Overheard on the interwebs: Donald Trump has been briefed on UFOs and aliens, including Nordics and hybrids (ChatGPT´s skeptical personality denies everything). So I suppose we will never know the truth about aliens, then. I mean, I´m sure Pam Bondi will somehow cover this up, right? :P
Trump sounds more unhinged than usual here. He actually says that the Epstein Files were invented by "Radical Left Extremists"! Also, the POTUS also expresses full confidence in his Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Could be a problem for those Trump supporters who try to blame the AG for the Epstein debacle...
HA HA HA. Look what I just asked ChatGPT...
While that’s a fun idea on the surface, it’s not exactly in Greta Thunberg’s wheelhouse. Let’s unpack it a bit:
The Waheela is a cryptid from Northern Canada and Alaska, particularly associated with the Nahanni Valley in the Northwest Territories. It's described as:
A large, wolf-like creature
Heavier and more muscular than modern wolves
With unusually large feet, and sometimes said to have no tail
Possibly a remnant prehistoric predator, like Amphicyon (a so-called “bear-dog”)
It’s sometimes linked in folklore to mysterious disappearances in the region, adding a supernatural or legendary aura.
Greta Thunberg is known worldwide as a climate activist, focusing on:
Global climate policy
Environmental justice
Scientific consensus on climate change
Mobilizing youth activism
She generally avoids mythological or fringe topics, especially those that could distract from the science-driven foundation of her advocacy.
Unless it were part of:
A campaign highlighting biodiversity loss
Or a symbolic journey to protect endangered wilderness (and not actually looking for cryptids)
…then no, a Waheela hunt wouldn't align with her mission. In fact, being associated with cryptozoology might undermine her credibility in the eyes of scientific institutions and the climate movement.
If a creature like the Waheela were somehow real, and evidence emerged pointing to it being a surviving prehistoric species, then yes, environmentalists like Greta might have a reason to advocate for protecting its habitat.
But as it stands, the Waheela is a fascinating part of Northern folklore and cryptozoology, not a known species under threat.
Greta Thunberg searching for the Waheela would make a great satirical cartoon or metaphorical adventure, but in real life, it’s not aligned with her mission or strategy. Better leave cryptid-hunting to cryptozoologists — or sci-fi novelists!
Would you like a list of other northern cryptids or mythical creatures from Indigenous traditions in the Yukon and Alaska?
Just for fun, I asked ChatGPT a rather silly question, but actually got an answer. So I suppose this is today´s AI essay, LOL.
Are there (alleged) reports of surviving dinosaurs from North America, i.e. cryptid reports interpreted as dinosaurs or similar prehistoric creatures by cryptozoology enthusiasts?
Yes, there are a few alleged reports from North America that cryptozoologists and enthusiasts have interpreted as possible surviving dinosaurs or prehistoric reptiles. These are fringe claims and are not supported by mainstream science, but they have circulated in cryptozoological literature and popular culture.
Here are the most notable examples:
Sightings of a large, serpentine or humped creature in Lake Champlain.
Some descriptions suggest a plesiosaur-like shape: long neck, flippers.
Widely considered a modern myth or misidentification (e.g. sturgeon, logs, waves), but featured in cryptozoology circles since the 1800s.
Described similarly to Champ.
Also interpreted by some cryptozoologists as a possible relict marine reptile, though more often described as serpentine.
These lake monsters are the most commonly linked to "prehistoric survivors", especially plesiosaurs, though no physical evidence exists.
Scattered reports in the 1940s–1970s, especially from rural Georgia and South Carolina, of large, upright lizard-like creatures.
Sometimes described as being 5–7 feet tall, walking on two legs.
Often interpreted in retrospect as hoaxes, folklore, or misidentified animals (e.g., large lizards, escaped pets, or alligators).
Some local legends describe reptilian creatures in swampy areas, occasionally linked to cryptids or “living dinosaurs.”
