Showing posts with label Posadism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Posadism. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 24, 2025

Merry Christmas, world


 

Here is that darn photo of Bannon and Chomsky again, probably taken by Epstein. In hindsight, it´s obvious that Western-style more-or-less-democratic capitalism simply couldn´t be overthrown by a revolution. Any revolution. The system was simply too good to derail and integrate all opposition and render it harmless. See the photo above! Chomsky (the "anarchist" who ended up voting for the Democrats like everyone else) was obviously controlled opposition, but the fact that Bannon shows up in the Epstein files may tell you something about *that* end of the political spectrum...  

The system could only have been smashed from the outside - but even that might have been impossible, Communism perhaps being too integrated itself into certain "geopolitical structures" (and strictures). I mean, how many of the revolutionary regimes in the Third World were really dependent on Western capital for their survival? And what about the Soviet Union itself? Beside, how would such a "smashing" even have looked like, anyway? A nuclear first strike á la Posadas?

There is of course another way in which the Western democratic-capitalism might end: by gradually rottening from the inside. Indeed, that seems to be what is happening as we speak. A process which will end in the simultaneous disappearence of the two main contending classes (whoever *they* are - the managerial class and the lose cannon capitalistas)?

Marxism ended as a utopia. In its un-ironic form, it was just the millennarian cult of modernity. And the paedophiles are always with you.    

 

Monday, December 15, 2025

Esoterisk marxism

 


Kan ju inte undgå att länka till denna. Ja, det är den högerradikala/högerextrema "tankesmedjan" Motpol som recenserar "I Want To Believe", alltså den där boken om Juan Posadas och hans bisarra rörelse. Tonvikten ligger såklart vid UFO-aspekten...

Posadismer

Saturday, November 29, 2025

Och hur mår grisen?

- Vilken jävla hushållsgris?
Det finns ingen sån här, jävla revisionist!

Vilken är/var världens knäppaste vänstergrupp? Konkurrensen är stenhård. Dessutom är begreppet "vänster" svårdefinierat allra längst ut på stollekanten. Kan lika gärna vara "höger". Har inte rankat grupperna nedan och det finns förstås fler, men av gammal hävd brukar väl posadisterna betraktas som den allra vansinnigaste vänstersekten. Vissa grupper har inte namngivits p.g.a. integritetsskäl. 
 
A-NORG: Norsk anarkistgrupp som stödde NATO och den norska militären. Medlemmarna gjorde entusiastiskt lumpen. Låter som en anarko-version av Hua-Deng-maoister. 1980-tal.

Arbetardemokratiska Föreningen (ADF): Krävde att Svenska Arbetsgivarföreningen skulle genomföra en statskupp och krossa SAP och LO eftersom dessa var "socialfascister"?! 1970-talet. Deras senare aktiviteter (under annan beteckning) var något mer normala och jag tänker därför inte nämna vad de kallade sig efter namnbytet.  

Rebellerna: Kräver ju ingen närmare presentation. Även kända som Rebellrörelsen. 1968. Såklart.

LaRouche-rörelsen:  I Sverige känd under beteckningarna Europeiska Arbetarkommittéerna (EAK) och Europeiska Arbetarpartiet (EAP). Amerikansk i grunden. Påstod sig ursprungligen vara en vänstergrupp. Den högste ledaren Lyndon LaRouche skrev den epokgörande texten "The Sexual Impotence of the Puerto Rican Socialist Party". Och så "Rats!" förstås. Ökända för sina hatkampanjer mot Olof Palme och sin plötsliga U-sväng till Ronald Reagans fromma. 1960-tal fram till nutid.  

New Alliance Party: Vänsterliberalt parti i New York City på 1980-talet. Sägs ha varit en front för det marxistiska International Workers Party, som i sin tur sägs ha varit en front för en polyamorös sexsekt. Sägs senare ha tagit över Reform Partys avdelning i NYC. Ett parti som Donald Trump sägs ha varit medlem av under en kort period. Även NYC:s borgmästare Michael Bloomberg (en av världens rikaste män) sägs ha samarbetat med denna gruppering. Försökte omgruppera sig med LaRouche-rörelsen på 1970-talet. Stödde Nation of Islam. Jag måste säga "sägs" annars blir jag väl stämd om de någonsin läser detta! 

Tvindrörelsen: Maoistisk sekt i Danmark som blev kommersiellt företag i en viss bransch. Sägs det. 1970-tal men även senare.

KAK/KAG: Också en maoistisk sekt i Danmark. 1970-tal. KAK var Gottfred Appels grupp (han med "snylterstatsteorien") medan KAG var hans ännu mer radikaliserade anhängare (även kända som Blekingegadeligan). PFLP, PFLP, PFLP, bankrån, bankrån, bankrån...

Kröcherligan: I Sverige bosatta RAF-groupies på 1970-talet, behöver knappast någon närmare presentation.

[Icke namngiven grupp]: Mycket liten grupp i Sverige på 1980-talet. Ledaren var kliniskt paranoid och spred "historiska dokument" om olika konspirationer (ofta mot honom själv). Tragiskt fall eftersom mannen varit fullt frisk till en början. Öde okänt.

[Icke namngiven grupp]: Enmansgrupp i Sverige på 1970-talet. Bestod av en ex-medlem av en nynazistisk organisation. Stödde Centerpartiet (!) och Rüdiger-falangen inom SAC. Skrev om andra enmansgrupper eller smågrupper som är i övrigt helt okända. Kliar mig fortfarande i håret! Gjorde alltså anspråk på att vara vänster.  

