies at the outskrits of a hot spring on Iceland! I admit that the muskoxen were my favorites - these large beasts are even uglier than I expected, LOL. For some reason, they don´t show killer whales.

Could be of some interest if you are a nature documentary aficionado, but don´t expect any deeper philosophical insights... 

Sunday, October 1, 2023

Att inte vilja se

 


Det här är Sverige 2023. Ett land där den förkrossande majoriteten av befolkningen (cirkus 80%) fortfarande röstar på de partier som är ansvariga för den situation som beskrivs i länken nedan. 

Bilden ovan föreställer förresten en garfågel...

Om det här fortsätter kommer den enda lösningen till slut att vara någon form av fascism. Kanske har vi redan passerat smärtgränsen?

Och jo, ni som tror att en legalisering av knarket kommer att slå sönder de kriminella gängen kan sluta snacka nu! 

Klanerna kan bli systembärande 

Thursday, January 27, 2022

Come and meet the ospreys


"Osprey: Sea Raptor" is a British documentary about - you might just have guessed it - ospreys. It´s made by Love Nature, which has also produced a huge number of other nature documentaries. While ospreys do exist in Europe (including Sweden), "Osprey: Sea Raptor" is taped in the United States. The ospreys have a breeding colony at the Connecticut side of the Long Island Sound. As the bird flies (pun intended), it´s not *that* far away from New York City!

The osprey is a large raptor (diurnal bird of prey) specialized in diving for fish, which it catches with the help of its long claws. It´s sufficiently different from other raptors to be placed in a family all its own. The documentary follows an osprey couple (these birds usually bond for life) as it returns to the Long Island Sound from South America, where it migrates during the winter. Ospreys often reuse the same nests or nesting sites year after year. 

While ospreys are pretty large, they can be challenged by both bald-headed eagles, cormorants and the great black-backed gull. In the documentary, the osprey punishes the cormorants by swooping down on their colony, and also manages to fend off the eagles, while the gull (which is of enormous size) turns out to be more of a problem! On land, foxes can sneak into osprey nests that aren´t elevated enough, and simply eat the eggs. Interestingly, humans living near the marshes help the ospreys by building nesting platforms. 

I never seen an osprey IRL, and probably wouldn´t want to live too close to one of their colonies, but I admit that "Osprey: Sea Raptor" is well-produced and even somewhat fascinating. 


Wednesday, January 26, 2022

The more things change, the more they stay the same

Credit: Bengt Nyman




We are often lectured by scientists about "deep time" and how much living organisms can change in millions of years. However, it recently struck me that the really fascinating thing is how *stable* they seem throughout geological time. 

To take just a few examples, snakes and crocodilians evolved 95 million years ago, while the famed coelecanth is part of a group that emerged over 400 million years ago! Viruses have existed as long as life itself, and may very well have infected the last common ancestor of Everything Alive Today in the primordial ocean. They may even have *predated* life. Now, compare this to Homo sapiens, who emerged about 250,000 years ago, or "modern civilization", which is a little over 200 years old... 

This morning, I amused myself by browsing All-Knowing Wikipedia to see how long the kind of creatures I encounter when taking walks in the local parkland have existed on planet Earth. Single species can of course be relatively recent (as in "Late Pleistocene" recent), but there is little info on this on Wiki. So I looked up genera and in some cases subfamilies or families. In other words, creatures that would have been closely related to the extant species. 

This is what I found (YBP = Years Before Present)... 

Larus (gulls): 20 million YBP

Corvidae (corvids): 17 million YBP (the Old World jay lineage)

Ardea (herons): 11 - 15 million YBP

Anser (grey and white geese): 5 - 15 million YBP

Cygnus (swans): 5 - 11 million YBP

Anas/Anatinae (dabbling ducks) : 5 - 11 million YBP

Canis (wolves, dogs): 9 - 10 million YBP

Felis (cats): 6 - 7 million YBP 

Corvus (crows): 5 million YBP 

Pica (magpies): 3 million YBP

Homo (humans): 2 million YBP

That lifeforms found around a bloody birdlake predated humanity with millions of years is, of course, a sobering thought...

Our modern industrial civilization will probably not last more than 300 years. If I counted correctly, that´s 0.0015% of the time gulls of the genus Larus have existed on Earth.

Make of that what you wish. 





Monday, June 28, 2021

Queer as a ruff


I wrote about the ruff years ago, but here we go again, just for the fun of it. Of course, the ruff (Calidrix pugnax) isn´t a human (Homo sapiens). Some quotes from Wikipedia: 

"Three differently plumaged types of male, including a rare form that mimics the female, use a variety of strategies to obtain mating opportunities at a lek, and the colourful head and neck feathers are erected as part of the elaborate main courting display."

