"The Crucifixion" purports to be an authentic eye-witness account of Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection, written seven years after the event. The writer claims to be a member of the Essene Brotherhood, and his letter is addressed to another Essene in Alexandria. As can be expected from a modern, rationalist forgery, the document gives wholly naturalistic explanations for the miracles surrounding Jesus. Thus, it strongly suggests that Jesus was conceived in the usual way, and that Jesus' father was an Essene. The easily impressionable Mary believed that her lover was an angel! Later, both Joseph and Jesus (but apparently not Mary) are initiated into the Essene Order. Jesus falls in love with Mary Magdalene, but abstains from marrying her due to his vow of celibacy.
Jesus never dies on the cross, but merely swoons. Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus were Essenes, and save Jesus by having him taken down from the cross and healed with exotic herbal potions. The disciples believe that the white-clad Essenes running back and forth from the tomb are angels! Later, Jesus himself appears - also clad in a white gown - and claims to have been resurrected. The dramatic natural events surrounding the crucifixion were caused by a normal earthquake. Indeed, the electrically charged fumes produced by the quake are what resuscitated Jesus as he was lying unconscious in the tomb. After teaching the multitude the message of the Gospel, Jesus seemingly "ascends to Heaven". What actually happened is that his descent from the mountain was rendered invisible by mist, while two white-clad Essenes performing as angels dramatically declared that he had ascended...
Somehow, the miraculous version of the story is much easier to believe!
It's also interesting to note that the Essenes are portrayed as a charitable, Masonic brotherhood with secret recognition signs, degrees of initiation and a preoccupation with healing. This, of course, is no co-incidence, the original author of the "eye-witness account" presumably belonging to such a fraternity himself.
I'm not sure why this work is said to be 200 pages long. The version I accessed on the web (at a Sikh website!) was about 20 pages. "The Crucifixion, By an Eyewitness" could be of some interest to people studying rejected knowledge claims about the Essenes, but in and of itself, it's a frankly silly story, which leaves the reader unmoved, or wondering why on earth it was written in the first place. To give some German Masonic lodge a fanciful prehistory? This piece of "cruci-fiction" only deserves two stars.