These often reflect tall tales, with little consistency or credibility.
In states like Texas, New Mexico, and Illinois, there are scattered reports (19th century to 20th century) of giant flying creatures with leathery wings and no feathers.
Sometimes described as having crests, long beaks, or bat-like wings.
Occasionally interpreted as living pterosaurs by cryptozoologists.
Notable case:
Tombstone, Arizona, 1890: A newspaper account told of cowboys shooting a huge bird with a wingspan of 160 feet. Some cryptozoologists argue this could have been a pterosaur, but the story is likely fabricated or exaggerated.
Native American legends sometimes describe giant birds, serpent-like river creatures, or monstrous reptiles — which modern interpreters occasionally link (anachronistically) to dinosaurs or prehistoric beasts.
These are more symbolic/mythic than cryptozoological, but occasionally repurposed in fringe literature as “evidence” of survival.
No physical or fossil evidence exists of non-avian dinosaurs or Mesozoic reptiles surviving past the Cretaceous.
Many sightings are explained by:
Misidentified animals (e.g., sturgeons, birds, alligators, hoaxes)
Folklore and storytelling
Pareidolia and eyewitness error
Popular interest in dinosaurs and prehistoric life
Influence of creationist pseudoscience (e.g., young earth creationists sometimes cite these reports as evidence against evolution)
Cultural fascination with the idea of "lost worlds" or "living fossils"
Yes, there are alleged reports in North America of creatures interpreted as surviving dinosaurs or pterosaurs, especially:
Lake monsters (Champ, Ogopogo) → interpreted as plesiosaurs
Flying cryptids (Thunderbirds) → interpreted as pterosaurs
Swamp creatures → occasionally likened to bipedal dinosaurs
But these are folkloric or anecdotal, and lack credible scientific backing. They remain part of cryptozoological lore rather than biological reality.
Would you like a list of books or articles from cryptozoology circles that promote these interpretations?
Yes — the so-called "river dinosaurs" or dinosaur-like cryptids of the Southeastern U.S. are a little-known subset of American folklore and cryptozoological lore, often involving reports of large, bipedal, reptilian creatures near rivers or swamps. These reports are rare, scattered, and not well-documented in scientific literature, but they have circulated in fringe or local sources, especially in the 1940s–1970s.
Here’s a breakdown of what’s known (or claimed):
Size: 5 to 8 feet tall
Stance: Bipedal, walking upright
Features: Lizard-like skin, long tail, small arms, glowing or reflective eyes
Movement: Fast and agile; some reports say they moved “like a man,” others describe “lizard-like hops”
Altamaha River, Georgia (also known for the lake monster “Altamaha-ha” or “Altie”)
Congaree Swamp, South Carolina
Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia/Florida border
Green Swamp, North Carolina
These areas are rich in wildlife and have long been settings for swamp monster stories, some dating back to Native American oral traditions and pioneer legends.
Although technically not a "dinosaur", this is the most famous modern case of a bipedal reptilian cryptid in the Southeast.
He claimed a scaly, green, man-sized reptilian creature attacked his car near Scape Ore Swamp.
Had red eyes, clawed hands, stood 7 feet tall.
Prompted a media frenzy and numerous follow-up sightings.
Widely considered a hoax or misidentification, but still celebrated locally.
Some cryptid enthusiasts speculated it could be a “relic dinosaur” (e.g., a theropod, like a small T. rex or raptor).
Others believed it might be a mutant alligator or humanoid reptilian.
The Lizard Man became a local legend, spawning festivals, merchandise, and decades of debate.
Some creationist authors in the mid-20th century and beyond (e.g., John C. Whitcomb, Carl Baugh) promoted the idea that dinosaurs still exist.
They occasionally cited Southeastern U.S. sightings (along with reports from Africa and Papua New Guinea) as evidence against evolution.
The narrative was that humans and dinosaurs coexisted, and isolated populations may have survived the Flood.