Posadisterna: Trotskistisk strömning med ursprung i Latinamerika. Ledaren kallade sig Juan Posadas. Var till en början en i mängden av trotskistiska strömningar. Sedan hände något. Posadas blev ökänd för att tro på UFO-n och hävda att rymdvarelserna måste vara socialister. Bland mycket annat. 1960-tal fram till nutid (?). Hela historien finns att läsa i boken "I Want to Believe: Posadism, UFOs and Apocalypse Communism" av A. M. Gittlitz. Posadisterna var faktiskt *ännu* knäppare än vad jag trodde! Och de är alltså numero uno på alla topplistor över tomtenissar...

Edition Wissenschaft, Kultur und Politik: Senare Gesellschaftsreform Jetzt. Enmansgrupp i Västtyskland och det återförenade Tyskland bestående av Paul Schulz. 1980-tal och 1990-tal. Troligen avliden. Nämns med namn i "I Want to Believe". Posadist, blev utesluten från den posadistiska internationalen efter den store ledarens död, men hade ungefär samma politiska inriktning. Lade dock större vikt vid UFO-n, science fiction och försvunna civilisationer (Mu). Var enligt "I Want to Believe" dessutom transmedium och trodde sig kanalisera budskap från rymdvarelser. Något Schulz inte nämnde när jag korresponderade med honom för många år sedan. 

[Icke namngiven grupp]: Enmansgrupp i USA, den ende medlemmen var avhoppare från en tämligen obskyr marxist-leninistisk organisation. Ansåg att arbetarklassen i USA borde växla in sina besparingar i schweizerfranc, detta för att denna valuta skulle bli den enda som klarade sig undan nästa stora depression (som gruppen förutspådde skulle inträffa på 1990-talet). Hade annars en rådskommunistisk inriktning. Blev sura när jag inte betalade för deras bulletin. Till slut skickade jag dem en handfull dollar. Har senare insett att jag kanske borde ha sänt över schweizerfranc istället...

Kansas City Marxist Leninist Cell: Samarbetade med en annan grupp jag tror hette Kansas City Revolutionary Workers Collective. Skrev en gemensam pamflett som innehöll helt obegripliga formuleringar av typen "kamraterna träffades och diskuterade proletariatet i form av en fotboll". Jag skojar inte. Har sett pamfletten med egna ögon! 1970-tal.

Communist Cadre (CTC): Även utbrytargruppen Communist Cadre Marxist (CTC-M). Ni undrar säkert vad bokstaven "T" i förkortningen står för. Det står faktiskt för "Trotsky"! Udda smågrupper som identifierade sig med Sam Marcys Global Class War Tendency men var "mer marcyitiska än Marcy". Det fanns även en tredje sådan grupp, RCL(I). En av grupperna (minns inte vilken) var antingen en utbrytning från det tidigare nämnda International Workers Party eller entrister inom det. Sägs det. 1970-tal, 1980-tal, kanske tidigt 1990-tal.

Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist): Den pro-albanska gruppen kring Hardial Bains i Kanada. Var närmast ökända på 1970-talet och 1980-talet. Verkar fortfarande existera. Har bloggat om dem tidigare. På en vänsterfestival sägs Bains ha uppträtt närmast som en indisk guru (han var etnisk indier). Han låg ner på en säng inne i ett tält iklädd konstiga kläder medan han hävde ur sig diverse förnumstigheter...

Ärkestalinisterna: Grupp på nätet circa 2005. Oklart om den existerade i sinnevärlden eller var något slags skämt. Gjorde en poäng av att öppet kalla sig "stalinister". Ärkestalinister, närmare bestämt.

Surrealistgruppen: Sverige på 1980-talet. Märklig anarkistgrupp. Delade ut provokativa flygblad på första maj med budskap av typen "Beväpna invandrarungdomen". Trolling? Lär ha varit väldigt trevliga när de sysslade med surrealistisk konst...

Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA): Den bisarra terrorgrupp som kidnappade Patricia Hearst och hjärntvättade henne. USA på 1970-talet. Deras förvirrade ideologi verkar ha haft "religiösa" inslag och de hör kanske inte hemma på denna lista? Verkar dock ha haft sitt ursprung på vänsterkanten.  

Maoism-Third Worldism: Egentligen namnet på en ideologi. Grupperna som gör anspråk på att följa den har bytt namn vid flera tillfällen. USA på 00-talet. 

Denna strömning radikaliserade maoismens mutteorier genom att hävda att den vita västerländska arbetarklassen *aldrig* kommer att bli revolutionär. När tredje världen befriats från de imperialistiska snyltarstaterna kommer den västerländska arbetarklassen istället att bli fascistisk. Västvärlden måste erövras militärt av maoistiska folkarméer från den globala södern som sedan omskolar den vita arbetarklassen genom en serie kulturrevolutioner. 

De fåtaliga anhängarna till denna ideologi hade en absurt storvulen retorik och parodierades friskt av ett trollkonto på YouTube som kallade sig "Maoism-Lin Biaoism". Parodin var närmast omöjlig att skilja från originalet! 

Eftersom grupperna hade en stenhård säkerhetspolitik bestod deras videor av seriefigurer som lade ut texten om det maoistiska budskapet... 

Sluta skvallra era jäääävlar, ni är snutar faaaan. 

 


Thursday, April 18, 2024

The lure of the fringe

 


Staffan Stigsjöö was a Swedish ufologist who wrote three almost “classical” books about UFOs and aliens during the 1970´s: “Tefatsfolket ser oss”, “Tefatsfolket – vänner eller fiender?” and “Tefatsfolket har landat!” Two mainstream Swedish ufology groups, UFO-Sverige and AFU, apparently disavowed one of the books. I originally assumed it was the third one, but after looking through them (I actually have these rare gems in my private stash), I came to the conclusion that it must have been the second book.