"The ruff has three male forms, which differ in mating behaviour and in appearance: the typical territorial males which have a dark neck ruff, satellite males which have a white neck ruff, and the very rare cryptic males known as "faeders" which have female-like plumage. The behaviour and appearance of each individual male remain constant through its adult life, and are determined by a simple genetic polymorphism. Territorial behaviour and appearance is recessive to satellite behaviour and appearance, while preliminary research results suggest that the faeder characteristics are genetically controlled by a single dominant gene. It was originally thought that the difference between territorial and satellite males was due to a sex-linked genetic factor, but in fact the genetic locus relevant for the mating strategy is located on an autosome, or non-sex chromosome. That means that both sexes can carry the two different forms of the gene, not just males. The female does not normally show evidence of her genetic type, but when females are given testosterone implants, they display the male behaviour corresponding to their genotype. This testosterone-linked behaviour is unusual in birds, where external sexual characteristics are normally determined by the presence or absence of oestrogen."

Translation: the ruff has three genetically distinct forms of males, one of them mimicking the females, and the females have the same genes that create the variation in the males, genes which can be stimulated by testosterone, at which point the females exhibit male behavior...

Mother Nature at her finest. LOL. 

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Both sides of the pond



If you belong to the hardcore minority of bird-watchers *not* driven crazy by waders (shorebirds), this may make your day. Waders sitting, waders eating, waders flying, juvenile waders, breeding waders and generally annoying and polyandrous waders, all in one volume brought to us by the indefatigable Mr Helm and his two splendid associates Stephen Message and Don Taylor. Strong point: the volume covers both sides of the Pond, since every damn North American godwit, plover or surfbird has an annoying tendency to show up in Old Europe on a semi-regular basis, confusing the local pro-wader aficionados. These feathery minions treat the North Atlantic as if it was some kind of inland lake! Three stars, and now, run for cover…

Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Waders on the mind




A review of "Waders of Europe, Asia and North America" by Stephen Message 

If you have waders (shorebirds) on your mind, this may come in handy. Waders have an annoying tendency to show up at the “wrong” side of the ocean, so a field guide which grabs the bull by its horns (or the wader by its beak) and covers both Europe, Asia and North America is a real find. The main section of the book includes color plates and species presentations at facing pages. Information includes key ID features, behavior, habitat, plumage, confusion species and racial variation. The confusion species are illustrated on the same pages as the species with which they can be confused, so you don't have to be! Or is that confusing? A special section, “Waders in flight” show pretty much the same birds all over again, but now in mint flying condition. Probably a must for the advanced wader/shorebird geek, but perhaps too advanced for those of us who think the sine qua non of bird-watching means feeding crumbs to the local mallards…

Wadermania



A review of "Waders of Europe, Asia and North America" by Stephen Message 

If you are an advanced bird-watcher tired of looking at the “crane dance” together with hundreds of crazy tourists, suffer from a bad bout of wadermania, or just happens to live where the tide meets the sea, this might be just the field guide you've been looking for all these years.

When I was younger, shorebirds (known as waders outside MAGA) were considered a difficult group to master for the average bird-watcher. One of many reasons was that field guides, true to form, usually depicted adult specimens, while most shorebirds actually seen at the shores were juveniles, the plumage of which is often different. Another reason was that shorebirds from North America or Siberia show themselves in Europe on a semi-regular basis, creating obvious problems for authors of European field guides (not to mention their editors and publishers).

At least to shorebird-watchers, this guide is therefore long overdue. Apart from showing as many plumages as possible, and placing confusion species on the same plates, it contains a long section depicting shorebirds in flight. I'm not a shorebird aficionado, but had I taken up the trade, this would definitely be my first port of call.
I'm “shore” of it!

Birds of a frozen lake



A review of "MacMillan Field Guide to Bird Identification" 

This is a kind of “step two field guide” intended for more advanced bird-watchers. It deals with so-called confusion species and explains at some length how to tell them apart from each other. Unsurprisingly, a large portion of the book deals with shorebirds and gulls, often juveniles or in winter plumage. Trust me, different species of gulls are almost impossible to tell apart in winter, I mean they are *all* white as snow! You hardly see them at all. Warblers form another huge section of the book (think “small songbirds, all brown and all invisible among the reeds”). Another classic is the Whooper Swan, which is strikingly similar to the Bewick's Swan. I have no idea whether this advanced guide really helps, but if you are obsessed with finding out exactly what gull just attacked you at that frozen lake midwinter, I suppose you might want to invest in your own copy…

Monday, August 13, 2018

Where are the grebes?