While most cryptozoologists separate themselves from creationist agendas, there's significant overlap in dinosaur cryptid speculation.
Mainstream scientists consider these reports to be:
Folkloric exaggeration
Misidentified animals, especially:
Large monitor lizards seen on two legs or alligators
Escaped exotic pets (e.g., iguanas)
Bears or other large mammals glimpsed briefly
Hoaxes or pranks
Possibly even mass hysteria in rare cases
There is no physical evidence — no tracks, scat, remains, or credible photos — for any of these supposed creatures.
The American South has a rich storytelling tradition, including monster legends tied to swamps, rivers, and backwoods.
Some stories may stem from fear of the unknown, especially in isolated rural areas.
Cryptozoological interest in the Loch Ness Monster and Mokele-mbembe (Central African "dinosaur") likely encouraged local reinterpretations of unexplained creatures as dinosaurs.
While not mainstream, some books and articles that discuss these creatures include:
Loren Coleman, Cryptozoology A to Z (1999)
Lyle Blackburn, Lizard Man: The True Story of the Bishopville Monster (2013)
Regional folklore collections from the Carolinas and Georgia
Cryptozoological websites (e.g., Cryptomundo, Mysterious Universe)
Yes, there have been scattered reports — mainly from the Southeastern U.S. — of bipedal, dinosaur-like creatures, especially near rivers and swamps. Most are folkloric or anecdotal and include:
The Bishopville Lizard Man
Rumors of “river dinosaurs” or reptilian bipeds in Georgia and the Carolinas
Occasional interpretations by cryptozoologists or creationists as surviving dinosaurs
However, these remain unsubstantiated and are considered legend, hoax, or misidentification by mainstream science.
Would you like a map or timeline of these kinds of sightings across the U.S.?
The Monster of Partridge Creek is a cryptozoological legend from the Yukon Territory in Canada, dating back to the early 20th century. It’s one of the more obscure “living dinosaur” stories and is often cited in fringe literature and cryptozoology discussions.
The tale originates from two main reports published in the French newspaper Le Journal in 1907 and 1908, written by a French writer and mining engineer named Georges Dupuy.
According to Dupuy, the creature was seen near Partridge Creek, close to Dawson City, during a gold prospecting expedition in the Yukon.
According to Dupuy’s reports, the creature was:
A reptilian, dinosaur-like animal
Around 30 feet (9 meters) long
Covered in scales, not fur
With a serpentine neck and large tail
Described as similar to a sauropod, like a Brontosaurus
Witnesses claimed the beast left large tracks in the snow and frightened both humans and sled dogs.
Dupuy claimed he saw it himself, along with:
Prospectors
A local Indigenous guide named Tom, who reportedly said his people knew of such creatures
However, the only written source remains Dupuy’s articles, which appeared in Le Journal, a French popular newspaper of the time.
No independent corroboration of the event exists.
No physical evidence (tracks, bones, photos) was ever collected.
The story was published in a popular newspaper, not a scientific journal, and reads more like a piece of early science fiction or adventure journalism.
The location (Yukon in winter) is ecologically and climatically implausible for a cold-blooded reptile or any large dinosaur to survive.
Dupuy may have fabricated the story or presented a fictionalized account as nonfiction.
It could be a case of hoax, tall tale, or misidentification (e.g., a moose, bear, or even drifted snow around animal tracks creating odd illusions).
Despite the lack of evidence, the Monster of Partridge Creek is sometimes cited by:
Young Earth Creationists seeking to discredit evolutionary timelines
Living dinosaur enthusiasts
Cryptozoologists interested in supposed relic populations of prehistoric creatures
It has appeared in books like:
Mysterious Creatures by George Eberhart
Searching for Hidden Animals by Roy Mackal
But even among cryptozoologists, it is treated as a fringe case with extremely low credibility.