Yepp, it´s a bit fringey, alright.

The first and third books are pretty moderate as UFO books go, especially the first one. Think ETH plus Däniken (yes, really – ancient aliens were a moderate take during the 1970´s). By contrast, “Tefatsfolket – vänner eller fiender?” (The Saucer People: Friends or Foes?) contains more radical takes, at least by respectable Swedish standards. A similar book published in the United States would presumably be considered rather bland! It was published in 1974.

Stigsjöö takes abduction stories and MIB reports seriously. He wonders aloud whether Earth might be threatened by an alien invasion, and eventually reaches the conclusion that several different alien civilizations are fighting over our planet. Some of the factions are hostile, others are not. And while he rejects the Theosophically-inspired contactees (and even wonders whether they are CIA agents or dupes), he espouses an even more absurd scenario: some of the aliens might be benign secular missionaries, who just like Che Guevara, Fidel Castro and Ho Chi Minh dream of a better society…

Wtf?! Sounds like Stigsjöö would be prime material for recruitment by the bizarre Posadists, who actually believed that the ufonauts were socialists! It also reminds me of the Swedish comic “Ville” (originally published 1975-76) by Jan Lööf, in which a UFO contactee writes pamphlets about socialist utopias instructed to do so by wise and ecologically conscious space brothers. Going back to Stigsjöö again, his book contains a chapter on overpopulation and the ecological crisis, even briefly mentioning anthropogenic global warming. Some things haven´t changed since 1974, it seems.

Stigsjöö also discusses the interface between ufology and what many today would call cryptozoology, wondering about Mothman (here called “birdman”) and Spring Heel Jack. Could they be animals left behind by the aliens? Forteana is also extensively discussed, such as worms falling from the sky. While rejecting George Adamski, Stigsjöö believes we should at least have an open mind towards John Keel and Charles Hoy Fort. He also discusses the Philadelphia Experiment and the Bermuda Triangle (plus a supposed similar triangle on land in Florida). His most original speculation is that the Man with the Iron Mask was actually a captured alien! 

Stigsjöö somewhat notoriously claims that UFO researchers or contactees often die on the 24th of a month (or around that date). Kenneth Arnold´s original UFO observation was made on June 24, 1947. More suspiciously still, many of the deaths are from heart attacks or suicides. It´s rumored that Stigsjöö himself “snapped” after writing this book, believed himself to be harassed by MIBs, and so on.

Somewhere in this strange collection of factoids, there are actually some interesting reports, including two “UFO cases” which happened before Arnold´s famous encounter in 1947.  Both are Finnish, and sound like a strange blend between folkloric fairy encounters and alien ditto. One is even a kind of abduction case. I might return to these in a future blog post.

Somewhat ironically, I almost suspect that the more spiritually-inclined subsegment of the ufology milieu might have been more well-disposed to this book than the secular mainline ufologists Stigsjöö presumably wanted to be seen as part of. Ironic, since the spiritual contactees are the only UFO believers he very explicitly rejects!    

Saturday, February 4, 2023

Come and eat us

 


Could this be the biggest mistake in human history? A map showing our location to any hungry alien that might be out there...

Let´s hope Juan Posadas was right. The aliens are actually revolutionary socialists, and will therefore only eat the rich! 

Sunday, February 14, 2021

Galaxy Brain




"I Want to Believe: Posadism, UFOs and Apocalypse Communism" is a intriguing book by New York-based writer A. M. Gittlitz, published last year. It tells the story of the Argentinian Trotskyist revolutionary Homero Cristalli (1912-1981), better known under his mysterious pen name J Posadas (sometimes interpreted as Juan Posadas, sometimes as José Posadas). The movement around Posadas was notorious on the far left for decades, first because of its bizarre theory that a nuclear war would trigger a future socialist reconstruction of society, and later because of Posadas´ belief in UFOs, space aliens and the possibility of human-dolphin communication. I first heard of the Posadists in the 1980´s as "the Trots who believe that socialism will come from the Moon". Later, I wrote to the British "Revolutionary Workers Party" asking for Posadas´ notorious UFO article, but instead, I was sent a pamphlet about Charlie Chaplin (thank you). I also corresponded with ultra-Posadist Paul Schulz and tried to read his German-language material. Yes, it did mention Star Trek ("Raumschiff Enterprise" in German), Erich von Däniken and the lost continent of Mu... I have previously reviewed some of Posadas´ own works on this blog (click on the label "Posadism" below this post to access it). After reading "I Want to Believe", I can only say that I didn´t know half of it! 

What makes the Posadist current so fascinating is that it started out as a "real" Trotskyist tendency, and even had a modicum of support in the unions and the working class. Posadas (or Homero Cristalli, to use his given name) was an Italian-Argentine left-wing radical of a working class background. He only attented school for two years, and tried his luck at a wide variety of odd jobs, including minstrel singer and soccer player. Eventually, he became a union organizer and joined the Trotskyist movement. To make a long story much shorter, Posadas eventually split with the "official" Fourth International, creating his own "Fourth International (Posadist)" in the 1960´s. At the time, the Posadists had a real presence in several Latin American nations: Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Mexico, Guatemala and Cuba. They attempted to organize workers and landless peasants. In Cuba and Guatemala, they tried to influence left-leaning guerilla movements with varying degrees of success. Eventually, both Castro and Guatemalan guerilla leader Yon Sosa disavowed the Posadistas. In Cuba, the Posadists were rounded up and imprisoned after Castro had allied himself with the "Stalinist" Communist Party. Che Guevara negotiated a deal which permitted the Posadistas to leave prison and return to civilian life, on condition that they would dissolve their party and never again partake in political activity. In many other Latin American nations, the followers of Posadas were murdered outright by pro-American military or right-wing death squads. More succesful, perhaps, was a clandestine arms factory in Morocco, smuggling weapons to the FLN in Algeria. The factory had been set up by Fourth International leader Michel Pablo, and several Posadist militants worked there. 