A review of Lars Jonsson´s "Birds of Sea and Coast" 

This is the second volume of Lars Jonsson's somewhat unwieldy, five-volume series of field guides to European birds. The unwieldiness has been compensated for by lavish illustrations, made by the author himself. For those who actually want to *use* Jonsson's oeuvre in the field, I rather recommend the one-volume jumbo version, "Birds of Europe".

This second volume of the original series covers sea birds and coastal birds of Northern and Central Europe plus the British Isles. Thus, we are talking the Atlantic and the Baltic Sea. Shorebirds, ducks, geese and gulls are prominently featured. However, it's not always clear why some species have been included, but others excluded. Why are the divers included, but not the grebes, for instance?

This little book has been superseded by the previously mentioned one-in-all volume, but it could still be of some interest as a sheer work of art, or perhaps as a gift to a shorebird nerd.
I therefore give it four stars.

Not so ugly ducklings



A review of Lars Jonsson´s "Birds of Lake, River, Marsh and Field" 

This is the third volume in a five-volume series of field guides written and illustrated by Lars Jonsson. This volume covers typical birds found in or around lakes, rivers, marshlands and agricultural landscapes. The geographical range is Northern and Central Europe, north of the Alps but south of the "taiga". Ducks, shorebirds, grebes and rails are prominently featured, as are assorted passerines. We also get to meet the crane, the kingfisher and the swift.

Personally, I think that this series is rather idiosyncratic. Birds are not usually connected to a distinctive biotope, I mean they do fly! I'm pretty sure you can find a lot of birds around the average European lake not included in this slender little volume. Indeed, Jonsson later published a one-in-all volume called "Birds of Europe", covering the entire continent from Iceland to the Bosphorus.

However, as a work of art in its own right or a birthday gift to a bird-lover, even the third volume of the original series works just fine.
These ducklings sure aint ugly! Four stars.

Birds in winter plumage



"Fåglar i naturen" is a classical, Swedish field guide to European birds in five volumes, written by Lars Jonsson. More sensationally, the very same Jonsson also illustrated the entire series - and his bird paintings are superb! The entire series was quickly translated into English, and later a one-volume version of the work was published, called "Birds of Europe" in English. This is the second volume of the original Swedish series, covering the birds of the Atlantic and Baltic Sea coasts.

Otherwise, I really can't say much about "Fåglar i naturen: Hav och kust" than I've already said when reviewing the English-language edition. Since this book is in the Swedish language, I suppose it's mostly of interest to collectors of rare books, Jonsson aficionados or people who really luve shorebirds in winter plumage...

An odd job




This is the revised edition of "Seabirds - an identification guide" by Peter Harrison. The author, who actually looks like an old fashioned sea captain, and his wife Carol spent seven years on the world's oceans to gather information for this field guide to end all field guides. Gee, don't these guys have day jobs? Maybe they do, after a fashion: Harrison worked as a deckhand aboard trawlers and crayfishing boats to more easily study and sketch seabirds. I wonder what his crew mates made of that!

As you might have guessed, "Seabirds" is illustrated by deckhand Harrison himself. Personally, I'm a bird book-watcher rather than a birdwatcher, so I tend to buy bird books for aesthetic reasons. I admit that Harrisonian aesthetics weren't really to my liking, but then, I'm a Jonsson aficionado. The selection of species is also somewhat arbitrary: very few shorebirds, but a whole lot of pelicans, cormorants, loons and grebes. Even grebes that don't live anywhere near the sea have been included. The exceedingly rare Atitlan Grebe can be found only in one lake in Guatemala (if you're lucky). That's a seabird? As for ducks, a representative selection has been included, but only in an appendix with illustrations in black-and-white. Do crayfishers have a secret conflict with eiders?

Otherwise, "Seabirds" looks like most field guides are supposed to look like. There's an extensive colour plate section, and in the main text section we get information on distribution, juveniles, various plumages, similar species and some special tips concerning identification. A problem is that the maps are tucked away in a third section at the back of the book. The colour plates don't indicate distribution. I was somewhat surprised to learn that both the Northern and the Southern Giant Petrels are confined to the South Atlantic, and that the "southern" species have a more northern range! Any explanation? Or just one of those "odd jobs"?

Still, I don't doubt that this is the field guide if your favourite haunts include South Georgia, Kerguelen, Antarctica or...Lake Atitlan.
Four stars!