The British SWP on the suspected gang rape at Cornell University in the United States. What a pity the perps weren´t Hamas terrorists and the victim an Israeli woman. I mean, then the SWP could have supported the "widespread violence" in good conscience. While of course denying it ever happened. You know, a bit like the Cornell administration...
The hypocrisy of these people never ceases to amaze me.
Cornell case exposes widespread violence at university campuses
Hmmm...
On Friday, it´s 25 years since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It´s also a dark moon. And a Tantric Hindu festival to celebrate Tara in a huge cremation ground somewhere in West Bengal.
I see.
Trump threatens Canada with...wait for it...renaming Lake Ontario "Lake America". LOL. I´m sure the Great White North are literally shaking right now.
For the record, I *did* know that Sheridan worked for Goldman Sachs years ago, but it´s still kinda funny that a conspiracy guy worked for *that* company, LOL.
Hade Trump bara gjort den här typen av dumheter, hade det hela nästan varit roligt...
Taylor Swift´s silence on the recent fall of Kostiantynivka is not a little damning, and given the extremely serious nature of the present geopolitical situation, entirely disqualifying!
A propos Anton´s latest video on YouTube: like everyone else, I assumed the "bizarre discovery" was that honeybees EAT DEAD HUMAN BODIES and that this somehow ends up in our honey, making it SOYLENT GREEN.
Instead, the (non)bizarre discovery is that millions of mining bees live at a New York cemetery and turn out to be extremely important pollinators of commercial crops (in this case, apples). Which might mean that the "bee apocalypse" has been postponed...again. Thank god, by the way!
I prefer apples to soylent any day.
Again: Why should we care about this? This is from Trump´s Pravda, Breitbart News.
A footnote of sorts to the previous blog post on David Wilcock. So who was Neil Keenan, then?
Is there a conspiracy theorist named Neil Keenan who tried to sue an alleged international banking cartel?
Yes, Neil Keenan is a central figure in one of the most sprawling and elaborate conspiracy theories in the world of "alternative finance" and exopolitics.
In November 2011, Keenan filed a legal complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 11-cv-8500), claiming that a staggering $1 trillion (and later trillions more) in financial instruments had been stolen from him and a group known as the "Dragon Family."
Keenan’s story reads like a high-stakes thriller involving ancient Asian wealth and modern banking corruption:
The Bonds: He claimed he was entrusted by the "Dragon Family" (an alleged ancient, wealthy group in Asia) with Federal Reserve bonds and other financial instruments worth billions.
The Theft: He alleged these were stolen/seized in 2009 at the Italian-Swiss border (the "Chiasso incident") by individuals linked to the Office of International Treasury Control (OITC) and the World Economic Forum.
The Cartel: Keenan sued a massive list of entities including the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the Italian government, and various international banks, claiming they were part of a "banking cartel" or "cabal" using these stolen assets to fund a secret global government.
Keenan's narrative is a direct ancestor to the "Alliance" theories we discussed earlier:
He often spoke of Global Collateral Accounts—vast reserves of gold and wealth supposedly hidden in bunkers across Southeast Asia (particularly Indonesia).
He claimed he was working to "free" these accounts to provide humanity with free energy, debt jubilees, and new technologies, all while being protected by a secret "Alliance" of military and spiritual leaders.
Like many of these conspiracy-related legal challenges, the court case did not result in a trial or a payout:
The original lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed by Keenan in 2012, reportedly so he could refile it with "stronger evidence" and more defendants.
It never successfully moved forward in a traditional court of law, but in the world of online discourse, it became a foundational myth. For his followers, the dismissal wasn't a failure, but proof of how "deep" the conspiracy went.
Melania Trump´s unexpected speech on Jeffrey Epstein has been spun by the mainstream media as simply a denial that she had anything to do with him or his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. But as perennial gadfly Michael Tracey points out on X, the really weird part is that the First Lady is calling on Congress to launch a new investigation into the Epstein files! This despite the fact that Donald Trump wants everyone to drop the entire issue. Is the POTUS trying to distract attention from the seeming Iran debacle by re-opening the Epstein case? That would be...richly ironic.
Tracey´s xweets below.
xxxxx
This is gobsmacking. Not only did Melania Trump suddenly decide to give a televised address about Jeffrey Epstein, she's calling on Congress to "act," because Epstein was "not alone." So she just threw a giant stick of political dynamite on the issue her husband despises!
I don't know about you, but my head is still spinning over this Melania speech. WTF! Sure, there are photos of her consorting with Jeffrey and Ghislaine over the years, and maybe a fleeting email here or there, but has she ever really been THAT big of a focal point in the speculation? (Because now she definitely WILL BE...) She denied wrongdoing. What wrongdoing was she ever even accused of? Did anyone notice that while she was at it, she could've declared that her husband also didn't do anything wrong, but conspicuously chose not to...? Why suddenly make a televised statement on Epstein this afternoon -- apparently without Donald's knowledge -- calling for Congressional action and public "survivor" testimony, because, she claims, Epstein did not "act alone"? Donald has always been adamant that he feels the country should move on from Epstein. It's certainly not something he feels should warrant any further political or legislative attention. But... that's exactly what Melania just called for! So again, WTF!