Or so the story goes. Gittlitz admits that it´s difficult to know what *really* happened in many cases, so his story of the Posadist international should perhaps be taken as a first approximation of the truth, rather than as a story about "what actually happened". But yes, I´ve heard the Guatemalan part of the story from a reputable source (who believed that the Posadists really did embezzle MR-13 funds. Curiously, my source referred to the man as "Posades"). Other claims sound more fantastic. Did the Posadist International really have sections in far-away places such as South Yemen, Somalia and Madagascar? I doubt it. I heard too many examples of small left-wing tendencies claiming "sections" that on closer inspection turn out to be fictitious (or consist of one guy in a Paris student café). 

An interesting fact is that the crazy perspective of hoping for a nuclear war wasn´t entirely Posadas´ own invention. It actually comes from Michel Pablo, the leader of the Fourth International in the immidiate post-World War II period. Pablo´s belief in War-Revolution - that a Third World War is imminent and will trigger a world socialist revolution - is only one step removed from Posadas´ more dramatic demand for the Soviet Union or China to actually launch such a war by a preemptive nuclear strike on the United States. And yet, Pablo is seldom painted as barking mad. Perhaps he was a more erudite theoretician than the autodidactic Posadas? Gittlitz also notes the shift in Posadist politics circa 1968 (which seems to have co-incided with a similar shift in Castro´s policy, something not noticed by the author) from ultra-leftish guerillism towards a more pro-Soviet "popular frontism". Posadas even supported the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia! When Posadas was forced to leave Latin America, he went to Italy where his group entered the Communist Party and even sent a representative to Moscow for talks. The Soviet host wasn´t impressed and would later publish a polemic against the Posadists. 

Had this been all, Posadism would simply be regarded as a kind of ultra-Pabloism, and nobody would give a damn. What made the tendency memorable (and meme-able) is that somewhere along the line, J Posadas *did* go barking mad...

Juan Posadas did have authoritarian, puritanical and slightly megalomaniacal tendencies already from the beginning of his Trotskyist career. It´s interesting to note that he originally slavishly followed the decrees of the Fourth International leadership, Pablo in particular. I suspect this dogmatism was Posadas´ way of compensating for his lack of education. At some point, the Argentine autodidact decided to replace his guru Pablo with...himself. It was pretty much downhill from there. During the 1970´s, if not earlier, the Posadist international became a kind of "Jehovah´s Witnesses of the left", or a cult by any other name. The internal life of the organization strikingly resembled other cults, both political and religious: all power was in the hands of Posadas and his immidiate family, morality was puritanical, members were not permitted to have children, critics of the leadership were invariably denounced as "police agents" and expelled, all meetings were closed with shouts of "Viva Posadas", and the party magazines were filled with the rambling, incoherent and incomprehensible speeches of the great leader, presented as infallible wisdom. The political line also resembled the message of apocalyptic cults. After an event known as "the repression" (compare the Great Tribulation of Christian fundamentalism) during which many militants would be rounded up and killed, a nuclear war would follow (compare Armaggedon) and after the war, almost miraculously, the survivors would establish socialism on a world scale (compare the Millennium). 

In one of these speeches, Posadas mentions UFOs, claims that they are extraterrestrial craft, and that the aliens must be socialist. Perhaps they can even help humanity to fight for socialism? The speech was dutifully printed in the magazines of the Posadist "sections" and quickly made them the laughing stock of the entire left. Ironically, Gittlitz believes that Posadas himself wasn´t *that* obsessed with UFOs. It was simply one of many topics on which he had all-knowing opinions, but it´s hardly surprising that Posadas´ opponents jumped to the occasion. 

During the 1970´s, Posadas purged most of his old guard, was involved in several sex scandals (again like any cultish guru) and seems to have gone completely and utterly mad. For instance, he treated the birth of his daughter Homerita as an event of world-historic significance, and wanted to raise her to become the first enlightened socialist human (or something to that effect). Party members in Italy were instructed to visit the maternity ward where Homerita was born, stand around the bed of the mother and the infant, sing revolutionary songs, etc. The staff of the ward eventually had to silence them! Posadas´ message became more and more New Age-like. He believed that humans could and should communicate with dolphins. Indeed, all animals and plants would become tame and live in peace with humans under socialism, and some animals (if I understand his ramblings correctly) would even become as intelligent as humans (including the almost iconic dolphins). At this point, the Posadistas had no working class base left, the experienced militants were all gone, and most of the "sections" consisted of confused young people of the kind that might just as well join a religious cult. 

After the death of Posadas, two ex-Posadistas developed the UFO strain of his thought even further. One of them was Dante Minazzoli, who had been expelled by Posadas for whatever reason, but still continued to believe in the alien-socialism interface. He spent years as a kind of one-man entryist in ufological circles, trying to gently win them over to a revolutionary socialist perspective. The other was Paul Schulz, who told me that he had been expelled after the death of Posadas by the new leadership of the International. Judging by "I Want to Believe", Schulz was far crazier than I had previously thought. Apparently, Schulz became a trance medium, believed that he was in direct communication with aliens, and tried to win Swiss contactee Billy Meier for a socialist perspective. Meier never responded to Schulz´ letters... 