The Monster of Partridge Creek is a dinosaur-like creature reportedly seen in the Yukon in the early 1900s.
Originated from reports by Georges Dupuy in Le Journal.
Described as a sauropod-like reptile in a snowy, northern setting.
Lacks any corroboration or physical evidence.
Widely regarded as folklore, fiction, or hoax, though it continues to interest fringe theorists.
Would you like to see excerpts from Dupuy’s original articles, or how this story compares to other alleged "living dinosaur" tales like Mokele-mbembe?
The ancient Gnostics would have been impressed. These bizarre sounds produced by the planets are truly scary. Or is it the demonic archons screaming at the Demiurge? It´s difficult not to believe that the cosmos is *cursed* after listening to these files, probably leaked from some FEMA torture camp in Alaska!
OK, seriously.
Since space is a vacuum, there really is no sound there. What our satellites picked up were radio waves, electromagnetism, and so on. This data is then "translated" into sound through a process known as sonification. However, these are not the sounds we would actually hear had these phenomena somehow reached our atmosphere. Rather, they are a kind of artistic renderings. In real life, we probably wouldn´t hear anything at all, since the soundwaves triggered would mostly produce infrasound or ultrasound. Or random noise.
Not sure if converting non-audible things into the screeching of damned souls is the best form of science communication. But then, I´m old enough to remember the "Siberian drillhole" hoax...
Michael Tracey likes to live dangerously on the interwebs. This is his heterodox take on the Epstein files. If the paywall is ever reinstated on the first article, you can read the summary in the second link.
The Idiocy of the Epstein Mythology
| AI´s perhaps self-ironic response to the prompt "Neo, Trinity and Morpheus"! |
So I finally watched "The Matrix Resurrections", the sequel to the Matrix trilogy. The film reminds me of installments two and three in said trilogy, but also adds a peculiar twist. It´s actually self-ironic. And if there´s something "The Matrix" concept never was, it´s self-ironic. Welcome to...the Meta-Matrix?! The film even makes fun of the conflict between Warner Brothers and the Wachowski sisters concerning the future of the franchise!
The plot is set sixty years after the original films. Thomas Anderson is a succesful game developer living out his life in a bustling early 21st century metropolis. Anderson´s most popular game is called "The Matrix" and is freely based on strange and apparently delusional memories he tries to suppress by consuming blue pills recommended by his shrink. He also has an inexplicable crush on an MC-obsessed woman named Tiffany.
Of course, it soon turns out that the memories are real (but we knew that already). Tom is really Neo, while Tiffany is Trinity. Anderson´s boss is none other than Agent Smith, while most inhabitants of the big city are zombified bots (but I´m repeating myself). The evil machines have rebuilt the Matrix, the gigantic interactive computer simulation which keeps humanity in thrall. They managed to resurrect Neo and Trinity from the dead and re-inserted them into the system. When Morpheus also comes back from the dead in the form of an avatar and frees Neo from his bondage, the stage is set for yet another confrontation between man and technics.
Some things are different, however. Some machines have sided with the free humans. Agent Smith has less of a grudge against Neo than usual. The previously classy Merovingian looks like a tramp. And despite the constant humorous jabs at the old franchise, the underlying tone actually seems darker. One central idea in "Matrix Resurrections" is that humanity as a whole is easily manipulated and really doesn´t want to be saved. As already noted, the humans have been possessed by bots and become a kind of zombies. This is an obvious nod to the NPC meme. Funny, since the Wachowski brothers-cum-sisters didn´t like how the Alt Right appropriated the "red pill" from the first movie. But the idea that most people are NPCs is of course also associated with the Alt Right...
Note also that the chief crook is The Analyst, who is indeed a psychoanalyst. This could be interpreted as psychology or psychiatry being evil for holding us back from our divine birthright, instead "adapting" us to the mundane existence of post-modern civilization (and boredom). Not sure why this plays such a prominent part of the plot, though. Sounds a bit too much like Scientology!
