Peter Lemesurier is a British “Nostradamus expert”
whose book “Nostradamus: The Next 50 Years” has that elusive quality we've come
to expect of cheap European paperbacks on the sensational: “it probably can't
be true…but what if it is…it must be true…but what if it really isn't”. An
American writer would presumably have declared, with a straight face, that of course
Nostradamus was an alien who predicted Gamergate (or, if he's a skeptic, of
course Nostradamus is a clear and present danger to liberal democracy and the
Great Society). Apparently, Lemesurier comes out of his British closet as an
all-out skeptic in his latest book on Michel de Notre Dame, a book I haven't
read.
Lemesurier's translations of Nostradamus' quatrains aren't literal, so the book
is of little use to those who want to know what the Provencal seer actually
said. The interpretations seem fairly traditional, and are to a great extent
based on Nostradamus' own explicit statements about a future Muslim invasion of
Europe, statements made not in the prophecies themselves, but in a letter to
the French king Henry II.
Nostradamus' prophecies are so convoluted (and deliberately not published in
chronological order) that it's almost impossible for the reader to know what
the future has in store before it actually happens. With some ingenuity, many
prophecies can be applied to very different characters or periods. Thus,
Lemesurier suggests that the Anti-Christ who struggles for 27 years before
being made low (Quatrain VIII.77) is a reference to Stalin, but Hitler or even
the French Revolution are other possibilities. Stalin dominated the Soviet
Union for (almost) 27 years, Hitler's entire “career” spanned (almost) 27
years, and the French revolution, alas, lasted for (almost) 27 years (I came up
with that one myself). Quatrain II.89 is traditionally taken as a prophecy of
the Hitler-Stalin pact, but Lemesurier proposes the détente between Reagan and
Gorbachev instead. “The New World” mentioned in the quatrain could be both
Hitler's New Order, the United States, or the New World Order proposed by Bush
Senior! Several verses describing the bad guys as “reds” are applied by Lemesurier to the future Muslim invasion, although Communists or Russians are
surely more likely candidates (who knows, maybe the “reds” will stage a
come-back in the future). A Swedish faux interpreter of Nostradamus, Åke
Ohlmarks, even amused himself by translating some of the prophet's convoluted
verses in several alternative ways, thereby getting different “predictions”.
Reading old books on Nostradamus and comparing their predictions to what
actually happened is always an interesting exercise. Ohlmarks' Swedish
compilation of Nostradamus-based prophecies (the paperback from 1983) claims
that France will become an absolutist monarchy during the 1990's, but says
nothing about the Balkan Wars, Iraq or 9/11. But yes, the future Muslim invasions
are there, too, with the Saracen eventually being defeated by…Swedish troops!
So did Lemesurier manage to predict the future any better in this book from
1993? Hardly, since he assumes that the Muslim invasions will start already
before the new millennium, Pope John Paul II will be overthrown by force, and
the now famous quatrains I.87 and VI.97 (supposedly about 9/11) are really
about European events. In Lemesurier's version, the liberation of Europe from
Muslim terror comes from his native Britain, not Sweden.
The author at several junctions implies that Nostradamus was cheating, either
because he was really describing events in his past, or believed in a cyclical
view of history, which made it possible to predict the future without recourse
to supernatural means, simply by projecting past or present events into the
future. The Muslim invasions of Europe during the 21st century (or later) are
simply a more frightening version of the Arab and Ottoman conquests. The fact
that the future papacy is removed to France is reminiscent of its “Babylonian
captivity” at 14th century Avignon, etc.
Still, even Nostradamus sometimes said things which make you wonder. Georges
Dumézil, tongue-in-cheek or otherwise, devoted an entire essay to a study of
IX.20, which does indeed sound like a prediction of the capture of King Louis
XVI and Marie Antoinette at Varennes during the French revolution. Another old
favorite is I.35, about the death of Henry II.
As for the end of the world, that ever-contentious subject, Ohlmarks placed it
at AD 2777 while Lemesurier opts for AD 2827. Only time will tell whose right.
One thing's for sure: there will be plenty of time for humanity to screw up
again, and plenty of time to reinterpret the prophecies of Nostradamus…