When J Posadas died, many assumed that his movement would die with him. However, it seems that the Posadist Fourth International still exists, led by Posadas´ son Léon Cristalli. Or perhaps there are now two Posadist internationals, the "European bureau" having split from the "Latin American bureau". Léon Cristalli´s wing of the movement (the Latin American one) supports Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump and the populist spring in general. They believe that Russia is a "workers´ state". However, the most well-known revival of Posadism is in the form of jocular and ironic Internet memes. This "Neo-Posadism" rose to prominence circa 2016-17, at about the same time that Trump-supporting trolls filled Twitter and other social media forums with curious memes featuring Pepe, Kek, Harambe, Trump as the restorer of German Idealism, and what not. There is a fake Posadist group known as "the Intergalactic Workers League" and an equally fake "DSA Posadist Caucus". In this era of postmodern irony, J Posadas have been turned into a LARP...

While I consider "I Want to Believe" an interesting and indispensable read for those of us who give a damn about the 57 varieties of Trotskyism, I must say that the author comes across as something of a quasi-intellectual. I only skimmed the last chapter, where he discusses "the function of the joke and irony in history" (sounds like something Posadas himself could have written). Gittlitz is also somewhat sloppy, as when he refers to the Russian capital in 1917 as "Saint Petersburg" (it´s Petrograd), or claims that the Popular Front government in Spain had a conflict with Franco in 1935 (it wasn´t elected until 1936), or uses English words in weird ways ("principal" instead of "principle", etc). The author accepts a kind of mythologized Trotskyist history, in which Lenin wanted to see Trotsky as his successor, hundreds of thousand Trotskyists were sent to the Gulags, and Hitler feared a world revolution led by Trotsky. Nah, none of that happened, except in the fevered imagination of...well...Posadas, perhaps? It´s almost as if the author has gone native!

That being said, "I Want to Believe" is nevertheless recommended. Four stars out of five. 


Thursday, December 24, 2020

In the land of the political chameleons



This blog has a rather obvious love-hate relationship with World Socialist Web Site (WSWS), the cyber-incarnation of David North's Socialist Equality Party (SEP), better known to Trot-watchers under its old name, the Workers League (WL).

Here we go again. This is a polemic against a "Morenoite" group in Brazil (perhaps the Brazilian co-thinkers of the Argentine ex-homosexual faction) concerning alternative medicine in general and HCQ in particular, with WSWS opposing the drug in question. Note that their polemical target is a former Posadista!

OK, I admit that I couldn't help myself linking to this...

Trotskyist polemix at their proletarian best. 

Morenoite-Posadista blocs with Bolsonaro


Monday, August 3, 2020

Galaxer i mina braxer



Det har tydligen kommit en bok om posadisterna. Den anmäls i Aftonbladet nedan. Jag har ju redan skrivit om de här tokstollarna (som faktiskt fanns på riktigt) här på bloggen tidigare. Ja, men det förstod ni väl redan? Vad jag inte vet är om boken ger ett glasklart svar på frågan om man verkligen kan bygga socialismen i endast EN GALAX. 

Proletärer på alla planeter, förena er!

Friday, September 14, 2018

Red Admiral over Madagascar



A review of a photo of Communist leaders sold by Amazon.

Good heavens, it's the president of Madagascar Didier Ratsiraka together with Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev (the smiling guy to the right) and Soviet foreign secretary Andrei Gromyko, better known as Mister Nyet (and non-smiling as usual). Well, in case anyone wondered about the political course of the Malagasy Socialist Revolution, this should dispel all doubts, ha ha. I'm sure Juan Posadas had this vintage photo at his work desk, together with a copy of "UFOs from Red China" and "The Mental Telepathy of Crows"...

Yeah, really.

Sunday, September 2, 2018

What is Spartacist?


The Spartacist League is a small but notorious (and frequently erratic) left-wing group in the United States. They claim to be Trotskyists. I was an avid left-watcher in my youth, and often bought copies of their magazines Workers Vanguard and Spartacist at a "Mandelite" bookstore in Stockholm. I read them with about equal fascination and horror. This would have been around 1990.

During the 1960's, by contrast, the Spartacist League must have been complete bores. No Yuri Andropov Brigade, no defence of porn star Nina Hartley (she was only a child back then), and very few invectives against Tim Wohlforth or Lyn Marcus (although they are mentioned).

This issue of Spartacist was published in 1967. It contains an article on the elections in California won by Ronald Reagan, articles about student and union protests, a bizarre article claiming that Germany in on the brink of dictatorship, and a polemic against the Posadists. The latter were a competing Trotskyist current in Latin America, and had some influence in the left-wing guerrilla MR-13 in Guatemala (later, the Posadists became even crazier than the Sparts). Unless I'm mistaken, this issue of Spartacist also contain a weird "open letter" to a Soviet diplomat, demanding that the Soviet Union "extends its nuclear shield" to cover Hanoi. The magazine also reprints an article by Trotsky on "centrism".

The abstract sectarianism and polemic-mongering against equally insignificant left-wing groups (such as the ACFI) are already visible, but otherwise early Spartacist sound surprisingly undistinct. Even more surprisingly, the Freedom Socialist Party is listed as a "fraternal group" in the directory. Was Jim Robertson on a first name basis with Ms. Seattle Six-Gun? Somehow, I find that very hard to believe. Her husband, maybe.

The Sparts used to sell bound volumes of all early issues of their magazine, but unfortunately these are out of print. I'm not sure if anyone would be willing to pay 50 bucks for a single issue from 1967. I wouldn't, and I'm a cult-watcher, OK?

For old times sake, I give "Spartacist No. 9, Jan-Feb. 1967" three stars.

Nina Hartley's adult body might be more interesting.

Wednesday, August 8, 2018

TROTSKY WAS A MIGHTY WARRIOR



A review of "The Assasination of Trotsky", featuring Richard Burton. 

When this movie was shown in Sweden back in 1972, a small and somewhat cranky group of Trotskyists became very upset.