In the end, love conquers all and the liberated Neo and Trinity fly away sky-bound, perhaps awaiting their next resurrection...
I haven´t double-checked this truly "esoteric" information, indeed, I´m not even sure how to double-check it. But...it seems that I called it! Make of this content whatever ye wish.
Gurdjieff says that humans lack an immortal soul and if they die without reaching enlightenment, they will simply dissolve and disappear (sounds almost materialist). However, a human can "create" an immortal soul through various spiritual practices. Where did Gurdjieff get this idea? Is it a unique teaching, or could it be influenced by, say, alchemy, perhaps even Taoist alchemy?
You're spot on in identifying the strangeness and depth of Gurdjieff’s teaching on the soul — and you’re also asking exactly the right question: Where did this idea come from? The notion that humans do not have an immortal soul by default, but must "create" one through conscious effort, is one of Gurdjieff's most provocative and original-seeming claims. But while his expression is unique, the underlying idea is not entirely original — it draws on multiple esoteric traditions, including:
Gurdjieff’s idea is deeply aligned with both Western and Eastern alchemical traditions:
Philosophers like Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, and Rosicrucians described the creation of a "spiritual body" or "astral body" through inner transformation.
This is the "philosopher's stone" as internal process: the transmutation of the base human being (lead) into the immortal self (gold).
In some strands, the “true” soul is latent, like prima materia — needing to be refined through discipline, ritual, and gnosis.
Practitioners aim to form an immortal spiritual body (often called the “immortal embryo”, or "golden elixir").
This is done through energetic practices, meditation, and bodily transformation (e.g., refining jing to qi to shen).
Like Gurdjieff, Taoist alchemists claim that ordinary people lack a complete immortal essence, and that only through cultivation can one avoid spiritual death.
🧭 So yes — Gurdjieff's model resonates strongly with Taoist alchemy, especially in its processual and developmental view of the soul.
Gurdjieff was heavily influenced by Eastern Christian mysticism (especially from Armenia and Central Asia), and Gnostic dualism.
In Valentinian Gnosticism, humans are categorized as:
Hylic (material) — no spiritual potential, perish at death
Psychic — possess a soul, but need instruction
Pneumatic — divine spark, destined for salvation
Gurdjieff may have reinterpreted this: only those who awaken and do “The Work” can stabilize the essence that survives death.
Also:
The "resurrection body" in Paul’s epistles (1 Cor 15) and some mystical Christian writings point to the idea that a higher body must be "formed" through spiritual striving — not automatically granted.
Gurdjieff studied in Central Asia and claimed contact with esoteric Sufi groups. Sufism teaches:
The nafs (ego/soul) must be purified through rigorous practice.
Higher spiritual bodies or states (e.g., the sirr, khafi, and haqqi) emerge only through inner transformation.
Some Sufi orders (especially Ishraqi/Illuminist schools) described spiritual “organs” that must be grown through practice — much like Gurdjieff’s “higher being-bodies.”
Gurdjieff uses striking formulations:
“A man is born without a soul. He may acquire a soul through conscious labor and intentional suffering.”
He speaks of the need to crystallize higher being-bodies (astral, mental, causal).
Without this, at death, the "personality" disintegrates, and only the "essence" (if anything) might persist briefly.
This model is developmental, hierarchical, and esoteric — you’re not born “ensouled” in the religious sense; rather, you must earn the right to continue existing.
| Source | Parallel Idea |
|---|---|
| Taoist alchemy | “Immortal embryo” must be built through internal practice |
| Hermeticism / Western alchemy | Transmutation of base self into spiritual gold (immortality) |
| Gnosticism | Only certain people have the potential for divine awakening |
| Sufism | The soul/self must be constructed through disciplined work |
| Christian mysticism | Resurrection body or "inner man" is a result of spiritual effort |
Gurdjieff’s teaching on the soul is not entirely unique, but rather a creative synthesis of alchemical, Gnostic, Christian, Sufi, and Eastern influences, shaped into a rigorous psycho-spiritual path. His brilliance lay in systematizing these esoteric ideas into a structured program — "The Work" — focused on self-remembering and the construction of the immortal self.