There are conflicting opinions and reports about whether Melania chose to deliver this gobsmacking Epstein Speech with or without the consent, or knowledge, of Donald. One report suggests Donald was given a "heads up." But this could just be something like: "Heads up, Melania is about to give a speech." Doesn't necessarily mean Donald was involved in the planning of it. He could've simply been told about it at the last minute. Other reports suggest he had no knowledge that his wife was about to speak on Epstein, and call for renewed political action on the matter. So this at least appears to have been the personal initiative of Melania. Still, speculation will abound that it was plotted out in concert with Donald. Even though this would blatantly contradict Donald's repeat admonitions that everyone should forget about Epstein, and concern about the Epstein Files is a "hoax" cooked up by Democrats, as well as a cohort of "stupid" Republicans. Though of course Donald is not above contradicting himself, and is in fact becoming increasingly erratic/volatile, this would certainly be an all-time Whopper of a contradiction. For now, we simply don't know what gave rise to the Melania Epstein Speech, which is what makes this episode so gobsmacking.
xxxxx
Did anyone really think that "the Truth about Trump/Epstein" would surface when Bill and Hillary Clinton were deposited by the Congressional sub-sub-committee so-and-so? LOL.
The crazy Irishman (but I´m repeating myself) Thomas Sheridan has a little prediction. This guy is nuts, but I can´t help wondering if there may be something to this...
"Yes, there actually was a conspiracy. But it was the Russians/Chinese/Muslims/liberals/conservatives" (insert name of "the other guy" here).
Is it finally unravelling?
America´s resident "Epstein-minimizer" Michael Tracey explains(?) why he isn´t scandalized by the Epstein Files. Hmmm...
>>>However much they now might want to try to deny it, amid this torrential downpour of extreme hindsight bias, the reality is that 10-15 years ago, it would've been perfectly reasonable for most people to meet with Jeffrey Epstein.
>>>Especially if it was in the context of being invited to some function featuring other interesting, noteworthy people. >>>Sure, they might have googled him in advance, and found he had pleaded guilty to some prostitution charges in the past. But that would've been widely seen as no big deal. >>>Prostitution? Really? Who cares? Even if it's not your cup of tea, it's not something to get overly exercised about. >>>The same year Epstein was convicted, Eliot Spitzer also had to resign as governor of New York after he got caught patronizing a high-end escort service. >>>As I recall, Spitzer was never banished from polite society, nor was anyone told they must refuse to ever associate with him again. In fact, he was not long thereafter given a show on CNN.
Steven Bannon supposedly sits on 15 hours of unreleased interview material with Jeffrey Epstein. Two hours have leaked, however. They are part of the Epstein files recently released by Congress. The interview (or conversation) have been posted on several YouTube channels.
After watching it, I´m not sure if Epstein is a midwit trying to talk like a genius, or a genius talking like a midwit. Yes, a large portion of the interview is about science, mathematics and philosophy. Epstein apparently dabbled in these topics. More disturbingly, we learn that at the age of 30, Epstein was invited to the board of the Rockefeller Foundation and the Trilateral Commission?!
Sometimes, Epstein (a former Wall Street trader or should I say shark) sound like a conspiracy theorist. He talks about debt creation, fractional reserve banking and how inflation "makes no sense". However, he never really walks the walk. Instead, Epstein argues that the financial system is so complex that nobody really understands it. Everyone is just a small cog in a gigantic machinery. In fact, most Wall Street stock brokers can hardly do basic math! Epstein worked for something called the Santa Fe Institute, the purpose of which was to discover and mathematize the laws governing the financial markets. The politicians usually don´t know anything either (OK, I can believe that).
Epstein veers strongly towards vitalism. Bananas might be conscious, somehow. The soul might be real. Indeed, the soul is "the dark matter of the brain". Existence is miraculous and mysterious. Bannon gets frustrated with Epstein at one point, accusing him of talking "bullshit" and "being rabbinical".
Epstein does talk about his time in jail in 2008. Ironically, it was right during the financial crisis, when half of Wall Street almost went bankrupt. Epstein was in solitary confinement and didn´t learn about the crisis until somewhat later (including the near-collapse of the business where he was a partner). Interesting factoid: Epstein claims that the other inmates hated him because he was rich, not because he was a suspected pedophile. The claim that sexual predators experience hell in jail or prison is a myth. I´ve actually heard this before - years ago, I read in a Swedish newspaper that whoever has the most drugs is king in prison, even if he is a sexual offender.
One bizarre detail struck me when listening to this material: Bannon sounds like he always does. That is, he sounds like a right-wing populist and friend of the little guy. But here he is, trying to whitewash (science-wash?) a convicted sex offender and organizer of countless orgies featuring the globalist elite. I mean, what the fuck.
At the very end of the two-hour sitting, Bannon asks Epstein the question that is making the rounds in the media right now: Are you the Devil? Epstein seems to deny it, and even says that the Devil scares him. The exchange probably tells us more about Bannon than about Epstein. I get the impression that Bannon actually admires Satan (as described by Milton) and projects this on Epstein?!
Maybe that´s the most chilling moment in the entire interview.