This group, known as Posadists, picketed one of the cinemas showing the movie, and passed out a leaflet. The leaflet said: "Trotsky was a mighty warrior. His pencil was his sword and his eyeglasses were his shield".

And no, I don't know if this is a true story, but I heard it second hand from several sources. The Posadists also believed in UFOs and wanted Brezhnev to nuke America. Or so the grapevine says. The truth may be very different, but since nobody seems to take this movie seriously, I guess I could report this funny rumour...

As for the movie itself, I've only seen it once. And no, it wasn't very good. Trotsky, after all, was a MIGHTY WARRIOR. LOL!

Sunday, August 5, 2018

A familiar twilight




This entertaining attack on Colin Wilson (of all people) was written by me in 2010, during my skeptical period. Today, I would probably not write like this...

Is there anything Colin Wilson *doesn't* believe in? God, perhaps. Or Karl Marx. Otherwise, he seems to be worse than agent Mulder!

A very long time ago, Wilson was actually something of a celebrity, due to his book "The Outsider". Its blend of Existentialism, Nietzscheanism and longing for the transcendental didn't appeal to me, so I never finished it. Still, I suppose it does have a certain philosophical interest.

Then, something happened. For decades, Wilson has been writing books on the paranormal, occult and cultish. UFOs, Atlantis, Spiritism and telepathic Neandertals are some of the subjects. So is reincarnation, Steiner and Gurdjieff. And yes, Wilson seems to believe in it.

All of it.

"Alien Dawn" is no exception. The book deals with the bizarre abduction phenomenon: thousands of people, mostly Americans, claim to have been kidnapped by aliens from outer space, taken onboard their UFOs and tortured in various ingenious ways. Wilson apparently believes this, too. The credulity of the author knows no bounds. Apparently, Bigfoot has been involved in some alien abductions! A lady encountered the pagan god Pan outside her balcony. He wanted contact. During some hectic weeks in the Devil's Triangle in Wales, aliens were roaming the countryside and teleporting cows from one farm to another. (The cow story has actually been investigated and debunked. Some people have strange pastimes.)

And so it goes on, page after page. Curiously, Wilson doesn't believe the phenomenon to be evil. Rather, he seems to think that the aliens are spiritual beings administering shock therapy to humanity, forcing us to become more transcendental. Tough love? Somehow, the more trivial Christian notion that demons are evil seem easier to believe!

Wilson has also edited a confusing anthology titled "Marx Refuted". He somehow managed to persuade Maggie Thatcher to write a contribution. Yes, *that* Margaret Thatcher. But what is Colin's alternative to Marxism? In one of his books, he speculates that a committee of angels wants to speed up the vital life force of our material universe. They were behind the manifestations in Hydesville. In this book, Pan and Bigfoot roams the countryside, abducting people to teach us some lessons in cosmic consciousness.

Has any stray group of Marxists within the British Labour Party ever bothered responding? :-D

I'm sure the "Posadista" Revolutionary Workers Party has some objections. They, after all, believe that aliens are socialists!

If you like bizarre and cultish books, "Alien Dawn" is excellent. It's available in both paperback and hardback editions. And if you think this twilight of a book sounds familiar, you are quite right.
We seen it all before...on "The X-Files".

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Whatever you do, don´t mention the aliens



Juan Posadas was a Latin American left-wing activist, originally from Argentina. He claimed to be a Trotskyist, and founded an international organization in 1962, sometimes known as the Posadist Fourth International. Originally, the Posadists were one of many Trotskyist or left-wing currents competing for the minds of radical students, and perhaps even some workers (Posadas was a labour union organizer at one point).

Then something happened. What is anybody's guess, but the Posadistas rapidly developed into *the* most bizarre leftist current ever spawned. They became a kind of lunatic fringe of the lunatic fringe. And let's face it, the competition is pretty stiff: David North, Lyn Marcus, Bob Avakian, Hardial Bains, etc. The ultimate article on J. Posadas can be found on the website of Fortean Times (you heard me). Pick up your smart phones, comrades, and search for "Fortean Times. Profiles. Juan R. Posadas". You won't be disappointed.

However, you just might if you read "Cambodia, Vietnam and the problems of the construction of socialism". It gives a wholly new meaning to the expression "rambling speech". Frankly, large parts of it are incomprehensible.

For your benefit, I nevertheless read the entire pamphlet. Posadas wants Trotskyists to support the Soviet Union, a hard sell if there ever was one. His argument is that Stalinism died with Stalin, and that the Soviets are once again at the centre of world revolutionary developments. One should also strongly support Soviet allies Cuba and Vietnam. Posadas never mentions the salient fact, that the Vietnamese Communists murdered prominent Trotskyist Ta Thu Thau, nor does he mention that his own supporters in Cuba were suppressed by Fidel Castro!

I also got the impression that comrade Posadas doesn't believe in the revolutionary capacity of the proletariat, instead extolling the virtues of technocrats and scientists in true Saint-Simonian fashion. But yes, I might be out on a limb here.

The ostensible point of J. Posadas' ramblings is the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia in 1979, which toppled Pol Pot's murderous regime. Posadas defends the invasion, hotly denies that Pol Pot's regime was a "Workers State", and condemns both the Khmer Rouge and the Chinese leadership in Peking (which supported Pol Pot) as counter-revolutionary cliques. He also expresses belief in the claim that one million people were killed by the Khmer Rouge during their reign of terror, while being sceptical to the Vietnamese claims of three million. Well, at least Mr. Posadas have a point here. "Brother Number One" in Cambodia definitely had it coming.

The pamphlet ends with a call for a united front of all Workers States, Communist and Socialist parties, and all Revolutionary States, including (wait for it) Libya and Madagascar.