If you're interested, I can show how Gurdjieff’s “three bodies” map onto Taoist or Hermetic alchemical stages — or how this concept evolved in his students' writings (e.g., Ouspensky or Jeanne de Salzmann).
Great question — Gurdjieff’s doctrine of the three bodies maps intriguingly onto both Taoist internal alchemy and Hermetic/Western alchemy. Though these traditions are culturally and terminologically distinct, all three describe a process of inner transformation, with stages of energetic refinement and spiritual embodiment that result in immortality or enlightenment.
Below is a comparative mapping of Gurdjieff's model with Taoist Neidan and Western Hermetic alchemy:
Gurdjieff teaches that humans are not born with fully developed being-bodies, but can construct them through conscious labor and intentional suffering:
Astral Body (also called the "body Kesdjan")
Created through emotional refinement and discipline
Allows for conscious existence after physical death
Mental Body
Formed through development of higher thought, will, and awareness
Capable of objective understanding and cosmic consciousness
Causal Body (or "Real I")
Permanent, immortal body
Linked to true individuality, able to reincarnate or escape time
These are not metaphorical, but actual energetic “vehicles” a person must construct.
Taoist Neidan (內丹) describes the process of cultivating the "Three Treasures" and forming an immortal spiritual body:
Jing (Essence) → refined into Qi
Related to physical vitality and sexual energy
Corresponds to early alchemical work on the body
Parallel: Gurdjieff's astral body, formed by refining instinctive/emotional forces
Qi (Energy) → refined into Shen
Breath, life-force, movement of subtle energy
Internal breathing, energy circulation
Parallel: Gurdjieff's mental body, developed through control of attention and presence
Shen (Spirit) → refined into Xu (emptiness / true self)
Pure consciousness, the immortal spirit
Birth of the “immortal embryo” (spirit body)
Parallel: Gurdjieff’s causal body, the immortal “I” beyond ego
Taoists say that only when Shen returns to the Dao, one becomes a Zhenren — a "true person" — akin to Gurdjieff’s Real Man or Man No. 7.
Western alchemy is metaphorically about turning lead into gold, but esoterically it’s about spiritual rebirth:
Nigredo (Blackening) – death of the base self
Descent into unconsciousness, chaos
Beginning of inner work
Parallel: Early stage of forming astral body, confronting sleep and mechanicality
Albedo (Whitening) – purification
Cleansing of emotions, emergence of inner clarity
Parallel: Refinement of consciousness → mental body
Rubedo (Reddening) – union and rebirth
The fusion of opposites (soul and spirit), realization of immortal self
Philosopher’s Stone formed
Parallel: Full realization of causal body, the "permanent I"
Some alchemists speak explicitly of forming a "subtle body" or "glorified body", capable of transcending the material world.
| Gurdjieff | Taoist Neidan | Hermetic Alchemy | Theme |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Body | Jing | Prima Materia / Lead | Raw material, unrefined being |
| Astral Body | Refined Jing → Qi | Nigredo | Emotional transmutation, energetic base |
| Mental Body | Refined Qi → Shen | Albedo | Mental clarity, subtle will, awareness |
| Causal Body | Shen → Immortal Embryo | Rubedo | Immortal soul, true self, resurrection |
| “Man No. 7” | Zhenren (True Person) | Philosopher’s Stone | Completed being, Real I, divine union |
Despite vastly different symbols, all three systems share these assumptions:
Ordinary humans are incomplete.
A spiritual body or essence must be constructed through effort.
The process involves refining energy, unifying mind/emotion/body, and achieving non-egoic being.
Without this transformation, the person perishes or dissolves.