Madagascar?

OK.

The pamphlet also contain one illustration, a photo of smiling women comrades of the National United Front for Salvation in Kampuchea (FUNSK).

I don't think "Cambodia, Vietnam and the problems of the construction of socialism", dutifully published by European Marxist Review, is particularly interesting. But then, it never mentions the UFOs, the surprisingly long life span of elephants, or the need to nuke America hard.

Stay tuned for further developments.

Uncle Charlie was a mighty warrior



"The role of cinema in history" is a very rare pamphlet, written by Argentine Trotskyist Juan Posadas. It's published by Scientific, Cultural and Political Editions, the publishing arm of the Posadist Fourth International.

The main article is a Marxist or socialist analysis of Charlie Chaplin and his films. Posadas clearly likes Chaplin, and (believe it or not) actually makes a few good points in this little book, both about Chaplin's movies and about comedy in general. For some reason, he then attacks the film "Little Big Man", claiming that Chaplin's productions were much better.

The problem, of course, is that J Posadas was, to all intents and purposes, barking mad. He believed that Earth was being visited by socialist UFOs, that the Soviets stashed nuclear arms at the Soyuz space station, and that a nuclear war would usher in international socialism. Apparently, Posadas also believed that elephants live 260 years, and that Soviet scientists could communicate with dolphins.

None of this is mentioned in "The role of cinema in history".

However, this splendid booklet does solve a deep mystery from my younger days as a Trot-watcher. According to an unconfirmed rumour, the Posadists at one point had a small group in Sweden. When a certain cinema in Stockholm showed the American movie "The assassination of Trotsky" (starring Richard Burton), the Posadists became upset. They picketed the theatre with leaflets stating in part: "TROTSKY WAS A MIGHTY WARRIOR. HIS PENCIL WAS HIS SWORD AND HIS SPECTACLES WERE HIS SHIELD".

What on earth for?

They were interested in the role of cinema in history, stupid.

:D

Uncle Charlie, I suppose, was a MIGHTY WARRIOR.

Push the button



"War, Peace and the Function of the Socialist Countries" is a small book published by Scientific, Cultural and Political Editions, an arm of the Posadist international organization. It contains a selection of articles by Juan Posadas on the threat of nuclear war. Except, of course, that J Posadas didn't see nuclear war as much of a threat. This guy literally wanted the Russians to push the button!

The Posadists were originally a pretty regular left-wing current (give or take a few ideas), which supported workers' and peasants' struggles in Latin America. Or so they claim. They were involved in the MR-13 guerillas in Guatemala, embezzling most of that organization's money. The guerrilla subsequently had the Posadistas expelled.

Around 1968, Posadas and his dwindling band of followers definitely went mustang. In a rambling speech in France, Posadas declared his belief in UFOs and aliens, claiming that these beings, described as "two metres tall, fair haired and with transparent clothes", must be socialists from other star systems. He hoped that the aliens might land and help us overcome our present problems. Naturally, this socialist ufology made the Posadists the laughing stock of the entire left. (In fact, the rest of the speech is even more bizarre. See Matt Salusbury's article on Juan R. Posadas at the website of Fortean Times.)

The Posadists soon became notorious for another idea as well, and this time their opponents weren't amused. Posadas believed that a nuclear war was inevitable, that it would lead to socialism, and that China or the USSR should therefore launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike to speed up the world revolution. The Soviets actually started to mention Juan Posadas in their propaganda, as a particularly egregious example of a "Trotskyist" and enemy of peace. At least according to rumour, Posadas had sent a telegram to Soviet leader Brezhnev, calling on him to nuke the United States ASAP. According to Salusbury's previously mentioned article, Posadas had toyed with ideas such as these already during his pre-UFO period.

Which finally brings me to the present publication under review. "War, Peace and the Function of the Socialist Countries" contains articles by Posadas written in 1978-81. On one point they will disappoint the reader. There's no explicit call on Moscow to launch World War III. Rather, Posadas puts all the blame for the future war on the Western powers. However, he claims that the Soviet bloc is militarily stronger, and will retaliate by launching nuclear war heads against Western Europe. Posadas even believes that the Russians are stashing nuclear weapons onboard the Soyuz space station, and that these can wipe out the United States within minutes. It's not clear how anyone is going to survive a nuclear war, but Posadas is confident that although hundreds of millions of people will be killed and large parts of the technological apparatus destroyed, human "intelligence" will remain and no scientific gain lost, making it possible to swiftly rebuild everything again, and usher in world socialism on an even higher level than capitalism. Of course, the aliens could help, too, but they are not mentioned in this book. (It just struck me how similar this is to doomsday scenarios of certain religious cults!)

There are many other delusional claims in this pamphlet. The Polish workers are hailed for their "Bolshevik-Soviet" behaviour. This was written during the high tide of Solidarnosc! Posadas died in 1981, and hence didn't get the opportunity to comment on Jaruzelski's state of emergency. It's possible that he actually supported a negotiated settlement between the regime and Solidarnosc - his statements are unclear on this point.

Further, Posadas believes that Carter was much stronger than Reagan. Above all, he believes that the Soviet Union is much stronger than the United States (in 1981!). The masses all over the world support the Soviet Union, and a Soviet military conquest of the West will therefore be very swift. The Russians already have the support of about half of all soldiers in the NATO armies, and even much of the military high command is going to defect once the Soviet Armed Forces start moving. Germany and France will be the first to turn coat. Apparently, even Thatcher's Britain is on the verge of breaking with the "Yanks". (It's unclear how all this is connected to the previously mentioned nuclear war.)