Gurdjieff’s model is not isolated, but harmonizes with both Taoist and Hermetic traditions. He translates alchemical transformation into a psychological and existential framework suited to modern seekers, replacing older symbolic language with terms like "self-remembering," "essence," and "the Work."
Would you like diagrams, visual mappings, or deeper dives into one of these traditions (e.g., Neidan practices or Gurdjieff’s "food diagram")?
Gurdjieff’s cryptic and unsettling statement that “the Moon eats people” is one of the most provocative in his teachings — and like much of his work, it operates on multiple symbolic, cosmological, and psychological levels.
Let’s unpack it carefully.
In Gurdjieff’s cosmology (especially as presented in In Search of the Miraculous), everything exists to serve something else, and cosmic bodies feed on the energies of smaller ones in a hierarchical structure.
The Moon, in his view, is not fully formed, a kind of embryonic body in the solar system.
It requires energy to grow, and Earth life provides that energy — particularly the energies released at death.
💬 Gurdjieff: "Everything living on Earth exists to feed the Moon."
When human beings die without having developed a soul, the energies of their essence are drawn off by the Moon.
Thus, mechanical, unconscious people live and die in vain — their life-energy nourishes the Moon, not their own being.
On the psychological level, the Moon represents mechanicalness — unconscious behavior, habit, and sleep.
It’s cold, repetitive, and predictable — like the way people live when they're not awake.
Gurdjieff says “man is a machine”, and unless a person begins conscious inner work, he functions entirely according to lunar influences.
💬 “All of man’s actions, words, thoughts, feelings, opinions, convictions, and habits are mechanical. All that he says, does, thinks, and feels happens. Man cannot move, think, or speak of his own accord. He is a marionette pulled by strings.”
So:
➡ The Moon “eats” people = people live entirely under its mechanical influence, die without waking up, and are reabsorbed into the planetary machine.
Gurdjieff outlines a metaphysical hierarchy he calls the Ray of Creation:
The Moon is the lowest, densest level of matter and consciousness.
Its position at the bottom means it receives the least light or will — it's almost pure inertia.
Life on Earth acts as a kind of bridge, transferring energies down the Ray to the Moon.
Thus, humans who remain mechanical are absorbed downward, becoming part of the Moon’s energetic field.
🛑 If one does not work to awaken, their being is "food for the Moon."
According to Gurdjieff:
Only those who create a higher body (astral, mental, causal) can retain their individuality after death.
Those who do not are dispersed — their psychic energies are recycled, part of which goes to the Moon.
The Moon thus becomes a symbol of annihilation through unconsciousness.
The idea that a celestial being “eats” souls or energy has mythic parallels:
Taoism & Chinese astrology: the Moon influences "hun" and "po" souls — without proper cultivation, the soul dissolves.
Egyptian mythology: Ammit, the “soul eater,” devours those unworthy of immortality.
Alchemy: the Moon often represents the unredeemed soul, or the passivity that must be transmuted into solar (conscious) essence.
Gurdjieff modernized this: the Moon is what devours you if you don’t wake up.
| Level | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Cosmic | The Moon literally feeds on life-force from Earth; unconscious people’s energy goes to nourish it. |
| Psychological | The Moon = mechanical behavior. If you stay asleep, you live and die as a machine. |
| Spiritual | Without inner development, the self is not preserved; you are absorbed into lunar recycling. |
| Symbolic | The Moon is the pull of inertia, habit, fate, unconscious death. |
When Gurdjieff says “The Moon eats people”, he is warning:
If you do not awaken and crystallize a soul, your life will be lost to mechanical nature — you will serve as energy for the cosmos, not as a conscious being.
It’s a chilling metaphor for the consequences of spiritual sleep.
Would you like to go further into Gurdjieff’s lunar theory (like how movements, shocks, or sex relate to Moon-energy), or how his system overlaps with astrology or ancient lunar cults?