It's obvious from the pamphlet that Posadas, despite claiming to be a Trotskyist, actually supported the Soviet Union. Naturally, he couldn't support Stalin, but he somehow wanted to believe that "Stalinism" ended when Stalin died. Khrushchev (whose name the editors consistently misspell) was somewhat better, and Brezhnev is apparently the best of them all. At times, Posadas' pro-Soviet attitude becomes truly demented, as when he exclaims that there are no murders or violent crimes in the Soviet Union, whereas in the United States, even presidents are assassinated. (Well, perhaps there *are* fewer random murders in police states? I mean, who wants to end up in Siberia?) This man strikes me as a kind of parody on Soviet propaganda.

Otherwise, I was struck by his strong determinism and fatalism. World history inexorably marches on, and there is nothing anyone can do about it. This strong determinism also strikes me as parody (or perhaps caricature) of dogmatic Soviet Marxism. Otherwise, I always get the impression when reading Posadas that he doesn't really believe in "the revolutionary role of the working class", but rather looks to scientists, engineers, technocrats and perhaps bureaucrats to change the system and save humanity. Yet, he has no real conception of how difficult and protracted societal changes can be. Posadas seems to think that places such as North Korea, Angola or Ethiopia went from literally nothing to advanced socialism overnight, and is honestly impressed by this fact. Small wonder he assumes that humanity can rise, as a phoenix, from the ashes of a nuclear conflagration.

"War, Peace and the Function of the Socialist Countries" isn't the most graceful read around, but its somewhat more well-written and somewhat less rambling than many other texts by this curious author, and for that reason I give it three stars.

Thursday, July 26, 2018

I´m not a Trotskyist, but please, this is ridiculous

A review of Basmanov´s peculiar book "Contemporary Trotskyism: Its Anti-Revolutionary Nature".

Mikhail Basmanov's book is, believe it or not, an old classic. Published in 1972 by the Soviet Communist Party, it has been translated to many different languages. I've read it in both English and Swedish. It was complete crap both times.

Basmanov's book is an attack on Leon Trotsky and Trotskyism, written from the viewpoint of post-Stalin Soviet Communism á la Khrushchev and Brezhnev. It's incredibly stale, repetitive and boring. Did I mention it was repetitive? Essentially, it's a kind of "lite" version of Stalin's charges against Trotsky, his old adversary.

Basmanov skillfully avoids all *really* controversial questions: the Moscow show trials, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, the super-sectarian Third Period (mentioned only in passing), and the murder of Trotsky by a Soviet agent. While suggesting that the Trotskyists were somehow pro-fascist, Basmanov never directly accuses them of being agents of Nazi Germany or British imperialism. Presumably, the reader is expected to draw this inference for himself. All the other Stalinist attacks on Trotsky have been included: he was never a real Bolshevik, betrayed Lenin and Soviet Russia at Brest-Litovsk, wanted to export the revolution on bayonets, underestimated the peasantry, didn't believe in the possibility of revolution in a single country at a time, etc.

Being neither Trotskyist nor "Stalinist", I honestly couldn't care less, but sure, Trotsky and the Trotskyists were often (though by no means always) more "sectarian" than the official Communist movement under Stalin. However, Basmanov is incapable of seriously discussing the matter, instead pulling the usual tiresome falsifications out of his hat ("The Red Army wasn't founded by Trotsky"). He has to avoid the Polish-Soviet war of 1920, since Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky all wanted to export the revolution on bayonets. Nor does he mention the Soviet interventions in Mongolia, Iran or Georgia. Export much? Instead, the author tries to cast Lenin (Lenin!) as a proponent of Khrushchev's line of peaceful co-existence. Please. Even the NEP is glossed over in silence, perhaps because Trotsky and the Left Opposition proposed an immediate transition to industrialization, while Stalin cooperated with the pro-kulak Bukharin. Trotsky as defender of nationalized industry and trade, with Stalin as capitalist-roader? Impossible! Down the memory hole!

Basmanov's treatment of contemporary Trotskyism is little better. He conflates the Fourth International with a plethora of splinter groups, including the bizarre Posadists - a bit like attacking the Watchtower Society in a book directed against mainline Christianity. Basmanov is right when he points out that most Trotskyists were very sectarian during the period when the book was published. (This was during the "guerillist" turn of the Fourth International.) However, he once again avoids certain issues. There is no serious discussion of the U.S. Socialist Workers' Party, obviously because they weren't as sectarian as the other Trotskyists. Indeed, the SWP played an important role in the anti-Vietnam War movement, a movement Basmanov presumably supports. Instead, he (ridiculously) attacks the SWP for "entrism" in the U.S. labor unions. The Teamsters, perhaps?

Of course, I didn't expect much from a book actually published in Moscow!

On a more funny note, I noticed that the translators (who were presumably Soviet nationals) didn't understand the difference between the terms "Trotskyist" and "Trotskyite". The former is the Trotskyist self-designation, the latter a Stalinist slur. At several points, the translators inserted "Trotskyite" when quoting from Trotskyist documents, as if the Fourth International was using the Stalinist slur to describe itself! Overall, I must say that the author quotes Trotskyist documents in a very strange fashion, and he seems oblivious to the fact that the post-reunification leadership of the Fourth International is called the United Secretariat, rather than the "International" Secretariat. However, it's possible that gaffes of this kind are quite intentional, as a way of showing disrespect for the object being attacked.

This book is so incredibly bad (and repetitive) that it deserves zero stars (let me repeat that), but since that's not an option on this site, I give it one.

This book is so incredibly bad (and repetitive) that it deserves zero stars (let me repeat that), but since that's not an option on this site, I give it one.

This book is so incredibly bad (and repetitive) that it deserves zero stars (let me repeat that), but since that's not an option on this site, I give it one.

Got it?